Sintilimab plus bevacizumab combined with radiotherapy as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Systemic treatments are listed as first-line therapies for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), resulting in modest efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus bevacizumab combined with radiotherapy in HCC with PVTT and to identify prognostic biomarkers. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at 3 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 46 patients with HCC with PVTT were enrolled. All the patients received the first cycle of i.v. sintilimab (200 mg, day 1) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1) within 3 days after enrollment. Radiotherapy (30-50 Gy/10 fractions) was administered after 2 cycles of Sin-Bev. Sin-Bev was disrupted during radiotherapy and resumed 2 weeks after radiotherapy and continued every 3 weeks thereafter until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was objective response rate. Patients obtained an objective response rate of 58.7% and a disease control rate of 100%. After a median follow-up time of 26.0 months (95% CI: 24.0-26.0), the median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI: 19.0 to not applicable) and the median progression-free survival was 13.8 months (95% CI: 12.0-21.0), respectively. No unexpected adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Mutations of PCTMD1 were predictive of shorter OS and progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Sintilimab plus bevacizumab combined with radiotherapy provides favorable treatment response and survival outcomes along with an acceptable safety profile in the first-line setting for patients with HCC with PVTT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05010434).

DEB-TACE versus cTACE for unresectable HCC with B1-type bile duct invasion after successful biliary drainage: A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given the lack of specific recommendations for conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) in patients having unresectable HCC with tumor infiltrating the common hepatic duct or the first-order branch of the bile ducts (B1-type bile duct invasion; B1-BDI) after biliary drainage, we retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE with cTACE in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from five tertiary medical centers (January 2017-December 2021), we compared complications, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate between patients having unresectable HCC with B1-BDI who underwent DEB-TACE or cTACE after successful biliary drainage. X-tile software calculated the pre-TACE total bilirubin (TBil) cutoff value, indicating optimal timing for sequential TACE after drainage. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. RESULTS: The study included 108 patients with unresectable HCC (B1-BDI) who underwent DEB-TACE and 114 who received cTACE as initial treatment. After PSM (n = 53 for each group), the DEB-TACE group had a longer TTP (8.9 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.038) and higher objective response rate (64.2% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.011) than did the cTACE group, although OS was comparable (16.7 vs. 15.3 months, p = 0.115). The DEB-TACE group exhibited fewer post-procedural increments in the mean albumin-bilirubin score, TBil, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), along with a significantly lower incidence of serious adverse events within 30 days (hepatic failure, ALT increase, and TBil increase) than the cTACE group (all p < 0.05). The pre-TACE TBil cutoff value was 99 µmol/L; patients with higher values (>99 µmol/L) had poorer OS in both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE is safe and effective after successful biliary drainage in unresectable HCC with B1-BDI, potentially better than cTACE in terms of liver toxicity, TTP, and ORR. Lowering TBil below 99 µmol/L through successful drainage may create ideal conditions for sequential TACE.

Survival in Patients With Recurrent Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Sorafenib Plus TACE vs TACE Alone Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is commonly used to treat patients with recurrent intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and positive microvascular invasion (MVI); however, TACE alone has demonstrated unsatisfactory survival benefits. A previous retrospective study suggested that TACE plus sorafenib (SOR-TACE) may be a better therapeutic option compared with TACE alone. Objective: To investigate the clinical outcomes of SOR-TACE vs TACE alone for patients with recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after R0 hepatectomy with positive MVI. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this phase 3, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial, patients with recurrent intermediate-stage HCC and positive MVI were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio via a computerized minimization technique to either SOR-TACE treatment or TACE alone. This trial was conducted at 5 hospitals in China, and enrolled patients from October 2019 to December 2021, with a follow-up period of 24 months. Data were analyzed from June 2023 to September 2023. Interventions: Randomization to on-demand TACE (conventional TACE: doxorubicin, 50 mg, mixed with lipiodol and gelatin sponge particles [diameter: 150-350 µm]; drug-eluting bead TACE: doxorubicin, 75 mg, mixed with drug-eluting particles [diameter: 100-300 µm or 300-500 µm]) (TACE group) or sorafenib, 400 mg, twice daily plus on-demand TACE (SOR-TACE group) (conventional TACE: doxorubicin, 50 mg, mixed with lipiodol and gelatin sponge particles [diameter, 150-350 µm]; drug-eluting bead TACE: doxorubicin, 75 mg, mixed with drug-eluting particles [diameter: 100-300 µm or 300-500 µm]). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Results: A total of 162 patients (median [range] age, 55 [28-75] years; 151 males [93.2%]), were randomly assigned to be treated with either SOR-TACE (n = 81) or TACE alone (n = 81). The median overall survival was significantly longer in the SOR-TACE group than in the TACE group (22.2 months vs 15.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; P < .001). SOR-TACE also prolonged progression-free survival (16.2 months vs 11.8 months; HR, 0.54; P < .001), and improved the objective response rate when compared with TACE alone based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria (80.2% vs 58.0%; P = .002). Any grade adverse events were more common in the SOR-TACE group, but all adverse events responded well to treatment. No unexpected adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrated that SOR-TACE achieved better clinical outcomes than TACE alone. These findings suggest that combined treatment should be used for patients with recurrent intermediate-stage HCC after R0 hepatectomy with positive MVI. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04103398.

Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization With Sorafenib for Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Certain patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus could benefit from surgical resection, and postoperative adjuvant therapy may lower the incidence of tumor recurrence. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization vs sorafenib alone as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted in 5 hospitals in China. A total of 158 patients were enrolled and randomized from October 2019 to March 2022, with a median follow-up of 28.4 months. Portal vein tumor thrombus was graded by the Cheng classification. Eligible patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with Cheng grade I to III portal vein tumor thrombus (ie, involving segmental or sectoral branches, right- or left-side branch, or main trunk of portal vein) were included. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib or sorafenib alone as postoperative adjuvant therapy. Sorafenib treatment was started within 3 days after randomization, with an initial dose of 400 mg orally twice a day. In the transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group, transarterial chemoembolization was performed 1 day after the first administration of sorafenib. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Results: Of 158 patients included, the median (IQR) age was 54 (43-61) years, and 140 (88.6%) patients were male. The median (IQR) recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in the transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group (16.8 [12.0-NA] vs 12.6 [7.8-18.1] months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.83; P = .002). The median (IQR) overall survival was also significantly longer with transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib than with sorafenib alone (30.4 [20.6-NA] vs 22.5 [15.4-NA] months; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.91; P = .02). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (23 of 79 patients in the transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group [29.1%] vs 24 of 79 patients in the sorafenib alone group [30.4%]). There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. The transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group did not show additional toxicity compared with the sorafenib monotherapy group. Conclusion and Relevance: In this study, the combination of sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization as postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus resulted in longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival than sorafenib alone and was well tolerated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04143191.