Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Med Care ; 60(4): 316-320, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999634

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Understanding how medical scribes impact care delivery can inform decision-makers who must balance the cost of hiring scribes with their contribution to alleviating clinician burden. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand how scribes impacted provider efficiency and satisfaction. DESIGN: This was mixed-methods study. PARTICIPANTS: Internal and family medicine clinicians were included. MEASURES: We administered structured surveys and conducted unstructured interviews with clinicians who adopted scribes. We collected average days to close charts and quantity of after-hours clinical work in the 6 months before and after implementation using electronic health record data. We conducted a difference in difference (DID) analysis using a multilevel Poisson regression. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the interviews: (1) charting time is less after training; (2) clinicians wanted to continue working with scribes; and (3) scribes did not reduce the overall inbox burden. In the 6-month survey, 76% of clinicians endorsed that working with a scribe improved work satisfaction versus 50% at 1 month. After implementation, days to chart closure decreased [DID=0.38 fewer days; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.61, -0.15] the average minutes worked after hours on clinic days decreased (DID=-11.5 min/d; 95% CI: -13.1, -9.9) as did minutes worked on nonclinical days (DID=-24.9 min/d; 95% CI: -28.1, -21.7). CONCLUSIONS: Working with scribes was associated with reduced time to close charts and reduced time using the electronic health record, markers of efficiency. Increased satisfaction accrued once scribes had experience.


Subject(s)
Documentation , Physicians , Cognition , Documentation/methods , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Patient Satisfaction
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 71(5): 1781-1788, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31843297

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clostridium septicum is an anaerobic, motile, spore-forming, toxin-producing gram-positive bacillus that can lead to rapidly progressive gas gangrene due to the release of alpha toxin. Aortic aneurysm secondary to C. septicum infection is a rare condition with 60 cases reported in the literature; however, we have recently treated several patients with the condition in our large tertiary care and aortic center. METHODS: Blood and tissue culture results collected between January 2005 and January 2018 and maintained in the microbiology laboratory database at the Cleveland Clinic were reviewed to identify those with C. septicum reported. Each was reviewed to determine radiographic or histopathologic correlation with aortic disease. RESULTS: Seven cases of C. septicum aortitis were reviewed. Underlying malignant disease was found in four cases and a history of remote malignant disease in one case. The most common location for infection was the infrarenal abdominal aorta. Vascular surgery had previously been performed in three of the cases. Five of the seven patients underwent operative repair. All patients were treated with ß-lactam antibiotics. The two patients who did not undergo an operation died, which is consistent with the 100% mortality described in the literature. Of the five patients who underwent an operation, there was only one documented survivor and one was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest reported case series, only a small percentage of patients with C. septicum-infected aortic aneurysms survived >1 year. In the patients described, those who did not receive an operation had 100% mortality. Earlier recognition and prompt operation with appropriate antimicrobial therapy are needed to improve the outcome of patients diagnosed with this rare infection.


Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Infected/microbiology , Aortic Aneurysm/microbiology , Clostridium septicum , Gas Gangrene/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Aneurysm, Infected/mortality , Aneurysm, Infected/therapy , Aortic Aneurysm/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm/therapy , Gas Gangrene/mortality , Gas Gangrene/therapy , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/mortality , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Survival Rate
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(7): 1972-1977, 2018 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29684172

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Patients receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) may require emergency department (ED) visits to manage complications. This study's purpose was to identify risk factors for ED visits during OPAT and risk factors for hospitalization among patients with ED visits. Methods: All OPAT courses initiated between 1 January 2013 and 1 January 2017 at Cleveland Clinic were identified. The first OPAT course per patient was included. For these, ED visits within 30 days were identified. Reasons and risk factors for these visits were sought, as were risk factors for hospitalization among patients visiting the ED. Results: Among 8263 patients on OPAT, 381 (4.6%) had at least one ED visit, an additional 1133 (14%) were hospitalized and an additional 50 (0.6%) died, within 30 days. One hundred and ninety-three ED visits (51%) were OPAT related. In a multivariable subdistribution proportional hazards competing risks regression model, prior ED visit (preceding year) was most strongly associated with ED visits (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.76-2.98, P = 8.1 × 10-10). Eighty-five visits (22%) led to hospitalization. Compared with non-OPAT-related reasons, visits for vascular access complications were associated with lower odds of hospitalization (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.83, P = 0.022) and visits for worsening infection with higher odds (OR 18.95, 95% CI 5.50-79.85, P = 1.2 × 10-7). Conclusions: Compared with patients without, patients with prior ED visit have a 2.3-fold higher hazard of an ED visit within 30 days of OPAT initiation. Visits for worsening infection are much more likely to result in hospitalization than those for vascular access complications.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Infections/complications , Infections/drug therapy , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infections/microbiology , Infections/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(2): 318-321, 2018 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28722286

