ABSTRACT
Over the past several years, multifaceted advances in the management of cancer have led to a significant improvement in survival rates. Throughout patients' oncological journeys, they will likely receive one or more implantable devices for the administration of fluids and medications as well as management of various comorbidities and complications related to cancer therapy. Infections associated with these devices are frequent and complex, often necessitating device removal, increasing health care costs, negatively affecting quality of life, and complicating oncological care, usually leading to delays in further life-saving cancer therapy. Herein, the authors comprehensively review multiple evidence-based recommendations along with best practices, expert opinions, and novel approaches for the prevention of diverse device-related infections. The authors present many general principles for the prevention of these infections followed by specific device-related recommendations in a systematic manner. The continuous involvement and meaningful cooperation between regulatory entities, industry, specialty medical societies, hospitals, and infection control-targeted interventions, along with primary care and consulting health care providers, are all vital for the sustained reduction in the incidence of these preventable infections.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Medical Oncology , Health PersonnelABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic overuse leads to the emergence of antibiotic resistance that threatens immunocompromised cancer patients. Infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens are difficult to treat and associated with high mortality. Hence, empirical therapy with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics could be suboptimal in these vulnerable patients. New antibiotics covering potential resistant pathogens may be considered. METHODS: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority study comparing safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IPM/REL), a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, with SOC antibiotics (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem) in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Patients received at least 48 h of IV antibiotics and were assessed at end-of-IV (EOIV) therapy, test of cure (TOC; Days 21-28), and late follow-up (LFU; Days 35-42). RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (49 IPM/REL and 50 SOC). Demographics and rates of documented microbiological infections were similar in both groups. In the SOC arm, 86% of antibiotics consisted of cefepime. Patients on IPM/REL had a higher favourable clinical response at EOIV than those on SOC (90% versus 74%; Pâ=â0.042); however, responses were similar at TOC and LFU. Microbiological eradication was comparable at all three timepoints. Study drug-related adverse events and adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were similar in both groups, with no study drug-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that compared with SOC antibiotics, predominantly cefepime, IPM/REL for empirical coverage of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients is generally safe and could be associated with a better clinical outcome at EOIV. The current SOC consisting mainly of agents that do not cover for ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria should be reconsidered.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Voriconazole has been recommended as primary treatment for patients with invasive aspergillosis. Intravenous and tablet formulations of posaconazole that have improved systemic absorption could be an effective alternative to voriconazole. We aimed to assess non-inferiority of posaconazole to voriconazole for the primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis. METHODS: We did a randomised, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial comparing posaconazole (intravenous or oral posaconazole 300 mg twice on day 1, followed by 300 mg once a day for days 2-84) with voriconazole (6 mg/kg intravenous or 300 mg oral twice on day 1 followed by 4 mg/kg intravenously or 200 mg orally twice a day for days 2-84) for 12 weeks or less in the primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Participants were from 91 study sites in 26 countries, were aged 13 years or older, weighed at least 40 kg, and met criteria for proven, probable, or possible fungal disease. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation schedule with stratification by risk status. The primary endpoint was cumulative all-cause mortality up until day 42 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (defined as randomly assigned participants who received ≥1 dose of study drug), with a 10% non-inferiority margin. The ITT population was also evaluated for safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01782131, and EudraCT, 2011-003938-14. FINDINGS: Between Oct 25, 2013, and Sept 10, 2019, of 653 individuals assessed for eligibility, 575 ITT participants were randomly assigned and received one or more doses of study drug (n=288 [50%] posaconazole, n=287 [50%] voriconazole). Mortality up until day 42 was 15% (44 of 288) in the posaconazole group and 21% (59 of 287) in the voriconazole group (treatment difference -5·3% [95% CI -11·6 to 1·0]; p<0·0001). Mortality up until day 42 in the full-analysis-set subpopulation (ITT participants with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis) supported this conclusion: 31 (19%) of 163 participants in the posaconazole group and 32 (19%) of 171 participants in the voriconazole group (treatment difference 0·3% [95% CI -8·2 to 8·8]). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (incidence >3%) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), nausea, hypokalaemia, and vomiting in the posaconazole group and increased ALT, AST, or alkaline phosphatase, hallucination, increased γ-glutamyltransferase peptidase, nausea, and blurred vision in the voriconazole group. The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse event rates in the ITT population was 30% for posaconazole and 40% for voriconazole (treatment difference -10·2% [95% CI -17·9 to -2·4]). INTERPRETATION: Posaconazole was non-inferior to voriconazole for all-cause mortality up until day 42 in participants with invasive aspergillosis. Posaconazole was well tolerated, and participants had fewer treatment-related adverse events than in the voriconazole group. This study supports the use of posaconazole as a first-line treatment for the condition. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Voriconazole/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravenous , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Triazoles/adverse effects , Voriconazole/adverse effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment. However, immune-related adverse events and the risk of infections are not well studied. To assess the infectious risk of CPIs, we evaluated the incidence of infections in lung cancer patients treated with CPIs plus conventional chemotherapy (CC) vs CC alone. METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who received CPIs combined with CC and those treated with CC alone at our institution during January 2016 to February 2019. We compared clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes including infection rate and mortality between the groups. RESULTS: We identified 123 patients for the CPI group and 147 patients for the control (CC) group. Eighteen patients (15%) in the CPI group and 33 patients (22%) in the control group developed infections (Pâ =â .1). Pneumonia was the most common infection encountered in both groups. Urinary tract infection was higher in the CC group (40%) than in the CPI group (9%) (Pâ =â .01). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Pâ =â .024), prior use of corticosteroids (Pâ =â .021), and neutropenia (Pâ <â .001) were independent risk factors for infection and severe infection requiring hospital admission. Chronic kidney disease (Pâ =â .02), prior cancer treatment (Pâ =â .023), and neutropenia (Pâ <â .0001) were identified as independent risk factors for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer patients treated with CPIs combined with CC have a comparable risk of infection to those treated with CC alone, although there is a trend towards fewer infections in those given CPIs, particularly when it comes to urinary tract infections.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/complications , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Humans , Immunotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Microbial contamination of wounds is a significant problem that delays healing, particularly when bacterial biofilms are present. A novel combination of pectinic acid (PG) + caprylic acid (CAP) was previously found in vitro to be highly effective in eradicating various pathogens in biofilms with minimal cytotoxicity. In this study, a novel wound ointment was formulated with PG + CAP and first assessed in vitro using a well-established biofilm eradication model. In vitro, the PG + CAP ointment was shown to be efficacious in reducing the microbial biofilms. This ointment was then tested in vivo in two pilot porcine wound healing models, with and without Staphylococcus aureus microbial challenge. Ointments were applied to each wound daily, and healing by wound closure area measurement was assessed weekly over 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, pigs were sacrificed and wounds were scored for reepithelialization, inflammation, granulation tissue, and collagen deposition. We compared PG + CAP to hydroxyethylcellulose + glycerol ointment base (control) and MediHoney (comparator). In the porcine microbial challenge model, the novel antimicrobial PG + CAP wound ointment rapidly eradicated bacterial organisms embedded in wounds, was safe and well-tolerated, and was associated with enhanced healing compared to ointment base and MediHoney. Specifically, the cumulative histopathology, reepithelialization of epidermis, and mature granulation tissue in the wound bed was significantly better with PG + CAP than with control and MediHoney treatments. This ointment warrants further study as a non-antibiotic ointment for use in treating a wide array of infected wounds.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Wound Infection , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Ointments , Swine , Wound Healing , Wound Infection/drug therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Enterococcus species are the third most common organisms causing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). The management of enterococcal CLABSI, including the need for and timing of catheter removal, is not well defined. We therefore conducted this study to determine the optimal management of enterococcal CLABSI in cancer patients. METHODS: We reviewed data for 542 patients diagnosed with Enterococcus bacteremia between September 2011 to December 2018. After excluding patients without an indwelling central venous catheter (CVC), polymicrobial bacteremia or with CVC placement less than 48 h from bacteremia onset we classified the remaining 397 patients into 3 groups: Group 1 (G1) consisted of patients with CLABSI with mucosal barrier injury (MBI), Group 2 (G2) included patients with either catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) as defined in 2009 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infection by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) or CLABSI without MBI, and Group 3 (G3) consisted of patients who did not meet the CDC criteria for CLABSI. The impact of early (< 3 days after bacteremia onset) and late (3-7 days) CVC removal was compared. The composite primary outcome included absence of microbiologic recurrence, 90-day infection-related mortality, and 90-day infection-related complications. RESULTS: Among patients in G2, CVC removal within 3 days of bacteremia onset was associated with a trend towards a better overall outcome than those whose CVCs were removed later between days 3 to 7 (success rate 88% vs 63%). However, those who had CVCs retained beyond 7 days had a similar successful outcome than those who had CVC removal < 3 days (92% vs. 88%). In G1, catheter retention (removal > 7 days) was associated with a better success rates than catheter removal between 3 and 7 days (93% vs. 67%, p = 0.003). In non-CLABSI cases (G3), CVC retention (withdrawal > 7 days) was significantly associated with a higher success rates compared to early CVC removal (< 3 days) (90% vs. 64%, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Catheter management in patients with enterococcal bacteremia is challenging. When CVC removal is clinically indicated in patients with enterococcal CLABSI, earlier removal in less than 3 days may be associated with better outcomes. Based on our data, we cannot make firm conclusions about whether earlier removal (< 3 days) could be associated with better outcomes in patients with Enterococcal CLABSI whose CVC withdrawal is clinically indicated. In contrast, it seemed that catheter retention was associated to higher success outcome rates. Therefore, future studies are needed to clearly assess this aspect.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia/therapy , Catheter-Related Infections/therapy , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Enterococcus , Neoplasms/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Device Removal , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 can lead to life-threatening coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in patients with hematologic malignancies, particularly among hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. We describe two patients with COVID-19 during the pre-engraftment period after HCT and review previous reports of COVID-19 in HCT recipients. Because of significant mortality from COVID-19, primarily after allogeneic HCT, early, preemptive, and optimal directed therapy may improve outcomes and reduce the mortality rate but still needs to be established in clinical trials.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Immune Reconstitution , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
Candida auris is an emerging pathogen that can cause virulent central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Catheter salvage through the eradication of biofilms is a desirable therapeutic option. We compared taurolidine and minocycline-EDTA-ethanol (MEE) catheter lock solutions in vitro for the eradication of biofilms of 10 C. auris strains. MEE fully eradicated all C. auris biofilms, while taurolidine lock partially eradicated all of the C. auris biofilms. The superiority was significant for all C. auris strains tested (P = 0.002).
Subject(s)
Biofilms/drug effects , Candida/drug effects , Catheter-Related Infections/drug therapy , Edetic Acid/therapeutic use , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Minocycline/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biofilms/growth & development , Candida/growth & development , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Candidiasis/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Humans , Taurine/analogs & derivatives , Taurine/therapeutic use , Thiadiazines/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Cefiderocol inhibited 97.5% of 478 Gram-negative isolates from cancer patients at ≤4 mg/liter. It had potent activity against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-positive Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Acinetobacter species isolates. Amikacin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem had appreciable activity against non-CRE Enterobacteriaceae No comparators were active against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Only trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had appreciable activity against S. maltophilia isolates. Overall, cefiderocol was associated with the lowest level of resistance.
