Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis in healthy blood donors: an unexpectedly common finding.

Circulating monoclonal B cells may be detected in healthy adults, a condition called monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL). MBL has also been identified in donated blood, but no systematic study of blood donors has been reported. Using sensitive and specific laboratory methods, we detected MBL in 149 (7.1%; 95% confidence interval, 6.0% to 8.3%) of 2098 unique donors ages 45 years or older in a Midwestern US regional blood center between 2010 and 2011. Most of the 149 donors had low-count MBL, including 99 chronic lymphocytic leukemia-like (66.4%), 22 atypical (14.8%), and 19 CD5(-) (12.8%) immunophenotypes. However, 5 donors (3.4%) had B-cell clonal counts above 500 cells per µL, including 3 with 1693 to 2887 cells per µL; the clone accounted for nearly all their circulating B cells. Four donors (2.7%) had 2 distinct MBL clones. Of 51 MBL samples in which immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH)V-D-J genotypes could be determined, 71% and 29% used IGHV3- and IGHV4-family genes, respectively. Sequencing revealed 82% with somatic hypermutation, whereas 18% had >98% germ-line identity, including 5 with entirely germ-line sequences. In conclusion, MBL prevalence is much higher in blood donors than previously reported, and although uncommon, the presence of high-count MBL warrants further investigations to define the biological fate of the transfused cells in recipients.

Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis in blood donors.

Monoclonal B-cell populations have been detected in the peripheral blood of apparently healthy individuals by flow cytometry. In 2005, the term monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) was proposed to describe these findings. MBL may be immunophenotypically similar to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and, like CLL, the prevalence is higher in males and older individuals. We studied the prevalence of MBL in blood donors from the Midwestern United States. Samples from 5141 donors were examined and seven (0.14%) were found to have immunophenotypic characteristics of MBL or CLL. Immunoglobulin heavy chain analysis yielded monoclonality or oligoclonality. Prior and subsequent to the study, an additional undetermined number of blood donors were screened and seven of these expressed immunophenotypic characteristics of MBL or CLL. We thus found a total of 14 healthy blood donors with monoclonal expansions of B-lymphocyte populations. Of these, 12 were presumptively classified as MBL and two as CLL. All but two of the donors were male; the mean age was 59 years. The clinical importance of these findings with regard to transfusion medicine has not been established.

Prevalence of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) have been identified in clinic outpatients, in unaffected relatives of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and in general populations. MBL and its relationship with CLL have been actively investigated over the last decade. This report systematically reviews the prevalence of MBL in the context of the populations studied and the evolution of laboratory methods used to define MBL. METHODS: To identify published studies that have assessed the prevalence of MBL, we systematically searched the MEDLINE databases and consulted with members of the International MBL Study Group. We reviewed the 10 articles that were identified by this process. We abstracted information on study populations, laboratory tests, criteria for designating MBL, and the reported frequencies. RESULTS: Three of the ten studies were published in 2009, three between 2007 and 2008, and four between 2002 and 2004. Reported prevalences varied widely, ranging from 0.12 to 18.2%. This variability was clearly associated with both the laboratory methods and the populations studied. MBL was more common among older individuals and kindred of persons with CLL. The most common MBL subtype was CLL-like MBL. CONCLUSIONS: Large population-based studies of MBL that employ standardized laboratory methods with a consensus case definition are needed to assess prevalence and establish risk factors. These studies should include prospective follow-up of MBL cases to determine the relationship between MBL and CLL. Data from original studies should be reported in sufficient detail to allow future synthesis of information from multiple studies, such as meta-analysis.

Commentary: Comparison of current flow cytometry methods for monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis detection.

Monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is now recognized as the B-lymphocyte analogue of a monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance. MBL can be the precursor of chronic lymphocytic leukemia or associated with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It may be associated with an autoimmune abnormality or be related to aging (immunosenescence). The combination of available new fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibody reagents, multilaser instrumentation, and improved software tools have led to a new level of multicolor analysis of MBL. Presently, several centers, including the University of Salamanca (Spain), Duke University (Durham, NC), Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), and the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD) in conjunction with the Genetics and Epidemiology of Familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia Consortium, the Food and Drug Administration (Bethesda, MD), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (Atlanta, GA) in collaboration with Saint Luke's Hospital (Kansas City, MO), the Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele in Milan (Italy), and Leeds Teaching Hospital (UK) are all actively conducting studies on MBL. This commentary is an updated summary of the current methods used in these centers. It is important to note the diversity of use in reagents, instruments, and methods of analysis. Despite this diversity, there is a consensus in what constitutes the diagnosis of MBL and its subtypes. There is also an emerging consensus on what the next investigative steps should be.

Immature platelet fraction as a predictor of platelet recovery following hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.

The immature platelet fraction (IPF) as determined by the Sysmex XE-2100 is a rapid automated measure of the least mature component of the platelet population and is thought to correlate with thrombopoietic activity of the marrow. We investigated the ability of IPF to predict platelet recovery following hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation. IPF was compared to standard parameters of hematopoietic recovery, including the immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), an early predictor of recovery. Fifty patients undergoing peripheral blood HPC transplantation (38 autologous and 12 allogeneic) were followed daily for 11 to 28 days after transplantation with measurement of IPF, IRF, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) and platelet counts. Mean days to recovery for IPF was 3.1 days less than for platelet count (P <.0001), 3.8 days less than for ANC (P <.0001), and 0.6 days less than for IRF (P = .0477). IPF recovered at least 1 day prior to platelet count in 79% (38 of 48) of patients, and was followed by platelet count recovery within 1 to 12 days (mean, 4.1 days). When autologous and allogeneic patient groups were analyzed separately, IPF recovered significantly earlier than platelet count and ANC in both groups (P <.0001). Thrombopoietin (TPO) levels in 5 patients receiving transplants correlated with IPF; however, this appeared to be secondary to an inverse correlation of both TPO and IPF with platelet count. IPF is comparable to IRF as one of the earliest predictors of hematopoietic recovery following peripheral blood HPC transplantation. IPF could potentially be useful as a predictor of platelet recovery in other bone marrow failure syndromes.