ABSTRACT

Infections involving internal cardiac devices can be very challenging to treat, and almost universally require complete device extraction for successful management. Of the pathogens that cause device-related endocarditis, fungi such as Candida albicans are notoriously difficult to manage because of their propensity to produce large vegetations and the need for long-term treatment with potentially toxic medications. Furthermore, individuals who develop fungal, device-associated endocarditis are typically among the most complex patients, with significant comorbidities that place them at high risk for open heart procedures such as surgical device extraction. We present a case of one such patient in whom treatment of Candida albicans device-related endocarditis was managed using AngioVac® aspiration of a large right atrial vegetation with simultaneous laser sheath extraction of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.


Subject(s)
Candida albicans/growth & development , Candidiasis/therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Device Removal/methods , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Vascular Access Devices , Adult , Candidiasis/diagnosis , Candidiasis/microbiology , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Suction/instrumentation
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(2): 506-12, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26510718

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The need for indwelling vascular access for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) places patients at risk of vascular access complications. The purpose of this study was to describe vascular access complications during OPAT at home, and identify factors associated with their occurrence. METHODS: All OPAT courses carried out at home for patients at Cleveland Clinic in 2013 were identified from the institution's OPAT registry. The first OPAT course per patient was included. Vascular access complications that occurred during the treatment course were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Only complications that triggered a clinical intervention were included. RESULTS: The 1461 included OPAT courses encompassed 33,579 OPAT days of treatment. One-hundred-and-forty-four vascular access complications occurred in 131 OPAT courses (9% of OPAT courses, 4.29 complications per 1000 OPAT days). The most common complication was occlusion (53% of all complications). Hickman catheters [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-0.63] and indwelling ports (IRR 0.25, 95% CI 0.04-0.78) were associated with lower complication rates than peripherally inserted central catheters, as was increasing age (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00). Log OPAT duration (IRR 1.60, 95% CI 1.28-2.03), female sex (IRR 1.62, 95% CI 1.16-2.28) and injection drug use (IRR 3.32, 1.16-7.46) were associated with increased risk of vascular access complications. CONCLUSIONS: Nine percent of OPAT courses at home have at least one vascular access complication requiring clinical intervention. Longer OPAT duration, younger age, female sex and injection drug use are associated with increased risk of vascular access complications.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Catheterization/adverse effects , Home Infusion Therapy/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/methods , Catheterization/methods , Female , Home Infusion Therapy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ohio , Outpatients , Young Adult
6.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 69(1): 228-33, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23887864

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Laboratory tests are usually requested for monitoring during outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), but these recommendations are not always followed. The purpose of this study was to determine whether rehospitalization during the OPAT course is associated with the availability of these test results to the treating physician. METHODS: Electronic health records (EHRs) from all patients in the Cleveland Clinic OPAT registry with start dates from 1 January to 28 February 2011 were reviewed in a retrospective cohort study. Comprehensive data on patient and OPAT characteristics were obtained for the first OPAT course per patient. Availability of laboratory test results was defined as documentation of results of at least one recommended test in the health system's EHR. Proportions of patients rehospitalized were compared for OPAT courses with test results available and non-available. Adjustments were made for patient age, hospital length of stay, anticipated OPAT duration, OPAT site and Charlson comorbidity index score. RESULTS: Four hundred patients received OPAT during the study period; 60% at home, 36% in skilled nursing facilities or long-term acute care facilities and 4% in other settings. Recommended monitoring laboratory test results were available to infectious disease physicians in 291 (73%) OPAT episodes. There were 82 patient readmissions (21%) while on OPAT. In a multivariable logistic regression model, non-availability of recommended test results was independently associated with readmissions while on OPAT (adjusted OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.36-4.73). CONCLUSIONS: Non-availability of recommended test results to treating physicians for patients on OPAT is associated with increased readmissions during OPAT.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Infusions, Parenteral , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 69(5): 1407-15, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24398341

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Vancomycin and daptomycin are the two most frequently prescribed parenteral antimicrobials for resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections. The purpose of this study was to compare antimicrobial adverse event rates and associated healthcare interventions and healthcare utilization in patients treated with the two antimicrobials. METHODS: All patients aged ≥18 years, discharged home from Cleveland Clinic on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with daptomycin or vancomycin between 1 July 2007 and 30 June 2010 were screened. Logistic regression models were built to calculate propensity to be treated with daptomycin for each patient. Propensity score-matched vancomycin-treated controls were identified for each daptomycin-treated patient. Adverse event, healthcare intervention and healthcare utilization rates during OPAT were compared in the matched cohort using negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: One thousand, two hundred and eighty-eight patients were identified. Three-to-one matching provided the best matching characteristics and identified 119 daptomycin-treated subjects (2518 OPAT days) and 357 vancomycin-treated controls (6649 OPAT days). The mean patient age was 56 years and the mean OPAT duration was 19 days. Antimicrobial adverse event rates for the daptomycin and vancomycin groups were 3.2 and 7.7 per 1000 OPAT days, respectively [relative risk (RR) 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.86; P = 0.02]. Antimicrobial intervention rates were 5.6 and 27.1 per 1000 OPAT days, respectively (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.11-0.36; P < 0.001). Readmissions for worsening infection or treatment complication were not significantly different between daptomycin (5%) and vancomycin (7%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving daptomycin at home have 60% fewer antimicrobial adverse events and require 80% fewer antimicrobial interventions than similar patients receiving vancomycin.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Daptomycin/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Home Infusion Therapy/adverse effects , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
8.
Vasc Med ; 19(6): 500-6, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25362111

ABSTRACT

Cerebral angiography is an invasive procedure utilized without supporting guidelines in preoperative evaluations of infective endocarditis (IE). It is used to identify mycotic intracranial aneurysm, which is suspected to increase the risk of intracranial bleeding during cardiac surgery. Our objectives were to: (1) assess the utility of cerebral angiography by determining which subset of IE patients benefit from its performance; and (2) identify clinical and noninvasive screening tests that can preclude the need for invasive cerebral angiography. Retrospective analysis was performed of all patients treated surgically for IE from 7/2007 to 1/2012 and discharged with medical treatment for IE from 7/2007 to 7/2009 presenting to a large academic center. Of the 151 patients who underwent cerebral angiography, mycotic aneurysm was identified in seven (prevalence=4.6%; 95% CI 2.3-9.3%). Five had viridans group streptococci as the causative IE microorganism (p=0.0017). Noninvasive imaging and particularly absence of intracranial bleed on magnetic resonance imaging conveys a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.977 (95% CI 0.879-0.996). Absence of a focal neurologic deficit or altered mental status convey a NPV of 0.990 (95% CI 0.945-0.998) and 0.944 (95% CI 0.883-0.974), respectively. Clinical suspicion for mycotic aneurysm and thus utilization of cerebral angiography is likely necessary only in the setting of acute neurologic deficits and when noninvasive imaging demonstrates acute intracranial bleed. A novel association between viridans group streptococci and intracranial mycotic aneurysm is demonstrated.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Angiography , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aneurysm, Infected/diagnosis , Cerebral Angiography/methods , Female , Humans , Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Retrospective Studies
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36731111

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report a unique case of pacemaker-related infective endocarditis manifesting as endogenous endophthalmitis with chorioretinitis secondary to Histoplasma capsulatum. METHOD: Case Report. RESULTS: A 75-year-old man was diagnosed with blood culture-negative infective endocarditis and was admitted with deteriorating vision and ocular inflammation. Examination of the eye indicated significant vitreous inflammation and retinitis. Vitreous cultures were negative, but universal fungal PCR of the vitreous fluid was positive for Histoplasma capsulatum. Histopathology of the fibrous cuff around the extracted right atrial lead demonstrated hyphal and yeast forms and PCR of this material identified Histoplasma capsulatum. Despite aggressive antifungal and surgical treatment, the eye became phthisical. CONCLUSION: We highlight the importance of considering Histoplasma capsulatum in the differential diagnosis of endogenous endophthalmitis, particularly among patients from endemic areas who present with possible endovascular infection.

10.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 55(2): 557-60, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21115798

ABSTRACT

Sepsis and multisystem organ failure are common diagnoses affecting nearly three-quarters of a million Americans annually. Infection is the leading cause of death in acute kidney injury, and the majority of critically ill patients who receive continuous dialysis also receive antibiotics. Dialysis equipment and prescriptions have gradually changed over time, raising concern that current drug dosing recommendations in the literature may result in underdosing of antibiotics. Our research group directed its attention toward antibiotic dosing strategies in patients with acute renal failure (ARF), and we sought data confirming that patients receiving continuous dialysis and antibiotics actually were achieving therapeutic plasma drug levels during treatment. In the course of those investigations, we explored "fast-track" strategies to estimate plasma drug concentrations. As most antimicrobial antibiotics are small molecules and should pass freely through modern high-flux hemodialyzer filters, we hypothesized that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) effluent could be used as the medium for drug concentration measurement by reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Here we present the first data demonstrating this approach for piperacillin-tazobactam. Paired blood and dialysate trough-peak-trough samples were drawn from 19 patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). Total, free, and dialysate drug concentrations were measured by HPLC. Dialysate drug levels predicted plasma free drug levels well (r(2) = 0.91 and 0.92 for piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively) in all patients. These data suggest a strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring that minimizes blood loss from phlebotomy and simplifies analytic procedures.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Dialysis Solutions/chemistry , Drug Monitoring/methods , Renal Dialysis/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Hemofiltration/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Penicillanic Acid/administration & dosage , Penicillanic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Penicillanic Acid/analysis , Penicillanic Acid/pharmacokinetics , Penicillanic Acid/therapeutic use , Piperacillin/administration & dosage , Piperacillin/analysis , Piperacillin/pharmacokinetics , Piperacillin/therapeutic use , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination , Tazobactam
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 51 Suppl 2: S176-82, 2010 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20731575

ABSTRACT

The evolution of methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has demanded serious review of antimicrobial use and development of new agents and revised approaches to prevent and overcome drug resistance. Depending on local conditions and patient risk factors, empirical therapy of suspected S. aureus infection may require coverage of drug-resistant organisms with newer agents and novel antibiotic combinations. The question of treatment with inappropriate antibiotics raises grave concerns with regard to methicillin-resistant S. aureus selection, overgrowth, and increased virulence. Several strategies to reduce the nosocomial burden of resistance are suggested, including shortened hospital stays and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy of the most serious infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Vancomycin Resistance , Ambulatory Care/methods , Biological Evolution , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Evolution, Molecular , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based , Humans , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
12.
Phys Sportsmed ; 38(4): 35-47, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21150140

ABSTRACT

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend vaccinations from birth through adulthood for lifetime protection against many diseases and infections. Healthy, active adults need to be vaccinated for personal protection against infection as well as associated health benefits (eg, ability to maintain their daily activities). Immunization also reduces the risk of an individual transmitting infection to others, thereby conferring protection to his or her entire community. In the United States, influenza and pertussis (part of the trivalent Tdap) vaccines are recommended for every adult. There are other important vaccines for adults: the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is recommended for every adult female aged up to 26 years, shingles vaccine is recommended for all adults aged ≥ 60 years, and pneumococcal vaccine is recommended based on age (all adults aged ≥ 65 years) and risk factors. Hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and meningococcal vaccines are recommended for adults with certain risk factors or conditions that increase their risk for serious complications (ie, there are no age-based recommendations for these vaccines in adults). Catch-up vaccination is also recommended for adults who have no evidence or proof of immunity to selected, traditionally childhood infections (ie, measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella). Despite the established safety and efficacy of vaccines for disease prevention, millions of adults who should be vaccinated are not, resulting in substantial and avoidable morbidity and mortality, as well as health care expenditures. It is incumbent on health care providers to raise awareness among their adult patients and encourage vaccination, thereby improving uptake among eligible adults. Routine vaccination into adulthood must be viewed as standard of care and an integral component of a comprehensive preventive care program.


Subject(s)
Immunization Schedule , Primary Prevention , Sports Medicine , Vaccination/standards , Adult , Humans , Risk Factors , Travel
13.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 7(10): ofaa398, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33033731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although widely accepted for adults, the safety of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in very old patients has not been examined. METHODS: Nonagenarians (age ≥90 years) discharged from the hospital on OPAT over a 5-year period were identified from the Cleveland Clinic OPAT Registry. Three matched controls (<90 years) were selected for each nonagenarian. Times to OPAT-related emergency department (ED) visit and OPAT-related readmission were compared across the 2 groups in multivariable subdistribution proportional hazards competing risks regression models. Incidence of adverse drug events and vascular access complications were compared using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Of 126 nonagenarians and 378 controls, 7 were excluded for various reasons. Among the remaining 497 subjects, 306 (62%) were male, 311 (63%) were treated for cardiovascular or osteoarticular infections, and 363 (73%) were discharged to a residential health care facility. The mean (SD) ages of nonagenarians and controls were 92 (2) and 62 (16) years, respectively. Compared with matched controls, being a nonagenarian was not associated with increased risk of OPAT-related ED visit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.33-1.80; P = .55), OPAT-related readmission (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.28-2.16; P = .63), adverse drug event from OPAT medications (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.43-2.17; P = .99), or vascular access complications (IRR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.27-1.51; P = .32). Nonagenarians had a higher risk of death overall (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.52-4.58; P < .001), but deaths were not from OPAT complications. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with younger patients, OPAT in nonagenarians is not associated with higher risk of OPAT-related complications. OPAT can be provided as safely to nonagenarians as to younger patients.

14.
Sleep Med ; 73: 181-186, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32846280

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Many healthcare workers live with sleep disorders and may be unaware of their condition. We aimed to ascertain sleep disorder symptoms including high-risk obstructive sleep apnea (hrOSA), significant insomnia, and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) by work shift in a sample of healthcare workers. We aim to inform the development of a mobile application for sleep disorder screening and electronically-delivered follow-up recommendations. METHODS: An initial survey, including the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) for EDS, Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) for insomnia, and STOP questionnaire for hrOSA, was completed by healthcare workers at the Cleveland Clinic. A follow-up survey sent ∼3-6 months after screening assessed perceptions of the utility of screening and subsequent actions taken by those with abnormal scores. RESULTS: 871 of 2851 (30.7%) workers who participated had abnormal ESS scores, with a significantly greater portion of night shift workers with abnormal scores compared to day or evening shift workers (p < 0.001). 27.5% of all workers had moderate to severe insomnia symptoms, with higher percentages of moderate or severe scores in evening and night shift workers (p < 0.001). 36.9% of workers had hrOSA, and of those previously diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and using positive airway pressure therapy, over 90% reported treatment adherence (≥4 h per night). At follow-up, 92% of 484 respondents believed that sleep screening was valuable, with most taking some action after receiving abnormal results and over a quarter seeking sleep center treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Many healthcare workers, especially shift workers, experience sleep disorder symptoms, and our findings suggest that electronic sleep disorder symptom screening is feasible.


Subject(s)
Sleep Wake Disorders , Sleep , Delivery of Health Care , Electronics , Feasibility Studies , Health Personnel , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
N Engl J Med ; 355(7): 653-65, 2006 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16914701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Alternative therapies for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis are needed. METHODS: We randomly assigned 124 patients with S. aureus bacteremia with or without endocarditis to receive 6 mg of daptomycin intravenously per kilogram of body weight daily and 122 to receive initial low-dose gentamicin plus either an antistaphylococcal penicillin or vancomycin. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success 42 days after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-two days after the end of therapy in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, a successful outcome was documented for 53 of 120 patients who received daptomycin as compared with 48 of 115 patients who received standard therapy (44.2 percent vs. 41.7 percent; absolute difference, 2.4 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -10.2 to 15.1 percent). Our results met prespecified criteria for the noninferiority of daptomycin. The success rates were similar in subgroups of patients with complicated bacteremia, right-sided endocarditis, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Daptomycin therapy was associated with a higher rate of microbiologic failure than was standard therapy (19 vs. 11 patients, P=0.17). In 6 of the 19 patients with microbiologic failure in the daptomycin group, isolates with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin emerged; similarly, a reduced susceptibility to vancomycin was noted in isolates from patients treated with vancomycin. As compared with daptomycin therapy, standard therapy was associated with a nonsignificantly higher rate of adverse events that led to treatment failure due to the discontinuation of therapy (17 vs. 8, P=0.06). Clinically significant renal dysfunction occurred in 11.0 percent of patients who received daptomycin and in 26.3 percent of patients who received standard therapy (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin (6 mg per kilogram daily) is not inferior to standard therapy for S. aureus bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00093067 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteremia/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Female , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Methicillin Resistance , Middle Aged , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Treatment Outcome , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
16.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 62(6): 1413-21, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18782781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In a prospective, randomized trial, daptomycin was non-inferior to standard therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and right-sided endocarditis. Since rates of infection due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection are increasing and treatment outcomes for bacteraemia caused by MRSA are generally worse than those observed with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteraemia, clinical characteristics and treatment results in the trial's pre-specified subset of patients with MRSA were analysed. METHODS: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving daptomycin were compared with those receiving vancomycin plus low-dose gentamicin. Success was defined as clinical improvement with clearance of bacteraemia among patients who completed adequate therapy, received no potentially effective non-study antibiotics and had negative blood cultures 6 weeks after end of therapy. RESULTS: Twenty of the 45 (44.4%) daptomycin patients and 14 of the 43 (32.6%) vancomycin/gentamicin patients were successfully treated (difference 11.9%; confidence interval -8.3 to 32.1). Success rates for daptomycin versus vancomycin/gentamicin were 45% versus 27% in complicated bacteraemia, 60% versus 45% in uncomplicated bacteraemia and 50% versus 50% in right-sided MRSA endocarditis. Cure rates in patients with septic emboli and in patients who received pre-enrolment vancomycin were similar between treatment groups. However, in both treatment groups, success rates were lower in the elderly (>/=75 years). Persisting or relapsing bacteraemia occurred in 27% of daptomycin and 21% of vancomycin/gentamicin patients; among these patients, MICs of >/=2 mg/L occurred in five daptomycin and four vancomycin/gentamicin patients. The clinical course of several patients may have been influenced by lack of surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin was an effective alternative to vancomycin/gentamicin for MRSA bacteraemia or right-sided endocarditis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Daptomycin/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Gentamicins/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Daptomycin/pharmacology , Female , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Treatment Outcome , Vancomycin/pharmacology
17.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 75(3): 177-80, 183-6, 190-2, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18383927

ABSTRACT

Nosocomial infections with strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) began to emerge in the 1960s, are increasing in frequency, and tend to have worse outcomes than infections due to methicillin-susceptible S aureus. Community-associated MRSA infections emerged in the 1990s. Community-associated MRSA strains have up to now been epidemiologically and bacteriologically distinct from hospital-associated MRSA strains, but in a new twist, MRSA strains that have sofar been only community-associated are invading the hospital. Another worrisome trend is increasing resistance to vancomycin (Vancocin).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus , Vancomycin Resistance , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Endocarditis/drug therapy , Endocarditis/microbiology , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/drug therapy , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/microbiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Staphylococcus aureus/pathogenicity , Vancomycin/therapeutic use
18.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 74 Suppl 4: S2-5, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17844832

ABSTRACT

The continuing emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria calls for new approaches to the management and treatment of infections in hospitalized patients. Health care-associated infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality while driving up health care resource use and costs worldwide. The continued spread of antimicrobial resistance requires a multidisciplinary approach and closer collaboration among health care providers, especially hospitalists, pharmacists, infection control practitioners, and infectious disease specialists. Such collaboration can potentially reduce treatment failures and minimize the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms between health care settings and the community.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Hospitalists , Hospitals , Humans , Infection Control Practitioners , Interdisciplinary Communication , Primary Health Care
20.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 83(6): 427-33, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27281256

ABSTRACT

With two nonequivalent vaccines available and different recommendations for different patient populations, vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae can be confusing. Here we try to clarify the situation.


Subject(s)
Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Vaccines/therapeutic use , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Vaccination/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Infant , Pneumococcal Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL