Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Thorax ; 74(8): 814-817, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30962273

ABSTRACT

The online British Lung Foundation Breath Test provides an opportunity to study the relationship between breathlessness, common sociobehavioural risk factors and interaction with healthcare. We analysed data from 356 799 responders: 71% were ≥50 years old and 18% were smokers. 20% reported limiting breathlessness (Medical Research Council breathlessness score ≥3), and the majority of these (85%) worried about their breathing; of these, 29% had not sought medical advice. Of those who had, 58% reported that the advice received had not helped their breathlessness. Limiting breathlessness was associated with being older, physically inactive, smoking and a higher body mass index. These data suggest a considerable unmet need associated with breathlessness as well as possibilities for intervention.


Subject(s)
Dyspnea/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Referral and Consultation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Body Mass Index , Dyspnea/therapy , Humans , Internet , Middle Aged , Sedentary Behavior , Severity of Illness Index , Smoking
2.
Euro Surveill ; 22(49)2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29233257

ABSTRACT

Following notification of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium gastroenteritis outbreak, we identified 82 cases linked to a restaurant with symptom onset from 12 February 2015 to 8 March 2016. Seventy-two cases had an isolate matching the nationally unique whole genome sequencing profile (single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) address: 1.1.1.124.395.395). Interviews established exposure to the restaurant and subsequent case-control analysis identified an association with eating carvery buffet food (adjusted odds ratios (AOR): 20.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2 - ∞). Environmental inspections, food/water testing, and a food trace-back investigation were inconclusive. Repeated cycles of cleaning were undertaken, including hydrogen peroxide fogging, however, transmission continued. After 7 months of investigation, environmental swabbing identified 106 isolates from kitchen surfaces and restaurant drains matching the outbreak profile. We found structural faults with the drainage system and hypothesised that a reservoir of bacteria in drain biofilm and underfloor flooded areas may have sustained this outbreak. Ineffective drain water-traps (U-bends) may have also contributed by allowing transmission of contaminated aerosols into the kitchen environment. These findings suggest that routine swabbing of sink drain points and inspection of drainage systems should be considered in future outbreak scenarios.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Food Contamination , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Restaurants , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella typhimurium/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Notification , England/epidemiology , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Gastroenteritis/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing , Salmonella Food Poisoning/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections/microbiology , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Whole Genome Sequencing , Young Adult
3.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 6(1): e000478, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31673369

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The British Lung Foundation (BLF) COPD Patient Passport (www.blf.org.uk/passport) was developed as a resource to help people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and clinicians to consider the care received and identify essential omissions. We used the online data collected to evaluate the delivery of COPD care in the UK from a patient perspective. Methods: The patient passport consists of 13 questions relating to key aspects of COPD care including: spirometry confirmation of diagnosis, understanding their diagnosis, support and a written management plan, vaccinations, smoking cessation, physical activity, exercise, eating well, pulmonary rehabilitation, exacerbations, medications and yearly reviews. Data were presented as proportions with an answer corresponding to good care, and plotted over time to identify trends. Results: After removing identifiable duplicates, data from 41 769 entries, completed online between November 2014 and April 2019, remained (table 1). Twenty-four per cent reported getting support to manage their care and a written action plan; 53% could spot the signs of an acute exacerbation; 34% had discussed pulmonary rehabilitation and 41% stated they understood their COPD, and their doctor or nurse had explained where to find information, advice and emotional support. A quarter reported not receiving influenza vaccination and a third of those who smoke were not offered support to quit smoking. Even the strongest areas including spirometry-confirmed diagnosis, and knowing the importance of being active and eating well, achieved only around 80%. Response patterns remained stable or worsened over time. Discussion: Responses to the BLF COPD Patient Passport identify substantial gaps in patients' experience of care, which did not appear to improve during the 5 years covered. These data provide a unique yet commonly overlooked perspective on care quality, and highlight that new approaches will be needed to meet the ambitions to improve respiratory care set out in the NHS Long Term Plan.


Subject(s)
Patient Outcome Assessment , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Humans , Self Report , United Kingdom
4.
Health Educ Behav ; 29(1): 14-29, 2002 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11822550

ABSTRACT

Participatory action research (PAR) is a collaborative approach to inquiry for education and social change that is gaining increasing prominence in health education. This case study explores the use of PAR by and with a community of people with disabilities in addressing a polarizing issue in that community: death with dignity or physician-assisted suicide legislation. Following a brief review of the debate within the community about this issue and the goals, methods, and findings of this project, the authors examine four key ethical challenges. These are dilemmas in issue selection when the community is deeply divided over a problem area, inclusion and exclusion in study team makeup and sample selection, insider/outsider issues, and how best to use findings in ways that can unite and strengthen the community. The implications of these issues for health educators and others engaged in community-based PAR efforts are presented.


Subject(s)
Community Participation , Disabled Persons , Ethics , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Health Services Research/methods , Health Education , Health Services Research/standards , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Organizational Case Studies , Research Design/standards , Right to Die , Suicide, Assisted , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL