Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in spondylolisthesis: frequency, demographic findings, and clinical characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The association of LSTV with low back pain has been debated in the literature for nearly a century, but the relationship between LSTV and spondylolisthesis is still under discussion. There is currently no valid information about LSTV's prevalence in Iran. This study investigated the relationship between the presence of LSTV and lumbosacral spondylolisthesis regarding frequency, gender and age variation, grade and level of spondylolisthesis, and clinical signs and symptoms. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included spondylolisthesis patients admitted for surgery between March 2021 to December 2022. All patients underwent CT imaging. After evaluating medical records, the baseline data were collected. Patients were categorized into No LSTV, Sacralization, and Lumbarization groups. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied groups were compared using an independent T-test and Chi-Square. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the age and sex variations between groups. RESULTS: 219 patients with a mean age of 57.07 ± 11.04 were included. A significant relationship was observed between the presence of sacralization and gender diversity with female predominance (P = 0.01). The level of spondylolisthesis and the presence of motor deficits (paresis) significantly differed among study groups (P < 0.05). Sacralization group exhibited a greater prevalence of higher grades of listhesis compared to the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: LSTV is frequently seen in spondylolisthesis patients. Sacralization is the common type of LSTV in spondylolisthesis patients, possibly leading to an increased risk for higher grades of vertebral slip and higher rates of motor deficit signs and symptoms. The presence of sacralization results in a significant increase in the incidence of higher levels of spondylolisthesis, especially the L4-L5*(sacralized L5) level. There is no relationship between age and the presence of LSTV in spondylolisthesis.

SARS-CoV-2 infection and spontaneous spinal hemorrhage: a systematic review.

The neurological manifestations of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, including spontaneous spinal hemorrhage (SSH), are diverse. SSH is a detrimental neurosurgical event requiring immediate medical attention. We aimed to investigate the association between SARS-CoV-2 and SSH and delineate a rational clinical approach. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published up to January 25, 2023, on SSH and SARS-CoV-2 infection. For each dataset, the authors performed pooled estimates examining three outcomes of interest: (1) early post-intervention neurological status, (2) mortality, and (3) post-intervention neurological rehabilitation outcomes. After reviewing 1341 results, seven datasets were identified for the final analysis. Fifty-seven percent of patients were females. Twenty-eight percent of the patients experienced severe systemic infection. The mean interval between the SARS-CoV-2 infection and neurological presentation was 18 days. Pain and sensorimotor deficits were the most common (57%). Spinal epidural hematoma (EDH) was the most common presentation (71.4%). Three patients were treated conservatively, while 4 received neurosurgical intervention. Pain and sensorimotor deficits had the best treatment response (100%), while the sphincter had the worst response (0%). Long-term follow-up showed that 71% of patients had good recovery. SARS-CoV-2-associated SSH is a rare complication of infection, with an often insidious presentation that requires high clinical suspicion. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and new neurological symptoms or disproportionate neck or back pain require a neuroaxis evaluation. Neurosurgical intervention and conservative management are both viable options to treat SSH following COVID-19. Still, a homogenous approach to the treatment paradigm of SSH cannot be obtained, but lesions with space-occupying effects are suitable for neurosurgical evacuation-decompression while more indolent lesions could be treated conservatively. These options should be tailored individually until larger studies provide a consensus.

Hemoperfusion in patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory failure, lifesaving or not?

BACKGROUND: The new coronavirus outbreak quickly filled hospital beds and stunned the world. Intensive care is required for 5% of patients, and the mortality rate for critically ill patients is 49%. The "cytokine storm" is considered as the main cause of pathogenesis for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19)-related respiratory failure, hemoperfusion may be a modality for treatment of disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven an patients with positive real-time polymerase chain reaction for SARStions2 in an upper respiratory tract sample or typical chest computed tomography lesion were eligible for this case-control study. Patients meeting the criteria for hemoperfusion including clinical and laboratory indices, were evaluated for outcomes such as hospitalization length and mortality. Patients were divided into three groups, i.e., patients who received hemoperfusion without a need for mechanical ventilation (MV), patients who received hemoperfusion before MV, and patients who received hemoperfusion after MV. RESULTS: Among 37 patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure, 32% were female with a mean age of 55.54 (standard deviation 14.1) years. There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of length of hospital stay and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P-tayns: 0.593 and 0.243, respectively, confidence interval [CI]: 95%). Heart rate, respiratory rate, PaO2/FIO2, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and ferritin significantly improved after the application of hemoperfusion in all groups (P < 0.05, CI: 95%). CONCLUSION: It seems that applying hemoperfusion in the inflammatory phase of the disease, especially before the intubation, reduce the need for MV. However, hemoperfusion does not have any impacts on the duration of hospital and ICU stay.

Comparison of open surgical discectomy versus plasma-laser nucleoplasty in patients with single lumbar disc herniation.

BACKGROUND: Intervertebral disc herniation is a major cause of low back pain. Several treatment methods are available for lumbar disc herniation including Chemonucleolysis, open surgery, nucleoplasty, laser disc decompression, and intradiscal electrothermal therapy. The high prevalence of lumbar disc herniation necessitates a minimally invasive yet effective treatment method. In this study, we compared the outcomes of open surgery and nucleoplasty method in patients with single lumbar disc herniation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted in one of the University Hospitals of Isfahan Medical University; The Alzahra Hospital. About 200 patients with the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation were recruited and were assigned to either the treatment or control groups using block randomization. One group received open surgery and the other group received nucleoplasty as the method of treatment. Patients were revisited at 14 days, 1, 2, 3 months, and 1-year after surgery and were assessed for the following variables: Lower back pain, lower limb pain, common complications of surgery (e.g., discitis, infection and hematoma) and recurrence of herniation. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) severity of low back pain was reduced from 6.92 (2.5) to 3.43 (2.3) in the nucleoplasty group (P = 0.04) and from 7.5 (2.2) to 3.04 (1.61) in the discectomy group (P = 0.73). Between group difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.44), however, time and treatment interaction was significant (P = 0.001). The level of radicular pain evaluated 1 year after treatment was reduced from 8.1 (1.2) to 2.9 (1.2) (P = 0.004) and from 7.89 (2.1) to 3.6 (2.5) (P =0.04) in the discectomy and the nucleoplasty groups respectively, significant interaction between time and treatment options was observed (P < 0.001) while there was no significant difference between two treatment groups (P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Our results show that while nucleoplasty is as effective as open discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, it is also less invasive with higher patient compliance. Taking factor such as decreased cost and duration of the surgery, as well as faster recovery in patients into account; we suggest considering nucleoplasty as an effective method of treatment in patients with single-level disc herniation.

Care needs of adults with spinal trauma in the prehospital and hospital setting from the perspective of patient care team: A qualitative research.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate care of patients with definite spinal cord injury or at risk of it in the prehospital and hospital stages requires comprehensive planning in the health system. It is also the requirement of any successful program to explain the needs from the perspective of its stakeholders. Thus, this study aimed to discover the care needs of adults with spinal trauma in prehospital and hospital settings from the perspective of the patient care team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted with the participation of urban and rural prehospital emergency personnel and emergency departments of educational and therapeutic hospitals affiliated to Isfahan, Tehran, Shiraz, Kermanshah, Ahvaz, and Yasuj Universities of Medical Sciences, through conducting 36 in-depth semi-structured interviews from September to December 2021. Using purposive sampling method, the participants were selected considering the maximum variation. The data saturation was reached after conducting interviews and group discussions with 36 subjects. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis approach. Lundman and Graneheim approach were used for the study rigour. Data were simultaneously analyzed using MAXQDA software version 10. RESULT: During the data analysis, two themes of prehospital care with two main categories (emergency care and management of secondary complications of spinal trauma) and hospital care with two main categories (emergency care and management of secondary complications of spinal trauma) emerged. CONCLUSION: Emergency care and management of secondary complications of spinal cord injury in the prehospital and hospital stages can affect treatment results, improve quality of life, and reduce mortality rate, secondary injuries, and healthcare costs. Thus, identification of the care needs of the adults with spinal trauma from the perspective of the patient care team can help the authorities to plan appropriate interventions.

Value of Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation Score, Pola Classification, and Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score from Decision to Surgery in Patients with Spondylodiscitis: A Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the value of the Spinal Infection Treatment Evaluation (SITE) score, Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score (BSDS), and Pola classification to predict the need for surgical intervention in patients with spondylodiscitis. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Spondylodiscitis is a rare disease, and the prediction of its outcome is crucial in the decision-making process. METHODS: All case records were assessed to extract information on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) scores before and after surgery. The SITE score, Pola classification, and BSDS were recorded. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were applied to estimate the predictive ability of the scoring systems. Patients' satisfaction with surgery outcomes was evaluated using the VAS, ASIA, JOABPEQ, and Likert scale for quality-of-life evaluation. RESULTS: In all 148 patients, case records were reviewed. The mean±standard deviation age of the patients was 54.6±14.7 years. Of these, 112 patients underwent surgery. The AUC scores were 0.86, 0.81, and 0.73 for the SITE score, BSDS, and Pola classification, respectively. In the comparison of the AUC of ROC curves, SITE score vs. BSDS showed a significantly greater AUC, 0.13 (Z =2.1, p =0.037); SITE score vs. Pola classification, 0.05 (Z =0.82, p =0.412); and Pola classification vs. BSDS, 0.08 (Z =1.22, p =0.219). The optimal cutoff score was 8.5 (sensitivity, 80.6%; specificity, 81.2%) for the SITE score and 9.5 (sensitivity, 52.8%; specificity, 83.0%) for the BSDS in the decision to surgery. VAS back pain and JOABPEQ subscales showed a significant difference when compared with preoperative scores. According to ASIA grading, none of the patients experienced neurological deterioration. Overall, patients' satisfaction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the SITE score is a useful measure and helps clinicians make clinically sound decisions in patients with spondylodiscitis.

Spondylodiscitis instrumented fusion, a prospective case series on a standardized neurosurgical protocol with long term follow up.

PURPOSE: To investigate the fusion construct properties, construct length, intervertebral prosthesis (IVP) selection, bone grafting methods, complications management, and follow-up outcomes of spondylodiscitis fusion. METHOD: This case series was conducted in Al-Zahra University referral hospital from March 2016 to November 2021. All the surgery-eligible patients were enrolled. Those who did not participate or failed the neurosurgical intervention were excluded. A unified neurosurgical protocol was defined. After operation and follow-up, all variables were documented. IBM SPSS v.26 was used for data analysis. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULT: Ninety-two patients were reviewed in the final analysis with 65.2 % males. The mean age was 55.07 ± 14.22 years old. The most frequent level of pathology and surgery was the lumbar spine (48.9 %). Short and long constructs were almost equally used (57.6 and 42.4 %, respectively). Bone graft mixture was the dominant IVP (75 %). The most frequent persistent postoperative symptom was back pain (55.4 %), while the neurological deficits resolution rate was 76.7 %. The fusion rate was 92.3 %. Proximal junctional kyphosis incidence was 16.3 % and had a significant association with on-admission neurological symptoms, thoracic and thoracolumbar junction involvements (p < 0.05). Follow-up Oswestry disability index scores showed 44.6 % of the patients had mild or no functional disabilities. Advanced age, On-admission deficits, comorbidities, titanium cages, and poor fusion status were associated with poor functional outcomes and higher mortality rates (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The introduced neurosurgical protocol could effectively achieve acceptable SD treatment, spine stabilization, and fusion with low long-term surgical complications. Autologous bone graft mixture in comparison to titanium cages showed a higher fusion rate with a lower mortality rate. Patients with older age, neurological symptoms, and comorbidities are expected to experience less favorable clinical outcomes.

Spontaneous spinal epidural haematoma following COVID-19 vaccination: a case report.

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccination side effects are rare but important medical situations. Spine-affecting side effects are amongst the rarest, but exceedingly important. Haemorrhagic spinal manifestations of COVID-19 and its vaccines are less reported with little knowledge about them. Case presentation: An 80-year-old male who received his first shot of the COVID-19 vaccine had developed COVID-19 pneumonia, weakness, and sensory problems in his legs followed by sphincter incontinence within 5 days period. MRI showed a spontaneous epidural spinal epidural haematoma (SSEDH) in T10-L1. He underwent laminectomy and haematoma evacuation. One month follow-up showed no clinical improvement. Discussion: To our knowledge, this was the first post-vaccination SSEDH and second in haemorrhagic spinal complications following COVID-19 vaccination. Considering the neuropathogenesis pathway of COVID-19 and its vaccines, there are common mechanisms of action that could potentially justify post-vaccination SSEDH such as seen in COVID-19 infection, itself. Early Neurosurgical intervention and better preoperative neurological status could be a beneficial modifier for favourable clinical outcomes. Conclusion: SSEDH and COVID-19 vaccine coincidence is a rare clinical event, still no solid association could be scientifically explained. Further studies are required for a reliable pathophysiologic association. Early diagnosis, interdisciplinary medical approach, and faster intervention are the cornerstone of the treatment paradigm.

Treatment refractory acute necrotizing myelitis after COVID-19 vaccine injection: a case report.

Introduction and importance: Post-vaccination myelitis is a rare and debilitating clinical situation. There are few reports of post-COVID-19 infection and vaccination neurological sequela. Case presentation: A 69-year-old lady was admitted to the emergency department due to weakness and hypoesthesia in her hands 1 week after the Sinopharm vaccine injection. MRI showed a cervicothoracic cord haemorrhagic lesion that deteriorated within 48 h. The clinical course was refractory to conservative treatments. She underwent an emergency cervical laminectomy as a salvage treatment. Intraoperative samples were in favour of acute necrotizing myelitis. Discussion: In the review of the literature, the inflammatory storm, vasculitis, and many unknown etiologies are deemed to be the possible causes of encephalopathy and myelitis after COVID-19 infection and vaccination. There are few cases of post-COVID-19 myelitis and hematomyelia, but this case was the first report of post-vaccination necrotizing myelitis. Conclusion: Post-vaccination necrotizing myelitis is a lethal medical situation requiring intensive and emergent neurosurgical vigilance. Early clinical diagnosis in the beginning and full neurosurgical-neurological treatment armamentarium options are cornerstones of treatment paradigms. Salvage treatment options such as extensive laminectomy may play a life-saving role in treatment refractory cases of acute necrotizing myelitis.

SARS-CoV-2 and spinal cord ischemia: a systematic review on clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal cord ischemia is a rare but ominous clinical situation with high levels of disability. There are emerging reports on COVID-19 and spinal cord ischemic events. PURPOSE: To investigate the cardinal manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 associated spinal cord ischemia, review treatment paradigms, and follow outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review. METHODS: The current study was conducted under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The authors searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published up to February 12, 2023, on spinal cord ischemia and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data on patient demographics, study methods, medical records, interventions, and outcomes were extracted from eligible articles. For each data set, the authors performed pooled estimates examining 3 factors of interest, which were (1) predisposing factors (2) treatment regimens, and (3) neurological rehabilitation outcomes. Neurological status was reported as the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale reported by data sets. RESULTS: Six data sets were identified. The mean age of the study population was 50 years old, with 66.6% male predominance. Sixty-six percent of the patients had severe COVID-19. Five data sets reported preexisting coagulopathy. ASIA A and B were the most prevalent primary neurological status (80%). The mean interval between COVID-19 and the first neurological deficit was 13 days. Anterior spinal artery lesions were the most prevalent ischemic pattern. The most common treatment regimens were heparin and steroid therapy. Physical rehabilitation showed poor functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 is associated with spinal cord ischemia through multiple neuropathological mechanisms. Proper coagulation profile control and aggressive rehabilitation may play a promising role in the prevention and recovery of spinal cord infarction in SARS-CoV-2 patients.

Oral prednisolone in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: A randomized placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Steroids are commonly used in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy (CR), but there is limited information in this regard. We evaluated the efficacy of oral prednisone in the treatment of CR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on adult patients with neck/shoulder pain for at least 1 month with no alarm symptoms/sings of malignancy, infection, or severe myelopathy, and no contraindication for corticosteroid use. Patients were allocated to receive prednisolone 50 mg/day for 5 days that was tapered within the following 5 days, or placebo. All patients also received acetaminophen 325 mg three times a day and ranitidine 150 mg two times a day. Neck disability index (NDI) and the verbal rating scale (VRS) were used to evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients (31 female, mean ± SD age = 46.2 ± 9.0 years) completed the study. A significant decrease was observed regarding the NDI and VAS scores from baseline to the end of study in both groups (P < 0.001). However, for both the NDI (35.7 ± 21.4 vs. 12.9 ± 10.2) and VRS (4.4 ± 2.7 vs. 1.6 ± 1.2), the amount of decrease was greater in the prednisone compared with the placebo group (P < 0.001). Based on the clinically important change in NDI, pain was improved in 75.8% (22/29) of the prednisolone and 30% (9/30) of the placebo group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A short course of oral steroid therapy with prednisolone is highly effective in reducing pain in patients referring with uncomplicated CR. Further studies are warranted on dosing, duration, and long-term efficacy and safety of oral steroid therapy, compared with injection approach.

The value of provocative tests in diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy.

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at assessing the accuracy of provocative tests in diagnosis of acute or chronic Cervical Radiculopathy (CR) based on an electrodiagnostic reference criterion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Shoulder Abduction Test (SAT), Spurling Test (ST), Upper Limb Tension Test (ULTT), and electromyography were done on 97 patients who referred to Electrodiagnostic center in the university hospital from January 2010 to March 2011. All of the participants had neck and radicular pain for at least 3 weeks. They were classified according to electrodiagnostic findings. Then diagnostic values of provocative tests were assessed in diagnosis of acute or chronic CR on the basis of reference criterion. RESULTS: SAT and ST were more specific (85%) compared to ULTT, while ULTT was more sensitive (60.46% in acute and 35.29% in chronic) than the other two. SAT and ST had a significant accuracy for comparison between acute and chronic CR (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ULTT is suitable for screening of CR, while SAT and ST can support diagnosis. SAT and ST are good diagnostic tests for comparison between acute and chronic CR.

Thoracolumbar Injury: The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scoring System or Modified Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) scoring system with its modified (mTLICS) version based on their agreement with the surgeon's opinion regarding treatment for patients with thoracolumbar injuries. Moreover, the Posterior Ligamentous Complex health was compared between intraoperative examinations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. METHODS: MRI was obtained from 114 patients suffering thoracolumbar spinal trauma; the TLICS and mTLICS scores were measured. Approaches 1 and 2 were designed in both scoring systems based on assuming a total score of 4 as surgery and conservative management indication, respectively. Kappa was used to estimate the agreements between each approach and the surgeon's opinion on treatment. The receiver operating curve calculated the appropriate cut-off scores for the above systems over which surgical management was preferred. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: All the approaches showed moderate agreements with the surgeon's opinion on therapeutic management (TLICS: κapproach1 = 0.557, κapproach2 =0.508; mTLICS: κapproach1 = 0.557, κapproach2 = 0.551; P < 0.001 for each κ). A score >3.5 best illustrated the indication for surgery in both systems. The radiology report agreed stronger with intraoperatively observed ligamentous health when suspicious cases on MRI were reported as injured (κTLICS = 0.830, κmTLICS = 0.704) rather than healthy (κTLICS = 0.620, κmTLICS = 0.620). CONCLUSIONS: The surgeon's treatment plan agreed moderately with suggestions of the TLICS and mTLICS systems; surgery was the preferred management for the patients with a score of 4. Moreover, radiologic suspicion of Posterior Ligamentous Complex injury seemed to indicate a damaged ligament rather than a healthy one.

In-Fracture Pedicular Screw Placement During Ligamentotaxis Following Traumatic Spine Injuries, a Randomized Clinical Trial on Outcomes.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of two different techniques for spinal ligamentotaxis. Spine ligamentotaxis reduces the number of retropulsed bone fragments in the fractured vertebrae. Two different ligamentotaxis techniques require clinical evaluation. Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial. The case group was defined as one pedicular screw insertion into a fractured vertebra, and the control group as a no-pedicular screw in the index vertebra. Spine biomechanical values were defined as primary outcomes and complications as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 105 patients were enrolled; 23 were excluded for multiple reasons, and the remaining were randomly allocated into the case (n=40) and control (n=42) groups. The patients were followed up and analyzed (n=56). The postoperative mid-sagittal diameter of the vertebral canal (MSD), kyphotic deformity correction, and restoration of the anterior height of the fractured vertebrae showed equal results in both groups. Postoperative retropulsion percentage and pain were significantly lower in the case group than in the control group (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively). There were no group preferences for early or long-term postoperative complications. Conclusions: Regarding clinical and imaging properties, inserting one extra pedicular screw in a fractured vertebra during ligamentotaxis results in better retropulsion reduction and lower postoperative pain.

Spinal Cord Tumors: A Review of Demographic Characteristics and Treatment Follow-Up of Patients in Isfahan City, Iran.

Background: Given that spinal cord tumors cause damage to the central nervous system, the involvement of body organs, patients' reduced quality of life, and the follow-up of patients should be performed with more sensitivity. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the demographic characteristics and treatment follow-up of patients with spinal cord tumors. Materials and Methods: The present descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study investigated all patients with spinal cord tumors in 2022 who visited the Kashani Hospital Isfahan. A total of 31 patients were included in the study using the census sampling method. The data were collected by a checklist and three pain scales, namely the Dennis pain scale, the Frankel Grade classification, and Nurick's grading scales. Results: The present cross-sectional study examined 31 patients with spinal cord tumors who visited the Kashani Hospital in Isfahan. Most spinal cord tumors were ependymoma with nine cases (29%) and neurofibroma with six cases (19.35%). The tumor site was thoracic in 10 cases (33.33%). In the follow-up phase, 31 patients (53.4%) returned to their normal life with full recovery and 10 (17.2%) died. Three (75%) out of four cases of tumor recurrence had ependymoma tumors and one (25%) had astrocytoma. There was a significant difference between the patients' pre- and post-operative pain severity and functional status as the post-operative scores decreased on all three scales. Conclusion: The results may contribute to improve the pre-operative planning, optimization, and monitoring of the patient's recovery after the operation.

Outcomes of Operative Treatment of Traumatic Spinal Injuries: 2-Year Follow-Up.

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is the second cause of complications and disability after brain injury. Although primary prevention is the best strategy, obtaining the necessary knowledge about the patient's condition and follow-up treatment can lead to the use of safety measures and appropriate healthcare planning. This is the basis of this study with the aim of a two-year follow-up of patients with traumatic SCI (TSCI) who underwent surgery. Materials and Methods: This study was a descriptive and analytical type that examined 79 patients with TSCI who had undergone surgery two years ago. The data were collected by a standard questionnaire and analyzed in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 software. Results: Among the patients in our study, 39.2% of them had the initial C American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score followed by patients with grade D (31.6%), grade A (15.2%), and grade E (14%), respectively, and also, a most common type of vertebral column injuries is burst fractures with a prevalence of 62%, followed by fracture-dislocation injury (25.3%) and compressed fracture (12.7%). Regarding the improvement of patients according to ASIA grade, the highest percentage of improvement is seen in grad grades D (84% and 77%), and grade A patients have improved to grade B by about 33.3%. In the study conducted, 5% of patients died during 24 months of follow-up, which means 75% of the deceased patients were grade A patients at the time of admission. Conclusion: As mentioned, the most important predictor of the patient's prognosis is the patient's initial condition.

Incidence of cervical collar-related pressure injury in patients with head and neck trauma: A scoping review study.

The use of the cervical collar to support the head and neck is inevitable in many patients with head and spinal cord injuries. One of the consequences of using this instrument is the development of pressure injuries. Therefore, in this review study, the incidence of as well as the risk factors for cervical collar-related pressure injury in this group of patients was evaluated. The current study is a scoping review conducted in 2022. Five scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and CINAHL), as well as Google Scholar, were searched for relevant studies published from 1990 to 2022 using the following keywords: trauma, spinal cord injury, head injury, head trauma, collar, cervical collar, cervical immobilization, risk factors, incidence, pressure injury, pressure ulcer, and bed sore. The search was performed independently by two researchers. Articles from the initial search were first recorded in special tables, and then, were reviewed and analyzed separately by two researchers. After extraction, information from each article was entered into a special table categorized by year, country, study design, study population, the incidence of cervical collar-related pressure injury, risk factors for cervical collar-related pressure injury, and grades of pressure injury. Of the 10 articles, 6 were retrospective cohort studies, 3 were cross-sectional descriptive studies, and 1 was a case report study. In terms of the study population, one study was conducted on pediatric patients, one was conducted on elderly patients, and eight were conducted on adults with head and neck trauma. In eight articles, the incidence of cervical collar-related pressure injury was reported. The reported incidence varied between 1.1% and 78.4%. In eight articles, risk factors for cervical collar-related pressure injury were reported. The most common risk factors were duration of cervical collar use, hospitalization in intensive care units, low level of consciousness, and longer hospital stay. The current review study showed that a significant percentage of head and neck trauma patients for whom cervical collar is used suffer from different grades of pressure injuries. Hence, healthcare providers should consider this issue when caring for this group of patients and take the necessary preventive measures in this regard. It should be noted that previous studies in this field had significant limitations, and thereby, it is strongly recommended to conduct further studies with a stronger methodology.

Autograft and allograft bone chips interbody fusion for spondylodiscitis: Surgery outcomes.

Background: Spondylodiscitis is a rare illness and serious complication of the vertebral column. The suitable type of surgery is debatable for these patients. This study describes a series of cases that are treated with modified interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylodiscitis by combining allograft and autograft bone chips with posterior segmental fusion. Methods: This was a retrospective study. The clinical deficit was evaluated with ASIA, VAS, and JOABPEQ scores before and after surgery. Radiological parameters were assessed with local kyphosis angle (degree), segmental height correction, and loss of correction. Post-operative bone union was evaluated as suggested by Tan et al. Results: The mean age of patients (n=34) was 52.3(SD=13.6) years and 67.6% were males. The mean follow-up duration was 25.8 (2.3) months. In the last follow-up, VAS back pain 4.9(0.77), VAS leg pain 4.6(0.78), JOABPEQ low back pain 68.1 (9.3), JOABPEQ lumbar function 81.3 (8.9), and JOABPEQ walking ability 72.8 (8.3) shows a significant difference when compared with preoperative scores. According to ASIA grading, none of the patients deteriorated neurologically (all p<0.0001). The average segmental height correction and loss of correction were observed 7.5(3.7) % and -1.8(3.6) %, respectively, indicating improvements in the patients. A high union fusion rate (82.4%) was observed in the last follow-up. Conclusion: This modified method can be a safe and effective technique for surgical intervention in patients with spondylodiscitis.

Spontaneous intramedullary hematoma following COVID-19 vaccination: A case report.

A 67-year-old female was hospitalized due to right-sided hemiparesis and neck pain with rapid deterioration to a deep coma. She had received the Sinopharm vaccine 2 days earlier. MRI showed extensive cervicothoracic hematomyelia. She received intensive medical care for 2 months and was discharged. An 18-month follow-up showed significant neurological recovery.

Spontaneous intramedullary hematoma in a patient with COVID-19 infection: A case report.

A 73-year-old man experienced four limb paresthesia and weakness following severe COVID-19 pneumonia. EMG-NCS showed inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy pattern while cervicothoracic imaging showed hematomyelia. The patient underwent laminectomy and hematoma evacuation. Neurological status improved to ASIA score C, postoperatively.