Single-Center Experience of Pulmonary Endarterectomy for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: The Results from the Tabriz University Medical Sciences (TUMS) CTEPH Program.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remains the preferred and potentially curative option for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This study aimed to report the results of PEA for CTEPH in a tertiary center in Tabriz, Iran. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 42 CTEPH patients undergoing PEA, who were enrolled in the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (TUMS-CTEPH) from January 2016 to October 2020. The main outcome measures included the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, the 6-Minute Walk Distance, hemodynamic measures in right heart catheterization, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in the NYHA function class (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.34), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (47.1 ± 13 vs 27.9 ± 8 mm Hg), cardiac output (4.3 ± 1.06 vs 5.9 ± 1.2 L/min), and pulmonary vascular resistance (709.4 ± 297.5 vs 214 ± 77 dyn s/cm5). Fifteen patients (35%) developed complications. The most common complication (10 [23%]) was reperfusion injury. Also, postsurgical mortality was 4% during hospital admission and 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is the first single-center report of PEA from Iran. Post-PEA and 1-year survival were acceptable as a referral center. PEA can be performed safe with low mortality. Greater awareness of PEA and patients' access to experienced CTEPH centers are important issues.

Mistakes, Misrepresentation, and Misunderstanding on Applications to a Canadian Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program.

Purpose: Determine the educational background, research publications/presentations experience, and rates of research publication and presentation inaccuracies in applications to a Canadian diagnostic imaging residency program. Method: The education and publication/presentation sections of the Canadian Resident Matching Service form for all applicants to the University of Saskatchewan diagnostic imaging residency program from 2019-20 and 2020-21 were reviewed. Number of advanced degrees (Master's/PhDs), publications, and presentations were recorded. Accuracy of publications listed was confirmed via PubMed-MEDLINE, journal's website, or internet searching. Accuracy of presentations was confirmed via society and residency program websites. Inaccuracies of non-authorship, incorrect authorship order/status (self-promotion or demotion), and nonexistence of article/presentation from a verifiable source were recorded. Result: There were a total of 106 applicants. Thirty (28%) had advanced degrees. There were 230 publications from 61 applicants with inaccuracies in only 5 (2%) of the publications (2 self-promotion, 3 self-demotion). For the 77 publications listed as pending, 25 (31%) were published within 6 months of applications deadlines with 1 non-authorship, 1 self-promotion, and 1 self-demotion. For scientific presentations, there were 467 listed presentations by 91 applicants. Two hundred and twenty-one presentations were from verifiable sources with inaccuracies in 28 (13%) of presentations (9 self-promotion, 9 self-demotion, 1 non-authorship, and 9 non-existence). Conclusion: Despite some uncertainty with scientific articles reported as pending and scientific presentations, radiology residency applicants are accurately representing their published articles with a negligible number of misrepresentations. Canadian radiology residency programs should regard the publication profiles of the applicants with a high level of confidence.

Outcome of Surgery for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease without Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a serious condition that results from incomplete resolution of thromboemboli in pulmonary arteries. Symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic disease may have normal hemodynamic at rest. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) in the absence of pulmonary hypertension as currently defined (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] < 20 mm Hg). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Here, we report four symptomatic patients with chronic thromboembolic and normal hemodynamic at rest (mPAP ≤20 mm Hg or 20 < mPAP < 25 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR] < 240 dyn·s/cm5) who underwent PEA between September 2015 and September 2019. The main outcome measures were functional New York Heart Association class, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), hemodynamic measures in right heart catheterization (RHC), morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: There were significant improvement in function class (2.6 ± 0.54 vs. 1 ± 0.2, p = 0.00), mPAP (preoperative: 23.3 ± 0.5 mm Hg vs. postoperative: 18.6 ± 1.5 mm Hg, p = 0.02), 6MWD (preoperative: 378.2 ± 68.7 m vs. postoperative: 432.9 ± 44.5 m, p = 0.01), and PVR (215.33 ± 91 vs. 101 ± 32 dyn·s/cm5, p = 0.1) 6 months after surgery based on data from RHC which was done during exercise. Also, RHC showed a significant decrease in mPAP (preoperative: 37 ± 7.7 mm Hg vs. postoperative 28 ± 3.2 mm Hg, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: PEA could improve function class and hemodynamic in patients with CTEPD. Considering hemodynamic improvement in this group of patients after PEA, definition of CTEPH may need to be revised.

Effect of Intermediate-Dose vs Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation on Thrombotic Events, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment, or Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: The INSPIRATION Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Thrombotic events are commonly reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Limited data exist to guide the intensity of antithrombotic prophylaxis. Objective: To evaluate the effects of intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design performed in 10 academic centers in Iran comparing intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (first hypothesis) and statin therapy vs matching placebo (second hypothesis; not reported in this article) among adult patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Patients were recruited between July 29, 2020, and November 19, 2020. The final follow-up date for the 30-day primary outcome was December 19, 2020. Interventions: Intermediate-dose (enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg daily) (n = 276) vs standard prophylactic anticoagulation (enoxaparin, 40 mg daily) (n = 286), with modification according to body weight and creatinine clearance. The assigned treatments were planned to be continued until completion of 30-day follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days, assessed in randomized patients who met the eligibility criteria and received at least 1 dose of the assigned treatment. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (type 3 or 5 definition), powered for noninferiority (a noninferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio), and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20 ×103/µL). All outcomes were blindly adjudicated. Results: Among 600 randomized patients, 562 (93.7%) were included in the primary analysis (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [50-71] years; 237 [42.2%] women). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 126 patients (45.7%) in the intermediate-dose group and 126 patients (44.1%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (absolute risk difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -6.6% to 9.8%]; odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.76-1.48]; P = .70). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (2.5%) in the intermediate-dose group and 4 patients (1.4%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (risk difference, 1.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.4%]; odds ratio, 1.83 [1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.00-5.93]), not meeting the noninferiority criteria (P for noninferiority >.99). Severe thrombocytopenia occurred only in patients assigned to the intermediate-dose group (6 vs 0 patients; risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, 0.4%-3.8%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, did not result in a significant difference in the primary outcome of a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days. These results do not support the routine empirical use of intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation in unselected patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486508.

Evaluation of the Incidence of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension 1 Year After First Episode of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is an important complication after acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with considerable morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to estimate the CTEPH incidence in a cohort after the first occurrence of PE. METHODS: We conducted a 1-year follow-up cohort study between 2015 and 2018 to assess the incidence of CTEPH in 474 patients with their first acute episode of PE. For the diagnosis of CTEPH, patients with unexplained persistent dyspnea during follow-up underwent transthoracic echocardiography, right heart catheterization, ventilation-perfusion lung scanning, and CT pulmonary angiography. RESULTS: Overall, 317 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 56.5 ± 16 years. One hundred and three patients (32%) had exertional dyspnea at the 1-year follow-up. Patients with evidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) on echocardiography underwent right heart catheterization. Eleven patients (18%) had no PH (mPAP < 25 mmHg); 47 patients (81%) had mPAP > 25 mmHg. Fifteen patients had PAWP > 15 mmHg, including those with underlying left heart problems or valvular diseases. There were 32 patients with PAH (mPAP > 25 mmHg and PVR > 3 WU) undergoing CTEPH studies; 22 patients (6.9%) had multiple segmental defects suggesting CTEPH on a perfusion scan. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CTEPH observed in this study 1 year after the first episode of acute PE was approximately 6.9%. This incidence seems to be high in our population, and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for the early identification of CTEPH are needed.

Echocardiographic evaluation of prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in ß-thalassemia major: A cross sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary hypertension is a common complication associated with thalassemia syndromes and it may play an important role in the pathogenesis of right ventricle failure. The true prevalence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with thalassemia major remains unclear and has been reported to be between 2 and 79%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 70 patients with thalassemia major were initially examined. Patients with valvular left heart disease, congenital heart diseases such as atrial septal defect (ASD) and ventricular septal defect (VSD), left heart failure, and chronic embolism were excluded. All patients with thalassemia major underwent echocardiography. Based on tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV), the patients were divided into the following three groups: low, medium, and high risk of pulmonary hypertension. RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 24 y; 60.6% of the subjects were males and 39.4% of the subjects were females. Overall, three (4.5%) subjects were considered at a high risk of pulmonary hypertension. The mean hemoglobin level in the patients with a high probability of pulmonary hypertension was 8.2 g/dL and that in the patients with a low or medium probability of pulmonary hypertension was 9.1 g/dL. No significant difference was observed between the groups (p = .059). CONCLUSION: This study showed that, based on new echocardiography criteria, the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension secondary to ß-thalassemia was 4.5% and there was no correlation between TRV and the number of received blood units or disease duration.

Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived-neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have been shown in many diseases. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published report evaluation of those parameters in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). The aims of this study are to evaluate the parameters in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study in two referral hospitals in Tabriz and Urmia, Iran. NLRs, PLR, LMR, and d-NLR were calculated from the admission day complete blood count of patients with AECOPD. Comparison was made between patients who died in hospital and those discharged alive. RESULT: Of 315 patients, 70 (22.2%) died in the hospital and 245 (77.8%) were discharged alive. The mortality rate was higher in patients with NLR ≥ 4 than with NLR < 4 (24% vs. 9.5% p value < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed NLR (p= 0.001) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. NLR had the highest odds ratio for death both in univariate (OR= 3.80) and multivariate (OR= 3.50) analyses. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for NLR in predicting in-hospital death was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.62-0.81; p< 0.001). PLR and LMR did not show significant relation to in-hospital death in AECOPD. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows for the first time that higher NLR is positively associated with in-hospital mortality in AECOPD.

Massive primary pulmonary artery rhabomyosarcoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary artery sarcomas (PAS) are rare tumours causing an insidiously progressive obstruction of the pulmonary circulation. The clinical presentation is often indistinguishable from chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, the atypical appearance of a heterogeneous filling defect in CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) should prompt further investigation. CASE PRESENTATION: A previously healthy young man presented with massive haemoptysis, acute respiratory distress, and progressive exertional dyspnea since the year before. Echocardiography demonstrated severe right ventricular dysfunction and highly probable pulmonary hypertension. CTPA revealed an extensive filling defect with an appearance concerning PAS. Due to syncopal episodes at rest, the patient underwent urgent pulmonary artery endarterectomy (PEA). A massive tree-like tumour was excised as a result. Post-operatively, reperfusion injury and refractory pulmonary oedema mandated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Unfortunately, ECMO was complicated with massive haemolysis and acute kidney injury. The patient succumbed to multi-organ failure. Through tissue analysis established a diagnosis of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. DISCUSSION: Unfortunately, the patient had not reached out for his worsening dyspnea. PASs should not be mistaken for a thrombus and anticoagulation should be avoided. The urgent condition precluded biopsy and tissue diagnosis. Similarly, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not feasible. Post-operatively, reperfusion injury and pulmonary oedema ensued, which mandated ECMO. This complication should be anticipated preoperatively. There is a need for more data on PASs to establish a consensus for management.

Clot Burden As a Predictor of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension After Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: A small percentage of acute pulmonary thromboembolisms (PTE) persist as chronic fibrin clots, potentially leading to chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). A scoring system for evaluating the burden of acute PTE based on computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) findings was tested for its association with CTEPH within one year. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort of 475 patients with a definitive diagnosis of acute PTE, the Qanadli score (QS) was calculated on the initial CTPA. Through regular follow-up over 1 year, symptomatic patients underwent extensive evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 475 patients enrolled in the study [age 58.3 ± 16.6, 195 (41.1%) female, QS: 13.01 ± 7.37/40], 321 patients completed the study. A total of 22 (6.8%) patients were definitively diagnosed with CTEPH. In univariate analysis, the initial QS was significantly higher in patients with subsequent CTEPH than in patients without (17 ± 5.6 vs. 13 ± 7.6, P = .009). QS was directly associated with CTEPH (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.16, P = .042). The evolution of CTEPH in men could be predicted with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54% when a cut-off point of 14.5 (43.5%) was set for QS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in this setting was 0.74 with a P-value of .032. Qanadli score failed to predict CTEPH in women. CONCLUSION: Scoring the clot burden in the pulmonary arteries through the Qanadli method can predict the evolution of CTEPH only in men 1 year after acute PTE. Women comprise most of the CTEPH patients. Thus, strict follow-up adherence seems to be even more important in women.

Cross-cultural validity of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire in the quality of life survey after pulmonary embolism: A Persian-speaking cohort.

Background: The Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire is the first disease-specific scale for assessing the quality of life in patients with a history of pulmonary embolism (PE). Objectives: To assess the cross-cultural validity and reliability of the disease-specific PEmb-QoL questionnaire. Methods: The Persian version was prepared through the forward and backward translation of the English questionnaire. Six months after the diagnosis of acute PE, consecutive Persian-speaking patients were asked to complete the PEmb-QoL, the generic 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaires and undertake a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Acceptability was assessed via item missing rate, reproducibility by the test-retest method, and internal consistency reliability by Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. Convergence validity was assessed using the Spearman rank correlation between scores of PEmb-QoL, SF-36, and 6MWT. The questionnaire structure was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis. Results: Ninety-six patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PE completed the questionnaires. The Persian version of PEmb-QoL had good internal consistency (α = 0.95, 3-factor ω = 0.96), inter-item correlation (0.3-0.62), item-total correlation (0.38-0.71), reproducibility (test-retest ICC with 25 participants = 0.92-0.99), and good discriminant validity. Convergence validity was confirmed by the moderate-to-high correlations between PEmb-QoL and SF-36 scores, and a good correlation between the "limitation in daily activities" dimension of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire and 6MWT results. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a 3-component structure with functional (items 1h, 4b-5d, 6, 8, 9i, and 9j), symptoms (1b-h, 7, and 8), and emotional (5a, 6, and 9a-h) components. Conclusion: The Persian version of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire is valid and reliable for measuring the disease-specific quality of life in patients with PE.

Atorvastatin versus Placebo in ICU Patients with COVID-19: Ninety-day Results of the INSPIRATION-S Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the INSPIRATION-S trial, atorvastatin versus placebo was associated with a nonsignificant 16% reduction in 30-day composite of venous/arterial thrombosis or death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19. Thrombo-inflammatory response in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may last beyond the first 30 days. METHODS: This article reports the effects of atorvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo on 90-day clinical and functional outcomes from INSPIRATION-S, a double-blind multicenter randomized trial of adult ICU patients with COVID-19. The main outcome for this prespecified study was a composite of adjudicated venous/arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or all-cause mortality. Functional status was assessed with the Post-COVID-19 Functional Scale. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, 587 patients were included (age: 57 [Q1-Q3: 45-68] years; 44% women). By 90-day follow-up, the main outcome occurred in 96 (33.1%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and 113 (38.0%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.05, p = 0.11). Atorvastatin in patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset was associated with reduced 90-day hazard for the main outcome (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.86, p interaction = 0.02). Atorvastatin use was associated with improved 90-day functional status, although the upper bound CI crossed 1.0 (ORordinal: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.01, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin 20 mg compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the 90-day composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous/arterial thrombosis. However, the point estimates do not exclude a potential clinically meaningful treatment effect, especially among patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset (NCT04486508).

Intermediate-Dose versus Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: 90-Day Results from the INSPIRATION Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic complications are considered among the main extrapulmonary manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The optimal type and duration of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy in these patients remain unknown. METHODS: This article reports the final (90-day) results of the Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) study. Patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care were randomized to intermediate-dose versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation for 30 days, irrespective of hospital discharge status. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or all-cause death. The main safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: Of 600 randomized patients, 562 entered the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median age [Q1, Q3]: 62 [50, 71] years; 237 [42.2%] women), of whom 336 (59.8%) survived to hospital discharge. The primary outcome occurred in 132 (47.8%) of patients assigned to intermediate dose and 130 (45.4%) patients assigned to standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.55, p = 0.11). Findings were similar for other efficacy outcomes, and in the landmark analysis from days 31 to 90 (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.45-5.06). There were 7 (2.5%) major bleeding events in the intermediate-dose group (including 3 fatal events) and 4 (1.4%) major bleeding events in the standard-dose group (none fatal) (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.53-6.24). CONCLUSION: Intermediate-dose compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation did not reduce a composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous or arterial thrombosis at 90-day follow-up.

Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism following hospitalization for coronavirus disease 2019: Prospective results from a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: Thrombosis and pulmonary embolism appear to be major causes of mortality in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, few studies have focused on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: In this multi-center study, we followed 1529 COVID-19 patients for at least 45 days after hospital discharge, who underwent routine telephone follow-up. In case of signs or symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), they were invited for an in-hospital visit with a pulmonologist. The primary outcome was symptomatic VTE within 45 days of hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of 1529 COVID-19 patients discharged from hospital, a total of 228 (14.9%) reported potential signs or symptoms of PE or DVT and were seen for an in-hospital visit. Of these, 13 and 12 received Doppler ultrasounds or pulmonary CT angiography, respectively, of whom only one patient was diagnosed with symptomatic PE. Of 51 (3.3%) patients who died after discharge, two deaths were attributed to VTE corresponding to a 45-day cumulative rate of symptomatic VTE of 0.2% (95%CI 0.1%-0.6%; n = 3). There was no evidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in these patients. Other deaths after hospital discharge included myocardial infarction (n = 13), heart failure (n = 9), and stroke (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe a high rate of symptomatic VTE in COVID-19 patients after hospital discharge. Routine extended thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for COVID-19 may not have a net clinical benefit. Randomized trials may be warranted.

Calcified Sister Mary Joseph nodule as the presenting complaint of advanced low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

A healthy 38-year-old woman presented with a hard umbilical mass that has been growing for a few months in duration with no other significant symptoms and signs. Computed tomography images identified a lobulated densely calcified umbilical mass, left ovarian cysts, a subcentimeter calcified omental nodule, and nonspecific punctate pelvic calcifications. Histopathology of the mass revealed low-grade serous carcinoma with postsurgical diagnosis of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV ovarian cancer. This case presentation emphasizes the importance of increased awareness of interpreting radiologists of a seemingly benign appearing imaging finding such as umbilical calcification on CT as a sign of intra-abdominal/pelvic malignancies.

Intermediate versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation and statin therapy versus placebo in critically-ill patients with COVID-19: Rationale and design of the INSPIRATION/INSPIRATION-S studies.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular and macrovascular thrombotic events are among the hallmarks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Furthermore, the exuberant immune response is considered an important driver of pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. The optimal management strategy to prevent thrombosis in critically-ill patients with COVID-19 remains unknown. METHODS: The Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) and INSPIRATION-statin (INSPIRATION-S) studies test two independent hypotheses within a randomized controlled trial with 2 × 2 factorial design. Hospitalized critically-ill patients with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 will be randomized to intermediate-dose versus standard dose prophylactic anticoagulation. The 600 patients undergoing this randomization will be screened and if meeting the eligibility criteria, will undergo an additional double-blind stratified randomization to atorvastatin 20 mg daily versus matching placebo. The primary endpoint, for both hypotheses will be tested for superiority and includes a composite of adjudicated acute arterial thrombosis, venous thromboembolism (VTE), use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all-cause death within 30 days from enrollment. Key secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, adjudicated VTE, and ventilator-free days. Key safety endpoints include major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20,000/fL) for the anticoagulation hypothesis. In a prespecified secondary analysis for non-inferiority, the study will test for the non-inferiority of intermediate intensity versus standard dose anticoagulation for major bleeding, considering a non-inferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio. Key safety endpoints for the statin hypothesis include rise in liver enzymes >3 times upper normal limit and clinically-diagnosed myopathy. The primary analyses will be performed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Results will be tested in exploratory analyses across key subgroups and in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRATION and INSPIRATON-S studies will help address clinically-relevant questions for antithrombotic therapy and thromboinflammatory therapy in critically-ill patients with COVID-19.

Does absolute neutrophilia predict early congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is usually associated with increased neutrophil count. However, it has not clearly been defined whether neutrophilia can cause myocardial injury. In this study, we hypothesized that absolute neutrophilia can predict the occurrence of congestive heart failure (CHF) after AMI. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on 312 patients with a diagnosis of AMI. Patients with a history of chest pain for more than 12 hours before admission, heart failure with Killip class III and IV, history of recent gastrointestinal bleeding, major trauma, infection, malignancy, renal failure and corticosteroid consumption were excluded. A blood sample was drawn for leukocyte count and an echocardiogram was obtained 4 days after admission. Congestive heart failure was defined as an ejection fraction less than 40% on echocardiogram or clinical heart failure according to the Framingham's criteria for diagnosis of heart failure. RESULTS: After excluding 19 patients, data for 293 patients were analyzed. Among them, 152 (51.9%) patients developed new onset CHF. Two hundred and two patients (68.9%) had neutrophilia (neutrophil count >7500/mic/lit). The risk of developing heart failure was higher in patients with neutrophilia (OR = 2.32; 95% CI = 1.33-4.03, P = 0.000). There was a negative correlation between ejection fraction and neutrophil count (r = -0.191, P = 0.000). After adjustment for age, sex, serum creatinine level, peak enzyme CK-MB level and MI location, the relationship between the absolute neutrophil count and the presence of congestive heart failure remained significant (OR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.19-3.84, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that the presence of absolute neutrophilia during the first 12 hours after AMI can predict the occurrence of CHF. This association may help identify high-risk individuals, who might benefit from more aggressive interventions.

Pregnancy outcome in a pregnant patient with idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and progressive condition which is aggravated by the physiologic changes during pregnancy. Because of high mortality rate, most physicians recommend early termination of pregnancy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we describe a case of a 30-year-old primigravida Caucasian housewife with functional class 1 idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and a positive vasoreactive response to adenosine who had a full-term non-complicated delivery. Right-sided heart catheterization before the pregnancy showed severe pulmonary hypertension with mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 60 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance of 12.2 WU. Vasoreactivity was positive after infusion of 200 µg/kg per minute adenosine. During pregnancy, she did not receive medication other than prophylactic enoxaparin. She had an elective cesarean section under general anesthesia at 39 weeks of gestation without complication and delivered a healthy baby. After delivery, her hemodynamic status was stable. One month postpartum, she was in a stable clinical condition in functional class 1. CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, decreased mortality has been observed over recent years particularly in patients with well-controlled pulmonary pressure and a positive vasoreactivity test.

Thyrotoxicosis presenting as exertional dyspnea and pulmonary hypertension: Case report and review of literature.

OBJECTIVES: In this case study, we describe a 35-year-old woman with pulmonary hypertension that was secondary to thyrotoxicosis who presented with exertional dyspnea. In the approach to exertional dyspnea, detailed physical examination and laboratory findings helped to get the diagnosis. METHODS: Echocardiography showed right ventricular systolic pressure = 60 mmHg. A suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone was seen in lab tests. The patient was treated with radioactive iodine. RESULTS: Palpitations and shortness of breath improved, and both her thyroid-stimulating hormone and T4 levels decreased. Echocardiography and the pulmonary pressure were normal after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Thyrotoxicosis is one of the etiologies of pulmonary hypertension, but the exact etiology and pathogenesis remain unknown. Some patients may have symptomatic pulmonary hypertension that can be resolved by hyperthyroidism treatment.

Safety Profile of Liver FibroScan in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

Background. Emerging evidence suggests that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with coronary artery diseases and arrhythmias. The FibroScan (Echosens, France), a widely available, noninvasive device, is able to detect liver fibrosis and steatosis within this patient population. However, the FibroScan is currently contraindicated in patients with cardiac pacemakers (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Objective. To determine the safety profile of FibroScan testing in patients with PM or ICD. Methods. Consecutive outpatients undergoing routine device interrogations at a tertiary level teaching hospital underwent simultaneous liver stiffness measurements. PM or ICD performance data, device types, patient demographics, medical history, and previous laboratory and conventional liver imaging results were collected. Results. Analysis of 107 subjects with 33 different types of implanted cardiac devices, from 5 different companies (Medtronic, Sorin, ELA Medical, Boston Scientific, and St. Jude), did not demonstrate any adverse events as defined by abnormal device sensing/pacing or ICD firing. This population included high risk subjects undergoing active pacing (n = 53) and with right pectoral PM placement (n = 1). None of the subjects had any clinical signs of decompensated congestive heart failure or cirrhosis during the exam. Conclusion. TE with FibroScan can be safely performed in patients with PM or ICD.