ABSTRACT
The enigmatic eosinophil has emerged as an exciting component of the immune system, involved in a plethora of homeostatic and inflammatory responses. Substantial progress has been achieved through experimental systems manipulating eosinophils in vivo, initially in mice and more recently in humans. Researchers using eosinophil knockout mice have identified a contributory role for eosinophils in basal and inflammatory processes and protective immunity. Primarily fueled by the purported proinflammatory role of eosinophils in eosinophil-associated diseases, a series of anti-eosinophil therapeutics have emerged as a new class of drugs. These agents, which dramatically deplete eosinophils, provide a valuable opportunity to characterize the consequences of eosinophil knockout humans. Herein, we comparatively describe mouse and human eosinophil knockouts. We put forth the view that human eosinophils negatively contribute to a variety of diseases and, unlike mouse eosinophils, do not yet have an identified role in physiological health; thus, clarifying all roles of eosinophils remains an ongoing pursuit.
Subject(s)
Eosinophils , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Animals , Biological Therapy , Humans , Mice , Mice, KnockoutABSTRACT
Eosinophils are important effector cells and therapeutic targets in allergic diseases. Emerging data indicate that eosinophils infiltrate a variety of solid tumor types and have pleiotropic activities by at least two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms: direct interactions with tumor cells, and intricate cross-talk with lymphocytes. In light of the immune checkpoint inhibition revolution in cancer therapy, we review eosinophil-lymphocyte interactions in the tumor microenvironment. We also analyze potential interactions between eosinophils and lymphocyte subsets, including T cells, natural killer cells and innate lymphoid cells. We provide perspectives on the consequences of these interactions and how eosinophils are accessory cells that can affect the response to various forms of T cell-mediated immunotherapies and might be therapeutically targeted to improve cancer immunotherapy.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Tumor Microenvironment , Eosinophils , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Immunity, Innate , Immunotherapy , Killer Cells, Natural/pathologyABSTRACT
Environmental allergens, including fungi, insects and mites, trigger type 2 immunity; however, the innate sensing mechanisms and initial signaling events remain unclear. Herein, we demonstrate that allergens trigger RIPK1-caspase 8 ripoptosome activation in epithelial cells. The active caspase 8 subsequently engages caspases 3 and 7, which directly mediate intracellular maturation and release of IL-33, a pro-atopy, innate immunity, alarmin cytokine. Mature IL-33 maintained functional interaction with the cognate ST2 receptor and elicited potent pro-atopy inflammatory activity in vitro and in vivo. Inhibiting caspase 8 pharmacologically and deleting murine Il33 and Casp8 each attenuated allergic inflammation in vivo. Clinical data substantiated ripoptosome activation and IL-33 maturation as likely contributors to human allergic inflammation. Our findings reveal an epithelial barrier, allergen-sensing mechanism that converges on the ripoptosome as an intracellular molecular signaling platform, triggering type 2 innate immune responses. These findings have significant implications for understanding and treating human allergic diseases.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Immunity, Innate/immunology , Inflammation/immunology , Adolescent , Animals , Caspase 8/immunology , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Child , Child, Preschool , Cytokines/immunology , Epithelial Cells/immunology , Female , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Interleukin-33/immunology , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Signal Transduction/immunologyABSTRACT
Eosinophils are suppressed by a new class of drugs targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5), an eosinophil growth, activation, and survival factor. Humanized anti-IL-5 antibodies are effective in treating asthma patients with the severe eosinophilic form of the disease and are the first new class of asthma drugs approved in 12 years.
ABSTRACT
Interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) is critical for the in vivo survival, expansion and effector function of IL-17-producing helper T (T(H)17) cells during autoimmune responses, including experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). However, the spatiotemporal role and cellular source of IL-1ß during EAE pathogenesis are poorly defined. In the present study, we uncovered a T cell-intrinsic inflammasome that drives IL-1ß production during T(H)17-mediated EAE pathogenesis. Activation of T cell antigen receptors induced expression of pro-IL-1ß, whereas ATP stimulation triggered T cell production of IL-1ß via ASC-NLRP3-dependent caspase-8 activation. IL-1R was detected on T(H)17 cells but not on type 1 helper T (T(H)1) cells, and ATP-treated T(H)17 cells showed enhanced survival compared with ATP-treated T(H)1 cells, suggesting autocrine action of T(H)17-derived IL-1ß. Together these data reveal a critical role for IL-1ß produced by a T(H)17 cell-intrinsic ASC-NLRP3-caspase-8 inflammasome during inflammation of the central nervous system.
