ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical therapeutic efficacy of syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube and T-tube via the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) approach for treatment of eccentric syringomyelia. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 41 patients with idiopathic or secondary eccentric syringomyelia from November 2011 to December 2022. Syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube or T-tube via the DREZ approach was performed. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association low back pain scale was used to investigate the severity of clinical symptoms. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to investigate therapeutic efficacyï¼reduction of the cavity volume by >10% was considered an improvement and 50% was considered a significant improvement). RESULTS: Incision length of the spinal cortex in the direct tube group was shorter than in the T-tube group (3.10 ± 0.28 cm vs. 5.03 ± 0.19 cm), with a significant difference between the 2 groups (t = -52.56, P < 0.001). Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score 3 months postoperatively was significantly better than the preoperative score in both the direct tube groupï¼t = 40.954, P < 0.001ï¼ and the T-tube groupï¼t = 24.769, P < 0.001ï¼. Statistical comparison revealed there was no difference in imaging improvement between the direct tube group and T-tube group 3 months (χ2 = 0.20, P = 0.655) and 12 months (χ2 = 0.21, P = 0.647) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Syringo-subarachnoid shunt placement with direct tube via the DREZ approach for treatment of eccentric syringomyelia is safer than with T-tube via the DREZ approach due to smaller incision length and less of a space-occupying effect with same therapeutic efficacy.
Subject(s)
Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts , Syringomyelia , Humans , Syringomyelia/surgery , Syringomyelia/diagnostic imaging , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts/methods , Treatment Outcome , Spinal Nerve Roots/surgery , Spinal Nerve Roots/diagnostic imaging , Subarachnoid Space/surgery , Subarachnoid Space/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Magnetic Resonance ImagingABSTRACT
Mounting evidence supports the role of neuroinflammation in radiation-induced brain injury (RIBI), a chronic disease characterized by delayed and progressive neurological impairment. Asparagine endopeptidase (AEP), also known as legumain (LGMN), participates in multiple malignancies and neurodegenerative diseases and may potentially be involved in RIBI. Here, we found AEP expression was substantially elevated in the cortex and hippocampus of wild-type (Lgmn+/+) mice following whole-brain irradiation. Lgmn knockout (Lgmn-/-) alleviated neurological impairment caused by whole-brain irradiation by suppressing neuronal senescence. Bulk RNA and metabolomic sequencing revealed AEP's involvement in the antigen processing and presentation pathway and neuroinflammation. This was further confirmed by co-culturing Lgmn+/+ primary neurons with the conditioned media derived from irradiated Lgmn+/+ or Lgmn-/- primary microglia. Furthermore, esomeprazole inhibited the enzymatic activity of AEP and RIBI. These findings identified AEP as a critical factor of neuroinflammation in RIBI, highlighting the prospect of targeting AEP as a therapeutic approach.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of complex giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) presents significant challenges. The efficacy and safety of combining transsphenoidal and transcranial approaches for these tumors remain controversial. In this largest cohort of patients with complex GPAs, we compared the surgical outcomes between those undergoing a combined regimen and a non-combined regimen. We also examined the differences in risks of complications, costs, and logistics between the two groups, which might offer valuable information for the appropriate management of these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted at 13 neurosurgical centers. Consecutive patients who received a combined or non-combined regimen for complex GPAs were enrolled. The primary outcome was gross total resection, while secondary outcomes included complications, surgical duration, and relapse. A propensity score-based weighting method was used to account for differences between the groups. RESULTS: Out of 647 patients [298 (46.1%) women, mean age: 48.5 ± 14.0 years] with complex GPAs, 91 were in the combined group and 556 were in the noncombined group. Compared with the noncombined regimen, the combined regimen was associated with a higher probability of gross total resection [50.5% vs. 40.6%, odds ratio (OR): 2.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-3.63, P = 0.003]. The proportion of patients with life-threatening complications was lower in the combined group than in the non-combined group (4.4% vs. 11.2%, OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.78, P = 0.017). No marked differences were found between the groups in terms of other surgical or endocrine-related complications. However, the combined regimen exhibited a longer average surgery duration of 1.3 h ( P < 0.001) and higher surgical costs of 22,000 CNY (~ 3,000 USD, P = 0.022) compared with the noncombined approach. CONCLUSIONS: The combined regimen offered increased rates of total resection and decreased incidence of life-threatening complications, which might be recommended as the first-line choice for these patients.