Role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in clinical hepatology.

Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis frequently require critical care management for sepsis, HE, respiratory failure, acute variceal bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), shock, and optimization for liver transplantation, while outpatients have unique care considerations. Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) enhances bedside examination of the hepatobiliary system and relevant extrahepatic sites. POCUS includes cardiac US and is used to assess volume status and hemodynamic parameters like cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac contractility, and pulmonary artery pressure, which aid in the early and accurate diagnosis of heart failure, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, porto-pulmonary hypertension, hepatopulmonary syndrome, arrhythmia, and pulmonary embolism. This also helps in fluid management and vasopressor use in the resuscitation of patients with cirrhosis. Lung ultrasound (LUS) can help in differentiating pneumonia, effusion, and edema. Further, US guides interventions such as line placement, drainage of abdominal collections/abscesses, relief of tension pneumothorax, drainage of pleural and pericardial effusions, and biliary drainage in cholangitis. Additionally, its role is essential to assess liver masses foci of sepsis, for appropriate sites for paracentesis, and to assess for vascular disorders such as portal vein or hepatic vein thrombosis. Renal US can identify renal and postrenal causes of AKI and aid in diagnosis of prerenal AKI through volume assessment. In this review, we address the principles and methods of POCUS in hospitalized patients and in outpatients with cirrhosis and discuss the application of this diverse modality in clinical hepatology.

Liver transplantation for acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver (ACLF) are distinct phenotypes of liver failure and, thus, need to be compared and contrasted for appropriate management. There has been a significant improvement in the outcomes of these patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Survival post-LT for ALF and ACLF ranges between 90% and 95% and 80% and 90% at 1 year, futility criteria have been described in both ALF and ACLF where organ failures define survival. Plasma exchange and continuous renal replacement therapy may serve as bridging therapies. Identifying the futility of LT is as necessary as the utility of LT in patients with ALF and ACLF. The role of regenerative therapies such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in ACLF and hepatocyte and xenotransplantation in both conditions remains uncertain. Measures to increase the donor pool through increasing deceased donor transplants in Asian countries, living donations in Western countries, auxiliary liver transplants, and ABO-incompatible liver transplants are necessary to improve the survival of these patients. In this review, we discuss the similarities and differences in clinical characteristics and the timing and outcomes of LT for ALF and ACLF, briefly highlighting the role of bridging therapies and providing an overview of recent advances in the management of ALF and ACLF.

Early living donor liver transplantation for alcohol-associated hepatitis: Status in the era of increasing demand, unmet needs, and future considerations.

Hazardous alcohol consumption is the leading cause of liver disease worldwide. Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is an acute and serious presentation of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) that is associated with high short-term mortality. Medical management remains limited to corticosteroid therapy and intensive nutrition but improves survival in less than 50% of individuals. Liver transplantation (LT) is increasingly recognized as a treatment option for many patients with AH and may lead to greater survival benefit than medical management alone. The rate of wait-listings and LTs for AH has doubled in recent years, especially in the US. Several studies from the West have reported early LT for AH to be successful, where deceased donor LT is the norm. The challenges of LT in living donor centers, particularly for those with AH, are unique and have previously not been discussed in depth. In this review, we aim to discuss the challenges unique to LDLT with respect to candidate and donor selection, ethical considerations, disparities in LDLT, post-LT alcohol relapse, and measures to prevent them while also addressing the definitions and outcomes of early-living donor liver LT (eLDLT) for AH.

Safety and efficacy of continuous terlipressin infusion in HRS-AKI in a transplant population.

Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While liver transplantation is the definitive treatment, continuous terlipressin infusion for HRS-AKI may provide benefit and, as such, was assessed in a population composed of candidates for liver transplant (LT). Fifty hospitalized LT-eligible patients with HRS-AKI received a single bolus followed by continuous terlipressin infusion. Acute-on-chronic liver failure grade 3, serum creatinine (SCr)>5.0 mg/dL, or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) ≥35 were exclusions. Fifty hospitalized patients who received midodrine and octreotide or norepinephrine for HRS-AKI served as a historical comparator cohort. Complete response (CR) was defined as a ≥30% decrease in SCr with end-of-treatment (EOT) SCr≤1.5, partial response as a ≥30% decrease in SCr with EOT SCr>1.5, and nonresponse as a <30% decrease in SCr. CR rate was significantly higher in the terlipressin cohort compared to the historical cohort (64% vs. 16%, p <0.001). Survival, while numerically higher in those who received terlipressin, was statistically similar (D30: 94% vs. 82%, p =0.12; D90: 78% vs. 68%, p =0.37). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) was more common among terlipressin NR than CR and PR (70% vs. 3% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). EOT MELD and SCr were significantly lower within terlipressin cohort (MELD: 19 vs. 25, SCr: 1.4 vs. 2.1 mg/dL, p <0.001). Sixteen of 40 terlipressin-treated patients received LT-alone (terlipressin CR in 10/16). One patient on terlipressin had a hypoxic respiratory failure that responded to diuretics; one possibly had drug-related rash. With continuous terlipressin infusion, a CR rate of 64% was observed with a favorable safety profile. Terlipressin use was associated with lower EOT MELD and SCr than the historical midodrine and octreotide/norepinephrine cohort; LT-alone was accomplished in a high proportion of complete terlipressin responders.

Surgical risk stratification in patients with cirrhosis.

Individuals with cirrhosis experience higher morbidity and mortality rates than the general population, irrespective of the type or scope of surgery. This increased risk is attributed to adverse effects of liver disease, encompassing coagulation dysfunction, altered metabolism of anesthesia and sedatives, immunologic dysfunction, hemorrhage related to varices, malnutrition and frailty, impaired wound healing, as well as diminished portal blood flow, overall hepatic circulation, and hepatic oxygen supply during surgical procedures. Therefore, a frequent clinical dilemma is whether surgical interventions should be pursued in patients with cirrhosis. Several risk scores are widely used to aid in the decision-making process, each with specific advantages and limitations. This review aims to discuss the preoperative risk factors in patients with cirrhosis, describe and compare surgical risk assessment models used in everyday practice, provide insights into the surgical risk according to the type of surgery and present recommendations for optimizing those with cirrhosis for surgical procedures. As the primary focus is on currently available risk models, the review describes the predictive value of each model, highlighting its specific advantages and limitations. Furthermore, for models that do not account for the type of surgical procedure to be performed, the review suggests incorporating both patient-related and surgery-related risks into the decision-making process. Finally, we provide an algorithm for the preoperative assessment of patients with cirrhosis before elective surgery as well as guidance perioperative management.

Review article: Evaluation and care of the critically ill patient with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The increase in prevalence of liver disease globally will lead to a substantial incremental burden on intensive care requirements. While liver transplantation offers a potential life-saving intervention, not all patients are eligible due to limitations such as organ availability, resource constraints, ongoing sepsis or multiple organ failures. Consequently, the focus of critical care of patients with advanced and decompensated cirrhosis turns to liver-centric intensive care protocols, to mitigate the high mortality in such patients. AIM: Provide an updated and comprehensive understanding of cirrhosis management in critical care, and which includes emergency care, secondary organ failure management (mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, haemodynamic support and intensive care nutrition), use of innovative liver support systems, infection control, liver transplantation and palliative and end-of life care. METHODS: We conducted a structured bibliographic search on PubMed, sourcing articles published up to 31 March 2024, to cover topics addressed. We considered data from observational studies, recommendations of society guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, and incorporated our clinical expertise in liver critical care. RESULTS: Critical care management of the patient with cirrhosis has evolved over time while mortality remains high despite aggressive management with liver transplantation serving as a crucial but not universally available resource. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of organ support therapies, intensive care protocols, nutrition, palliative care and end-of-life discussions and decisions are an integral part of critical care of the patient with cirrhosis. A multi-disciplinary approach towards critical care management is likely to yield better outcomes.

