Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Br J Cancer ; 124(1): 156-160, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33024263

ABSTRACT

Brain metastases are a major cause of melanoma-related mortality and morbidity. We undertook whole-exome sequencing of 50 tumours from patients undergoing surgical resection of brain metastases presenting as the first site of visceral disease spread and validated our findings in an independent dataset of 18 patients. Brain metastases had a similar driver mutational landscape to cutaneous melanomas in TCGA. However, KRAS was the most significantly enriched driver gene, with 4/50 (8%) of brain metastases harbouring non-synonymous mutations. Hotspot KRAS mutations were mutually exclusive from BRAFV600, NRAS and HRAS mutations and were associated with a reduced overall survival from the resection of brain metastases (HR 10.01, p = 0.001). Mutations in KRAS were clonal and concordant with extracranial disease, suggesting that these mutations are likely present within the primary. Our analyses suggest that KRAS mutations could help identify patients with primary melanoma at higher risk of brain metastases who may benefit from more intensive, protracted surveillance.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Melanoma/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , Humans , Mutation , Recurrence , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
2.
J Pathol ; 247(5): 539-551, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30511391

ABSTRACT

Melanoma is characterised by its ability to metastasise at early stages of tumour development. Current clinico-pathologic staging based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria is used to guide surveillance and management in early-stage disease, but its ability to predict clinical outcome has limitations. Herein we review the genomics of melanoma subtypes including cutaneous, acral, uveal and mucosal, with a focus on the prognostic and predictive significance of key molecular aberrations. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/genetics , Genes, cdc/genetics , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
3.
Postgrad Med J ; 91(1074): 188-92, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25715334

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the uptake and impact of a peer mentoring scheme for core medical trainees on both mentors and mentees. METHOD: All second year core medical trainees in the Southwest London Training programme in September 2012 were invited to mentor a first year core medical trainee. In parallel, all first year core medical trainees were invited to be mentored. Both potential mentors and mentees were asked to submit personal statements, to attend a three-session mentoring training programme and to be matched into mentoring pairs. The impact of the mentoring scheme on trainees' behaviour and outlook was assessed through questionnaires distributed at the start and at the end of the year. RESULTS: 31 of 72 (43%) core medical trainees submitted personal statements and 40 of 72 (56%) attended training sessions. 42 trainees (58%) participated in the scheme (21 mentor/mentee pairs were established). Of the trainees who participated, 23 of 42 (55%) completed the end of year questionnaire. Participating trainees viewed the scheme positively. Reported benefits included changes in their behaviour and acquiring transferable skills that might help them in later career roles, such as an educational supervisor. The end of year questionnaire was sent to all trainees and 10 responded who had not participated. They were asked why they had not participated and their reasons included lack of time, lack of inclination and a desire for more senior mentors. Their suggestions for improvement included more structured sessions to allow the mentor/mentee pairs to meet. CONCLUSIONS: This simple peer mentoring scheme was popular despite busy workloads and benefited all concerned. It is a simple effective way of supporting doctors. More work is needed to improve training for mentors and to improve access to mentoring.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Mentors , Program Development/methods , Specialization , Education, Medical, Graduate/statistics & numerical data , England , Female , Humans , London , Male , Peer Group , Program Development/statistics & numerical data , Program Evaluation , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (10): CD010482, 2013 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24142521

