Aircraft noise exposure and risk for recurrent cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndrome: A prospective patient cohort study.

In several population based cohort studies associations between aircraft noise and various diagnoses of cardiovascular disease were observed. However, no study has yet addressed the risk of recurrences in relation to transportation noise in patients with acute coronary heart disease. We conducted a prospective patient cohort study of 737 individuals recruited from eleven cardiac centers in the Rhine-Main region in the vicinity of Frankfurt Airport. All patients had an angiographically confirmed acute coronary syndrome diagnosed between July 2013 and November 2018. Individual aircraft noise exposure at the place of residence was calculated using Soundplan software, and exposure to road traffic and railway noise was obtained from noise maps provided by the Hessian State Agency. Data was analyzed by means of Cox regression adjusted for relevant confounders. Recurrent event as non-fatal endpoint was defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. In addition, all-cause mortality was evaluated. Follow-up data including socioeconomic and confounder information was obtained from 663 (90%) patients covering a mean follow-up period of 42 (range: 1-80) months. Mean Lden aircraft noise exposure was 48.1 dB. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence was 1.24 (95%-CI: 0.97-1.58) per 10 dB increase in Lden aircraft noise exposure. A combined analysis of recurrence and all-cause mortality yielded a HR of 1.31 (95%-CI: 1.03-1.66). Similar HRs were found for Lday and Lnight aircraft noise exposure. HRs for road traffic and railway noise were above unity but less pronounced and not significant. Observed exposure-response associations for aircraft noise were more pronounced than previously observed in population-based cohort studies suggesting that acute coronary heart disease patients are particularly vulnerable to effects from transportation noise. Measures to reduce environmental noise exposure may thus be helpful in improving clinical outcome of patients with coronary heart disease.

Dose comparisons of clopidogrel and aspirin in acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel and aspirin are widely used for patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, evidence-based guidelines for dosing have not been established for either agent. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 2-by-2 factorial design, 25,086 patients with an acute coronary syndrome who were referred for an invasive strategy to either double-dose clopidogrel (a 600-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 150 mg daily for 6 days and 75 mg daily thereafter) or standard-dose clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and 75 mg daily thereafter) and either higher-dose aspirin (300 to 325 mg daily) or lower-dose aspirin (75 to 100 mg daily). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 4.2% of patients assigned to double-dose clopidogrel as compared with 4.4% assigned to standard-dose clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.30). Major bleeding occurred in 2.5% of patients in the double-dose group and in 2.0% in the standard-dose group (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.46; P=0.01). Double-dose clopidogrel was associated with a significant reduction in the secondary outcome of stent thrombosis among the 17,263 patients who underwent PCI (1.6% vs. 2.3%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.85; P=0.001). There was no significant difference between higher-dose and lower-dose aspirin with respect to the primary outcome (4.2% vs. 4.4%; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.09; P=0.61) or major bleeding (2.3% vs. 2.3%; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.17; P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an acute coronary syndrome who were referred for an invasive strategy, there was no significant difference between a 7-day, double-dose clopidogrel regimen and the standard-dose regimen, or between higher-dose aspirin and lower-dose aspirin, with respect to the primary outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. (Funded by Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00335452.)

Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Earlier trials have shown that a routine invasive strategy improves outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. However, the optimal timing of such intervention remains uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 3031 patients with acute coronary syndromes to undergo either routine early intervention (coronary angiography < or = 24 hours after randomization) or delayed intervention (coronary angiography > or = 36 hours after randomization). The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 6 months. A prespecified secondary outcome was death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia at 6 months. RESULTS: Coronary angiography was performed in 97.6% of patients in the early-intervention group (median time, 14 hours) and in 95.7% of patients in the delayed-intervention group (median time, 50 hours). At 6 months, the primary outcome occurred in 9.6% of patients in the early-intervention group, as compared with 11.3% in the delayed-intervention group (hazard ratio in the early-intervention group, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68 to 1.06; P=0.15). There was a relative reduction of 28% in the secondary outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia in the early-intervention group (9.5%), as compared with the delayed-intervention group (12.9%) (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.89; P=0.003). Prespecified analyses showed that early intervention improved the primary outcome in the third of patients who were at highest risk (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89) but not in the two thirds at low-to-intermediate risk (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.56; P=0.01 for heterogeneity). CONCLUSIONS: Early intervention did not differ greatly from delayed intervention in preventing the primary outcome, but it did reduce the rate of the composite secondary outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia and was superior to delayed intervention in high-risk patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00552513.)

Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel and aspirin are the most commonly used antiplatelet therapies for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed the effect of various clopidogrel and aspirin regimens in prevention of major cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: The CURRENT-OASIS 7 trial was undertaken in 597 centres in 39 countries. 25,086 individuals with acute coronary syndromes and intended early PCI were randomly assigned to double-dose (600 mg on day 1, 150 mg on days 2-7, then 75 mg daily) versus standard-dose (300 mg on day 1 then 75 mg daily) clopidogrel, and high-dose (300-325 mg daily) versus low-dose (75-100 mg daily) aspirin. Randomisation was done with a 24 h computerised central automated voice response system. The clopidogrel dose comparison was double-blind and the aspirin dose comparison was open label with blinded assessment of outcomes. This prespecified analysis is of the 17,263 individuals who underwent PCI. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days. Analyses were by intention to treat, adjusted for propensity to undergo PCI. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00335452. FINDINGS: 8560 patients were assigned to double-dose and 8703 to standard-dose clopidogrel (8558 and 8702 completed 30-day follow-up, respectively), and 8624 to high-dose and 8639 to low-dose aspirin (8622 and 8638 completed 30-day follow-up, respectively). Compared with the standard dose, double-dose clopidogrel reduced the rate of the primary outcome (330 events [3·9%] vs 392 events [4·5%]; adjusted hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·74-0·99, p=0·039) and definite stent thrombosis (58 [0·7%] vs 111 [1·3%]; 0·54 [0·39-0·74], p=0·0001). High-dose and low-dose aspirin did not differ for the primary outcome (356 [4·1%] vs 366 [4·2%]; 0·98, 0·84-1·13, p=0·76). Major bleeding was more common with double-dose than with standard-dose clopidogrel (139 [1·6%] vs 99 [1·1%]; 1·41, 1·09-1·83, p=0·009) and did not differ between high-dose and low-dose aspirin (128 [1·5%] vs 110 [1·3%]; 1·18, 0·92-1·53, p=0·20). INTERPRETATION: In patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes, a 7-day double-dose clopidogrel regimen was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis compared with the standard dose. Efficacy and safety did not differ between high-dose and low-dose aspirin. A double-dose clopidogrel regimen can be considered for all patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with an early invasive strategy and intended early PCI. FUNDING: Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Effects of aspirin dose on ischaemic events and bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the PCI-CURE study.

AIMS: In the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), due to a paucity of data, the optimal dose of aspirin is uncertain. We evaluated the safety of different doses of aspirin after PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the PCI-CURE study, 2658 patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI were stratified into three aspirin dose groups >/=200 mg (high, n = 1064), 101-199 mg (moderate, n = 538), and

Low-dose vs standard-dose unfractionated heparin for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes treated with fondaparinux: the FUTURA/OASIS-8 randomized trial.

CONTEXT: The optimal unfractionated heparin regimen for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with fondaparinux is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety of 2 unfractionated heparin regimens during PCI in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes initially treated with fondaparinux. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind randomized parallel-group trial in 179 hospitals in 18 countries involving 2026 patients undergoing PCI within 72 hours, nested within a cohort of 3235 high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes initially treated with fondaparinux enrolled from February 2009 to March 2010. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received intravenously either low-dose unfractionated heparin, 50 U/kg, regardless of use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb-IIIa) inhibitors or standard-dose unfractionated heparin, 85 U/kg (60 U/kg with GpIIb-IIIa inhibitors), adjusted by blinded activated clotting time (ACT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite of major bleeding, minor bleeding, or major vascular access-site complications up to 48 hours after PCI. Key secondary outcomes include composite of major bleeding at 48 hours with death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization within day 30. RESULTS: The primary outcome occurred in 4.7% of those in the low-dose group vs 5.8% in the standard-dose group (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.19; P = .27). The rates of major bleeding were not different but the rates of minor bleeding were lower with 0.7% in the low-dose group vs 1.7% in the standard-dose group (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.97; P = .04). For the key secondary outcome, the rates for low-dose group were 5.8% vs 3.9% in the standard-dose group (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.00-2.28; P = .05) and for death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization it was 4.5% for the low-dose group vs 2.9% for the standard-dose group (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.98-2.53; P = .06). Catheter thrombus rates were very low (0.5% in the low-dose group and 0.1% in the standard-dose group, P = .15). CONCLUSION: Low-dose compared with standard-dose unfractionated heparin did not reduce major peri-PCI bleeding and vascular access-site complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00790907.

Antithrombotic therapy with fondaparinux in relation to interventional management strategy in patients with ST- and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: an individual patient-level combined analysis of the Fifth and Sixth Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS 5 and 6) randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: The Fifth and Sixth Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS 5 and 6) trials evaluated fondaparinux, a synthetic factor Xa inhibitor, in patients with non-ST- and ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, respectively. Combined results for these 2 trials on major efficacy and safety outcomes and data on the effects of fondaparinux in relation to interventional management strategy have not been previously reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an individual patient-level combined analysis of 26 512 patients from the OASIS 5 and 6 trials who were randomized in a double-blind fashion to fondaparinux 2.5 mg daily or a heparin-based strategy (dose-adjusted unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin). Results were stratified according to whether an early invasive, a delayed invasive, or an initial conservative management strategy was performed. Fondaparinux was superior to heparin in reducing the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (8.0% versus 7.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; P=0.03) and death alone (4.3% versus 3.8%; HR, 0.89; P=0.05). Fondaparinux reduced major bleeding by 41% (3.4% versus 2.1%; HR, 0.59; P<0.00001) and had a more favorable net clinical outcome than heparin (11.1% versus 9.3%; HR, 0.83; P<0.0001). In 19 085 patients treated with an invasive strategy, fondaparinux suppressed ischemic events to an extent similar to heparin and reduced major bleeding by more than one-half, resulting in a superior net clinical outcome (10.8% versus 9.4%; HR, 0.87; P=0.008). A similar benefit also was observed in those treated with a conservative strategy (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.85; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a heparin-based strategy, fondaparinux reduced mortality, ischemic events, and major bleeding across the full spectrum of acute coronary syndromes and was associated with a more favorable net clinical outcome in patients undergoing either an invasive or a conservative management strategy.

Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes recommend an early invasive approach with concomitant antithrombotic therapy, including aspirin, clopidogrel, unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We evaluated the role of thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin in such patients. METHODS: We assigned 13,819 patients with acute coronary syndromes to one of three antithrombotic regimens: unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. The primary end points were a composite ischemia end point (death, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization for ischemia), major bleeding, and the net clinical outcome, defined as the combination of composite ischemia or major bleeding. RESULTS: Bivalirudin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with noninferior 30-day rates of the composite ischemia end point (7.7% and 7.3%, respectively), major bleeding (5.3% and 5.7%), and the net clinical outcome end point (11.8% and 11.7%). Bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was associated with a noninferior rate of the composite ischemia end point (7.8% and 7.3%, respectively; P=0.32; relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.24) and significantly reduced rates of major bleeding (3.0% vs. 5.7%; P<0.001; relative risk, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.65) and the net clinical outcome end point (10.1% vs. 11.7%; P=0.02; relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate- or high-risk acute coronary syndromes who were undergoing invasive treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin was associated with rates of ischemia and bleeding that were similar to those with heparin. Bivalirudin alone was associated with similar rates of ischemia and significantly lower rates of bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00093158 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Design and rationale of CURRENT-OASIS 7: a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial trial evaluating optimal dosing strategies for clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with ST and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) reduces major cardiovascular events in patients with ST and non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Recent mechanistic and clinical data suggest that higher loading and maintenance doses of clopidogrel may achieve a more rapid and greater degree of platelet inhibition that translates into improved clinical outcomes, but this is yet to be formally evaluated in an adequately powered randomized trial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of (1) a higher loading and initial maintenance dose of clopidogrel compared with the standard-dose regimen and (2) high-dose ASA compared with low-dose ASA in patients with ST or non-ST-segment-elevation ACS managed with an early invasive strategy. DESIGN: Multicenter, international, randomized, 2 x 2 factorial design trial evaluating a clopidogrel high-dose regimen (600 mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 150 mg once daily on days 2 to 7, followed by 75 mg once daily on days 8-30) compared with the standard-dose regimen (300 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 75 mg once daily on days 2-30) and high-dose ASA (300-325 mg daily) versus low-dose ASA (75-100 mg daily) in patients with ST or non-ST-segment-elevation ACS managed with an early invasive strategy. The clopidogrel dose comparison is double-blind and the ASA dose comparison is open-label. The primary outcome is the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial (re)infarction or stroke up to day 30. The primary safety outcome is major bleeding. The sample size is 18,000 to 20,000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The CURRENT-OASIS 7 trial will help to define optimal dosing regimens for clopidogrel and ASA in patients with ST and non-ST-segment-elevation ACS treated with an early invasive strategy.

[Surgical procedures in patients treated with platelet function inhibitors]. / Therapie mit Thrombozytenfunktionshemmern bei operativen Eingriffen.

The platelet function inhibitors (PFI) acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel are widely used in a broad spectrum of atherothrombotic diseases, either as mono- or dual antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function is inhibited for the whole lifespan of platelets (10 days). In case of surgical procedures the bleeding risk under continued antiplatelet therapy has to be balanced against the risk of ischemic complications due to withdrawal of antiplatelet therapy. Especially after stent implantation, the high risk and unfavorable prognosis of stent thrombosis have to be considered. Whereas surgical procedures with a low bleeding risk may be performed with continued antiplatelet therapy, there is a need for partial or total discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy in surgical procedures with higher bleeding risks.

Rationale and design of the 'F.I.R.E.' study. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to measure the effect of FX06 (a fibrin-derived peptide Bbeta(15-42)) on ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Immediate reopening of acutely occluded coronary arteries via primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice to salvage the ischemic myocardium in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the sudden re-initiation of blood flow achieved with PCI can lead to a local acute inflammatory response with further endothelial and myocardial damage. This phenomenon, described as 'reperfusion injury', has been recognized for several decades, yet no pharmacologic intervention has so far succeeded in reducing myocardial damage linked to reperfusion. FX06 is a naturally occurring peptide derived from the neo-N-terminus of fibrin (Bbeta(15-42)). It prevents leukocyte migration through the gap junctions of endothelial cells. Experimental studies have shown that FX06 inhibits the binding of the proinflammatory fibrin E1 fragment to VE-cadherin expressed in the adherence junction. It represents a novel approach to reducing local and systemic inflammation, including myocardial reperfusion injury, in the adherens junction. The present multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study is designed to test the hypothesis that FX06 injection during and immediately after primary PCI can reduce infarct size in patients with STEMI. The primary outcome measure of efficacy in this study is the degree of myocardial salvage calculated as the difference between the perfusion defect before and after PCI, determined by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy during rest. Further, infarct size at the end of the index hospitalization, as well as at 4 months, will be measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The present position paper describes the rationale, design and the methods utilized in this trial.

Genetic analysis of the interleukin-18 system highlights the role of the interleukin-18 gene in cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin (IL)-18 plays a key role in atherosclerosis and its complications. The present study investigated the genetic variability of 4 genes of the IL-18 system-IL18, IL18R1, IL18RAP, and IL18BP-in relation to circulating IL-18 levels and cardiovascular mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-two polymorphisms were genotyped in 1288 patients with coronary artery disease prospectively followed up during a median period of 5.9 years. The end point was death from cardiovascular causes (n=142). Baseline IL-18 levels were predictive of cardiovascular deaths occurring during < or =4 years of follow-up (HR=2.96, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.70, P=0.001 for the top compared with the bottom quartile) but not of later deaths. Haplotypes of the IL18 gene were associated with IL-18 levels (P=0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (P=0.006) after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. The same haplotype was associated with both a 9% lowering effect on IL-18 levels and a protective effect on risk (HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.92). IL18 haplotypes explained only 2% of IL-18 variability. Adjustment for baseline IL-18 levels abolished the association of haplotypes with cardiovascular risk. The haplotype associated with phenotypes was the only one carrying the minor allele of the IL18/A+183G polymorphism located in the 3'untranslated region and potentially affecting mRNA stability. The other genes of the system were not related to IL-18 levels or cardiovascular outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Variations of the IL18 gene consistently influence circulating levels of IL-18 and clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease, which supports the hypothesis of a causal role of IL-18 in atherosclerosis and its complications.

Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel was superior to aspirin in patients with previous manifestations of atherothrombotic disease in the CAPRIE study and its benefit was amplified in some high-risk subgroups of patients. We aimed to assess whether addition of aspirin to clopidogrel could have a greater benefit than clopidogrel alone in prevention of vascular events with potentially higher bleeding risk. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare aspirin (75 mg/day) with placebo in 7599 high-risk patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and at least one additional vascular risk factor who were already receiving clopidogrel 75 mg/day. Duration of treatment and follow-up was 18 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, vascular death, or rehospitalisation for acute ischaemia (including rehospitalisation for transient ischaemic attack, angina pectoris, or worsening of peripheral arterial disease). Analysis was by intention to treat, using logrank test and a Cox's proportional-hazards model. FINDINGS: 596 (15.7%) patients reached the primary endpoint in the group receiving aspirin and clopidogrel compared with 636 (16.7%) in the clopidogrel alone group (relative risk reduction 6.4%, [95% CI -4.6 to 16.3]; absolute risk reduction 1% [-0.6 to 2.7]). Life-threatening bleedings were higher in the group receiving aspirin and clopidogrel versus clopidogrel alone (96 [2.6%] vs 49 [1.3%]; absolute risk increase 1.3% [95% CI 0.6 to 1.9]). Major bleedings were also increased in the group receiving aspirin and clopidogrel but no difference was recorded in mortality. INTERPRETATION: Adding aspirin to clopidogrel in high-risk patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack is associated with a non-significant difference in reducing major vascular events. However, the risk of life-threatening or major bleeding is increased by the addition of aspirin.

Impact of infectious burden on progression of carotid atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent findings suggest a causative role of infections in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The extent of atherosclerosis and the prognosis of patients with atherosclerosis seem to be increased by the number of infections to which an individual has been exposed. In a prospective study, we evaluated the effect of 8 pathogens and the aggregate pathogen burden on the progression of carotid atherosclerosis. METHODS: In 504 patients (74.9% men; age, 62.9+/-10 years), we measured intima-media thickness and prevalence of carotid artery stenosis. Follow-up measurements after a mean of 2.5 years were available in 427 patients (85%). Blood samples were taken, and IgG or IgA antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 were measured. Statistical evaluation was performed with logistic regression procedures. RESULTS: Elevated IgA antibodies against C pneumoniae (P<0.04) and IgG antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (P<0.01) and herpes simplex virus type 2 (P<0.04) were associated with progression of atherosclerosis (increase of intima-media thickness > or =0.1 mm/y or progression of carotid stenosis) after adjustment for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, highly sensitive C-reactive protein, and statin intake. Infectious burden, divided into 0 to 3, 4 to 5, and 6 to 8 seropositivities, was significantly associated with progression of atherosclerosis, with odds ratios of 1.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.9) for 4 to 5 and 3.8 (95% CI, 1.6 to 8.8) for 6 to 8 compared with 0 to 3 seropositivities after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that the number of infectious pathogens to which an individual has been exposed independently contributes to the progression of carotid atherosclerosis.

Nickel release after implantation of the Amplatzer occluder.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects is a new and less traumatic technique than open heart surgery. In recent years, patients with a patent foramen ovale sustaining potential paradoxical embolism have also become candidates for interventional closure devices. One of the more popular occluding devices is the Amplatzer septal occluder, which, like many other occluders, is made of nitinol. Nitinol-based alloys are widely used in medical products, for example, in orthopedics and orthodontics. However, the clinical use of nitinol, which contains 55% nickel, is still controversial because of concerns about its biocompatibility. Therefore, we examined the systemic nickel release after implantation of the Amplatzer occluder. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 67 patients with no history of nickel sensitivity, blood samples were taken 24 hours before and 24 hours, 1, 3, and 12 months after occluder implantation. Nickel serum concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry; a value of <2 ng/mL of nickel was considered to be normal. A rise in mean serum levels of nickel was observed, from 0.47 ng/mL before implantation to 1.27 ng/mL (24 hours after), to a maximum of 1.50 ng/mL 1 month after implantation, which was statistically significant (P =.008 and P = 0.022, Wilcoxon Test). During follow-up, the values decreased to those measured before implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Nickel seems to be released from the device, causing a systemic rise in serum levels of nickel, possibly until a calcium-phosphate layer has formed on the passive oxide film of the device or until endothelialization is complete. Possible biological effects should be considered, particularly in young patients or patients with nickel hypersensitivity.

Angiographic analysis of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST).

Patients with diffuse in-stent restenoses (ISRs) are at high risk for recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTCA). Percutaneous transluminal rotational ablation (PTCR) has proved effective in removing neointimal burden in ISRs. This study compares the acute and long-term results of PTCA and PTCR for the treatment of diffuse ISR in a randomized, multicenter investigation. The primary end point was the comparison of the minimum luminal diameter (MLD) between both groups at 6-month follow-up. Patients with symptomatic, diffuse, or high-grade ISRs were included; 146 patients were randomized to PTCA and 152 patients to PTCR. Diameter stenosis was reduced from 80 +/- 12% to 29 +/- 10% and from 80 +/- 11% to 28 +/- 12%, respectively, and MLD increased from 0.55 +/- 0.3 to 1.9 +/- 0.3 mm in the PTCA group and from 0.54 +/- 0.3 mm to 1.9 +/- 0.4 mm in the PTCR group. Spasm in the treated vessel and an intermittent slow flow phenomenon occurred more often after rotational ablation (17.7% vs 8.6%, p = 0.001; 5.3% vs 0%, p = 0.007). Minimum stenosis diameter at 6-month follow-up was smaller in the PTCR group than in the PTCA group (1.0 +/- 0.6 vs 1.2 +/- 0.6 mm, p = 0.008) and the restenosis rate was higher (64.9% vs 51.2%, p = 0.027). Procedural factors did not influence long-term outcome. In the PTCR group, the restenosis rate increased with decreasing vessel size, whereas this was not seen in the PTCA group. The lesion length and the baseline diameter stenosis were found to be predictive of restenosis with both treatment strategies; however, a residual diameter stenosis of <30% predicted absence of a restenosis only in the PTCR group. Thus, PTCA and PTCR of diffuse ISRs yield comparable acute angiographic results. The recurrence of a restenosis is higher after PTCR than after PTCA.

Impact of vessel curvature on the accuracy of three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound: validation by phantoms and coronary segments.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is used for volumetric assessment of arteriosclerotic plaque burden and restenotic tissue at follow-up after coronary interventions. However, the accuracy of these measurements, especially in tortuous vessels, is unclear. METHODS: A commercially available electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated 3-dimensional-IVUS system was tested in volume-validated straight and curved hydrocolloid phantoms and in volume-validated coronary specimens. Catheter withdrawal (30 MHz, 3.2F) was triggered using standardized ECG source with 0.2-mm step intervals per cardiac cycle simulation. RESULTS: On the basis of automated phantom volume measurements, IVUS overestimated true phantom volume (relative error = [measured V - true V]/true V x 100) by a median of 0.9%, 0.25%, and 1.96% for straight, mildly curved, and severely curved segments, respectively. The true volume of the coronary specimens was overestimated by a median of 5.79%. CONCLUSION: A median percentage deviation of 3-dimensional-IVUS-measured volumes from the true volumes of less than 10% in phantoms and coronary artery segments can be achieved.

[Modern therapy in acute coronary syndrome]. / Moderne Therapie bei akutem Koronarsyndrom.

Inhibition of platelet aggregation with aspirin and anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin can be considered the gold standard treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Replacement of unfractionated heparins by low-molecular weight heparins seem to further improve the cardiovascular risk. Additional treatment with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers led to a further reduction of the clinical event rate, especially in patients undergoing coronary interventions during an acute coronary syndrome (more than 30% relative risk reduction). However, the latter substances did only lead to marginal improvements in the setting of a conservative stabilization of patients with acute coronary syndrome (7% relative risk reduction). On the contrary, the initial treatment with clopidogrel in addition to aspirin and anticoagulation led to a 20% relative risk reduction for an endpoint of death, myocardial infarction and stroke in the CURE trial. The treatment with aspirin, clopidogrel (including loading-dose) for a treatment period of 3-12 months and anticoagulation for 2 days can be considered the new standard of treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation, myocardial infarction). Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers should be used especially during coronary interventions. Antianginal treatment should include nitrates and betablockers. A treatment with statins and ACE-inhibitors should be initiated in the early course of acute coronary syndrome for plaque stabilization.

[Manifestations of atherosclerosis in various vascular regions. Similarities and differences regarding epidemiology, etiology and prognosis]. / Manifestationen der Atherosklerose in verschiedenen Gefässregionen. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede hinsichtlich Epidemiologie, Atiologie und Prognose.

Pathologic studies have demonstrated that atherosclerosis involves the whole arterial vessel tree. In the Framingham study, cardiovascular risk factors could be defined with different prognostic value for the development of atherosclerosis in various vascular regions. The prognosis of patients with atherosclerosis in coronary, carotid or leg arteries is worse compared to a normal population. Moreover, patients with symptomatic lesions in one vascular bed often have additional asymptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in other vascular regions. Patients with atherosclerosis in multiple vascular regions have a worse prognosis than patients with atherosclerosis in one vascular bed only. In a study of 804 patients, we could show a significantly higher incidence of cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and additional lesions in peripheral arteries (leg, carotid) during a 3.2-year follow-up compared to those with CAD only. Local and systemic inflammatory processes in the arterial vessel wall are considered to play an important role with regard to plaque instability. It has been suggested, that besides the symptomatic atherosclerotic lesion, multiple stable or unstable lesions are present in the whole arterial vessel tree predicting the patient's prognosis. Chronic infections with multiple pathogens ("concept of infectious burden") probably play an important role by triggering these inflammatory processes. Therefore, systemic therapeutic regimes are necessary for the treatment of patients with atherosclerosis. The platelet aggregation inhibitors improve the prognosis of patients with atherosclerosis in all vascular areas. Another important therapeutic regime is the use of statins, which seem to be not only effective in lipid lowering but also in plaque stabilization.