Crystal structure of human Cep57 C-terminal domain reveals the presence of leucine zipper and the potential microtubule binding region.

Cep57, a vital centrosome-associated protein, recruits essential regulatory enzymes for centriole duplication. Its dysfunction leads to anomalies, including reduced centrioles and mosaic-variegated aneuploidy syndrome. Despite functional investigations, understanding structural aspects and their correlation with functions is partial till date. We present the structure of human Cep57 C-terminal microtubule binding (MT-BD) domain, revealing conserved motifs ensuring functional preservation across evolution. A leucine zipper, with an adjacent possible microtubule-binding region, potentially forms a stabilizing scaffold for microtubule nucleation-accommodating pulling and tension from growing microtubules. This study highlights conserved structural features of Cep57 protein, compares them with other analogous proteins, and explores how protein function is maintained across diverse organisms.

Molecular characteristics and clinical features of multifocal glioblastoma.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastomas (GBMs) usually occur as a solitary lesion; however, about 0.5-35% present with multiple lesions (M-GBM). The genetic landscape of GBMs have been thoroughly investigated; nevertheless, differences between M-GBM and single-foci GBM (S-GBM) remains unclear. The present study aimed to determine differences in clinical and molecular characteristics between M-GBM and S-GBM. METHODS: A retrospective review of multifocal/multicentric infiltrative gliomas (M-IG) from our institutional database was performed. Demographics, clinical, radiological, and genetic features were obtained and compared between M-GBM IDH-wild type (IDH-WT) vs 193 S-GBM IDH-WT. Mutations were examined by a targeted next-generation sequencing assay interrogating 315 genes. RESULTS: 33M-IG were identified from which 94% were diagnosed as M-GBM IDH-WT, the remaining 6% were diagnosed as astrocytomas IDH-mutant. M-GBM and S-GBM comparison revealed that EGFR alterations were more frequent in M-GBM (65% vs 42% p = 0.019). Furthermore, concomitant EGFR/PTEN alterations were more common in M-GBM vs. S-GBM (36% vs 19%) as well as compared to TCGA (21%). No statistically significant differences in overall survival were observed between M-GBM and S-GBM; however, within the M-GBM cohort, patients harboring KDR alterations had a worse survival (KDR-altered 6.7 vs KDR-WT 16.6 months, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrate that M-GBM genetically resembles S-GBM, however, M-GBM harbor higher frequency of EGFR alterations and co-occurrence of EGFR/PTEN alterations, which may account for their highly malignant and invasive phenotype. Further study of genetic alterations including differences between multifocal and multicentric GBMs are warranted, which may identify potential targets for this aggressive tumor.

The role of RB1 alteration and 4q12 amplification in IDH-WT glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have identified that glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM IDH-WT) might be comprised of molecular subgroups with distinct prognoses. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between genetic alterations and survival in 282 GBM IDH-WT patients, to identify subgroups with distinct outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed characteristics of GBM IDH-WT (2009-2019) patients analyzed by next-generation sequencing interrogating 205 genes and 26 rearrangements. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with the log-rank test and Cox regression models. We validated our results utilizing data from cBioPortal (MSK-IMPACT dataset). RESULTS: Multivariable analysis of GBM IDH-WT revealed that treatment with chemoradiation and RB1-mutant status correlated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25, P < .001 and HR 0.47, P = .002) and OS (HR 0.24, P < .001 and HR 0.49, P = .016). In addition, younger age (<55 years) was associated with improved OS. Karnofsky performance status less than 80 (HR 1.44, P = .024) and KDR amplification (HR 2.51, P = .008) were predictors of worse OS. KDR-amplified patients harbored coexisting PDGFRA and KIT amplification (P < .001) and TP53 mutations (P = .04). RB1-mutant patients had less frequent CDKN2A/B and EGFR alterations (P < .001). Conversely, RB1-mutant patients had more frequent TP53 (P < .001) and SETD2 (P = .006) mutations. Analysis of the MSK-IMPACT dataset (n = 551) validated the association between RB1 mutations and improved PFS (11.0 vs 8.7 months, P = .009) and OS (34.7 vs 21.7 months, P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: RB1-mutant GBM IDH-WT is a molecular subgroup with improved PFS and OS. Meanwhile, 4q12 amplification (KDR/PDGFRA/KIT) denoted patients with worse OS. Identifying subgroups of GBM IDH-WT with distinct survival is important for optimal clinical trial design, incorporation of targeted therapies, and personalized neuro-oncological care.

Therapeutic advances in hormone-dependent cancers: focus on prostate, breast and ovarian cancers.

Hormonal cancers affect over 400,000 men and women and contribute collectively to over 100,000 deaths in the United States alone. Thanks to advances in the understanding of these cancers at the molecular level and to the discovery of several disease-modifying therapeutics, the last decade has seen a plateauing or even a decreasing trend in the number of deaths from these cancers. These advanced therapeutics not only effectively slow the growth of hormonal cancers, but also provide an insight on how these cancers become refractory and evolve as an altogether distinct subset. This review summarizes the current therapeutic trends in hormonal cancers, with focus on prostate, breast and ovarian cancers. The review discusses the clinical drugs being used now, promising molecules that are going through various stages of development and makes some predictions on how the therapeutic landscape will shift in the next decade.