Perfusion imaging heterogeneity during NO inhalation distinguishes pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) from healthy subjects and has potential as an imaging biomarker.

BACKGROUND: Without aggressive treatment, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has a 5-year mortality of approximately 40%. A patient's response to vasodilators at diagnosis impacts the therapeutic options and prognosis. We hypothesized that analyzing perfusion images acquired before and during vasodilation could identify characteristic differences between PAH and control subjects. METHODS: We studied 5 controls and 4 subjects with PAH using HRCT and 13NN PET imaging of pulmonary perfusion and ventilation. The total spatial heterogeneity of perfusion (CV2Qtotal) and its components in the vertical (CV2Qvgrad) and cranio-caudal (CV2Qzgrad) directions, and the residual heterogeneity (CV2Qr), were assessed at baseline and while breathing oxygen and nitric oxide (O2 + iNO). The length scale spectrum of CV2Qr was determined from 10 to 110 mm, and the response of regional perfusion to O2 + iNO was calculated as the mean of absolute differences. Vertical gradients in perfusion (Qvgrad) were derived from perfusion images, and ventilation-perfusion distributions from images of 13NN washout kinetics. RESULTS: O2 + iNO significantly enhanced perfusion distribution differences between PAH and controls, allowing differentiation of PAH subjects from controls. During O2 + iNO, CV2Qvgrad was significantly higher in controls than in PAH (0.08 (0.055-0.10) vs. 6.7 × 10-3 (2 × 10-4-0.02), p < 0.001) with a considerable gap between groups. Qvgrad and CV2Qtotal showed smaller differences: - 7.3 vs. - 2.5, p = 0.002, and 0.12 vs. 0.06, p = 0.01. CV2Qvgrad had the largest effect size among the primary parameters during O2 + iNO. CV2Qr, and its length scale spectrum were similar in PAH and controls. Ventilation-perfusion distributions showed a trend towards a difference between PAH and controls at baseline, but it was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion imaging during O2 + iNO showed a significant difference in the heterogeneity associated with the vertical gradient in perfusion, distinguishing in this small cohort study PAH subjects from controls.

An international, multicenter study of intravenous bevacizumab for bleeding in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: the InHIBIT-Bleed study.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osler-Weber-Rendu disease) is a rare multisystem vascular disorder causing chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, epistaxis, and severe anemia. Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, may be effective to treat bleeding in HHT. This international, multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the use of systemic bevacizumab to treat HHT-associated bleeding and anemia at 12 HHT treatment centers. Hemoglobin, epistaxis severity score, red cell units transfused, and intravenous iron infusions before and after treatment were evaluated using paired means testing and mixed-effects linear models. 238 HHT patients received bevacizumab for a median of 12 (range, 1-96) months. Compared with pretreatment, bevacizumab increased mean hemoglobin by 3.2 g/dL (95% CI, 2.9-3.5 g/dL) [mean hemoglobin 8.6 (8.5, 8.8) g/dL versus 11.8 (11.5, 12.1) g/dL, p<0.0001)] and decreased the epistaxis severity score (ESS) by 3.4 (3.2-3.7) points [mean ESS 6.8 (6.6-7.1) versus 3.4 (3.2-3.7), P<0.0001] during the first year of treatment. Compared with 6 months pretreatment, RBC units transfused decreased by 82% [median of 6.0 (IQR 0.0-13.0) units versus 0 (IQR, 0.0-1.0) units, P<0.0001] and iron infusions decreased by 70% [median of 6.0 (1.0-18.0) infusions versus 1.0 (0.0-4.0) infusions, P<0.0001] during the first 6 months of bevacizumab treatment. Outcomes were similar regardless of underlying pathogenic mutation. Following initial induction infusions, continuous/scheduled bevacizumab maintenance achieved higher hemoglobin and lower ESS than intermittent/as needed maintenance but with more drug exposure. Bevacizumab was well tolerated: hypertension, fatigue, and proteinuria were the most common adverse events. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 2% of patients. In conclusion, systemic bevacizumab was safe and effective to manage chronic bleeding and anemia in HHT.

Inhaled high dose nitric oxide is a safe and effective respiratory treatment in spontaneous breathing hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled nitric oxide (NO) is a selective pulmonary vasodilator. In-vitro studies report that NO donors can inhibit replication of SARS-CoV-2. This multicenter study evaluated the feasibility and effects of high-dose inhaled NO in non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This is an interventional study to determine whether NO at 160 parts-per-million (ppm) inhaled for 30 min twice daily might be beneficial and safe in non-intubated COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: Twenty-nine COVID-19 patients received a total of 217 intermittent inhaled NO treatments for 30 min at 160 ppm between March and June 2020. Breathing NO acutely decreased the respiratory rate of tachypneic patients and improved oxygenation in hypoxemic patients. The maximum level of nitrogen dioxide delivered was 1.5 ppm. The maximum level of methemoglobin (MetHb) during the treatments was 4.7%. MetHb decreased in all patients 5 min after discontinuing NO administration. No adverse events during treatment, such as hypoxemia, hypotension, or acute kidney injury during hospitalization occurred. In our NO treated patients, one patient of 29 underwent intubation and mechanical ventilation, and none died. The median hospital length of stay was 6 days [interquartile range 4-8]. No discharged patients required hospital readmission nor developed COVID-19 related long-term sequelae within 28 days of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In spontaneous breathing patients with COVID-19, the administration of inhaled NO at 160 ppm for 30 min twice daily promptly improved the respiratory rate of tachypneic patients and systemic oxygenation of hypoxemic patients. No adverse events were observed. None of the subjects was readmitted or had long-term COVID-19 sequelae.

Treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia - A case series and systematic review.

RATIONALE: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), a rare complication of HHT is associated with poor outcome. There are no trials to date that have investigated whether pulmonary vasodilator therapy improves hemodynamics or survival in this disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pulmonary vasodilator therapy improves survival, exercise capacity, or hemodynamics in HHT patients with pre-capillary PH. METHODS: We performed a before-and-after observational study on a multicenter cohort of subjects with HHT-PAH who received intravenous prostanoid therapy. We then conducted a systematic review, searching Medline and EMBASE through December 2019. Studies that enrolled HHT-PAH subjects and reported treatment outcomes were selected. PROSPERO #158179. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles were selected. Studies were before-and-after observational studies, case reports, and case series. Among all subjects with HHT-PAH, both mPAP (65 ± 19 pre-treatment vs 51 ± 16 mmHg post-treatment p = 0.04) and PVR (12 ± 6 pre-treatment vs 8 ± 4 WU post-treatment p = 0.01) improved with treatment. The mPAP improved with either oral (57 ± 17 pre-treatment versus 44 ± 13 mmHg post-treatment, p = 0.03) or intravenous (80 ± 15 pre-treatment versus 64 ± 16 mmHg post-treatment, p = 0.017) therapy. PVR also improved with either oral (10 ± 4 pre-treatment versus 6 ± 3 WU post-treatment, p = 0.004) or intravenous (17 ± 5 pre-treatment versus 10 ± 4 WU post-treatment, p = 0.04) therapy. Survival among HHT-PAH patients who received oral or intravenous therapy was not different (p = 0.2). Unadjusted survival among HHT-PAH patients was longer than that of IPAH patients (p = 0.008). There was no difference in side effects among HHT-PAH patient who received oral or intravenous therapy (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vasodilator therapy is effective in improving hemodynamics of subjects with HHT-PAH and was not associated with increased risk of side effects.

Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease burden in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare genetic disease with prevalence of approximately 1 in 5000-10,000. We evaluated the prevalence and association of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular comorbidities in HHT patients using national database. METHODS: Retrospective observational study was performed using National Inpatient Sampling (NIS) database for the year 2014. HHT patients and comorbidities were identified using ICD-9 codes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using SAS. RESULTS: Prevalence of HHT was 0.0119% with predominance in White population. Mean age of HHT patients was 59 years. Increased proportion of HHT patients had hypertension (46.8% vs 42%), anemia (28.9% vs 15.1%), chronic pulmonary disease (24.8% vs 16.4%), congestive heart failure (15.7% vs 7.5%), liver disease (7.9% vs 2.8%), migraine (4.5% vs 1.5%), and cerebrovascular malformations (0.8% vs 0.03%), whereas chronic kidney disease (12.7% vs 12.2%), headaches (1.3% vs 1.1%), seizures (0.7% vs 0.9%), transient ischemic attacks (1.06% vs 1.03%), ischemic (1.2% vs 1.0%), and hemorrhagic (0.5% vs 0.3%) strokes were similar to those without HHT. Multivariable model shows increase in cerebrovascular malformations (OR 11.04, CI 2.49-22.26, p < 0.0001), migraine (OR 3.23, CI 2.30-4.52, p < 0.0001), chronic blood loss anemia (OR 6.83, CI 5.36-8.71, p < 0.0001), congestive heart failure (OR 1.55, CI 1.26-1.91, p < 0.0001), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.30, CI 1.09-1.56, p = 0.0038), and hepatic disease (OR 2.63, CI 2.01-3.45, p < 0.0001) in HHT patients as compared to non-HHT patients. CONCLUSION: There is a need for a large prospective registry of HHT patients that can corroborate these associations and burden of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases.

Second International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.

DESCRIPTION: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant disease with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 5000 that is characterized by the presence of vascular malformations (VMs). These result in chronic bleeding, acute hemorrhage, and complications from shunting through VMs. The goal of the Second International HHT Guidelines process was to develop evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management and prevention of HHT-related symptoms and complications. METHODS: The guidelines were developed using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) framework and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. The guidelines expert panel included expert physicians (clinical and genetic) in HHT from 15 countries, guidelines methodologists, health care workers, health care administrators, patient advocacy representatives, and persons with HHT. During the preconference process, the expert panel generated clinically relevant questions in 6 priority topic areas. A systematic literature search was done in June 2019, and articles meeting a priori criteria were included to generate evidence tables, which were used as the basis for recommendation development. The expert panel subsequently convened during a guidelines conference to conduct a structured consensus process, during which recommendations reaching at least 80% consensus were discussed and approved. RECOMMENDATIONS: The expert panel generated and approved 6 new recommendations for each of the following 6 priority topic areas: epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia and iron deficiency, liver VMs, pediatric care, and pregnancy and delivery (36 total). The recommendations highlight new evidence in existing topics from the first International HHT Guidelines and provide guidance in 3 new areas: anemia, pediatrics, and pregnancy and delivery. These recommendations should facilitate implementation of key components of HHT care into clinical practice.

Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis.

Multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) are being implemented to improve care of patients with life-threatening PE. We sought to determine how the creation of PERT affects treatment and outcomes of patients with serious PE. A pre- and post-intervention study was performed using an interrupted time series design, to compare patients with PE before (2006-2012) and after (2012-2016) implementation of PERT at a university hospital. T-tests, Chi square tests and logistic regression were used to compare outcomes, and multivariable regression were used to adjust for differences in PE severity. Two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. For the interrupted time-series analysis, data was divided into mutually exclusive 6-month time periods (11 pre- and 7 post-PERT). To examine changes in treatment and outcomes associated with PERT, slopes and change points were compared pre- and post-PERT. Two-hundred and twelve pre-PERT and 228 post-PERT patients were analyzed. Patient demographics were generally similar, though pre-PERT, PE were more likely to be low-risk (37% vs. 19%) while post-PERT, PE were more likely to be submassive (32% vs. 49%). More patients underwent catheter directed therapy (1% vs. 14%, p = < 0.0001) or any advanced therapy (19 [9%] vs. 44 [19%], p = 0.002) post PERT. Interrupted time series analysis demonstrated that this increase was sudden and coincident with implementation of PERT, and most noticeable among patients with submassive PE. There were no differences in major bleeding or mortality pre- and post-PERT. While the use of advanced therapies, particularly catheter-directed therapies, increased after creation of PERT, especially among patients with submassive PE, there was no apparent increase in bleeding.

Correction to: Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis.

The original version of the article unfortunately contained an error in conflict of interest. This erratum is published with the correct conflict of interest.

Health Disparities in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Blueprint for Action. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.

BACKGROUND: Health disparities have a major impact in the quality of life and clinical care received by minorities in the United States. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare cardiopulmonary disorder that affects children and adults and that, if untreated, results in premature death. The impact of health disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcome of patients with PAH has not been systematically investigated. OBJECTIVES: The specific goals of this research statement were to conduct a critical review of the literature concerning health disparities in PAH, identify major research gaps and prioritize direction for future research. METHODS: Literature searches from multiple reference databases were performed using medical subject headings and text words for pulmonary hypertension and health disparities. Members of the committee discussed the evidence and provided recommendations for future research. RESULTS: Few studies were found discussing the impact of health disparities in PAH. Using recent research statements focused on health disparities, the group identified six major study topics that would help address the contribution of health disparities to PAH. Representative studies in each topic were discussed and specific recommendations were made by the group concerning the most urgent questions to address in future research studies. CONCLUSIONS: At present, there are few studies that address health disparities in PAH. Given the potential adverse impact of health disparities, we recommend that research efforts be undertaken to address the topics discussed in the document. Awareness of health disparities will likely improve advocacy efforts, public health policy and the quality of care of vulnerable populations with PAH.

The Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: What Is the Ideal Model?

Treatment of patients with intermediate- and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is a controversial area. Many therapeutic options exist, and deciding on appropriate treatment can be difficult. In addition, multiple specialties are often involved in the care of PE patients. To better organize the response to serious PE patients, several hospitals and academic centers across the United States, spearheaded by Massachusetts General Hospital, have created pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs). The goal of a PERT is to have a single multidisciplinary team of experts in thromboembolic disease, who can respond rapidly to patients with acute PE, and offer consultation with the full spectrum of therapeutic options. PERT teams were modeled after rapid response teams and are meant to generate a prompt, patient-specific plan for patients with PE without having to consult multiple individual specialists.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia may be the most morbid inherited bleeding disorder in women.

ABSTRACT: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is the second-most common inherited bleeding disorder (BD) worldwide and remains without approved therapies. HHT causes serious mucosal bleeding resulting in severe iron-deficiency anemia, major psychosocial complications, and visceral arteriovenous malformations in the brain, lung, and liver, which can cause life-threatening hemorrhagic complications. No study has examined the relative morbidity of HHT and von Willebrand disease (VWD), which is the most common inherited BD in women. We performed an observational cohort study of women with HHT or VWD, comparing a representative sample of 100 randomly selected women with HHT to 100 randomly selected age-matched women with VWD. In HHT vs VWD, recurrent epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding were more likely (odds ratio [OR], 32.73 [95% confidence interval, 13.81-71.80]; P < .0001 and 5.69 [2.59-12.89]; P < .0001) and heavy menstrual bleeding was less likely (OR, 0.32 [0.18-0.57]; P < .0001). Iron-deficiency anemia was significantly more likely, and the lowest hemoglobin was significantly lower in HHT than in VWD. The odds of iron infusion dependence, requirement for red cell transfusion, and hemostatic surgical procedures were significantly higher-17-fold, threefold, and eightfold higher, respectively-and hospital admissions to manage disease complications were both ∼14 times more frequent in women with HHT vs those with VWD. In conclusion, much higher disease-related morbidity, mortality, and health care use were observed in women with HHT vs VWD, providing evidence that HHT may be the most clinically significant inherited BD in women. Given the vast gap in research funding for HHT compared with both hemophilia (a disease primarily of men) and VWD, these findings have significant implications for gender equity in hematology.

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Data describing safety and tolerability of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), the second-most-common inherited bleeding disorder, is limited. METHODS: We performed a scoping review, searching MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2023 for eligible studies reporting detailed clinical data describing antithrombotic use in HHT. Data extracted included study design, patient population, and characteristics and outcomes of antithrombotic therapy. RESULTS: Of 625 unique manuscripts identified through database search, 77 were included: 64 case reports/case series describing 65 patients and 13 cohort studies. Data were extracted on a total of 466 patients with HHT, covering 587 episodes of antithrombotic therapy. The most common reasons for antithrombotic therapy were venous thromboembolism (VTE) (44.6 %), atrial arrhythmias (17.8 %) and stroke (10.5 %). anticoagulation was used in in 356 episodes (61.9 %), antiplatelet therapy in 140 episodes (24.3 %), and both together in 50 episodes (8.7 %). Complications of therapy included worsened HHT-associated bleeding (primarily epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding) in 198 antithrombotic treatment episodes (38.9 %) and premature antithrombotic therapy discontinuation in 142 episodes (28.9 %). Bleeding-directed therapy (local ablative therapy and systemic therapies) were employed to address worsening bleeding in 14.6 % of episodes. No specific complications of therapy were reported in 322 total antithrombotic events (58.4 %). Rates of bleeding (8.3 % to 80 %), therapy discontinuation (14.3 % to 57.1 %), and other complications ranged considerably from study to study. CONCLUSION: Current publications vary widely on the outcomes and tolerability of antithrombotics in HHT, but confirm the clinical challenge of adequate antithrombotic therapy in this population. More formal studies are needed to better guide optimal antithrombotic use in HHT.

Elevations in Norclobazam Concentrations and Altered Mental Status in CYP2C19 Poor Metabolizer Phenotype: A Case Report.

Clobazam is a 1,5-benzodiazepine frequently used as an adjunctive agent for refractory seizures and status epilepticus. Clobazam undergoes metabolism to an active metabolite norclobazam which is subsequently hydroxylated by CYP2C19, a cytochrome with several pharmacogenetic variants. Patients with poor metabolizer phenotypes may have elevated norclobazam levels and subsequent adverse effects. We present a case of an Asian American male receiving clobazam at a standard therapeutic dose for seizure disorder who became comatose secondary to significantly elevated norclobazam concentrations. Genetic testing revealed the patient was a poor CYP2C19 metabolizer, accounting for the impaired clearance. Clinicians should be aware of the patient populations at risk for these genetic polymorphisms and adjust initial doses based on package labeling or consider therapeutic drug monitoring to avoid adverse effects.

Safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy) is frequently needed in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT); however, data describing and guiding its use are very limited. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of antithrombotic therapy in HHT in a cohort large enough to compare agents, evaluate for baseline predictors of premature discontinuation, and evaluate hematologic support requirements and healthcare utilization before and after antithrombitc therapy initiation. METHODS: We performed a multicenter observational cohort study characterizing the outcomes of antithrombic therapy in adults with HHT. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients with HHT with 187 discrete antithrombotic therapy episodes were included. Of these, 59 patients (50%) dose-reduced and/or prematurely discontinued therapy (including 52 patients [44%] who discontinued) due to worsened bleeding complications. Initiation at reduced dose intensity had a similar premature discontinuation rate (49%) as initiation at standard dose intensity (43%). In a multivariable logistic model, a history of gastrointestinal bleeding was associated with 3.25-fold odds of discontinuation (p = .001). Hemoglobin was significantly lower (10.8 g/dL vs 12.2 g/dL, p < .001), and the need for hematologic support (intravenous iron and/or red blood cell transfusion) was significantly higher (29 patients vs 12 patients, p = .004) in the 3 months after antithrombotic therapy initiation vs the 3 months before; emergency department visits and hospital admissions due to bleeding also increased. The rates of dose-reduction and/or premature discontinuation were similar regardless of the anticoagulant class (warfarin, 46%; heparin-based, 48%; direct oral anticoagulants, 44%) or with multiple simultaneous agents (44%) but were slightly lower with single-agent antiplatelet therapy (37%). Thromboembolism despite receiving antithrombotic therapy was common (18 patients, 15%) with varying outcomes. CONCLUSION: Antithrombotic therapy is challenging in HHT, resulting in objectively higher morbidity and health care utilization from worsened bleeding. Discontinuation rates approached 50% regardless of the dose intensity at initiation or type of antithrombotic agent used and were higher in patients with a gastrointestinal bleeding history.

Safety of macitentan for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension: Real-world experience from the OPsumit® USers Registry (OPUS) and OPsumit® Historical USers cohort (OrPHeUS).

Macitentan is an oral endothelin receptor antagonist for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The OPsumit® USers Registry (OPUS) and the OPsumit® Historical USers cohort (OrPHeUS) medical chart review provide real-world data for patients newly initiating macitentan. This study aims to describe the characteristics, safety profile, and clinical outcomes of PAH patients newly treated with macitentan in the combined OPUS/OrPHeUS data set. OPUS was a prospective, multicenter, long-term, observational drug registry from April 2014 to June 2020. OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter chart review: observation period October 2013 to March 2017. All analyses were descriptive. At registry closure in June 2020, the combined population consisted of 5654 patients, of whom 81.9% were diagnosed with PAH. For these 4626 patients, median duration of macitentan exposure observed was 14.5 (Q1 = 5.2, Q3 = 29.0) months; idiopathic PAH (54.8%) was the most common form of PAH; macitentan was initiated as monotherapy (37.9%), or as part of double (48.0%) or triple therapy (14.1%); discontinuation due to nonhepatic/hepatic adverse events occurred in 17.1%/0.3% of patients; 9.9% of patients experienced ≥1 hepatic adverse events; Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that at 1 year 59.9% (95% confidence interval: 58.3, 61.5) of patients were free from hospitalization and survival was 90.4% (89.3, 91.3). This analysis of real-world data from the combined OPUS and OrPHeUS populations demonstrated that macitentan is well tolerated in a large, diverse population of PAH patients, with overall and hepatic safety profiles consistent with previous macitentan clinical trials.

Room for improvement in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reporting: a review of hemodynamic tracings at a large academic medical center.

To describe the frequency with which pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measurements, obtained during right heart catheterization, are falsely elevated and to educate operators on techniques to improve accuracy of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reporting. Failure to completely occlude pulmonary artery branch vessels during balloon inflation can lead to falsely elevated, "incomplete" pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. Balloon deflation prior to catheter retraction may result in catheter advancement into smaller branch vessels, yielding an inadvertent but more accurate alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. We hypothesized that this phenomenon can be identified on retrospective review of right heart catheterization tracings, which occurs commonly and goes unrecognized by operators. We conducted a retrospective study of patients undergoing right heart catheterization or right heart catheterization and left heart catheterization with computer-generated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ≥20 from January 2015 to June 2017. Alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were defined as a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure trace during balloon deflation ≥3 mmHg lower than the reported pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Inter-rater reliability of tracing reviewers was also evaluated. Results showed that, of the 182 tracings reviewed, an alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was identified in 26 or 14.3% of cases. Eleven of these alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were ≤15 mmHg with a calculated pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 Wood units in 10 patients, re-classifying the etiology of pulmonary hypertension from post-capillary to pre-capillary in 38.5% of cases. For the eight patients for whom left heart catheterization data were available, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure aligned with the alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. In conclusion, inadvertently obtained, but likely more accurate, alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures were identified in almost 15% of procedures reviewed from a busy academic institution. As wedge pressures often drive diagnosis and treatment decisions for patients with cardiac and pulmonary pathology, operators should be attuned to balloon deflation as a time when alternative pulmonary capillary wedge pressures may be identified as they are likely more reflective of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. Additional tools to ensure accuracy of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure reporting are reviewed.