Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 68(5-6): 389-396, 2023 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37735028

ABSTRACT

Technical advances in gender-affirming genital surgery have allowed the modern surgeon to create a vagina, vulva and clitoris from a male sex. This surgery, commonly known as vaginoplasty, should in fact be identified as aidopoiesis, since it is not a question of improving an already existing vagina but of creating a female sex. Numerous technical advances made since 1930 throughout the world now offer a safe and proven surgical strategy for female genital gender affirmation. Most of these techniques are derived from advances in intersex genital surgery. The first vaginoplasties described in the context of gender affirmation were performed in Berlin in the 1930s. After the Second World War, the greatest advances in vaginoplasty were made in Denmark. It was not until Geroges Burou in Casablanca and Harold Gillies, aided by Ralph Millard in England, in the mid-fifties that the modern technique of invagination of the penile skin took over from neo-vaginal grafting techniques. The creation of the clitoris from the glans penis and a more aesthetic vulva were the major advances from the 1970s. Other flap or intestinal transplant techniques were also developed, often to correct the failure of penile skin invagination. Some of the patients who benefited from these early technical advances, such as Lili Elbe and Christine Jorgensen later on, helped to make this surgery, which had long remained taboo, popular with the general public. Pioneers such as the gynaecologist Georges Burou in Casablanca have contributed, with the greatest discretion, to the well-being of gender-affirmed people by improving these techniques. Today, this hard-won heritage cannot be ignored by surgeons interested in vaginoplasty.

2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 64(1): 113-8, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21167406

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM) and acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) are often large and clinically ill defined. The surgical challenge is to spare tissue while still achieving clear margins. OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide a retrospective assessment of a two-phase surgical technique for lentiginous melanomas (MM) not suitable for en bloc resection. METHODS: In the first phase, a narrow band of skin, "the spaghetti", is resected just beyond the clinical outline of the MM, immediately sutured, and sent for pathological examination without removing the MM. The same procedure is repeated beyond the segments which are shown to be not tumor free and so forth until the minimal tumor-free perimeter is outlined. No operative wound is left between operative sessions. In the second phase, the MM resection and reconstruction are performed at the same time. RESULTS: In 21 patients with LM (n = 16) or ALM (n = 5), the mean operative defect size was 27.5 cm(2) (range, 1.97-108.4 cm(2)). The mean number of steps in the procedure was 1.55 (1-4). Grafts were used for reconstruction in all cases. The relevance of the "spaghetti"-defined outline was confirmed in 19 of 21 patients. After a median follow-up period of 25.36 months (range, 0-72 months), the local control rate was 95.24% with one case (4.76%) of in-transit invasive recurrence after 48 months. LIMITATIONS: This study was performed at a single center and included a limited number of patients. The follow-up time was relatively brief. CONCLUSION: The "spaghetti technique" is simple and reliable for LM and ALM. Unlike Mohs surgery, it does not require specific training of surgeons or pathologists. Unlike staged surgery, it does not leave patients with an open wound on the face or soles before final reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures , Hutchinson's Melanotic Freckle/pathology , Hutchinson's Melanotic Freckle/surgery , Microsurgery/methods , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Melanoma/pathology , Melanoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Mohs Surgery/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 74(12): 3394-3403, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34253487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, 200 million girls and women have been subjected to female genital mutilation. To restore the clitoral function and vulvar anatomy, clitoral repair has been performed since the 2000s. Nevertheless, there is a lack of precise and comprehensive data on the clitoral anatomy during surgical repair. This study aimed to precisely describe the terminal anatomies of the dorsal nerve and artery of the clitoris, and the clitoral neurovascular flap advancement for reconstruction in patients with female genital mutilation. METHODS: This study was performed on seven fresh female cadavers. The site of origin, diameter, length, and trajectory of each nerve and artery were recorded. The clitoral neurovascular flap advancement was measured after a midline transection of the suspensory ligament was performed and after extensive liberation of the dorsal bundles at their emergence from the pubic rami. RESULTS: At the distal point of the clitoral body, the width of the dorsal nerve and artery was 1.9 ± 0.3 mm and 0.9 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. The total length of the dorsal bundles was 6.6 cm (± 0.4). The midpart of the suspensory ligament was sectioned, which allowed a mean anteroposterior mobility of 2.7 cm (± 0.2). Extensive dissection of the neurovascular bundles up to their point of emergence from the suspensory ligament allowed a mean mobility of 3.4 ± 0.2 cm. CONCLUSION: We described the anatomical characteristics of the dorsal nerve and artery of the clitoris and the mobility of the clitoral neurovascular flap for reconstruction post clitoridectomy. This was done to restore the anatomic position of the glans clitoris while preserving and potentially restoring clitoral function in patients with female genital mutilation.


Subject(s)
Circumcision, Female/rehabilitation , Clitoris/anatomy & histology , Clitoris/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Vulva/anatomy & histology , Vulva/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL