ABSTRACT
In vitro combinations of isavuconazole with echinocandins were evaluated against 30 Aspergillus strains with a two-dimensional checkerboard microdilution method and an agar-based diffusion method. With the checkerboard method, the three combinations showed indifferent interactions for all strains. With the agar-based method, indifferent interactions were found for all strains for isavuconazole-micafungin and isavuconazole-anidulafungin. For the isavuconazole-caspofungin combination, indifference was found in 24/30 strains, synergism in 4/30 strains, and antagonism in 2/30 strains.
Subject(s)
Anidulafungin/pharmacology , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , Aspergillus flavus/drug effects , Aspergillus fumigatus/drug effects , Aspergillus nidulans/drug effects , Aspergillus niger/drug effects , Micafungin/pharmacology , Nitriles/pharmacology , Pyridines/pharmacology , Triazoles/pharmacology , Aspergillus flavus/isolation & purification , Aspergillus fumigatus/isolation & purification , Aspergillus nidulans/isolation & purification , Aspergillus niger/isolation & purification , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Fungal/physiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
Severe malaria accounts for approximately 10% of all cases of imported malaria in France; cases are mainly due to Plasmodium falciparum, while other Plasmodium species are possible but uncommon (P. vivax, P. knowlesi, P. malariae, and P. ovale). On the basis of WHO criteria for endemic areas, the French criteria defining severe imported malaria in adults have been progressively adapted to the European healthcare level. Management of severe imported malaria is a diagnostic and treatment emergency and must be initially conducted in the intensive care unit. Anti-infective treatment is now based on intravenous artesunate, which must be available in every hospital of the country likely to receive severe imported malaria patients. Intravenous quinine is thus used as a second-line treatment and is restricted to limited indications. Critical care management of organ failure is essential, particularly in patients presenting with very severe malaria. To date, no adjunctive therapy (including exchange transfusion) has demonstrated clear beneficial effects.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Imported/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases, Imported/therapy , Malaria/diagnosis , Malaria/therapy , Adult , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Differentiating acute chest syndrome (ACS) from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is challenging in adults presenting with major sickle cell disease (SCD) (semiological similarity, rare microbiological documentation). We aimed to assess the usefulness of nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for respiratory pathogens, in combination with standard bacteriological investigations, in febrile ACS adult patients presenting with major SCD. METHODS: We performed a prospective, monocentric, observational study of 61 SCD adults presenting with febrile ACS from February 2015 to April 2016. Systematic blood, urine, and respiratory specimens were collected, before antibiotic initiation, for culture, urinary antigen tests, serology, and NAAT for respiratory pathogens. RESULTS: A pathogen was detected in 12 febrile ACS (19.7%): four viruses (6.6%) (Rhinovirus; Influenza A/B), seven bacteria (11.4%) (S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, K. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila, M. pneumoniae), one mixed infection (1.6%) (S. aureus and Influenza B). NAAT only detected L. pneumophila in one case (serogroup 2). Apart from a significantly shorter antibiotic therapy duration (6.1 vs. 7.8 days, P=0.045), no difference was observed between undocumented and microbiologically-documented febrile ACS. CONCLUSION: Using NAAT for the detection of respiratory pathogens in adults presenting with SCD slightly improved the microbiological diagnostic of febrile ACS, although respiratory infections are not the main etiological factor.
Subject(s)
Acute Chest Syndrome/microbiology , Anemia, Sickle Cell/microbiology , Fever/microbiology , Pneumonia, Bacterial/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Acute Chest Syndrome/complications , Adult , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Female , Fever/etiology , Humans , Male , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/isolation & purification , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis (LB) diagnosis currently relies mainly on serological tests and sometimes PCR or culture. However, other biological assays are being developed to try to improve Borrelia-infection diagnosis and/or monitoring. OBJECTIVES: To analyse available data on these unconventional LB diagnostic assays through a systematic literature review. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library databases according to the PRISMA-DTA method and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We analysed controlled and uncontrolled studies (published 1983-2018) on biological tests for adults to diagnose LB according to the European Study Group for Lyme Borreliosis or the Infectious Diseases Society of America definitions, or identify strongly suspected LB. Two independent readers evaluated study eligibility and extracted data from relevant study reports; a third reader analysed full texts of papers to resolve disagreements. The quality of each included study was assessed with the QUADAS-2 evaluation scale. RESULTS: Forty studies were included: two meta-analyses, 25 prospective controlled studies, five prospective uncontrolled studies, six retrospective controlled studies and two case reports. These biological tests assessed can be classified as: (i) proven to be effective at diagnosing LB and already in use (CXCL-13 for neuroborreliosis), but not enough to be standardized; (ii) not yet used routinely, requiring further clinical evaluation (CCL-19, OspA and interferon-α); (iii) uncertain LB diagnostic efficacy because of controversial results and/or poor methodological quality of studies evaluating them (lymphocyte transformation test, interferon-γ, ELISPOT); (iv) unacceptably low sensitivity and/or specificity (CD57+ natural killer cells and rapid diagnostic tests); and (v) possible only for research purposes (microscopy and xenodiagnoses). DISCUSSION: QUADAS-2 quality assessment demonstrated high risk of bias in 25/40 studies and uncertainty regarding applicability for 32/40, showing that in addition to PCR and serology, several other LB diagnostic assays have been developed but their sensitivities and specificities are heterogeneous and/or under-evaluated or unassessed. More studies are warranted to evaluate their performance parameters. The development of active infection biomarkers would greatly advance LB diagnosis and monitoring.
Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Serologic Tests/standards , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests/methodsABSTRACT
Lyme disease is a tick-borne bacterial disease with polymorphic clinical manifestations (cutaneous, rheumatological, and neurological). In recent years the issue of the diagnosis of this infection has been highly publicized on the Internet and other media in Europe and America. Some patients and physicians may share the perception that the diagnosis of the infection is not reliable in France. We reviewed current European and American guidelines on Lyme disease and performed a methodological evaluation of all guidelines. We retrieved 16 guidelines from seven countries. Our analysis revealed a global consensus regarding diagnosis at each stage of the infection. All guidelines indicate that the diagnosis is currently based on a two-tier serology at all stages of the infection, except for the early localized dermatological presentation known as Erythema migrans. One text of so-called guidelines has discordant recommendations when compared with the other guidelines, possibly explained by its low quality score. Contrary to the intense debate taking place on the Internet and in the European and American media, our analysis shows that the great majority of medical scientific guidelines with a high quality score, agree on the clinical diagnostic methods of Lyme disease.
Subject(s)
Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Diagnosis, Differential , Europe , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the residual broncho-pulmonary lesions and evaluate the role of CT scanning at the end of treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis of the initial and end of treatment CT scans of 56 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis according to a reading grid including parenchymatous and airways lesions. The CT data at the end of treatment were analysed in relation to the clinical and microbiological data, and the original CT scan. RESULTS: Active lesions (thick walled cavities and/or centrilobular micronodules) persisted in 24 patients (43%) after a mean treatment period of 7 months. The persistence of these signs of activity was correlated with the initial presence of a cavitary syndrome (p=0.027), with predominant sub-segmentary bronchial involvement, with extensive micronodular spread (p=0.024) and with bronchiectasis (p=0.04). These residual lesions were not associated with an increased risk of relapse. CONCLUSION: The persistence of signs of activity on the CT scan at the end of treatment of tuberculosis do not necessarily correspond to an absence of cure but to a radiological delay. This imaging is nevertheless useful to make an assessment of any subsequent changes in the bronchial tree and to estimate the risk of later complications.
Subject(s)
Bronchi/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bronchi/pathology , Female , France , Humans , Lung/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Pulmonary/pathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
The serodiagnosis of Lyme borreliosis is based on a two-tier strategy: a screening test using an immunoenzymatic technique (ELISA), followed if positive by a confirmatory test with a western blot technique for its better specificity. Lyme serology has poor sensitivity (30-40%) for erythema migrans and should not be performed. The seroconversion occurs after approximately 6 weeks, with IgG detection (sensitivity and specificity both>90%). Serological follow-up is not recommended as therapeutic success is defined by clinical criteria only. For neuroborreliosis, it is recommended to simultaneously perform ELISA tests in samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid to test for intrathecal synthesis of Lyme antibodies. Given the continuum between early localized and disseminated borreliosis, and the efficacy of doxycycline for the treatment of neuroborreliosis, doxycycline is preferred as the first-line regimen of erythema migrans (duration, 14 days; alternative: amoxicillin) and neuroborreliosis (duration, 14 days if early, 21 days if late; alternative: ceftriaxone). Treatment of articular manifestations of Lyme borreliosis is based on doxycycline, ceftriaxone, or amoxicillin for 28 days. Patients with persistent symptoms after appropriate treatment of Lyme borreliosis should not be prescribed repeated or prolonged antibacterial treatment. Some patients present with persistent and pleomorphic symptoms after documented or suspected Lyme borreliosis. Another condition is eventually diagnosed in 80% of them.
Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Lyme Disease , Tick-Borne Diseases , Animals , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Progression , France , Humans , Lyme Disease/complications , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/pathology , Lyme Disease/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Scientific/organization & administration , Societies, Scientific/standards , Tick-Borne Diseases/complications , Tick-Borne Diseases/diagnosis , Tick-Borne Diseases/pathology , Tick-Borne Diseases/therapyABSTRACT
Lyme borreliosis is transmitted en France by the tick Ixodes ricinus, endemic in metropolitan France. In the absence of vaccine licensed for use in humans, primary prevention mostly relies on mechanical protection (clothes covering most parts of the body) that may be completed by chemical protection (repulsives). Secondary prevention relies on early detection of ticks after exposure, and mechanical extraction. There is currently no situation in France when prophylactic antibiotics would be recommended. The incidence of Lyme borreliosis in France, estimated through a network of general practitioners (réseau Sentinelles), and nationwide coding system for hospital stays, has not significantly changed between 2009 and 2017, with a mean incidence estimated at 53 cases/100,000 inhabitants/year, leading to 1.3 hospital admission/100,000 inhabitants/year. Other tick-borne diseases are much more seldom in France: tick-borne encephalitis (around 20 cases/year), spotted-fever rickettsiosis (primarily mediterranean spotted fever, around 10 cases/year), tularemia (50-100 cases/year, of which 20% are transmitted by ticks), human granulocytic anaplasmosis (<10 cases/year), and babesiosis (<5 cases/year). The main circumstances of diagnosis for Lyme borreliosis are cutaneous manifestations (primarily erythema migrans, much more rarely borrelial lymphocytoma and atrophic chronic acrodermatitis), neurological (<15% of cases, mostly meningoradiculitis and cranial nerve palsy, especially facial nerve) and rheumatologic (mostly knee monoarthritis, with recurrences). Cardiac and ophtalmologic manifestations are very rarely encountered.
Subject(s)
Lyme Disease , Tick-Borne Diseases , Animals , Babesiosis/diagnosis , Babesiosis/epidemiology , Babesiosis/therapy , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/diagnosis , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/epidemiology , Encephalitis, Tick-Borne/therapy , France/epidemiology , Humans , Ixodes/physiology , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Lyme Disease/epidemiology , Lyme Disease/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/diagnosis , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/epidemiology , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/therapy , Societies, Scientific/organization & administration , Societies, Scientific/standards , Tick-Borne Diseases/diagnosis , Tick-Borne Diseases/epidemiology , Tick-Borne Diseases/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the last alarming Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak, the French Ministry of Health developed guidelines for the outpatient management of EVD. We aimed to assess family physicians' (FP) knowledge of EVD, to assess their working conditions, and to collect their opinion about the applicability of these guidelines in France. METHODS: Cross-sectional quantitative study (telephone or email) performed (November 2014-June 2015) during the EVD outbreak. Relevant results were further analyzed with a qualitative study (interviews) based on grounded theory (June-September 2016), after the end of the EVD outbreak. RESULTS: Thirty-three FPs out of 100contacted answered our survey (response rate: 33%). We interviewed five FPs. Their knowledge of EVD was good. Information sent by post, especially from the national medical association, was considered the best means of information and was preferred to emails. Compliance with guidelines was based on their ease of understanding and application (common sense). The main difficulty in applying these guidelines was the unusual recommended equipment that seemed unnecessary as the management of these patients was based on their interview (anamnesis) and isolation without examination. EVD had little impact on the FPs' practice, they only trained their secretaries to screen for suspected EVD patients and refer them to the mobile emergency unit. CONCLUSION: FPs had good knowledge of EVD and guidelines. This seemed important to prevent the outbreak in France as they were ready to cope with such a situation, thanks to guidelines they could easily adjust to their practice.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Family Practice , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/therapy , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Guideline Adherence , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Self ReportABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Artesunate and other artemisinin derivatives are used in various infectious and non-infectious diseases. We aimed to analyze available data on artesunate and artemisinin derivatives activity in humans and their potential clinical benefits in non-malarial indications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature review performed on PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases using the PRISMA method. We analyzed studies published in English from January 2008 to August 2017 using the same indicators of drug efficacy. RESULTS: We included 19 studies performed in humans (1 meta-analysis, 1 literature review, 4 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective controlled trials, 3 prospective uncontrolled trials, 2 exploratory phase 1 or 2 trials, 1 case series, and 4 case reports). Artesunate and artemisinin derivatives demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of schistosomiasis in combination with praziquantel (P=0.003). Artesunate monotherapy was less effective than praziquantel alone (P<0.001) probably because its activity only affects the early stages of Schistosoma parasites. Artesunate monotherapy could be interesting as a chemoprophylactic drug against schistosomiasis (P<0.001). Findings seem promising but are still controversial in the treatment of multidrug-resistant CMV infections. Studies do not conclude on artesunate and artemisinin derivatives efficacy in the treatment of cervix, breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. CONCLUSION: Artesunate and artemisinin derivatives in combination with praziquantel were effective against schistosomiasis, and could be used as a chemoprophylactic drug alone. They could be interesting as anti-CMV and anti-tumor treatment. Additional trials in humans are required to assess the efficacy of artesunate and artemisinin derivatives in diseases other than malaria.