Subject(s)
Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/immunology , Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Th17 Cells/immunology , Adenosine Triphosphate/pharmacology , Animals , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/genetics , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/metabolism , CARD Signaling Adaptor Proteins , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Carrier Proteins/immunology , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Caspase 8/genetics , Caspase 8/immunology , Caspase 8/metabolism , Cell Survival/genetics , Cell Survival/immunology , Cells, Cultured , Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental/genetics , Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental/metabolism , Flow Cytometry , Gene Expression/immunology , Immunoblotting , Inflammasomes/genetics , Inflammasomes/immunology , Inflammasomes/metabolism , Interleukin-17/genetics , Interleukin-17/immunology , Interleukin-17/metabolism , Interleukin-1beta/genetics , Interleukin-1beta/immunology , Interleukin-1beta/metabolism , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Transgenic , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Signal Transduction/genetics , Signal Transduction/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Th17 Cells/drug effects , Th17 Cells/metabolismABSTRACT
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a rare atopic disorder associated with esophageal dysfunction, including difficulty swallowing, food impaction, and inflammation, that develops in a small subset of people with food allergies. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified 9 independent EoE risk loci reaching genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10-8) and 27 additional loci of suggestive significance (5 × 10-8 < p < 1 × 10-5). In the current study, we perform linkage disequilibrium (LD) expansion of these loci to nominate a set of 531 variants that are potentially causal. To systematically interrogate the gene regulatory activity of these variants, we designed a massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) containing the alleles of each variant within their genomic sequence context cloned into a GFP reporter library. Analysis of reporter gene expression in TE-7, HaCaT, and Jurkat cells revealed cell-type-specific gene regulation. We identify 32 allelic enhancer variants, representing 6 genome-wide significant EoE loci and 7 suggestive EoE loci, that regulate reporter gene expression in a genotype-dependent manner in at least one cellular context. By annotating these variants with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) and chromatin looping data in related tissues and cell types, we identify putative target genes affected by genetic variation in individuals with EoE. Transcription factor enrichment analyses reveal possible roles for cell-type-specific regulators, including GATA3. Our approach reduces the large set of EoE-associated variants to a set of 32 with allelic regulatory activity, providing functional insights into the effects of genetic variation in this disease.
Subject(s)
Enteritis , Eosinophilia , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Gastritis , Humans , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/genetics , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/complications , Genome-Wide Association Study , Genotype , Quantitative Trait Loci/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Benralizumab is an eosinophil-depleting anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis are unclear. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients 12 to 65 years of age with symptomatic and histologically active eosinophilic esophagitis in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous benralizumab (30 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks. The two primary efficacy end points were histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) and the change from baseline in the score on the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ; range, 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating more frequent or severe dysphagia) at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients underwent randomization: 104 were assigned to receive benralizumab, and 107 were assigned to receive placebo. At week 24, more patients had a histologic response with benralizumab than with placebo (87.4% vs. 6.5%; difference, 80.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72.9 to 88.8; P<0.001). However, the change from baseline in the DSQ score did not differ significantly between the two groups (difference in least-squares means, 3.0 points; 95% CI, -1.4 to 7.4; P = 0.18). There was no substantial between-group difference in the change from baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score, which reflects endoscopic abnormalities. Adverse events were reported in 64.1% of the patients in the benralizumab group and in 61.7% of those in the placebo group. No patients discontinued the trial because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients 12 to 65 years of age with eosinophilic esophagitis, a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) occurred in significantly more patients in the benralizumab group than in the placebo group. However, treatment with benralizumab did not result in fewer or less severe dysphagia symptoms than placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; MESSINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04543409.).
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Eosinophils , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/drug therapy , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Interleukin-5 Receptor alpha Subunit/antagonists & inhibitors , Leukocyte CountABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 pathways and has shown efficacy in five different atopic diseases marked by type 2 inflammation, including eosinophilic esophagitis in adults and adolescents. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 2:2:1:1 ratio, patients 1 to 11 years of age with active eosinophilic esophagitis who had had no response to proton-pump inhibitors to 16 weeks of a higher-exposure or lower-exposure subcutaneous dupilumab regimen or to placebo (two groups) (Part A). At the end of Part A, eligible patients in each dupilumab group continued the same regimen and those in the placebo groups were assigned to higher-exposure or lower-exposure dupilumab for 36 weeks (Part B). At each level of exposure, dupilumab was administered in one of four doses tiered according to baseline body weight. The primary end point was histologic remission (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count, ≤6 per high-power field) at week 16. Key secondary end points were tested hierarchically. RESULTS: In Part A, histologic remission occurred in 25 of the 37 patients (68%) in the higher-exposure group, in 18 of the 31 patients (58%) in the lower-exposure group, and in 1 of the 34 patients (3%) in the placebo group (difference between the higher-exposure regimen and placebo, 65 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, 48 to 81; P<0.001]; difference between the lower-exposure regimen and placebo, 55 percentage points [95% CI, 37 to 73; P<0.001]). The higher-exposure dupilumab regimen led to significant improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures as compared with placebo. The improvements in histologic, endoscopic, and transcriptomic measures between baseline and week 52 in all the patients were generally similar to the improvements between baseline and week 16 in the patients who received dupilumab in Part A. In Part A, the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019, nausea, injection-site pain, and headache was at least 10 percentage points higher among the patients who received dupilumab (at either dose) than among those who received placebo. Serious adverse events were reported in 3 patients who received dupilumab during Part A and in 6 patients overall during Part B. CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab resulted in histologic remission in a significantly higher percentage of children with eosinophilic esophagitis than placebo. The higher-exposure dupilumab regimen also led to improvements in measures of key secondary end points as compared with placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; EoE KIDS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04394351.).
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/drug therapy , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Eosinophils/immunology , Eosinophils/pathology , Esophagus/drug effects , Esophagus/immunology , Esophagus/pathology , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interleukin-13/antagonists & inhibitors , Interleukin-4/antagonists & inhibitors , Remission Induction , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Eosinophilia is a hallmark characteristic of T helper type 2 (TH2) cell-associated diseases and is critically regulated by the central eosinophil growth factor interleukin 5 (IL-5). Here we demonstrate that IL-5 activity in eosinophils was regulated by paired immunoglobulin-like receptors PIR-A and PIR-B. Upon self-recognition of ß2-microglobulin (ß2M) molecules, PIR-B served as a permissive checkpoint for IL-5-induced development of eosinophils by suppressing the proapoptotic activities of PIR-A, which were mediated by the Grb2-Erk-Bim pathway. PIR-B-deficient bone marrow eosinophils underwent compartmentalized apoptosis, resulting in decreased blood eosinophilia in naive mice and in mice challenged with IL-5. Subsequently, Pirb(-/-) mice displayed impaired aeroallergen-induced lung eosinophilia and induction of lung TH2 cell responses. Collectively, these data uncover an intrinsic, self-limiting pathway regulating IL-5-induced expansion of eosinophils, which has broad implications for eosinophil-associated diseases.
Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation/immunology , Eosinophils/immunology , Interleukin-5/immunology , Receptors, Immunologic/immunology , Animals , Apoptosis/genetics , Apoptosis/immunology , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/genetics , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/immunology , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/metabolism , Asthma/genetics , Asthma/immunology , Asthma/metabolism , Bcl-2-Like Protein 11 , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cells, Cultured , Colony-Forming Units Assay/methods , Eosinophils/cytology , Eosinophils/metabolism , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/genetics , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/immunology , Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases/metabolism , Female , Flow Cytometry , GRB2 Adaptor Protein/genetics , GRB2 Adaptor Protein/immunology , GRB2 Adaptor Protein/metabolism , Gene Expression/immunology , Interleukin-5/pharmacology , Male , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/immunology , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Transgenic , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/immunology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , Receptors, Immunologic/genetics , Receptors, Immunologic/metabolism , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Signal Transduction/genetics , Signal Transduction/immunology , Stem Cells/cytology , Stem Cells/drug effects , Stem Cells/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling, which have key roles in eosinophilic esophagitis. METHODS: We conducted a three-part, phase 3 trial in which patients 12 years of age or older underwent randomization in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous dupilumab at a weekly dose of 300 mg or placebo (Part A) or in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 300 mg of dupilumab either weekly or every 2 weeks or weekly placebo (Part B) up to week 24. Eligible patients who completed Part A or Part B continued the trial in Part C, in which those who completed Part A received dupilumab at a weekly dose of 300 mg up to week 52 (the Part A-C group); Part C that included the eligible patients from Part B is ongoing. The two primary end points at week 24 were histologic remission (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) and the change from baseline in the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) score (range, 0 to 84, with higher values indicating more frequent or more severe dysphagia). RESULTS: In Part A, histologic remission occurred in 25 of 42 patients (60%) who received weekly dupilumab and in 2 of 39 patients (5%) who received placebo (difference, 55 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 40 to 71; P<0.001). In Part B, histologic remission occurred in 47 of 80 patients (59%) with weekly dupilumab, in 49 of 81 patients (60%) with dupilumab every 2 weeks, and in 5 of 79 patients (6%) with placebo (difference between weekly dupilumab and placebo, 54 percentage points; 95% CI, 41 to 66 [P<0.001]; difference between dupilumab every 2 weeks and placebo, 56 percentage points; 95% CI, 43 to 69 [not significant per hierarchical testing]). The mean (±SD) DSQ scores at baseline were 33.6±12.41 in Part A and 36.7±11.22 in Part B; the scores improved with weekly dupilumab as compared with placebo, with differences of -12.32 (95% CI, -19.11 to -5.54) in Part A and -9.92 (95% CI, -14.81 to -5.02) in Part B (both P<0.001) but not with dupilumab every 2 weeks (difference in Part B, -0.51; 95% CI, -5.42 to 4.41). Serious adverse events occurred in 9 patients during the Part A or B treatment period (in 7 who received weekly dupilumab, 1 who received dupilumab every 2 weeks, and 1 who received placebo) and in 1 patient in the Part A-C group during the Part C treatment period who received placebo in Part A and weekly dupilumab in Part C. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, subcutaneous dupilumab administered weekly improved histologic outcomes and alleviated symptoms of the disease. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03633617.).
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Deglutition Disorders , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Deglutition Disorders/drug therapy , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Deglutition Disorders/pathology , Double-Blind Method , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/complications , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/drug therapy , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Injections, Subcutaneous , Treatment Outcome , Child , Young AdultABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common skin disorders among children. Disease etiology involves genetic and environmental factors, with 29 independent AD risk loci enriched for risk allele-dependent gene expression in the skin and CD4+ T cell compartments. We investigated the potential epigenetic mechanisms responsible for the genetic susceptibility of CD4+ T cells. To understand the differences in gene regulatory activity in peripheral blood T cells in AD, we measured chromatin accessibility (an assay based on transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing, ATAC-seq), nuclear factor kappa B subunit 1 (NFKB1) binding (chromatin immunoprecipitation with sequencing, ChIP-seq), and gene expression levels (RNA-seq) in stimulated CD4+ T cells from subjects with active moderate-to-severe AD, as well as in age-matched non-allergic controls. Open chromatin regions in stimulated CD4+ T cells were highly enriched for AD genetic risk variants, with almost half of the AD risk loci overlapping AD-dependent ATAC-seq peaks. AD-specific open chromatin regions were strongly enriched for NF-κB DNA-binding motifs. ChIP-seq identified hundreds of NFKB1-occupied genomic loci that were AD- or control-specific. As expected, the AD-specific ChIP-seq peaks were strongly enriched for NF-κB DNA-binding motifs. Surprisingly, control-specific NFKB1 ChIP-seq peaks were not enriched for NFKB1 motifs, but instead contained motifs for other classes of human transcription factors, suggesting a mechanism involving altered indirect NFKB1 binding. Using DNA sequencing data, we identified 63 instances of altered genotype-dependent chromatin accessibility at 36 AD risk variant loci (30% of AD risk loci) that might lead to genotype-dependent gene expression. Based on these findings, we propose that CD4+ T cells respond to stimulation in an AD-specific manner, resulting in disease- and genotype-dependent chromatin accessibility alterations involving NFKB1 binding.
Subject(s)
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Dermatitis, Atopic , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Child , Chromatin/genetics , DNA , Dermatitis, Atopic/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic , Humans , NF-kappa B/metabolismABSTRACT
Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are a group of diseases characterized by selective eosinophil infiltration of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in the absence of other causes of eosinophilia. These diseases are generally driven by type 2 inflammation, often in response to food allergen exposure. Among all EGIDs, the clinical presentation often includes a history of atopic disease with a variety of GI symptoms. EGIDs are traditionally separated into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs. EoE is relatively better understood and now associated with clinical guidelines and 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments, whereas non-EoE EGIDs are rarer and less well-understood diseases without US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments. Non-EoE EGIDs are further subclassified by the area of the GI tract that is involved; they comprise eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis (including eosinophilic duodenitis), and eosinophilic colitis. As with other GI disorders, the disease presentations and mechanisms differ depending on the involved segment of the GI tract; however, the differences between EoE and non-EoE EGIDs extend beyond which GI tract segment is involved. The aim of this article is to summarize the commonalities and differences between the clinical presentations and disease mechanisms for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs.
Subject(s)
Enteritis , Eosinophilia , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Gastritis , Humans , Eosinophilia/immunology , Eosinophilia/diagnosis , Eosinophilia/pathology , Enteritis/diagnosis , Enteritis/immunology , Enteritis/pathology , Gastritis/diagnosis , Gastritis/immunology , Gastritis/pathology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Animals , Eosinophils/immunology , Eosinophils/pathology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/immunology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is diagnosed and monitored using esophageal eosinophil levels; however, EoE also exhibits a marked, understudied esophageal mastocytosis. OBJECTIVES: Using machine learning, we localized and characterized esophageal mast cells (MCs) to decipher their potential role in disease pathology. METHODS: Esophageal biopsy samples (EoE, control) were stained for MCs by anti-tryptase and imaged using immunofluorescence; high-resolution whole tissue images were digitally assembled. Machine learning software was trained to identify, enumerate, and characterize MCs, designated Mast Cell-Artificial Intelligence (MC-AI). RESULTS: MC-AI enumerated cell counts with high accuracy. During active EoE, epithelial MCs increased and lamina propria (LP) MCs decreased. In controls and EoE remission patients, papillae had the highest MC density and negatively correlated with epithelial MC density. MC density in the epithelium and papillae correlated with the degree of epithelial eosinophilic inflammation, basal zone hyperplasia, and LP fibrosis. MC-AI detected greater MC degranulation in the epithelium, papillae, and LP in patients with EoE compared with control individuals. MCs were localized further from the basement membrane in active EoE than EoE remission and control individuals but were closer than eosinophils to the basement membrane in active EoE. CONCLUSIONS: Using MC-AI, we identified a distinct population of homeostatic esophageal papillae MCs; during active EoE, this population decreases, undergoes degranulation, negatively correlates with epithelial MC levels, and significantly correlates with distinct histologic features. Overall, MC-AI provides a means to understand the potential involvement of MCs in EoE and other disorders.
Subject(s)
Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Esophagus , Machine Learning , Mast Cells , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/diagnosis , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/immunology , Humans , Mast Cells/immunology , Mast Cells/pathology , Male , Female , Esophagus/pathology , Esophagus/immunology , Adult , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Eosinophils/pathology , Eosinophils/immunologyABSTRACT
Type 2 inflammation is characterized by overexpression and heightened activity of type 2 cytokines, mediators, and cells that drive neuroimmune activation and sensitization to previously subthreshold stimuli. The consequences of altered neuroimmune activity differ by tissue type and disease; they include skin inflammation, sensitization to pruritogens, and itch amplification in atopic dermatitis and prurigo nodularis; airway inflammation and/or hyperresponsiveness, loss of expiratory volume, airflow obstruction and increased mucus production in asthma; loss of sense of smell in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; and dysphagia in eosinophilic esophagitis. We describe the neuroimmune interactions that underlie the various sensory and autonomic pathologies in type 2 inflammatory diseases and present recent advances in targeted treatment approaches to reduce type 2 inflammation and its associated symptoms in these diseases. Further research is needed to better understand the neuroimmune mechanisms that underlie chronic, sustained inflammation and its related sensory pathologies in diseases associated with type 2 inflammation.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Dermatitis, Atopic , Sinusitis , Humans , Inflammation , Pruritus/drug therapy , Sinusitis/pathologyABSTRACT
Climate change is not just jeopardizing the health of our planet but is also increasingly affecting our immune health. There is an expanding body of evidence that climate-related exposures such as air pollution, heat, wildfires, extreme weather events, and biodiversity loss significantly disrupt the functioning of the human immune system. These exposures manifest in a broad range of stimuli, including antigens, allergens, heat stress, pollutants, microbiota changes, and other toxic substances. Such exposures pose a direct and indirect threat to our body's primary line of defense, the epithelial barrier, affecting its physical integrity and functional efficacy. Furthermore, these climate-related environmental stressors can hyperstimulate the innate immune system and influence adaptive immunity-notably, in terms of developing and preserving immune tolerance. The loss or failure of immune tolerance can instigate a wide spectrum of noncommunicable diseases such as autoimmune conditions, allergy, respiratory illnesses, metabolic diseases, obesity, and others. As new evidence unfolds, there is a need for additional research in climate change and immunology that covers diverse environments in different global settings and uses modern biologic and epidemiologic tools.
Subject(s)
Climate Change , Humans , Animals , Immune Tolerance , Immunity, Innate , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Adaptive ImmunityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by persistent or relapsing allergic inflammation, and both clinical and histologic features of esophageal inflammation persist over time in most individuals. Mechanisms contributing to EoE relapse are not understood, and chronic EoE-directed therapy is therefore required to prevent long-term sequelae. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether EoE patients in histologic remission have persistent dysregulation of esophageal gene expression. METHODS: Esophageal biopsy samples from 51 pediatric and 52 adult subjects with EoE in histopathologic remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field [eos/hpf]) and control (48 pediatric and 167 adult) subjects from multiple institutions were subjected to molecular profiling by the EoE diagnostic panel, which comprises a set of 94 esophageal transcripts differentially expressed in active EoE. RESULTS: Defining remission as <15 eos/hpf, we identified 51 and 32 differentially expressed genes in pediatric and adult EoE patients compared to control individuals, respectively (false discovery rate < 0.05). Using the stringent definition of remission (0 eos/hpf), the adult and pediatric cohorts continued to have 18 and 25 differentially expressed genes (false discovery rate < 0.05). Among 6 shared genes between adults and children, CDH26 was upregulated in both children and adults; immunohistochemistry demonstrated increased cadherin 26 staining in the epithelium of EoE patients in remission compared to non-EoE controls. In the adult cohort, POSTN expression correlated with the endoscopic reference system score (Spearman r = 0.35, P = .011), specifically correlating with the rings' endoscopic reference system subscore (r = 0.53, P = .004). CONCLUSION: We have identified persistent EoE-associated esophageal gene expression in patients with disease in deep remission. These data suggest potential inflammation-induced epigenetic mechanisms may influence gene expression during remission in EoE and provide insight into possible mechanisms that underlie relapse in EoE.
Subject(s)
Enteritis , Eosinophilia , Eosinophilic Esophagitis , Gastritis , Adult , Humans , Child , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/pathology , Eosinophils/pathology , Inflammation/pathology , RecurrenceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Eosinophils are elusive cells involved in allergic inflammation. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is an emerging approach to deeply characterize cellular properties, heterogeneity, and functionality. OBJECTIVES: We sought to comprehensively characterize the transcriptome and biological functions of human eosinophils at a site of severe allergic inflammation in the esophagus (ie, eosinophilic esophagitis [EoE]). METHODS: We employed a gravity-based scRNA-seq methodology to sequence blood eosinophils from patients with EoE and control individuals compared to a reanalyzed public scRNA-seq dataset of human esophageal eosinophils of EoE patients. We used flow cytometry, immunostaining, and a stimulation assay to verify mRNA findings. RESULTS: In total, scRNA-seq was obtained from 586 eosinophils (188 from blood [n = 6 individuals] and 398 from esophagus [n = 6 individuals]). The esophageal eosinophils were composed of a population of activated eosinophils (enriched in 659 genes compared with peripheral blood-associated eosinophils) and a small population of eosinophils resembling peripheral blood eosinophils (enriched in 62 genes compared with esophageal eosinophils). Esophageal eosinophils expressed genes involved in sensing and responding to diverse stimuli, most notably IFN-γ, IL-10, histamine and leukotrienes, and succinate. Esophageal eosinophils were most distinguished from other esophageal populations by gene expression of the receptors CCR3, HRH4, SUCNR1, and VSTM1; transcription factors CEBPE, OLIG1, and OLIG2; protease PRSS33; and the hallmark eosinophil gene CLC. A web of bidirectional eosinophil interactions with other esophageal populations was derived. Comparing esophageal eosinophils and mast cells revealed that esophageal eosinophils expressed genes involved in DNAX-activation protein-12 (also known as TYROBP) interactions, IgG receptor-triggered events, immunoregulation, and IL-10 signaling. CONCLUSIONS: In EoE, esophageal eosinophils exist as 2 populations, a minority population resembling blood eosinophils and the other population characterized by high de novo transcription of diverse sensing receptors and inflammatory mediators readying them to potentially intersect with diverse cell types.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Eosinophil accumulation is a main feature of eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) and is associated with its histologic diagnosis and pathology. However, a recent clinical trial has demonstrated that EoG endoscopic, noneosinophil histologic, and clinical features remain persistent despite complete eosinophil depletion. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to examine gastric T-cell composition and associated cytokine levels of patients with EoG following benralizumab-induced eosinophil depletion versus following administration of placebo. METHODS: A cohort of subjects with EoG from a subset of subjects who participated in a recent phase 2 benralizumab trial was treated for 12 weeks with administration of 3 doses of benralizumab (anti-IL-5 receptor α antibody [n = 5]) or placebo (n = 4). Single-cell suspensions obtained by gastric biopsy were stimulated with phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate and ionomycin in the presence of brefeldin A and monensin. Harvested cells were fixed, stained, and analyzed by flow cytometry to examine T-cell populations and associated cytokines. RESULTS: Following benralizumab treatment but not placebo, blood and gastric eosinophil levels decreased 16-fold and 10-fold, respectively. Whereas histologic score and features were significantly decreased, no change was observed in endoscopic score and features. Following complete eosinophil depletion with benralizumab, gastric TH2 cell levels were 3-fold higher than the levels in the patients with EoG who were given placebo; and the levels of associated type 2 cytokine production of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in the benralizumab-treated patients were, respectively, 4-, 5.5-, and 2.5-fold, higher than those in the placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: We have identified a putative positive feedback loop whereby eosinophil depletion results in a paradoxic increase in levels of TH2 cells and derived cytokines; this finding suggests an explanation for the limited success of eosinophil depletion as monotherapy in eosinophil-associated gastrointestinal disorders.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Index of Severity for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (I-SEE) is a new expert-defined clinical tool that classifies disease severity of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether I-SEE is associated with patient characteristics, molecular features of EoE, or both. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with EoE from the Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Researchers (CEGIR). Associations between I-SEE and clinical and molecular features (assessed by an EoE diagnostic panel [EDP]) were assessed. RESULTS: In 318 patients with chronic EoE (209 adults, 109 children), median total I-SEE score was 7.0, with a higher symptoms and complications score in children than adults (4.0 vs 1.0; P < .001) and higher inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores in adults than children (3.0 vs 1.0 and 3.0 vs 0, respectively; both P < .001). Total I-SEE score had a bimodal distribution with the inactive to moderate categories and severe category. EDP score correlated with total I-SEE score (r = -0.352, P < .001) and both inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores (r = -0.665, P < .001; r = -0.446, P < .001, respectively), but not with symptoms and complications scores (r = 0.047, P = .408). Molecular severity increased from inactive to mild and moderate, but not severe, categories. Longitudinal changes of modified I-SEE scores and inflammatory and fibrostenotic features scores reflected histologic and molecular activity. CONCLUSIONS: I-SEE score is associated with select clinical features across severity categories and with EoE molecular features for nonsevere categories, warranting further validation.