ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes in patients treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2019, this retrospective observational study was conducted at 3 centers, involving 62 consecutive BTAI patients who underwent TEVAR. Computed tomography angiography scans were planned to be conducted at 6 months post-procedure, and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all 62 procedures (100%), which included cases of dissection (n=35, 56.45%), pseudoaneurysm (n=20, 32.26%), and rupture (n=7, 11.29%). Mean injury severity score was 31.66±8.30. A total of 21 supra-arch branches were revascularized by chimney technique, with 12 cases involving the left subclavian artery (LSA) and 9 cases involving the left common carotid artery. In addition, 11 LSAs were covered during the procedure. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.61% (n=1). The mean follow-up time was 86.82±30.58 months. The all-cause follow-up mortality rate was 3.28% (n=2). Stenosis or occlusion of 3 supra-arch branches (4.92%) was identified at follow-up, with 2 cases (3.28%) requiring re-intervention. No spinal cord ischemia, endoleak, or migration was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite only including patients with long-term follow-up, this study confirms the long-term safety and effectiveness of TEVAR for BTAI. For young BTAI patients, as the thoracic aorta increases with age, longer follow-up is needed to observe the potential mismatch between the endograft and the aorta. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study confirms the long-term safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI). For young BTAI patients, as the thoracic aorta increases with age, longer follow-up is needed to observe the potential mismatch between the endograft and the aorta. Through a remarkably extended follow-up period (86.82±30.58 months) conducted at multiple centers in China, this study confirms the long-term safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for BTAI.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify iliac artery characteristics of East Asian patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to evaluate the anatomical suitability rates with current iliac branch devices (IBDs). METHODS: This was a single centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study. Patients diagnosed with AAA between 2008 and 2023 were enrolled. Morphological parameters of iliac arteries were measured, and their eligibility for four IBDs (Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD) was evaluated according to the manufacturer's latest instructions for use (IFU). RESULTS: Among 1 144 AAAs observed in the study, 45.5% (n = 521) presented with concurrent common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA). In total, 304 patients (26.6%) and 371 iliac arteries necessitated internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction. The anatomical suitability rates for the Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD were 18.9%, 21.8%, 11.9%, and 22.6%, respectively. The E-Liac IBD exhibited a significantly lower anatomical suitability rate compared with the other three devices (p < .001). The primary exclusion criteria of IBDs were: a common iliac artery (CIA) length of < 50 mm for Cook ZBIS (n = 211, 56.9%); an IIA diameter of < 6.5 mm or > 13.5 mm for Gore IBE (n = 177, 47.7%); and a CIA bifurcation diameter of < 18 mm both for E-Liac IBD and G-Iliac IBD (n = 244, 65.8%). A total of 171 patients (46.1%) failed to meet the anatomical criteria for any device, while 120 (32.4%) qualified for one device, 34 (9.2%) for two devices, 36 (9.7%) for three devices, and 10 (2.7%) for all four devices. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of East Asian patients with AAA present with concurrent CIAA, necessitating substantial IIA reconstruction. The IBD techniques show low anatomical suitability rates among the East Asian population, with 46.1% of patients failing to meet anatomical criteria for any IBD based on the manufacturer's IFU.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and risk factors for poor prognosis after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: Clinical records for patients with TBAD presenting to a medical center between March 1, 2012 and July 31, 2020 were reviewed. Clinical data including demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications were obtained from electronic medical records. Comparative analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. A logistic regression model was used to analyze prognostic factors in patients with TBAD after TEVAR. RESULTS: TEVAR was performed on all 170 patients with TBAD, and poor prognosis was identified in 28.2% (48/170) of cases. Patients with a poor prognosis were younger (38.5 [32.0, 53.8] years vs. 55.0 [48.0, 62.0] years, P < 0.001), had higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (138.5 [127.8, 152.8] mm Hg vs. 132.0 [120.8, 145.3] mm Hg, P = 0.013) and more complicated aortic dissection patients (19 [60.4] vs. 71 [41.8], P = 0.029) than those without a poor prognosis. According to the results of binary logic regression analysis, the possibility of a poor prognosis after TEVAR decreased with each 10 years increase in age (odds ratio: 0.464, 95% confidence interval: 0.327-0.658, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between younger age and a poor prognosis after TEVAR in patients with TBAD, with the condition that those with poor prognoses have higher SBP and more complicated cases. In younger patients, postoperative follow-up should be more frequent, and complications should be managed in time.