Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 83
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Nature ; 544(7650): 309-315, 2017 04 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28405027

ABSTRACT

The 2013-2016 West African epidemic caused by the Ebola virus was of unprecedented magnitude, duration and impact. Here we reconstruct the dispersal, proliferation and decline of Ebola virus throughout the region by analysing 1,610 Ebola virus genomes, which represent over 5% of the known cases. We test the association of geography, climate and demography with viral movement among administrative regions, inferring a classic 'gravity' model, with intense dispersal between larger and closer populations. Despite attenuation of international dispersal after border closures, cross-border transmission had already sown the seeds for an international epidemic, rendering these measures ineffective at curbing the epidemic. We address why the epidemic did not spread into neighbouring countries, showing that these countries were susceptible to substantial outbreaks but at lower risk of introductions. Finally, we reveal that this large epidemic was a heterogeneous and spatially dissociated collection of transmission clusters of varying size, duration and connectivity. These insights will help to inform interventions in future epidemics.


Subject(s)
Ebolavirus/genetics , Ebolavirus/physiology , Genome, Viral/genetics , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/transmission , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology , Climate , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Ebolavirus/isolation & purification , Geography , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Humans , Internationality , Linear Models , Molecular Epidemiology , Phylogeny , Travel/legislation & jurisprudence , Travel/statistics & numerical data
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 60(12): e0126122, 2022 12 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36445090

ABSTRACT

The molecular detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is key for clinical management and surveillance. Funded by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, we conducted an external quality assessment (EQA) on the molecular detection and variant typing of SARS-CoV-2 that included 59 European laboratories in 34 countries. The EQA panel consisted of 12 lyophilized inactivated samples, 10 of which were SARS-CoV-2 variants (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, Eta, parental B.1 strain) ranging from 2.5 to 290.0 copies/µL or pooled respiratory viruses (adenovirus, enterovirus, influenza virus A, respiratory syncytial virus, or human coronaviruses 229E and OC43). Of all participants, 72.9% identified the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA correctly. In samples containing 25.0 or more genome copies/µL, SARS-CoV-2 was detected by 98.3% of the participating laboratories. Laboratories applying commercial tests scored significantly better (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test) than those using in-house assays. Both the molecular detection and the typing of the SARS-CoV-2 variants were associated with the RNA concentrations (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test). On average, only 5 out of the 10 samples containing different SARS-CoV-2 variants at different concentrations were correctly typed. The identification of SARS-CoV-2 variants was significantly more successful among EQA participants who combined real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays for mutation detection and high-throughput genomic sequencing than among those who used a single methodological approach (P = 0.0345, Kruskal-Wallis test). Our data highlight the high sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection in expert laboratories as well as the importance of continuous assay development and the benefits of combining different methodologies for accurate SARS-CoV-2 variant typing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Laboratories , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 59(3)2021 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298612

ABSTRACT

During the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, robust detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a key element for clinical management and to interrupt transmission chains. We organized an external quality assessment (EQA) of molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 for European expert laboratories. An EQA panel composed of 12 samples, containing either SARS-CoV-2 at different concentrations to evaluate sensitivity or other respiratory viruses to evaluate specificity of SARS-CoV-2 testing, was distributed to 68 laboratories in 35 countries. Specificity samples included seasonal human coronaviruses hCoV-229E, hCoV-NL63, and hCoV-OC43, as well as Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), SARS-CoV, and human influenza viruses A and B. Sensitivity results differed among laboratories, particularly for low-concentration SARS-CoV-2 samples. Results indicated that performance was mostly independent of the selection of specific extraction or PCR methods.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , Coronavirus 229E, Human , Coronavirus NL63, Human , Coronavirus OC43, Human , Humans , Alphainfluenzavirus , Betainfluenzavirus , Laboratories , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Euro Surveill ; 26(10)2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33706863

ABSTRACT

BackgroundSensitive molecular diagnostics and correct test interpretation are crucial for accurate COVID-19 diagnosis and thereby essential for good clinical practice. Furthermore, they are a key factor in outbreak control where active case finding in combination with isolation and contact tracing are crucial.AimWith the objective to inform the public health and laboratory responses to the pandemic, we reviewed current published knowledge on the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 infection as assessed by RNA molecular detection in a wide range of clinical samples.MethodsWe performed an extensive search on studies published between 1 December 2019 and 15 May 2020, reporting on molecular detection and/or isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in any human laboratory specimen.ResultsWe compiled a dataset of 264 studies including 32,515 COVID-19 cases, and additionally aggregated data points (n = 2,777) from sampling of 217 adults with known infection timeline. We summarised data on SARS-CoV-2 detection in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract, blood, oral fluid, tears, cerebrospinal fluid, peritoneal fluid, semen, vaginal fluid; where provided, we also summarised specific observations on SARS-CoV-2 detection in pregnancy, infancy, children, adolescents and immunocompromised individuals.ConclusionOptimal SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing relies on choosing the most appropriate sample type, collected with adequate sampling technique, and with the infection timeline in mind. We outlined knowledge gaps and directions for future well-documented systematic studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(5): 1024-1027, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32150528

ABSTRACT

We developed and validated 2 species-independent protein-based assays to detect Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus functional antibodies that can block virus receptor-binding or sialic acid-attachment. Antibody levels measured in both assays correlated strongly with virus-neutralizing antibody titers, proving their use for serologic confirmatory diagnosis of Middle East respiratory syndrome.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Immunoassay/methods , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Serologic Tests/methods , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Species Specificity
6.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(7): 1478-1488, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32267220

ABSTRACT

A new coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has recently emerged to cause a human pandemic. Although molecular diagnostic tests were rapidly developed, serologic assays are still lacking, yet urgently needed. Validated serologic assays are needed for contact tracing, identifying the viral reservoir, and epidemiologic studies. We developed serologic assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing, spike protein-specific, and nucleocapsid-specific antibodies. Using serum samples from patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, other coronaviruses, or other respiratory pathogenic infections, we validated and tested various antigens in different in-house and commercial ELISAs. We demonstrated that most PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected persons seroconverted by 2 weeks after disease onset. We found that commercial S1 IgG or IgA ELISAs were of lower specificity, and sensitivity varied between the 2 assays; the IgA ELISA showed higher sensitivity. Overall, the validated assays described can be instrumental for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies for diagnostic, seroepidemiologic, and vaccine evaluation studies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Neutralization Tests , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests
7.
Euro Surveill ; 25(6)2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32046815

ABSTRACT

Timely detection of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection cases is crucial to interrupt the spread of this virus. We assessed the required expertise and capacity for molecular detection of 2019-nCoV in specialised laboratories in 30 European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries. Thirty-eight laboratories in 24 EU/EEA countries had diagnostic tests available by 29 January 2020. A coverage of all EU/EEA countries was expected by mid-February. Availability of primers/probes, positive controls and personnel were main implementation barriers.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Laboratories/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , COVID-19 , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus/classification , Coronavirus Infections/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Disease Outbreaks , European Union , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reference Standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sentinel Surveillance , Sequence Analysis
8.
Euro Surveill ; 25(12)2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32234115

ABSTRACT

To rapidly assess possible community transmission in Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands, healthcare workers (HCW) with mild respiratory complaints and without epidemiological link (contact with confirmed case or visited areas with active circulation) were tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Within 2 days, 1,097 HCW in nine hospitals were tested; 45 (4.1%) were positive. Of six hospitals with positive HCW, two accounted for 38 positive HCW. The results informed local and national risk management.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Health Personnel , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/transmission
9.
Euro Surveill ; 25(13)2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32265004

ABSTRACT

We illustrate the potential for specialist laboratory networks to be used as preparedness and response tool through rapid collection and sharing of data. Here, the Emerging Viral Diseases-Expert Laboratory Network (EVD-LabNet) and a laboratory assessment of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) in returning European travellers related to an ongoing outbreak in Thailand was used for this purpose. EVD-LabNet rapidly collected data on laboratory requests, diagnosed CHIKV imported cases and sequences generated, and shared among its members and with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Data across the network showed an increase in CHIKV imported cases during 1 October 2018-30 April 2019 vs the same period in 2018 (172 vs 50), particularly an increase in cases known to be related to travel to Thailand (72 vs 1). Moreover, EVD-LabNet showed that strains were imported from Thailand that cluster with strains of the ECSA-IOL E1 A226 variant emerging in Pakistan in 2016 and involved in the 2017 outbreaks in Italy. CHIKV diagnostic requests increased by 23.6% between the two periods. The impact of using EVD-LabNet or similar networks as preparedness and response tool could be improved by standardisation of the collection, quality and mining of data in routine laboratory management systems.


Subject(s)
Chikungunya Fever/epidemiology , Chikungunya virus/isolation & purification , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Laboratories/standards , Chikungunya Fever/diagnosis , Disease Notification , Humans , Laboratories/organization & administration , Phylogeny , Thailand/epidemiology , Travel
10.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(7): 1394-1396, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31008703

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the benefit of whole blood versus plasma to detect acute Zika virus infections. Comparison of Zika virus quantitative reverse transcription PCR results in single timepoint whole blood-plasma pairs from 227 patients with suspected Zika virus infection resulted in confirmation of 8 additional patients with Zika virus infection.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Serologic Tests , Zika Virus Infection/diagnosis , Zika Virus Infection/virology , Zika Virus , Algorithms , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Humans , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Serologic Tests/methods , Zika Virus/classification , Zika Virus/genetics
11.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(10): 1868-1877, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31423970

ABSTRACT

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infections in humans can cause asymptomatic to fatal lower respiratory lung disease. Despite posing a probable risk for virus transmission, asymptomatic to mild infections can go unnoticed; a lack of seroconversion among some PCR-confirmed cases has been reported. We found that a MERS-CoV spike S1 protein-based ELISA, routinely used in surveillance studies, showed low sensitivity in detecting infections among PCR-confirmed patients with mild clinical symptoms and cross-reactivity of human coronavirus OC43-positive serum samples. Using in-house S1 ELISA and protein microarray, we demonstrate that most PCR-confirmed MERS-CoV case-patients with mild infections seroconverted; nonetheless, some of these samples did not have detectable levels of virus-neutralizing antibodies. The use of a sensitive and specific serologic S1-based assay can be instrumental in the accurate estimation of MERS-CoV prevalence.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Humans , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
12.
Transfusion ; 59(9): 2931-2937, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270821

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The screening of Dutch blood donations for West Nile virus (WNV) may be imminent, as WNV emerges in nearby countries and more donors travel to WNV-affected regions. Since 2016 the related, mosquito-borne Usutu virus (USUV) causes seasonal mortality in Dutch birds. To what extent will human USUV infections affect Dutch WNV donor screening? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From April through September 2018, plasma samples from blood donations in blackbird-rich regions were stored. When increased bird mortality was reported in August, samples from July, August, and September were tested for USUV-RNA in pools of eight, using a home-brew combined WNV/USUV-PCR assay. Reactive pools were deconstructed. Original plasma units and samples of previous and follow-up donations of reactive donors were tested for USUV- and WNV-RNA, and for antibody responses. RESULTS: The number of USUV RNA-positive, WNV RNA-negative donations was 0 of 2688 donations in July, 6 of 4416 in August (1:736), and 1 of 4936 in September. The seven infected donors tested negative for USUV-RNA in preceding and follow-up donations. For 6 donors, seroconversion for USUV-antibodies was demonstrated. All index donations tested positive in a commonly used PCR-assay for WNV donor screening. Three exposed recipients did not show signs of infection. Screening a random subset of 1092 donations from September for USUV-IgG antibodies showed that 22 donors tested reactive; for three donors retrospective testing identified an USUV PCR-positive pre-seroconversion donation. CONCLUSION: Seasonal USUV infection in Dutch blood donors is common. Cross-reactivity in molecular assays for WNV-screening occurs, but can be resolved using USUV- and WNV-specific PCR-primers and sequencing of viral RNA.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors/statistics & numerical data , Flavivirus Infections/epidemiology , Flavivirus , Adult , Aged , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Birds/virology , Culicidae/virology , Female , Flavivirus/genetics , Flavivirus/isolation & purification , Flavivirus Infections/diagnosis , Flavivirus Infections/veterinary , Flavivirus Infections/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , RNA, Viral/blood , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , West Nile Fever/blood , West Nile Fever/epidemiology , West Nile Fever/virology , West Nile virus/genetics , West Nile virus/isolation & purification
13.
Euro Surveill ; 24(5)2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30722811

ABSTRACT

BackgroundCrimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is considered an emerging infectious disease threat in the European Union. Since 2000, the incidence and geographic range of confirmed CCHF cases have markedly increased, following changes in the distribution of its main vector, Hyalomma ticks.AimsTo review scientific literature and collect experts' opinion to analyse relevant aspects of the laboratory management of human CCHF cases and any exposed contacts, as well as identify areas for advancement of international collaborative preparedness and laboratory response plans.MethodsWe conducted a literature review on CCHF molecular diagnostics through an online search. Further, we obtained expert opinions on the key laboratory aspects of CCHF diagnosis. Consulted experts were members of two European projects, EMERGE (Efficient response to highly dangerous and emerging pathogens at EU level) and EVD-LabNet (Emerging Viral Diseases-Expert Laboratory Network).ResultsConsensus was reached on relevant and controversial aspects of CCHF disease with implications for laboratory management of human CCHF cases, including biosafety, diagnostic algorithm and advice to improve lab capabilities. Knowledge on the diffusion of CCHF can be obtained by promoting syndromic approach to infectious diseases diagnosis and by including CCHFV infection in the diagnostic algorithm of severe fevers of unknown origin.ConclusionNo effective vaccine and/or therapeutics are available at present so outbreak response relies on rapid identification and appropriate infection control measures. Frontline hospitals and reference laboratories have a crucial role in the response to a CCHF outbreak, which should integrate laboratory, clinical and public health responses.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , DNA, Viral/genetics , Hemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-Congo/genetics , Hemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-Congo/isolation & purification , Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean/diagnosis , Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean/transmission , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/standards , Animals , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , DNA, Viral/analysis , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Hemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-Congo/immunology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean/virology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Ixodidae , Laboratories , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/methods , Sequence Analysis, RNA , Ticks/virology
14.
Euro Surveill ; 23(19)2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29766839

ABSTRACT

From December 2013 to March 2016, West Africa experienced the largest Ebola virus (EBOV) outbreak to date, leading to a European-wide activation of laboratory preparedness and response. At the end of the outbreak, laboratories associated with the two European preparedness networks of expert laboratories EMERGE JA and EVD-LabNet were invited to participate in an assessment of the response of European laboratories to the EBOV outbreak, to identify learning points and training needs to strengthen future outbreak responses. Response aspects assessed included diagnostics, biorisk management and quality assurance. The overall coverage of EBOV diagnostics in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) was found to be adequate although some points for quality improvement were identified. These included the need for relevant International Organization for Standardization (ISO) accreditation, the provision of EBOV external quality assessments (EQA) in periods where there is no emergency, facilitating access to controls and knowledge, biorisk management without compromising biosafety and a rapid public health response, and the need for both sustained and contingency funding for preparedness and response activities.


Subject(s)
Containment of Biohazards/standards , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Ebolavirus/isolation & purification , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/diagnosis , Laboratories/standards , Safety/standards , Africa, Western/epidemiology , Europe , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology , Humans , Laboratories/organization & administration
15.
Euro Surveill ; 23(28)2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30017021

ABSTRACT

An external quality assessment of yellow fever virus (YFV) molecular detection in European laboratories was organised in rapid response to an increase in human cases in Brazil in 2018 with risk of import to Europe. Detection of YFV was assessed among 32 laboratories in 23/31 European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) countries and two laboratories in one non-EU/EEA country. Adequate capabilities were lacking in 10/23 countries; five did not participate as they lacked implemented assays.


Subject(s)
Laboratories/standards , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/standards , Serologic Tests/standards , Yellow Fever/diagnosis , Yellow fever virus/genetics , Yellow fever virus/isolation & purification , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Population Surveillance/methods , Serologic Tests/methods , Yellow Fever/immunology , Yellow Fever/virology , Yellow fever virus/immunology
16.
J Infect Dis ; 215(11): 1702-1705, 2017 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28387845

ABSTRACT

The transmission routes and risk factors for zoonotic Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infections are still unknown. We used the World Health Organization questionnaire for MERS-CoV case-control studies to assess risk factors for human MERS-CoV seropositivity at a farm complex in Qatar. Nine camel workers with MERS-CoV antibodies and 43 workers without antibodies were included. Some camel-related activities may pose a higher risk of MERS-CoV infection, as may cross-border movements of camels, poor hand hygiene, and overnight hospital stays with respiratory complaints. The risk factors identified in this study can be used to develop infection prevention and control measures for human MERS-CoV infections.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Zoonoses , Adult , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Camelus , Case-Control Studies , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Humans , Male , Qatar/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/transmission
17.
J Infect Dis ; 216(7): 859-866, 2017 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28961947

ABSTRACT

Background: Treatment of blood samples from hemorrhagic fever virus (HFV)-infected patients with 0.1% detergents has been recommended for virus inactivation and subsequent safe laboratory testing. However, data on virus inactivation by this procedure are lacking. Here we show the effect of this procedure on diagnostic test results and infectious Ebola virus (EBOV) titers. Methods: Serum and whole-blood samples were treated with 0.1% or 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) or 0.1% Triton X-100 and assayed for clinical chemistry and malaria antigen detection. Infectious EBOV titers were determined in SDS-treated plasma and whole blood from EBOV-infected nonhuman primates (NHPs). Infectious titers of EBOV or herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) in detergents-treated cell culture medium containing various serum concentrations were determined. Results: Laboratory test results were not affected by 0.1% detergent treatment of blood samples, in contrast with 1% SDS treatment. However, 0.1% detergent treatment did not inactivate EBOV in blood samples from infected NHPs. Experiments with cell culture medium showed that virus inactivation by detergents is annulled at physiological serum concentrations. Conclusions: Treatment of blood samples with 0.1% SDS or Triton X-100 does not inactivate EBOV. Inactivation protocols for HFV should be validated with serum and whole blood.


Subject(s)
Detergents/pharmacology , Ebolavirus/drug effects , Serum , Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate/pharmacology , Virus Inactivation/drug effects , Animals , Herpes Simplex , Humans , Laboratories , Macaca mulatta , Octoxynol
18.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 23(3): 477-481, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28221112

ABSTRACT

We screened squirrels in Germany and the Netherlands for the novel zoonotic variegated squirrel bornavirus 1 (VSBV-1). The detection of VSBV-1 in 11 squirrels indicates a considerable risk for transmission to humans handling those animals. Therefore, squirrels in contact with humans should routinely be tested for VSBV-1.


Subject(s)
Bornaviridae/classification , Bornaviridae/isolation & purification , Mononegavirales Infections/veterinary , Sciuridae/virology , Animals , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Mononegavirales Infections/epidemiology , Mononegavirales Infections/virology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Zoonoses
19.
J Clin Microbiol ; 55(11): 3219-3226, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28835479

ABSTRACT

Zika virus (ZIKV) infections are a significant public health concern. A strong capability for ZIKV detection is an absolute requirement for adequate preparedness and response strategies and individual patient care. The objective of this study was to assess and improve the capability of European expert laboratories for molecular testing for ZIKV through an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme. Laboratories were provided a panel of 12 samples which included negative samples, samples containing African- or Asian-lineage ZIKV at various concentrations (103 to 109 copies/ml), and samples containing dengue virus, yellow fever virus, or chikungunya virus. The results were analyzed on the basis of the outcomes of testing for the samples and the extraction and detection method used. Samples with a ZIKV RNA status scored correctly by >50% of the laboratories were designated the core sample. A total of 85 panel outcomes were submitted by 50 laboratories in 31 countries. The results designated all samples as core samples. Thirty-three percent (28/85) of the panel outcomes identified all samples. Analysis at the laboratory level showed that only 40% of the laboratories (20/50), representing 45% of the countries, scored sufficiently; i.e., they had at least one test operational that scored all core samples correctly. There is a need for improvement of the molecular detection of ZIKV in 60% of the participating laboratories. While the specificity of the tests was more robust, the results of the EQA showed large variation in test sensitivity. Improvements should focus on both nucleic acid extraction and ZIKV detection methods.


Subject(s)
Laboratories , Laboratory Proficiency Testing , Zika Virus Infection/diagnosis , Zika Virus/isolation & purification , Europe , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity
20.
Infection ; 44(6): 797-802, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27209175

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We report 18 cases of confirmed Zika virus (ZIKV) infection in travellers returning to the Netherlands from Surinam (South America, bordering northern Brazil) and the Dominican Republic. METHODS: In a multi-centre study, we collected epidemiological, virological and clinical characteristics, as well as data on travel history, underlying illness and laboratory results of the 18 imported ZIKV infection cases using a standardised form. RESULTS: Most cases had a self-limiting course of disease, two patients developed complications, one had Guillain-Barré and another had severe thrombocytopenia. Four patients had underlying illness. One of the reported cases was pregnant. Three of 13 patients tested had a weak-positive result for dengue IgM. The majority of patients were born in Suriname and/or visiting friends and relatives (VFR). CONCLUSIONS: Providing pre-travel advice among travellers, especially VFR travellers, is needed to enhance the use of preventive measures against ZIKV infection. Further evidence on health risks associated with ZIKV infection is urgently needed.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Zika Virus Infection , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cohort Studies , Dominican Republic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Suriname , Travel , Young Adult , Zika Virus
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL