Targeting serine/glycine metabolism improves radiotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the most lethal cancer, and 85% of cases are classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Metabolic rewiring is a cancer hallmark that causes treatment resistance, and lacks insights into serine/glycine pathway adaptations upon radiotherapy. METHODS: We analyzed radiotherapy responses using mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics in NSCLC patient's plasma and cell lines. Efficacy of serine/glycine conversion inhibitor sertraline with radiotherapy was investigated by proliferation, clonogenic and spheroid assays, and in vivo using a serine/glycine dependent NSCLC mouse model by assessment of tumor growth, metabolite and cytokine levels, and immune signatures. RESULTS: Serine/glycine pathway metabolites were significantly consumed in response to radiotherapy in NSCLC patients and cell models. Combining sertraline with radiotherapy impaired NSCLC proliferation, clonogenicity and stem cell self-renewal capacity. In vivo, NSCLC tumor growth was reduced solely in the sertraline plus radiotherapy combination treatment group. Tumor weights linked to systemic serine/glycine pathway metabolite levels, and were inhibited in the combination therapy group. Interestingly, combination therapy reshaped the tumor microenvironment via cytokines associated with natural killer cells, supported by eradication of immune checkpoint galectin-1 and elevated granzyme B levels. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight that targeting serine/glycine metabolism using sertraline restricts cancer cell recovery from radiotherapy and provides tumor control through immunomodulation in NSCLC.

Radiotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The immunomodulatory effects of ionizing radiation have long been recognized; however, so far these have not been fully exploited in clinical practice. We review the rationale to combine radiation with immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are used in standard practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Preclinical research suggests a synergy between radiotherapy and these immune checkpoint inhibitors. Whether or not this benefit translates into a clinical benefit is currently subject of ongoing research. SUMMARY: It is highly rational to combine radiation with immune therapy as in preclinical models and in proof of concept trials in humans it clearly can increase the antitumor immunity when given together with other immune interventions.

An overview of the published and running randomized phase 3 clinical results of radiotherapy in combination with immunotherapy.

Several studies have established that radiotherapy (RT) in combination with immunotherapy (IO) has a strong synergistic effect. RT changes the tumor microenvironment, generates local inflammation reactions, and enhances immunostimulatory effects, which are able to assist IO with improving local and systemic tumor control. In several pre-clinical reports, RT in combination with IO reveals regression of tumors locally (irradiated sites) and systemically (non-irradiated sites). Several clinical trials are currently running, mostly as phase I and II studies. This article provides an overview of the randomized, prospective reported and recruiting phase 3 clinical trials of RT in combination with IO. To date, three phase 3 trials have been published on RT and sequential IO with variable results, ranging from no significant difference (Kwon et al., START) to absolute differences in overall survival of 13.5% after 3 years (PACIFIC), respectively. No phase 3 randomized trials have been published on the simultaneous combination of RT with IO. Thirty trials are presently under way, and still recruiting patients to quantify the response to RT with IO. These studies fall into three categories of research interests: (I) to discover an enhancement effect of IO as induction therapy with RT; (II) to determine the additional effect of concurrent IO on the local effect of RT; and (III) to determine the additional effect of adjuvant or consolidation IO on the local effect of RT. Most of the ongoing studies are a combination of these interests, with 15 trials evaluating the concurrent RT+IO with IO consolidation strategy. The results in coming years will provide more insights in the role of RT as an activator of the immune system, the effect of IO as local sensitizer of RT, the optimal sequencing of IO with RT, and the total RT doses needed to obtain the optimal local and systemic effect.

Is prostate cancer radiotherapy using implantable rectum spacers safe and effective in inflammatory bowel disease patients?

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT) in patients with (active) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains controversial. We hypothesized that RT in combination with a biodegradable prostate-rectum spacer balloon implantation, might be a safe treatment approach with acceptable toxicities for these high risk for rectal toxicity patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on a small prospective mono-centric series of 8 patients with all-risk prostate cancer with the comorbidity of an IBD. Four patients had Crohn's disease and 4 patients had ulcerative colitis. One out of four had an active status of IBD. All patients were intended to be treated with curative high-dose RT: 5 patients were treated with external beam RT (70 Gray (Gy) in 28 fractions), and 3 patients were treated with 125I-implant (145 Gy). Toxicities were scored according to the CTCAE v4.03: acute side effects occur up to 3 months after RT, and late side effects start after 3 months. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13 months (range: 3-42 months). Only one acute grade 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity was observed: an increased diarrhea (4-6 above baseline) during RT, which resolved completely 6 weeks after treatment. No late grade 3 or more GI toxicity was reported, and no acute and late grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicity events were observed. CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer patients with IBD are a challenge to treat with RT. Our results suggest that RT in combination with a balloon implant in selective patients with (active) IBD may be promising, however additional validation is needed.

Identification of Potential Prognostic and Predictive Immunological Biomarkers in Patients with Stage I and Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Prospective Exploratory Study.

Radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy can induce immune responses, but not much is known regarding treatment-induced immune changes in patients. This exploratory study aimed to identify potential prognostic and predictive immune-related proteins associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this prospective study, patients with stage I NSCLC treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (n = 26) and patients with stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 18) were included. Blood samples were collected before (v1), during (v2), and after RT (v3). In patients with stage I NSCLC, CD244 (HR: 10.2, 95% CI: 1.8-57.4) was identified as a negative prognostic biomarker. In patients with stage III NSCLC, CR2 and IFNGR2 were identified as positive prognostic biomarkers (CR2, HR: 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00-0.12; IFNGR2, HR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.00-0.46). In addition, analysis of the treatment-induced changes of circulating protein levels over time (Δv2/v3-v1) also identified CXCL10 and IL-10 as negative predictive biomarkers (CXCL10, HR: 3.86, 95% CI: 1.0-14.7; IL-10, HR: 16.92 (2.74-104.36)), although serum-induced interferon (IFN) response was a positive prognostic. In conclusion, we identified several circulating immunogenic proteins that are correlated with PFS in patients with stage I and stage III NSCLC before and during treatment.

RNA-sequencing in non-small cell lung cancer shows gene downregulation of therapeutic targets in tumor tissue compared to non-malignant lung tissue.

BACKGROUND: Gene expression of specific therapeutic targets in non-malignant lung tissue might play an important role in optimizing targeted therapies. This study aims to identify different expression patterns of fifteen genes important for targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We prospectively collected tissue of NSCLC and non-malignant lung tissue from 25 primary resected patients. RNA-sequencing and 450 K methylation array profiling was applied to both NSCLC and non-malignant lung tissue and data were analyzed for 14 target genes. We analyzed differential expression and methylation as well as expression according to patient characteristics like smoking status, histology, age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, C-reactive protein (CRP) and gender. TCGA data served as a validation set. RESULTS: Nineteen men and 6 women were included. Important targets like PD-L2 (p = 0.035), VEGFR2 (p < 0.001) and VEGFR3 (p < 0.001) were downregulated (respective fold changes = 1.8, 3.1, 2.7, 3.5) in tumor compared to non-malignant lung tissue. The TCGA set confirmed these findings almost universally. PD-L1 (p < 0.001) became also significantly downregulated in the TCGA set. In NSCLC, MUC1 (p = 0.003) showed a higher expression in patients with a CRP < 5 mg/L compared to > 5 mg/L. In the TCGA data but not in our primary data, PD-L1 & 2 were both borderline more expressed in tumors of active smokers vs. tumors of ex-smokers (p = 0.044 and 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a lower PD-L1 & 2 and VEGFR expression in NSCLC vs. non-malignant lung tissue. Specific patient characteristics did not seem to change the overall expression differences as they were in line with the overall results. This information may contribute to the optimization of targeted treatments.

Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy: Improving Cancer Treatment through Synergy.

Radiotherapy is an important cornerstone in cancer treatment. Ionizing gamma-irradiation is capable of inducing DNA damage and consequential cell death in a precise and effective manner. In recent years it has become clear, however, that this is not the only relevant mechanism of action. Radiotherapy alters the immune composition of the tumor and influences upregulation of MHC I and cancer-testis antigens, inducing immunogenic cell death and supporting dendritic cell activation. Paradoxically, it also increases the relative ratio of regulatory T cells to CD4+ cells, which hampers an effective immune response. Nevertheless, the overall stimulating influence of irradiation on the immune system has been recognized and illustrated in preclinical studies as well as clinical case reports. There have been several attempts to use radiotherapy as an in situ vaccine. The basic rationale is a synergistic effect of different immune therapies like dendritic cell vaccination and CTLA-4 blockade with irradiation. Changes in the immune phenotype after radiotherapy can facilitate dendritic cell functioning. Immune therapy is also able to overcome the inhibitory pool of regulatory T cells through CTLA-4 inhibition, a weak point of radiotherapy. Although successful in preclinical models, there is still a lot of ground that needs to be covered. The optimal radiation dose is crucial, as well as timing and patient selection. Once these unknown parameters are explored, there is a lot of potential in the powerful combination of local immunization and systemic immune treatments for future novel cancer regimens.

The abscopal effect of local radiotherapy: using immunotherapy to make a rare event clinically relevant.

BACKGROUND: Recently, immunologic responses to localized irradiation are proposed as mediator of systemic effects after localized radiotherapy (called the abscopal effect). Here, we give an overview of both preclinical and clinical data about the abscopal effect in particular and link them with the immunogenic properties of radiotherapy. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase with the search term "abscopal", "(non-targeted irradiation) OR (non-targeted radiotherapy)" and "distant bystander" from 1960 until July, 2014. Only papers that cover radiotherapy in an oncological setting were selected and only if no concurrent cytotoxic treatment was given. Targeted immune therapy was allowed. RESULTS: Twenty-three case reports, one retrospective study and 13 preclinical papers were selected. Eleven preclinical papers used a combination of immune modification and radiotherapy to achieve abscopal effects. Patient age range (28-83years) and radiation dose (median total dose 32Gy) varied. Fractionation size ranged from 1.2Gy to 26Gy. Time to documented abscopal response ranged between less than one and 24months, with a median reported time of 5months. Once an abscopal response was achieved, a median time of 13months went by before disease progression occurred or the reported follow-up ended (range 3-39months). CONCLUSION: Preclinical data points heavily toward a strong synergy between radiotherapy and immune treatments. Recent case reports already illustrate that such a systemic effect of radiotherapy is possible when enhanced by targeted immune treatments. However, several issues concerning dosage, timing, patient selection and toxicity need to be resolved before the abscopal effect can become clinically relevant.