ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Aortic aneurysms and/or dissection (AADs) in the aorta are a leading cause of human morbidity and mortality. To date, data on non-syndromic thoracic AADs (TAADs) have been mainly derived from Caucasians, and the genetic basis of TAADs remains to be elucidated. In this study, we assessed gene mutations in a Chinese population with TAADs. METHODS: A cohort of 68 non-syndromic familial TAAD Chinese patients was screened for the most common TAAD-causing genes (ACTA2, MYH11, TGFBR1, TGFBR2, and SMAD3) using high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis. Thereafter, 142 unrelated non-syndromic sporadic cases were recruited and further analyzed using HRM analysis to estimate the prevalence of disease-causing mutations in these candidate genes. RESULTS: Two novel ACTA2 mutations (N117I and L348R) were identified in each familial TAAD proband separately, and an additional novel ACTA2 mutation (Y168N) was identified in one patient with sporadic TAADs. In contrast, none of the three mutations occurred in 480 control subjects. Also, no other gene mutations were identified in this cohort of Chinese TAAD patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current study identified three novel ACTA2 mutations in Chinese TAAD patients, and these mutations represented the most predominant genes responsible for non-syndromic TAADs. In addition, HRM analysis was shown to be a sensitive and high-throughput method for screening gene mutations.
Subject(s)
Actins/genetics , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/genetics , Asian People/genetics , Adult , Aged , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Child , China , Cohort Studies , DNA/chemistry , DNA/isolation & purification , DNA/metabolism , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Pedigree , Phase Transition , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Sequence AlignmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The prosthesis of choice for a tricuspid valve replacement is still unkown. This meta-analysis was undertaken to review the results of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves in the tricuspid position. METHODS: We identified all relevant studies published in the past 20 years (from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2014) through the Embase, Current Contents, and PubMed databases. The hazard ratio and its 95% confidence limits were utilized to evaluate time-to-event related effects of surgical procedures. The Q-statistic, Index of Inconsistency test, funnel plots, and Egger's test were used to assess the degree of heterogeneity and publication bias. Random effects models were used, and study quality was also assessed. RESULTS: In our meta-analysis, 22 studies published from 1995 to 2014 were reviewed and 2630 patients and 14,694 follow-up years were analyzed. No statistically significant difference was identified between mechanical and biological valves in terms of survival, reoperation, and prosthetic valve failure. The respective pooled hazard ratio estimates were 0.95 (0.79 to 1.16, p = 0.62, I(2) = 29%), 1.20 (0.84 to 1.71, p = 0.33, I(2) = 0%), and 0.35 (0.06 to 2.01, p = 0.24, I(2) = 0%). A higher risk of thrombosis was found in mechanical tricuspid valve prostheses (3.86, 1.38 to 10.82, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference was identified between mechanical and biological valves in terms of survival, reoperation, or prosthetic valve failure, but mechanical tricuspid valve prostheses had a higher risk of thrombosis. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12730 (J Card Surg 2016;31:294-302).