Subject(s)
Amikacin/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacology , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Meropenem/pharmacology , Acinetobacter/drug effects , Acinetobacter/isolation & purification , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Drug Combinations , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Neoplasms/pathology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/drug effects , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/isolation & purification , CefiderocolABSTRACT
To assess the potential for the induction of antimicrobial resistance following repeated subinhibitory exposures to the combination minocycline (MIN), rifampin (RIF), and chlorhexidine (CHX), a total of 29 clinical microbial pathogenic isolates were repeatedly exposed to subinhibitory concentrations of MIN, RIF, and CHX for 20 passages. MICs of the MIN, RIF, and CHX combination were assessed at each passage to evaluate the potential for resistance to have been induced. The combination of MIN, RIF, and CHX showed significant antimicrobial efficacy and synergy against organisms resistant to all 3 individual components (MIC of ≥16 µg/ml for MIN or MIC of ≥4 µg/ml for RIF or CHX). Among the organisms originally resistant to 2 or more individual components and the organisms originally susceptible to 2 or more individual components, there was no evidence that organisms became resistant following 20 repeated subinhibitory exposure cycles to the triple combination. The risk of resistance developing to the triple combination is extremely low because microbes are inhibited or killed before resistance can simultaneously emerge to all three agents. Surveillance studies monitoring the development of resistance should be conducted in a clinical setting.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Minocycline/pharmacology , Rifampin/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
Candida auris poses emerging risks for causing severe central line-associated bloodstream infections. We tested in vitro the ability of antifungal lock solutions to rapidly eradicate C. auris biofilms. Liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B deoxycholate, fluconazole, voriconazole, micafungin, caspofungin, and anidulafungin failed to completely eradicate all 10 tested C. auris biofilms. Conversely, nitroglycerin-citrate-ethanol (NiCE) catheter lock solution completely eradicated all replicates for all of C. auris biofilms tested.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Candida/drug effects , Catheters/microbiology , Citric Acid/pharmacology , Nitroglycerin/pharmacology , Amphotericin B/pharmacology , Anidulafungin/pharmacology , Biofilms , Caspofungin/pharmacology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Ethanol/pharmacology , Fluconazole/pharmacology , Micafungin/pharmacology , Pharmaceutical Solutions , Voriconazole/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Data are sparse on treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in cancer patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapy (SOFBT) in cancer patients. METHODS: Patients treated with SOFBT at our center during 2014-2017 were included in a prospective observational study. Efficacy [sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12)], cancer-related outcomes and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. RESULTS: We included 153 patients. Most were men (109; 71%), white (92; 60%), non-cirrhotic (105; 69%), and with HCV genotype 1 (110; 72%). The most common cancers were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (27; 18%) and multiple myeloma (14; 9%). The overall SVR12 rate was 91% (128/141). SVR12 was 100% in patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8 weeks. Of the 32 patients initially excluded from cancer clinical trials because of HCV, 27 (84%) were granted cancer therapy access after starting SOFBT. Six patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received SOFBT without cancer treatment. Two achieved complete remission, one had partial remission, and two had stable cancer. Within 6 months after SOFBT, 5% (6/121) of patients in remission or with stable cancer, had progression or recurrence (two with HCC and one each with esophageal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, NHL, and tonsillar cancer). No de novo HCCs occurred. AEs were most commonly grade 1-2 (90%). CONCLUSIONS: SOFBT in HCV-infected cancer patients is effective and safe, may permit access to investigational cancer therapy expanding treatment options, may induce remission of NHL, and may be used for 8 weeks.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complications , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Aged , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Carbamates/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/complications , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fluorenes/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/therapeutic use , Humans , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Interferons/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Pyrrolidines , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Simeprevir/therapeutic use , Sustained Virologic Response , Valine/analogs & derivativesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) catheters are mainly indicated for urinary tract obstructions. Unfortunately, the rate for infection and recurrence remains elevated. Our objective was to identify the risk factors leading to recurrent PCN-related infections (PCNI) in cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 571 patients who underwent initial PCN catheter placement at our institution. Of these, we identified patients with a definite PCNI and catheter exchange, with a minimum 30-day follow-up. We defined PCNI as presence of a urine culture positive for bacteria (≥ 104 CFU/mL) plus symptoms of urinary tract infection. A PCNI was considered recurrent if the same organism was isolated. Antibiotics were considered concordant if they were active against all identified organisms. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients (14%) developed an initial PCNI. Of 47 patients with 30-day follow-up, 10 patients (21%) were identified as having a recurrent PCNI. In terms of demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and microbiological data, there was no statistically significant difference between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis, two factors were independently associated with a decrease in recurrent PCNI: concordant antibiotic use (OR 0.04; p = 0.008) and PCN catheter exchange within 4 days of infection (OR 0.1; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: To decrease the high rate of recurrent infections, associated costs, and potential delay in further chemotherapy, we recommend that once antimicrobial susceptibility test results are available and the patient is known to be receiving concordant antimicrobials, clinicians proceed with immediate PCN catheter exchange, ideally within the first 4 days of the infection.
Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Female , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Texas/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Aerobic glycolysis, known as the "Warburg effect", is one of several hallmarks of cancer cells. The conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) to pyruvate can be down regulated by the re-expression of the embryonic isoform 2 of pyruvate kinase (PKM2). This mechanism allows the accumulation of glycolytic intermediates for the biosynthesis of macromolecules, such as proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. PKM2 is favored by the well-known PI3K/Akt/mTOR proliferative pathway. This pathway is induced by high glucose levels, and the mTOR kinase is the central activator of the Warburg effect. In this study, we investigated the role of glucose restriction (GR) and mTOR inhibition in reversing the Warburg effect in MDA-MB 231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines. PKM2 expression was measured by western blot. Lactate production by cells was determined by a colorimetric assay. The concentration of glucose in the supernatant of cells was measured using the Trinder method. ATP level was evaluated by using a Colorimetric/Fluorometric ATP Assay Kit. Our results showed that MDA-MB 231 cells increased glucose consumption when the glucose concentration was 0 g/L (P <0.01). In MCF-7 cells, glucose deprivation reduced lactate secretion by 80% (P =0.0001) but tripled glucose consumption (P = 0.0041). ATP concentration increased approximately when MCF-7 cells were deprived of glucose (P = 0.02). GSK1059615 does not significantly modulate lactate secretion and glucose uptake in both cell lines. Glucose restriction contribute to the reduction of the Warburg effect through mTOR inhibition and regulation of PKM2 kinases.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Glucose/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases/metabolism , Thyroid Hormones/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Aminopyridines/pharmacology , Blotting, Western , Cell Line, Tumor , Colorimetry , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Lactic Acid/metabolism , MCF-7 Cells , Piperidines/pharmacology , Thyroid Hormone-Binding ProteinsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Granulation tissue is a common complication of airway stenting, but no published methods can quantify the volume and type of tissue that develops. OBJECTIVE: To use design-based stereology to quantify changes in tissue volume and type associated with airway stenting. METHODS: We compared drug-eluting stents (DES) filled with gendine to standard silicone stents in pigs in an assessor-blinded randomized trial. Tracheal stents were placed via rigid bronchoscopy. After 1 month, animals were euthanized and necropsies were performed. Antimicrobial effects of the DES were assessed in trachea tissue samples, on the DES surface, and with residual gel from the DES reservoir. Tracheal thickness was measured using orthogonal intercepts. Design-based stereology was used to quantify the volume density of tissues using a point-counting method. The volume of each tissue was normalized to cartilage volume, which is unaffected by stenting. RESULTS: Pigs were randomized to DES (n = 36) or control stents (n = 9). The drug was successfully eluted from the DES, and the stent surface showed antibacterial activity. DES and controls did not differ in tissue microbiology, tracheal thickness, or granulation tissue volume. Compared to nonstented controls, stented airways demonstrated a 110% increase in soft-tissue volume (p = 0.005). Submucosal connective tissue (118%; p < 0.0001), epithelium (70%; p < 0.0001), submucosal glands (47%; p = 0.001), and smooth muscle (41%; p < 0.0001) increased in volume. CONCLUSION: Stenting doubles the volume of soft tissue in the trachea. Design-based stereology can quantify the tissue changes associated with airway stenting.
Subject(s)
Drug-Eluting Stents/adverse effects , Granulation Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Granulation Tissue/pathology , Trachea/diagnostic imaging , Trachea/pathology , Animals , Bronchoscopy , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Random Allocation , Swine , Trachea/surgeryABSTRACT
Sepsis and bloodstream infections remain a leading cause of death in immunocompromised patients with cancer. The management of these serious infections consist of empiric use of antimicrobial agents which are often overused. Procalcitonin and proadrenomedullin are biomarkers that have been extensively evaluated in the general populations but with little emphasis in the population immunocompromised patients with cancer, where they may have promising roles in the management of febrile patients. In this review, we summarize the available evidence of the potential role of these available biomarkers in guiding antimicrobial therapy to optimize the use of resources in the general patient population. Special emphasis is given to the role of these 2 biomarkers in the immunocompromised and critically ill patients with cancer, highlighting the distinctive utility of each.
Subject(s)
Adrenomedullin/blood , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Neoplasms/complications , Procalcitonin/blood , Protein Precursors/blood , Sepsis/diagnosis , Biomarkers/blood , Critical Illness , Fever/etiology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Neoplasms/microbiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early antifungal therapy for invasive aspergillosis (IA) has been associated with improved outcome. Traditionally, of empiric antifungal therapy has been used for clinically suspected IA. We compared outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancy and IA who were treated with voriconazole using the diagnostic driven DDA (DDA-Vori) that includes galactomannan testing vs. empiric therapy with a non-voriconazole-containing regimen (EMP-non-Vori) or empiric therapy with voriconazole (EMP-Vori). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 342 hematologic malignancy patients diagnosed with proven, or probable IA between July 1993 and February 2016 at our medical center who received at least 7 days of DDA-Vori, EMP-Vori, or EMP-non-Vori. Outcome assessment included response to therapy (clinical and radiographic), all-cause mortality, and IA-attributable mortality. RESULTS: By multivariate analysis, factors predictive of a favorable response included localized/sinus IA vs. disseminated/pulmonary IA (p < 0.0001), not receiving white blood cell transfusion (p < 0.01), and DDA-Vori vs. EMP-non-Vori (p < 0.0001). In contrast, predictors of mortality within 6 weeks of initiating IA therapy included disseminated/pulmonary infection vs. localized/sinus IA (p < 0.01), not undergoing stem cell transplantation within 1 year before IA (p = 0.01), and EMP-non-Vori vs. DDA-Vori (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DDA-Vori was associated with better outcome (response and survival) compared with EMP-non-Vori and with equivalent outcome to EMP-Vori in hematologic malignancy patients. These outcomes associated with the implementation of DDA could lead to a reduction in the unnecessary costs and adverse events associated with the widespread use of empiric therapy.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Hematologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aspergillosis/complications , Aspergillosis/diagnosis , Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Aspergillosis/mortality , Empiricism , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/complications , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/diagnosis , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Precision Medicine/methods , Precision Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Standard of Care/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Voriconazole/therapeutic use , Young AdultABSTRACT
Importance: The appropriate duration of antibiotics for staphylococcal bacteremia is unknown. Objective: To test whether an algorithm that defines treatment duration for staphylococcal bacteremia vs standard of care provides noninferior efficacy without increasing severe adverse events. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized trial involving adults with staphylococcal bacteremia was conducted at 16 academic medical centers in the United States (n = 15) and Spain (n = 1) from April 2011 to March 2017. Patients were followed up for 42 days beyond end of therapy for those with Staphylococcus aureus and 28 days for those with coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had 1 or more blood cultures positive for S aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococci. Patients were excluded if they had known or suspected complicated infection at the time of randomization. Interventions: Patients were randomized to algorithm-based therapy (n = 255) or usual practice (n = 254). Diagnostic evaluation, antibiotic selection, and duration of therapy were predefined for the algorithm group, whereas clinicians caring for patients in the usual practice group had unrestricted choice of antibiotics, duration, and other aspects of clinical care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were (1) clinical success, as determined by a blinded adjudication committee and tested for noninferiority within a 15% margin; and (2) serious adverse event rates in the intention-to-treat population, tested for superiority. The prespecified secondary outcome measure, tested for superiority, was antibiotic days among per-protocol patients with simple or uncomplicated bacteremia. Results: Among the 509 patients randomized (mean age, 56.6 [SD, 16.8] years; 226 [44.4%] women), 480 (94.3%) completed the trial. Clinical success was documented in 209 of 255 patients assigned to algorithm-based therapy and 207 of 254 randomized to usual practice (82.0% vs 81.5%; difference, 0.5% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -6.2% to ∞]). Serious adverse events were reported in 32.5% of algorithm-based therapy patients and 28.3% of usual practice patients (difference, 4.2% [95% CI, -3.8% to 12.2%]). Among per-protocol patients with simple or uncomplicated bacteremia, mean duration of therapy was 4.4 days for algorithm-based therapy vs 6.2 days for usual practice (difference, -1.8 days [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.6]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with staphylococcal bacteremia, the use of an algorithm to guide testing and treatment compared with usual care resulted in a noninferior rate of clinical success. Rates of serious adverse events were not significantly different, but interpretation is limited by wide confidence intervals. Further research is needed to assess the utility of the algorithm. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01191840.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Coagulase , Confidence Intervals , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Single-Blind Method , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
A total of 521 unique clinical isolates from cancer patients with primarily (>90%) bloodstream infections were tested for susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators using broth microdilution methods. Ceftazidime-avibactam inhibited 97.8% of all Enterobacteriaceae (n = 321) at the susceptibility breakpoint of ≤8/4 µg/ml (there were 7 nonsusceptible strains). It was also active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (91.7% isolates susceptible, n = 121), including many isolates not susceptible to meropenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, or other comparators.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacology , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Cefepime , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Drug Combinations , Enterobacteriaceae/growth & development , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/complications , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Humans , Meropenem , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/microbiology , Opportunistic Infections/complications , Opportunistic Infections/drug therapy , Opportunistic Infections/microbiology , Penicillanic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Penicillanic Acid/pharmacology , Piperacillin/pharmacology , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination , Pseudomonas Infections/complications , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/growth & development , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolation & purification , Thienamycins/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) catheters are the primary method for draining ureters obstructed by malignancy and preventing a decline of renal function. However, PCN catheter-related infections, such as pyelonephritis and urosepsis, remain a significant concern. Currently, no antimicrobial PCN catheters are available for preventing infection complications. Vascular catheters impregnated with minocycline-rifampin (M/R) and M/R with chlorhexidine coating (M/R plus CHD) have previously demonstrated antimicrobial activity. Therefore, in this study, we examined whether these combinations could be applied to PCN catheters and effectively inhibit biofilm formation by common uropathogens. An in vitro biofilm colonization model was used to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of M/R and M/R-plus-CHD PCN catheters against nine common multidrug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative uropathogens as well as Candida glabrata and Candida albicans Experimental catheters were also assessed for durability of antimicrobial activity for up 3 weeks. PCN catheters coated with M/R plus CHD completely inhibited biofilm formation for up to 3 weeks for all the organisms tested. The reduction in colonization compared to uncoated PCN catheters was significant for all Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal organisms (P < 0.05). M/R-plus-CHD PCN catheters also produced significant reductions in biofilm colonization relative to M/R PCN catheters for Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, C. glabrata, and C. albicans (P < 0.05). M/R-plus-CHD PCN catheters proved to be highly efficacious in preventing biofilm colonization when exposed to multidrug-resistant pathogens common in PCN catheter-associated pyelonephritis. M/R-plus-CHD PCN catheters warrant evaluation in a clinical setting to assess their ability to prevent clinically relevant nephrostomy infections.