Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 4(7): e0002686, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058698

ABSTRACT

Prior studies have identified various determinants of differential immune responses to COVID-19. This study focused on the Ig-G anti-RBD marker, analyzing its potential correlations with sex, vaccine type, body fat percentage, metabolic risk, perceived stress, and previous COVID-19 exposure. In this study, data (available in S1 Data) were obtained from 108 participants from the ESFUERSO cohort, who completed questionnaires detailing their COVID-19 experiences and stress levels assessed through the SISCO scale. IgG anti-RBD concentrations were quantified using an ELISA assay developed by UNAM. Multiple regression analysis was employed to control for covariates, including sex, age, body fat percentage, body mass index (BMI), and perceived stress. This sample comprised young individuals (average age of 21.4 years), primarily consisting of females (70%), with a substantial proportion reporting a family history of diabetes, hypertension, or obesity. Most students had received the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines, and 91% displayed a positive anti-RBD response. A noteworthy finding was the interaction between body fat percentage and sex. In males, increased adiposity was associated with decreased Ig-G anti-RBD concentration; in females, the response increased. Importantly, this pattern remained consistent regardless of the vaccine received. No significant associations were observed for dietary habits or perceived stress variables. This research reports the impact of sex and body fat percentage on the immune response through Ig-G anti-RBD levels to COVID-19 vaccines. The implications of these findings offer a foundation for educational initiatives and the formulation of preventive policies aimed at mitigating health disparities.

2.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 15(6): 644-8, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20883286

ABSTRACT

AIM: The TGF-ß gene participates in the development of chronic kidney disease. We investigated whether the 869 T > C, 915 G > C and -800 G > A polymorphisms of TGF-ß1 are associated with diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS: Polymorphisms were genotyped in 439 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, 233 with diabetic nephropathy (DN+) and 206 without (DN-). The sample was characterized for relevant clinical and biochemical parameters. RESULTS: The 869 T > C (P = 0.016; odds ratio (OR) = 1.818, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.128-2.930) and the 915 G > C polymorphisms (P = 0.008, OR = 4.073, 95% CI = 1.355-12.249) were associated with diabetic nephropathy. The 869 T > C variant was associated with total cholesterol levels: CC + CT genotypes had a mean cholesterol concentration of 5.62 ± 1.40 mmol/L vs a mean concentration of 5.15 ± 1.40 mmol/L for the TT genotype (P = 0.011). Triglycerides were also higher in CC + CT genotypes (2.49 ± 1.56 mmol/L) in comparison with TT homozygotes (2.1 ± 1.22 mmol/L, P = 0.042). Multivariate logistic regression showed that the polymorphisms 869 T > C and 915 G > C were independent predictors for DN (P = 0.049 and 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSION: The 869 T > C and 915 G > C polymorphisms within the TGF-ß1 gene were associated with DN+. Lower cholesterol and triglycerides levels were observed in TT homozygotes for the 869 T > C polymorphism. The TGF-ß1 869 T allele seems to confer protection against DN+.


Subject(s)
Cholesterol/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Diabetic Nephropathies/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Transforming Growth Factor beta1/genetics , Triglycerides/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Chi-Square Distribution , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetic Nephropathies/blood , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Heterozygote , Homozygote , Humans , Logistic Models , Mexico , Odds Ratio , Phenotype , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL