ABSTRACT
Part-time and job-share policies may allow pharmacy practice faculty members to achieve work/life balance while pursuing their professional goals. Precedent for alternative work schedules within the health professions community can be found throughout the literature; however, little is known about part-time roles in academic pharmacy. The design and implementation of 3 different alternative faculty appointments are described and department chair and faculty perspectives are shared. Teaching, service, and scholarship responsibilities, as well as outcomes before and after changes in appointment, are described. Advantages and disadvantages, including advice for other colleges of pharmacy, are presented. Alternate appointments may be a key factor in retaining highly qualified faculty members who continue to bring their expertise to teaching, precepting, and scholarship within a college or school of pharmacy.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Career Mobility , Education, Pharmacy , Faculty , Job Description , Pharmacists , Teaching , Time Management , Workload , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Program Development , Teaching/methods , Time Factors , WorkforceABSTRACT
Drug-induced proarrhythmia is a frequently encountered clinical problem and a leading cause for withdrawal or relabeling of prescription drugs. Suppression of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current, I(Kr), represents the principal pharmacodynamic mechanism leading to heterogeneous prolongation of the ventricular action potential and prolongation of the QT interval clinically. However, the risk of proarrhythmia by QT-interval-prolonging drugs is variable and critically dependent on several factors leading to multiple reductions in the cardiac repolarization reserve. As antiarrhythmic drugs that prolong the QT interval are usually aggressively managed with continuous electrocardiogram monitoring and screening for drug interactions when administered to patients who have a high risk of sudden cardiac death, their risk of mortality is not increased. However, noncardiovascular QT-interval-prolonging drugs, which often produce less QT-interval prolongation compared with antiarrhythmic drugs, are found to be associated with increased rates of death in patients who have a markedly lower de novo risk of sudden cardiac death. Thus, it is important for clinicians, particularly pharmacists, to be cognizant of the levels of risk associated with varying degrees of QT-interval prolongation caused by drugs so that they can develop strategies to either prevent or reduce the risk of proarrhythmias.