Impacts of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on the risk of adverse liver outcomes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We examined the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) initiation on long-term Adverse Liver Outcomes (ALO) in patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes using real-world data from the MarketScan database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MASLD cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes between 2012 and 2020. Cox proportional hazard models examine the association between GLP-1RAs initiation, modelled as time-dependent, and the risk of ALO, a composite endpoint defined by the first occurrence of hepatic decompensation(s), portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver transplantation (LT). We used Overlap Propensity Score Weighting (OPSW) to account for confounding. The study included 459 GLP-1RAs and 4837 non-GLP-1RAs patients. RESULTS: The non-GLP-1RAs patients presented with 1411 (29%) ALO over 7431.7 person years, while GLP-1RAs patients had 32 (7%) ALO over 586.6 person years - risk rate difference 13.5 (95% CI: 11.4-15.7) per 100 person-years. The OPSW-adjusted risk of ALO was reduced by 36% (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.54-0.76) in patients with vs. without GLP-1RAs initiation. GLP-1RAs initiation was associated with significant reductions in the adjusted risk of hepatic decompensation (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61-0.88), portal hypertension (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.60-0.88), HCC (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20-0.63) and LT (HR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.43). CONCLUSION: The use of GLP-1RAs was associated with significant risk reductions in long-term adverse liver outcomes, including hepatic decompensation, portal hypertension, HCC and LT, in MASLD cirrhosis patients with type 2 diabetes.

African American race does not confer an increased risk of clinical events in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) among African Americans (AA) is not well understood. METHODS: Transplant-free survival and hepatic decompensation-free survival were assessed using a retrospective research registry from 16 centers throughout North America. Patients with PSC alive without liver transplantation after 2008 were included. Diagnostic delay was defined from the first abnormal liver test to the first abnormal cholangiogram/liver biopsy. Socioeconomic status was imputed by the Zip code. RESULTS: Among 850 patients, 661 (77.8%) were non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs), and 85 (10.0%) were AA. There were no significant differences by race in age at diagnosis, sex, or PSC type. Inflammatory bowel disease was more common in NHWs (75.8% vs. 51.8% p=0.0001). The baseline (median, IQR) Amsterdam-Oxford Model score was lower in NHWs (14.3, 13.4-15.2 vs. 15.1, 14.1-15.7, p=0.002), but Mayo risk score (0.03, -0.8 to 1.1 vs. 0.02, -0.7 to 1.0, p=0.83), Model for End-stage Liver Disease (5.9, 2.8-10.7 vs. 6.4, 2.6-10.4, p=0.95), and cirrhosis (27.4% vs. 27.1%, p=0.95) did not differ. Race was not associated with hepatic decompensation, and after adjusting for clinical variables, neither race nor socioeconomic status was associated with transplant-free survival. Variables independently associated with death/liver transplant (HR, 95% CI) included age at diagnosis (1.04, 1.02-1.06, p<0.0001), total bilirubin (1.06, 1.04-1.08, p<0.0001), and albumin (0.44, 0.33-0.61, p<0.0001). AA race did not affect the performance of prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS: AA patients with PSC have a lower rate of inflammatory bowel disease but similar progression to hepatic decompensation and liver transplant/death compared to NHWs.

Improving Outcomes in Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury With Early Diagnoses and Implementation of Approved Treatment Regimens.

Decompensated cirrhosis, defined by the overt manifestations of liver failure and portal hypertension (eg, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), is the inflection point associated with increased morbidity and mortality in chronic liver disease. Acute kidney injury in the setting of cirrhosis (hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury [HRS-AKI]) is a severe and often fatal complication. The goals of treatment of HRS-AKI are to reverse renal failure and prolong survival in these critically ill patients or perhaps to allow the transplant team to complete the pretransplant evaluation and bridge the patient to transplant. Historically, in the United States, standard-of-care treatments for HRS-AKI were chosen by default despite lack of data, off-label use, and suboptimal results. Terlipressin represents the first drug in the United States indicated for the treatment of HRS-AKI. This review provides an up-to-date overview of HRS-AKI, discusses terlipressin and how to incorporate this new treatment into patient care and streamline society guidelines on HRS diagnosis and treatment in a practical way for clinical use, and concludes with a sample order set that highlights the recommendations discussed throughout the supplement.

Hepatotoxicity after prolonged use of acetaminophen: a case report

La toxicidad producida por la subredosis de acetaminofen es un problema bien conocido en casos de intentos de suicidio con este medicamento. Se presenta un caso donde la paciente desarrolla síntoma y signos clínicos consistentes con una hepatitis aguda secundaria al uso prolongado de acetaminofen. Se discuten las características histológicas de la toxicidad hepática y el metabolismo de la droga en condiciones normales y en casos de sobredosis. Tambíen se menciona el tratamiento del envenenamiento por acetaminofen. Se recomienza no usar la preparación extrafuerte (500mg) en pacientes con enfermedad hepática a menos que están bajo estricta supervisión médica