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, requiring primary cytoreductive surgery and combination chemotherapy for its first-line management. Currently, the recommended standard first-line chemotherapy is platinum-based, usually consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel (PAC/carbo). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an improved formulation of doxorubicin that is associated with fewer and less severe side effects than are seen with non-modified doxorubicin. In combination with carboplatin, PLD has recently been shown to improve progression-free survival compared with PAC/carbo in women with relapsed, platinum-sensitive EOC. It is therefore important to know whether any survival benefit can be attributed to PLD when it is used in the first-line setting. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of PLD, alone or in combination, in first-line chemotherapy for women with EOC. SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group's Trial Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1990 to February 2013. In addition, we searched online trial registries for ongoing trials and abstracts of studies presented at relevant scientific meetings from 2000 onwards. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PLD alone or in combination with other agent/s (e.g. carboplatin) versus other agent/s for first-line chemotherapy in women with EOC who may or may not have undergone primary cytoreductive surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for each included trial. We obtained updated trial data when possible. MAIN RESULTS: We included two large trials. One trial compared three-weekly PLD and carboplatin (PLD/carbo) with PAC/carbo. The other trial included four experimental arms, one of which was PLD plus PAC/carbo, that were compared with the standard PAC/carbo regimen. We did not combine results of these two trials in the meta-analysis. We considered the two studies to be at low risk of bias.For the comparison PLD/carbo versus PAC/carbo (820 women; stages Ic to IV), no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 to 1.19) or overall survival (OS) (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13) were noted between study arms. Severe anaemia (risk ratio [RR] 2.74, 95% CI 1.54 to 4.88) and thrombocytopenia (RR 8.09, 95% CI 3.93 to 16.67) were significantly more common with PLD/carbo, whereas alopecia (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.14) and severe neurotoxicity (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.66) were significantly more common with PAC/carbo. Quality of life scores were not significantly different.For the comparison PLD/PAC/carbo versus PAC/carbo (1726 women; stage III/IV), it is important to note that PLD was given for alternate cycles only (i.e. every 6 weeks). No statistically significant difference in PFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09) or OS (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.08) between these two treatment arms was reported. However, women in the triplet arm experienced significantly more severe haematological adverse events (anaemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia) compared with those given standard treatment.No RCTs evaluated single-agent PLD for first-line treatment of EOC. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PLD/carbo is a reasonable alternative to PAC/carbo for the first-line treatment of EOC. Although three-weekly PLD/carbo may be associated with increased dose delays and discontinuations compared with the standard PAC/carbo regimen, it might be more acceptable to women who wish to avoid alopecia or those at high risk of neurotoxicity. No survival benefits appear to be associated with the alternating triplet regimen, and the additional toxicity associated with adding PLD to PAC/carbo limits further investigation. Further studies are needed to establish the safest, most effective PLD/carbo regimen for newly diagnosed disease.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Polyethylene Glycols/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (4): CD008039, 2013 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23633348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 10, 2010 (Rabbie 2010). Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers do not seek professional help, relying instead on over-the-counter analgesics. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce symptoms commonly associated with migraine headaches. OBJECTIVES: To determine efficacy and tolerability of ibuprofen, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine headaches in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Oxford Pain Relief Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists for studies through 22 April 2010 for the original review and to 14 February 2013 for the update. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies using self-administered ibuprofen to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants achieving each outcome were used to calculate relative risk and number needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to placebo or other active treatment. MAIN RESULTS: No new studies were found for this update. Nine included studies (4373 participants, 5223 attacks) compared ibuprofen with placebo or other active comparators; none combined ibuprofen with a self-administered antiemetic. All studies treated attacks with single doses of medication. For ibuprofen 400 mg versus placebo, NNTs for 2-hour pain-free (26% versus 12% with placebo), 2-hour headache relief (57% versus 25%) and 24-hour sustained headache relief (45% versus 19%) were 7.2, 3.2 and 4.0, respectively. For ibuprofen 200 mg versus placebo, NNTs for 2-hour pain-free (20% versus 10%) and 2-hour headache relief (52% versus 37%) were 9.7 and 6.3, respectively. The higher dose was significantly better than the lower dose for 2-hour headache relief. Soluble formulations of ibuprofen 400 mg were better than standard tablets for 1-hour, but not 2-hour headache relief.Similar numbers of participants experienced adverse events, which were mostly mild and transient, with ibuprofen and placebo.Ibuprofen 400 mg did not differ from rofecoxib 25 mg for 2-hour headache relief or 24-hour headache relief. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no new studies since the last version of this review. Ibuprofen is an effective treatment for acute migraine headaches, providing pain relief in about half of sufferers, but complete relief from pain and associated symptoms for only a minority. NNTs for all efficacy outcomes were better with 400 mg than 200 mg in comparisons with placebo, and soluble formulations provided more rapid relief. Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, occurring at the same rate as with placebo.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (4): CD008783, 2013 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23633360

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This review is an update of a previously published review in Issue 2, 2012 (Derry 2012a). Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers choose not to, or are unable to, seek professional help and rely on over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics. Diclofenac is an established analgesic, and new formulations using the potassium or epolamine salts, which can be dissolved in water, have been developed for rapid absorption, which may be beneficial in acute migraine. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce the nausea and vomiting commonly associated with migraine. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine headaches in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Oxford Pain Relief Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists for studies through 27 September 2011 for the original review and 15 February 2013 for the update. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled or active-controlled studies, or both, using self administered diclofenac to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used numbers of participants achieving each outcome to calculate relative risk (or 'risk ratio') and numbers needed to treat to benefit (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to placebo or a different active treatment. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies (1356 participants, 2711 attacks) compared oral diclofenac with placebo, and one also compared it with sumatriptan; none combined diclofenac with a self administered antiemetic. Four studies treated attacks with single doses of medication, and two allowed an optional second dose for inadequate response. Only two studies, with three active treatment arms, provided data for pooled analysis of primary outcomes. For single doses of diclofenac potassium 50 mg versus placebo (two studies), the NNTs were 6.2, 8.9, and 9.5 for pain-free at two hours, headache relief at two hours, and pain-free responses at 24 hours, respectively.Similar numbers of participants experienced adverse events, which were mostly mild and transient, with diclofenac and placebo.There were insufficient data to evaluate other doses of oral diclofenac, or to compare different formulations or different dosing regimens; only one study compared oral diclofenac with an active comparator (oral sumatriptan 100 mg). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Oral diclofenac potassium 50 mg is an effective treatment for acute migraine, providing relief from pain and associated symptoms, although only a minority of patients experience pain-free responses. Adverse events are mostly mild and transient and occur at the same rate as with placebo.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Analgesics/adverse effects , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Migraine Disorders/complications , Nausea/drug therapy , Nausea/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sumatriptan/administration & dosage
7.
Cancer Discov ; 13(1): 194-215, 2023 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36259947

ABSTRACT

In melanoma, predicting which tumors will ultimately metastasize guides treatment decisions. Transcriptional signatures of primary tumors have been utilized to predict metastasis, but which among these are driver or passenger events remains unclear. We used data from the adjuvant AVAST-M trial to identify a predictive gene signature in localized tumors that ultimately metastasized. Using a zebrafish model of primary melanoma, we interrogated the top genes from the AVAST-M signature in vivo. This identified GRAMD1B, a cholesterol transfer protein, as a bona fide metastasis suppressor, with a majority of knockout animals rapidly developing metastasis. Mechanistically, excess free cholesterol or its metabolite 27-hydroxycholesterol promotes invasiveness via activation of an AP-1 program, which is associated with increased metastasis in humans. Our data demonstrate that the transcriptional seeds of metastasis are embedded within localized tumors, suggesting that early targeting of these programs can be used to prevent metastatic relapse. SIGNIFICANCE: We analyzed human melanoma transcriptomics data to identify a gene signature predictive of metastasis. To rapidly test clinical signatures, we built a genetic metastasis platform in adult zebrafish and identified GRAMD1B as a suppressor of melanoma metastasis. GRAMD1B-associated cholesterol overload activates an AP-1 program to promote melanoma invasion. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1.


Subject(s)
Melanoma , Zebrafish , Animals , Humans , Zebrafish/genetics , Transcription Factor AP-1/genetics , Transcription Factor AP-1/metabolism , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Melanoma/pathology , Gene Expression Profiling , Neoplasm Metastasis , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (2): CD008783, 2012 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22336852

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers choose not to, or are unable to, seek professional help and rely on over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics. Diclofenac is an established analgesic, and new formulations using the potassium or epolamine salts, which can be dissolved in water, have been developed for rapid absorption, which may be beneficial in acute migraine. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce the nausea and vomiting commonly associated with migraine. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine headaches in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Oxford Pain Relief Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists for studies through 27 September 2011. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- and/or active-controlled studies using self administered diclofenac to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We used numbers of participants achieving each outcome to calculate relative risk (or 'risk ratio') and numbers needed to treat to benefit (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to placebo or a different active treatment. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies (1356 participants) compared oral diclofenac with placebo, and one also compared it with sumatriptan; none combined diclofenac with a self administered antiemetic. Four studies treated attacks with single doses of medication, and two allowed an optional second dose for inadequate response. Only two studies, with three active treatment arms, provided data for pooled analysis of primary outcomes. For single doses of diclofenac potassium 50 mg versus placebo (two studies), the NNTs were 6.2, 8.9, and 9.5 for pain-free at two hours, headache relief at two hours, and pain-free responses at 24 hours, respectively.Associated symptoms of nausea, photophobia and phonophobia, and functional disability were reduced within two hours, and similar numbers of participants experienced adverse events, which were mostly mild and transient.There were insufficient data to evaluate other doses of oral diclofenac, or to compare different formulations or different dosing regimens; only one study compared oral diclofenac with an active comparator (oral sumatriptan 100 mg). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Oral diclofenac potassium 50 mg is an effective treatment for acute migraine, providing relief from pain and associated symptoms, although only a minority of patients experience pain-free responses. Adverse events are mostly mild and transient and occur at the same rate as with placebo.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/administration & dosage , Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Analgesics/adverse effects , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Hyperacusis/drug therapy , Hyperacusis/etiology , Migraine Disorders/complications , Nausea/drug therapy , Nausea/etiology , Photophobia/drug therapy , Photophobia/etiology , Sumatriptan/administration & dosage
9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (9): CD007400, 2012 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22972108

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly taken orally, but they are also available in topical preparations to be applied to or rubbed onto the skin of a painful joint, typically one affected by arthritis, with the aim of relieving pain locally. Topical NSAIDs are widely used in some parts of the world for acute and chronic painful conditions, but have not been universally accepted until recently. One of the problems has been that older clinical studies were generally short, lasting four weeks or less, and short duration studies are not regarded as adequate in ongoing painful conditions. OBJECTIVES: To examine the use of topical NSAIDs in chronic musculoskeletal pain, focusing on studies of high methodological quality, and examining the measured effect of the preparations according to study duration. The principal aim was to estimate treatment efficacy in longer duration studies of at least 8 weeks. SEARCH METHODS: A series of electronic searches, together with bibliographic searches, and searches of in-house databases were combined with electronic searches of clinical trial registers and manufacturers of topical NSAIDs, or companies known to be actively researching topical NSAIDs. There had to be at least 10 participants in each treatment arm, with application of treatment at least once daily. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised, double blind studies with placebo or active comparators, where at least one treatment was a topical NSAID product, in any topical formulation (cream, gel, patch, solution), in studies lasting at least two weeks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed study quality and validity, and extracted data. Numbers of participants achieving each outcome were used to calculate relative risk (RR) and numbers needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to placebo or other active treatment. MAIN RESULTS: Information was available from 7688 participants in 34 studies from 32 publications; 23 studies compared a topical NSAID with placebo. Topical NSAIDs were significantly more effective than placebo for reducing pain due to chronic musculoskeletal conditions. The best data were for topical diclofenac in osteoarthritis, where the NNT for at least 50% pain relief over 8 to 12 weeks compared with placebo was 6.4 for the solution, and 11 for the gel formulation. There were too few data of good quality to calculate NNTs for other individual topical NSAIDs compared with placebo. Direct comparison of topical NSAID with an oral NSAID did not show any difference in efficacy. There was an increase in local adverse events (mostly mild skin reactions) with topical NSAIDs compared with placebo or oral NSAIDs, but no increase in serious adverse events. Gastrointestinal adverse events with topical NSAID did not differ from placebo, but were less frequent than with oral NSAIDs.A substantial amount of data from unpublished studies was unavailable. Much of this probably relates to formulations that have never been marketed. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Topical NSAIDs can provide good levels of pain relief; topical diclofenac solution is equivalent to that of oral NSAIDs in knee and hand osteoarthritis, but there is no evidence for other chronic painful conditions. Formulation can influence efficacy. The incidence of local adverse events is increased with topical NSAIDs, but gastrointestinal adverse events are reduced compared with oral NSAIDs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/drug therapy , Administration, Topical , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.
Commun Biol ; 4(1): 395, 2021 03 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33758365

ABSTRACT

Melanoma represents ~5% of all cutaneous malignancies, yet accounts for the majority of skin cancer deaths due to its propensity to metastasise. To develop new therapies, novel target molecules must to be identified and the accessibility of cell surface proteins makes them attractive targets. Using CRISPR activation technology, we screened a library of guide RNAs targeting membrane protein-encoding genes to identify cell surface molecules whose upregulation enhances the metastatic pulmonary colonisation capabilities of tumour cells in vivo. We show that upregulated expression of the cell surface protein LRRN4CL led to increased pulmonary metastases in mice. Critically, LRRN4CL expression was elevated in melanoma patient samples, with high expression levels correlating with decreased survival. Collectively, our findings uncover an unappreciated role for LRRN4CL in the outcome of melanoma patients and identifies a potential therapeutic target and biomarker.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Melanoma, Experimental/metabolism , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Skin Neoplasms/metabolism , Animals , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Melanoma, Experimental/genetics , Melanoma, Experimental/secondary , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Inbred NOD , Mice, Knockout , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Up-Regulation
11.
Dev Cell ; 56(20): 2808-2825.e10, 2021 10 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34529939

ABSTRACT

Melanomas can have multiple coexisting cell states, including proliferative (PRO) versus invasive (INV) subpopulations that represent a "go or grow" trade-off; however, how these populations interact is poorly understood. Using a combination of zebrafish modeling and analysis of patient samples, we show that INV and PRO cells form spatially structured heterotypic clusters and cooperate in the seeding of metastasis, maintaining cell state heterogeneity. INV cells adhere tightly to each other and form clusters with a rim of PRO cells. Intravital imaging demonstrated cooperation in which INV cells facilitate dissemination of less metastatic PRO cells. We identified the TFAP2 neural crest transcription factor as a master regulator of clustering and PRO/INV states. Isolation of clusters from patients with metastatic melanoma revealed a subset with heterotypic PRO-INV clusters. Our data suggest a framework for the co-existence of these two divergent cell populations, in which heterotypic clusters promote metastasis via cell-cell cooperation.


Subject(s)
Cluster Analysis , Melanoma/metabolism , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Animals , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/physiology , Melanoma/pathology , Neural Crest/pathology , Zebrafish
12.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 1137, 2021 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602918

ABSTRACT

Adjuvant systemic therapies are now routinely used following resection of stage III melanoma, however accurate prognostic information is needed to better stratify patients. We use differential expression analyses of primary tumours from 204 RNA-sequenced melanomas within a large adjuvant trial, identifying a 121 metastasis-associated gene signature. This signature strongly associated with progression-free (HR = 1.63, p = 5.24 × 10-5) and overall survival (HR = 1.61, p = 1.67 × 10-4), was validated in 175 regional lymph nodes metastasis as well as two externally ascertained datasets. The machine learning classification models trained using the signature genes performed significantly better in predicting metastases than models trained with clinical covariates (pAUROC = 7.03 × 10-4), or published prognostic signatures (pAUROC < 0.05). The signature score negatively correlated with measures of immune cell infiltration (ρ = -0.75, p < 2.2 × 10-16), with a higher score representing reduced lymphocyte infiltration and a higher 5-year risk of death in stage II melanoma. Our expression signature identifies melanoma patients at higher risk of metastases and warrants further evaluation in adjuvant clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Melanoma/genetics , Databases, Genetic , Humans , Machine Learning , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Progression-Free Survival , Proportional Hazards Models , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
13.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (10): CD008039, 2010 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20927770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers do not seek professional help, relying instead on over-the-counter analgesics. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce symptoms commonly associated with migraine headaches. OBJECTIVES: To determine efficacy and tolerability of ibuprofen, alone or in combination with an antiemetic, compared to placebo and other active interventions in the treatment of acute migraine headaches in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Oxford Pain Relief Database for studies through 22 April 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies using self-administered ibuprofen to treat a migraine headache episode, with at least 10 participants per treatment arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Numbers of participants achieving each outcome were used to calculate relative risk and number needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to placebo or other active treatment. MAIN RESULTS: Nine studies (4373 participants, 5223 attacks) compared ibuprofen with placebo or other active comparators; none combined ibuprofen with a self-administered antiemetic. All studies treated attacks with single doses of medication. For ibuprofen 400 mg versus placebo, NNTs for 2-hour pain-free (26% versus 12% with placebo), 2-hour headache relief (57% versus 25%) and 24-hour sustained headache relief (45% versus 19%) were 7.2, 3.2 and 4.0, respectively. For ibuprofen 200 mg versus placebo, NNTs for 2-hour pain-free (20% versus 10%) and 2-hour headache relief (52% versus 37%) were 9.7 and 6.3, respectively. The higher dose was significantly better for 2-hour headache relief than the lower dose. Soluble formulations of ibuprofen 400 mg were better than standard tablets for 1-hour, but not 2-hour headache relief.Associated symptoms of nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia and functional disability were reduced within 2 hours, and fewer participants used rescue medication with ibuprofen compared with placebo. Similar numbers of participants experienced adverse events, which were mostly mild and transient.Ibuprofen 400 mg did not differ from rofecoxib 25 mg for 2-hour headache relief, 24-hour headache relief or use of rescue medication. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen is an effective treatment for acute migraine headaches, providing pain relief in about half of sufferers, but complete relief from pain and associated symptoms for only a minority. NNTs for all efficacy outcomes were better with 400 mg than 200 mg in comparisons with placebo, and soluble formulations provided more rapid relief. Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, occurring at the same rate as with placebo.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Adult , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
14.
Nat Commun ; 11(1): 4306, 2020 08 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32855398

ABSTRACT

Metastatic melanoma carries a poor prognosis despite modern systemic therapies. Understanding the evolution of the disease could help inform patient management. Through whole-genome sequencing of 13 melanoma metastases sampled at autopsy from a treatment naïve patient and by leveraging the analytical power of multi-sample analyses, we reveal evidence of diversification among metastatic lineages. UV-induced mutations dominate the trunk, whereas APOBEC-associated mutations are found in the branches of the evolutionary tree. Multi-sample analyses from a further seven patients confirmed that lineage diversification was pervasive, representing an important mode of melanoma dissemination. Our analyses demonstrate that joint analysis of cancer cell fraction estimates across multiple metastases can uncover previously unrecognised levels of tumour heterogeneity and highlight the limitations of inferring heterogeneity from a single biopsy.


Subject(s)
Clonal Evolution , Genetic Heterogeneity , Melanoma/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Aged , Biopsy , DNA Mutational Analysis , Humans , Male , Melanoma/secondary , Prospective Studies , Skin/pathology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Whole Genome Sequencing
15.
Clin Cancer Res ; 24(20): 5133-5142, 2018 10 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29950348

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancers (IBD-CRC) are associated with a higher mortality than sporadic colorectal cancers. The poorly defined molecular pathogenesis of IBD-CRCs limits development of effective prevention, detection, and treatment strategies. We aimed to identify biomarkers using whole-exome sequencing of IBD-CRCs to guide individualized management.Experimental Design: Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 34 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary IBD-CRCs and 31 matched normal lymph nodes. Computational methods were used to identify somatic point mutations, small insertions and deletions, mutational signatures, and somatic copy number alterations. Mismatch repair status was examined.Results: Hypermutation was observed in 27% of IBD-CRCs. All hypermutated cancers were from the proximal colon; all but one of the cancers with hypermutation had defective mismatch repair or somatic mutations in the proofreading domain of DNA POLE Hypermutated IBD-CRCs had increased numbers of predicted neo-epitopes, which could be exploited using immunotherapy. We identified six distinct mutation signatures in IBD-CRCs, three of which corresponded to known mechanisms of mutagenesis. Driver genes were also identified.Conclusions: IBD-CRCs should be evaluated for hypermutation and defective mismatch repair to identify patients with a higher neo-epitope load who may benefit from immunotherapies. Prospective trials are required to determine whether IHC to detect loss of MLH1 expression in dysplastic colonic tissue could identify patients at increased risk of developing IBD-CRC. We identified mutations in genes in IBD-CRCs with hypermutation that might be targeted therapeutically. These approaches would complement and individualize surveillance and treatment programs. Clin Cancer Res; 24(20); 5133-42. ©2018 AACR.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/genetics , Mutation , Alleles , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , DNA Copy Number Variations , DNA Mismatch Repair , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA Polymerase III/genetics , Epitopes/immunology , Gene Frequency , HLA Antigens/immunology , Humans , Microsatellite Instability , Mutation Rate , Phenotype , Exome Sequencing
16.
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res ; 30(3): 307-316, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28097802

ABSTRACT

Melanoma in young children is rare; however, its incidence in adolescents and young adults is rising. We describe the clinical course of a 15-year-old female diagnosed with AJCC stage IB non-ulcerated primary melanoma, who died from metastatic disease 4 years after diagnosis despite three lines of modern systemic therapy. We also present the complete genomic profile of her tumour and compare this to a further series of 13 adolescent melanomas and 275 adult cutaneous melanomas. A somatic BRAFV600E mutation and a high mutational load equivalent to that found in adult melanoma and composed primarily of C>T mutations were observed. A germline genomic analysis alongside a series of 23 children and adolescents with melanoma revealed no mutations in known germline melanoma-predisposing genes. Adolescent melanomas appear to have genomes that are as complex as those arising in adulthood and their clinical course can, as with adults, be unpredictable.


Subject(s)
Genomics , Melanoma/genetics , Skin Neoplasms/genetics , Adolescent , Female , Germ Cells/metabolism , Humans , Male , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Melanoma/pathology , Pedigree , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Skin Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
19.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 94(1): 18-30, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25591826

ABSTRACT

In the last decade treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved with the addition of contemporary chemotherapy drugs and targeted therapies. Despite this progress, our drug armamentarium is by no means complete and modern molecular biology techniques have led to the identification of a number of 'druggable' targets. One of the most important current drug targets is the phosphatidyl-inositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, which is frequently deregulated in patients with CRC. In vitro and in vivo data strongly support the clinical development of compounds affecting signal transduction via the PI3K pathway. In this review we outline the role of PI3K in the development and progression of CRC and discuss data from current and ongoing clinical trials targeting this pathway. In addition we make suggestions toward the optimization of future research in order to derive the maximum benefit for patients with CRC.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases/metabolism , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Signal Transduction/drug effects
20.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 14(10): 1115-25, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25204327

ABSTRACT

Treatment of metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic cancer has made slow progress during the last decade. Single agent gemcitabine or in combination with capecitabine or erlotinib remained the preferred systemic treatment options until 2010 when the ACCORD study demonstrated significantly improved outcomes achieved with FOFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine monotherapy. Since 2010, use of FOLFIRINOX has increased both in metastatic and locally advanced cancer. Despite its gaining popularity among oncologists, unanswered questions remain. Do the often necessary dose modifications affect its efficacy? Are the toxicities manageable and how applicable are the results of the ACCORD study in the general population of patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer? In the present manuscript, we review the published literature regarding the use of FOLFIRINOX, the challenges associated with its use and how it will be optimally incorporated into the management of patients with different stages of pancreatic cancer and ultimately, in a more biomarker-driven pathway algorithm.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Camptothecin/administration & dosage , Camptothecin/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Irinotecan , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Organoplatinum Compounds/administration & dosage , Oxaliplatin , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Gemcitabine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL