Feasibility and safety of reprocessing of intracardiac echocardiography catheters for electrophysiology procedures - a large single center experience.

PURPOSE: Intra-cardiac echocardiography (ICE) has become an important tool for catheter ablation. Adoption of ICE imaging is still limited because of its prohibitively high cost. Our aim was to study the safety and feasibility of ICE catheters reprocessing and its environmental and financial impact. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective analysis of all consecutive electrophysiology procedures in which ICE catheters were used from 2015 to 2022. In total, 1128 patients were studied (70.6% male, mean age was 57.9 ± 13.2 years). The majority of procedures were related to atrial fibrillation ablation (84.6%). RESULTS: For the whole cohort, 57 new ICE catheters were used. Consequently one catheter could be used for 19.8 procedures. New catheters were only used when the image obtained by reused probes was not satisfactory. There were no cases of ICE probe steering mechanism malfunction, no procedure related infections and no allergic reactions that could be attributed to the resterilization process. In total, there was 8.6% of complications not related to ICE imaging. Financially, ICE probe reprocessing resulted with 90% cost reduction (> 2 millions of Euros savings for the studied period) and 95% waste reduction (639.5 kg less, mostly non degradable waste was produced). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that ICE catheter reprocessing is feasible and safe. It seems that risk of infection is not increased. Significant economic and environmental savings could be achieved by ICE catheters reprocessing. Furthermore, ICE reprocessing could allow more extensive ICE usage resulting in safer procedures with a potential reduction of serious complications.

Treatment of atrial fibrillation with second-generation cryoballoon followed by contact-sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation for arrhythmia recurrences-results of a 5-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to report the long-term follow-up results of cryoballoon (CB) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent second-generation CB ablation from February 2015 to December 2017 were included in our study. In all procedures, we used a 28-mm CB placed via a single transseptal puncture guided by intracardiac ultrasound. A 20-mm octapolar intraluminal circular catheter was used for intracardiac recordings. A single 180-s freeze strategy was employed. Repeated procedures were performed with a 3D mapping system and radiofrequency catheters. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (69.8% male, mean age 57 ± 11 years), of which 77.0% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), were included in the study. After a 5-year period, 52.4% of patients were in sinus rhythm without AF recurrence, off antiarrhythmic drugs. A total of 61.9% of patients were free of AF recurrence when redo PVI procedures were performed. When accounting for redo pulmonary vein isolation and antiarrhythmic drugs, a total of 73.8% of the patients were without AF recurrence in long-term follow-up. The patients who underwent redo pulmonary vein isolation procedures had statistically significant lower rates of AF recurrence (p = 0.006). In patients with PAF, long-term success rates improved from 62.9 to 79.4% for patients who underwent the redo procedure (p = 0.020). In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF), success rates went up from 41.4 to 55.1% for patients with single or repeated PVI procedure (p = 0.071). In the whole cohort, a total of 3 (2.4%) procedure-related major complications occurred which included persistent PNP, arterial pseudoaneurysm, and arteriovenous fistula. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a favorable long-term safety and efficacy profile of second-generation CB ablation. In the mixed paroxysmal and persistent population, up to 73.8% of patients remained free of AF recurrence in the 5-year follow-up, when accounting for redo procedures and AADs. Only 2.4% of patients experienced major complications of the ablation procedure, none with permanent sequelae.