Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
J Card Surg ; 37(9): 2776-2785, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35701901

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a rare but life-threatening complication. Surgery and fibrinolytic therapy (FT) are the two main treatment options for PVT. The choice between surgery and FT has always been a matter of debate. Previous studies have shown that although the mortality rate is higher in surgery, complications are less frequent than in FT. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the results of surgery and FT in PVT. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed through Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, encompassing all studies comparing surgery and FT in PVT. The rate of each complication and risk ratio (RR) of complications in surgery and FT were assessed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 1235 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled risk of the mortality was not significantly different between FT and surgery in patients with PVT (pooled RR = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-1.60, I² = 61.4%). The pooled risks of thromboembolic events (pooled RR = 4.70, 95% CI: 1.83-12.07, I² = 49.6%) and major bleeding (pooled RR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.09-5.50, I² = 41.1%) and PVT recurrence (pooled RR = 2.06 95% CI: 1.29-3.27, I² = 0.0%) were significantly higher in patients who received FT. CONCLUSION: Surgery may be safer and with fewer complications than FT for PVT treatment. However, randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the proper treatment for PVT.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Thrombosis , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Valve Diseases/complications , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Humans , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/etiology
2.
BMC Surg ; 21(1): 449, 2021 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34972501

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with MI who are candidates for early coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can affect intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of DAPT up to the day before CABG on the outcomes during and after surgery in patients with MI. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 224 CABG candidate patients with and without MI were divided into two groups: (A) patients without MI who were treated with aspirin 80 mg/day before surgery (noMI-aspirin group; n = 124) and (B) patients with MI who were treated with aspirin 80 mg/day before surgery and clopidogrel (Plavix brand) at a dose of 75 mg/day (MI-DAPT group; n = 120). Dual or mono-antiplatelet therapy continued until the day before surgery. Patients were followed to assess in-hospital and 6-months outcomes. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality in MI-DAPT group was similar with noMI-aspirin group (OR 4.2; 95% CI 0.9-20.5; p = 0.071). The prevalence of CVA (p = 0.098), duration of hospital stay (p = 0.109), postoperative ejection fraction level (p = 0.693), diastolic dysfunction grade (p = 0.651) and postoperative PAP level (p = 0.0364) did not show difference between two groups. No mild or severe bleeding was observed in the patients. Six-month follow up showed that number of readmissions (p = 0.801), number of cases requiring angiography (p = 0.100), cases requiring re-PCI (p = 0.156), need for re-CABG (p > 0.999) and CVA (p > 0.999) did not differ between the two groups. During the 6-month follow-up, out-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.446). CONCLUSIONS: A 6-month follow-up showed that DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel before CABG in patients with MI has no effect on postoperative outcomes more than mono-APT with aspirin. Therefore, DAPT is recommended in the preoperative period for these patients.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Coronary Artery Bypass , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
ARYA Atheroscler ; 19(4): 37-45, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881996

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the impact of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on outcomes in elderly patients compared to younger patients. METHOD: An observational case-control study was conducted involving 535 patients, divided into two groups: older adults (≥75 years) and younger adults (<75 years). All patients underwent CABG following a similar protocol. The primary endpoints focused on early post-procedure outcomes, including in-hospital mortality and the duration of ICU or hospital stay. Patients were followed up for six months, and secondary study endpoints included long-term mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction, re-hospitalization rates, and repeated revascularization. RESULTS: 535 patients who underwent CABG were enrolled in this study. The smoking habit was significantly higher among younger adults (38.2% vs. 12.5%, P=0.001). Hypertension was more prevalent among older adults than younger adults (75% vs. 60%, P=0.044). LDL cholesterol serum levels were higher among younger adult patients (94.9±32.5 vs. 80.9±32.9, P=0.028). In-hospital death was not significantly different between younger and older adults (2.8% vs. 5.0%, P=0.34). Mortality in the six-month follow-up was non-significantly higher in the elderly (2.1% vs. 8.1%, P=0.06).A significant proportion of patients in both groups (46.9% in younger patients vs. 40% in older ones, P=0.40) received dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) prior to CABG due to a recent myocardial infarction and receipt of a new stent, but without increased major bleeding in both groups. CONCLUSION: CABG should be considered a viable treatment option for elderly patients with acceptable operative risk in current clinical practice.

4.
ARYA Atheroscler ; 19(1): 1-11, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38883151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gender impacts pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters and outcomes following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with conflicting results. This study aimed to identify differences in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters. It also seeks to compare the postoperative complications and mortality between two genders who had CABG surgery. METHOD: This prospective observational study included patients who had isolated CABG and were divided based on gender. Demographic information, underlying comorbidities, drug history, clinical and laboratory data at the time of referral, operative characteristics, postoperative variables, and mortality outcomes were tracked during hospitalization and six months after discharge. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty patients were enrolled in the study during its duration. 71% were male. Women were older (62.40±9.03 vs. 59.99±9.81 years, p= 0.011) and had more dyslipidemia (p=0.003), hypertension (p=0.000), and diabetes (p=0.001), whereas men admitted with more myocardial infarction (MI) (p=0.011) and had lower Ejection fraction (EF) (p=0.001). They also had lower EF post-surgery (p <0.001) and six months after discharge (p = 0.006). However, the number of vessels involved was not different between genders (p=0.589), but the number of grafts was higher in men (p=0.008).There was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality rates between the two groups (4.42% and 6.38% in men and women, respectively, p= 0.464). CONCLUSIONS: The women had more underlying comorbidities than men. Furthermore, there were some differences in the intra-operative parameters and postoperative complications between the two genders, but there was no difference in postoperative mortality in our setting.

5.
Arch Acad Emerg Med ; 11(1): e63, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37840868

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The leuko-glycemic index (LGI), a combined index of patient leukocyte counts and blood glucose levels, has been shown to predict the prognosis of myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Our study aims to investigate the performance of LGI in prediction of outcomes in a population of diabetic and non-diabetic MI patients. Methods: This observational registry-based cohort study was performed on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Participants were sub-grouped according to their diabetes status and the calculated optimal LGI cut-off value. The outcomes of the study were the length of hospital stay, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 296 AMI (112 diabetic and 184 non-diabetic) patients were included in the study. The optimal cut-off value of LGI in the diabetic and non-diabetic groups was calculated as 2970.4 mg/dl.mm3 and 2249.4 mg/dl.mm3, respectively. High LGI was associated with increased hospital admission duration in non-diabetic patients (p = 0.017). The area under the curve (AUC) of LGI for prediction of in-hospital mortality was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.87 to 1.00) in the diabetic group and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85 to 0.99) in the non-diabetic group. LGI had a sensitivity and specificity of 90.00%, and 93.14% in prediction of in-hospital mortality in the diabetic group compared to 77.77% and 90.85% in the non-diabetic group. We observed 4 post-discharge mortalities in our patient group. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that higher LGI predicts in-hospital mortality in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, while the length of hospital stay was only predicted by LGI levels in non-diabetic patients.

6.
Arch Acad Emerg Med ; 11(1): e25, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36919141

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In recent years, studies have provided evidence on the prognostic value of the leuko-glycemic index (LGI) in acute myocardial infarction (MI), but there is a lack of consensus. In addition, various reported cut-offs for LGI have raised concern regarding its clinical applicability. So, to conclude, through this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate all available evidence on the prognostic value of LGI in acute MI. Methods: Two independent researchers summarized records available in the four main databases of Medline (Via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science until 15 Sep 2022. Articles studying the prognostic value of the LGI in acute MI were included. Finally, sensitivity, specificity, prognostic odds ratio, and the area under the curve (AUC) for LGI were analyzed and reported. Results: Eleven articles were included (3701 patients, 72.1% male). Based on the analyses, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for LGI in prediction of mortality following acute MI were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.80), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.84), and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.78), respectively. Positive and negative post-test probability of LGI in prediction of mortality were 21% and 5%, respectively. AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for LGI in prediction of major cardiac complications after acute MI were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.84), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.70 to 0.92), and 0.64 (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.84), respectively. Also, the Positive and negative post-test probability of LGI in this regard were 59% and 13%, respectively. Conclusion: Although the results demonstrated that the LGI could predict mortality and acute cardiac complication after MI, the low post-test probability of LGI in risk stratification of patients raises questions regarding its applicability. Nevertheless, as most of the available studies have been conducted in the Latino/Hispanic population, further evidence is warranted to generalize the validity of this tool to other racial populations.

7.
Daru ; 20(1): 20, 2012 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23351936

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (meth) is a stimulant used illegally around the world, including in Iran. Cardiomyopathy and cardiac failure may occur following chronic meth use and may cause the patients referred to the emergency department. CASE REPORTS: A 28-year old man and two women, ages 29 and 31-year-old, with a history of meth use, were admitted to the emergency department with severe dyspnea at rest. Each had sinus tachycardia with tachypnea and an echocardiogram that showed severe systolic dysfunction consistent with heart failure. Additional evaluation in the hospital revealed cardiomyopathy with no other etiology other than the meth use. CONCLUSION: There are several reports that show an increase in frequency of meth use, suggesting that cardiomyopathy and acute heart failure may be a new medical concern.

8.
Arch Acad Emerg Med ; 10(1): e48, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36033987

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The available literature regarding the rate of readmission of COVID-19 patients after discharge is rather scarce. Thus, the aim in the current study was to evaluate the readmission rate of COVID-19 patients and the components affecting it, including clinical symptoms and relevant laboratory findings. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, COVID-19 patients who were discharged from Imam Hossein hospital, Tehran, Iran, were followed for six months. Data regarding their readmission status were collected through phone calls with COVID-19 patients or their relatives, as well as hospital registry systems. Eventually, the relationship between demographic and clinical characteristics and readmission rate was assessed. Results: 614 patients were entered to the present study (mean age 58.7±27.2 years; 51.5% male). 53 patients were readmitted (8.6%), of which 47 patients (7.6%) had a readmission during the first 30 days after discharge. The reasons for readmission were relapse of COVID-19 symptoms and its pulmonary complications in 40 patients (6.5%), COVID-19 related cardiovascular complications in eight patients (1.3%), and non-COVID-19 related causes in five patients (0.8%). Older age (OR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06; p=0.002) and increased mean arterial pressure during the first admission (OR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.08; p=0.022) were found to be independent prognostic factors for the readmission of COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: Readmission is relatively frequent in COVID-19 patients. Lack of adequate hospital space may be the reason behind the early discharge of COVID-19 patients. Hence, to reduce readmission rate, extra care should be directed towards the discharge of older or hypertensive patients.

9.
Bull Emerg Trauma ; 10(1): 9-15, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35155691

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the levels of troponin I in COVID-19 patients and its role in the prediction of their in-hospital mortality as a cardiac biomarker. METHODS: The current retrospective cohort study was performed on the clinical records of 649 COVID-19-related hospitalized cases with at leat one positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in Tehran, Iran from February 2020 to early June 2020. The on admission troponin I level divided into two groups of ≤0.03ng/mL (normal) and >0.03ng/mL (abnormal). The adjusted COX-regression model was used to determine the relationship between the studied variables and patient's in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In this study, the median age of subjects was 65 years (54.8% men) and 29.53% of them had abnormal troponin I levels. Besides, the in-hospital mortality rate among patients with abnormal troponin I levels was found to be 51.56%; whereas, patients with normal levels exhibited 18.82% mortality. Also, the multivariable analysis indicated that the risk of death among hospitalized COVID-19 patients displaying abnormal troponin I levels was 67% higher than those with normal troponin I levels (Hazard ratio=1.67, 95% confidence interval=1.08-2.56, p=0.019). CONCLUSION: It seems that troponin I is one of the important factors related to in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients. Next, due to the high prevalence of cardiac complications in these patients, it is highly suggested to monitor and control cardiac biomarkers along with other clinical factors upon the patient's arrival at the hospital.

10.
Arch Acad Emerg Med ; 8(1): e61, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32613203

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Currently, the basis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) therapy is dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Aspirin as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and clopidogrel as adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review is to answer that should DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel be continued until coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients who have ACS? METHODS: The search for relevant studies in the present meta-analysis is based on three approaches: A) systematic searches in electronic databases, B) manual searches in Google and Google Scholar, and C) screening of bibliography of related original and review articles. The endpoints included mortality rate, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), reoperation, re-exploration, other cardiac events, renal failure, length of ICU and hospital stay, chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion after CABG. RESULTS: After the initial screening, 41 articles were studied in detail, and finally the data of 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. DAPT before CABG in patients with ACS does not increase the rate of mortality, CVA, renal failure, MI, and other cardiac events, but increases reoperation, re-exploration, length of ICU, and hospital stay. Chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion rate significantly increased in the DAPT group compared to the control group (non-antiplatelet or Aspirin alone). Increase in chest tube drainage and blood product transfusion rate indicates an increase in bleeding, so increase in reoperation, re-exploration to control bleeding, and, subsequently, increase in the length of ICU and hospital stay are expected. CONCLUSIONS: DAPT with Aspirin and clopidogrel before CABG in patients with ACS does not increase the rate of mortality, CVA, renal failure, MI, and other cardiac events despite more bleedings, and it may be suggested before CABG for better graft patency.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL