Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Adv Nurs ; 77(3): 1141-1154, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33259701

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of online memory training interventions in improving memory of patients diagnosed with early-stage dementia. The secondary outcomes comprised cognitive and psychological outcomes. DESIGN: This review was conducted for accordance to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. DATA SOURCE: A comprehensive search from six electronic databases: PubMed, Embassy, The Cochrane Library, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted (2000-2020). REVIEW METHODS: The populations included in this review comprised adults who had been clinically diagnosed with early-stage dementia and involved in online memory training interventions. Two reviewers appraised the risks of bias through the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and performed the meta-analysis, including the assessment of heterogeneity. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials retrieved from six databases demonstrated low to moderate levels of quality of evidence according to the GRADE approach. The meta-analysis revealed that online memory training interventions have demonstrated a moderate effect size in improving memory outcomes (d = 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.85; p = 0.0001). Additionally, such interventions have shown improvements in secondary outcomes of cognition and psychological with small to medium effects. Duration of each online memory training session and its frequencies did not affect the memory outcome. As opposed to the conventional face-to-face interventions conducted for a group, it is more effective to be conducted for an individual setting. CONCLUSIONS: Online memory training intervention was effective in improving the memory for adults with dementia. IMPACT: Memory interventions have the prospect of reducing everyday problems caused by lapses in memory and improving well-being. With factors such as limited resources and restriction of social gathering due to pandemic, this review could offer relevant information for clinical decision-makers when planning online memory training interventions for adults with dementia.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Learning , Adult , Cognition , Humans
2.
Arch Toxicol ; 92(10): 3103-3115, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30132045

ABSTRACT

Reporter cell lines are a particularly useful tool to screen for the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. Current cell models based on Keap1-Nrf2 mimic induction by conducting antioxidant response element-luciferase plasmids. However, plasmid-based reporters may ignore comprehensive aspects of induction, thus affecting the accuracy of hazard identification. Herein, we developed a novel HaCaT-based reporter system, EndoSens, whereby luciferase was specifically inserted into the cassette for heme oxygenase (decycling) 1 (HMOX1, the most consistent marker induced by skin sensitizers) by CRISPR/Cas9. Testing data from 20 coded substances showed an accuracy of 90%, sensitivity of 91.7%, and specificity of 87.5%, which exceeded the OECD requirement. Among the 35 chemicals examined, predictivity was better than reported for the validated KeratinoSens™. These results indicate that the EndoSens assay could advance the predictivity of skin sensitization, thus making it a promising tool for in vitro skin sensitization testing.


Subject(s)
Heme Oxygenase-1/genetics , Keratinocytes/drug effects , Luciferases/genetics , Skin Irritancy Tests/methods , Skin Tests/methods , Animal Testing Alternatives , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Cell Line , Genes, Reporter , HEK293 Cells , Heme Oxygenase-1/metabolism , Humans , Keratinocytes/physiology , Luciferases/metabolism , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL