Bradycardia risk stratification with implantable loop recorder after unexplained syncope.

BACKGROUND: An implantable loop recorder is an effective tool for diagnosing unexplained syncope. However, after a first episode in non-high-risk patients, the usefulness of implantable loop recorder implantation remains unclear. AIMS: To analyse relevant risk factors for significant bradycardia in order to identify patients who do or do not benefit from implantable loop recorder implantation. Also, to study whether implantable loop recorder implantation with remote monitoring is associated with less recurrence of traumatic syncope. METHODS: This was a retrospective monocentric study including patients with implantable loop recorder implantation after unexplained syncope, using remote monitoring and iterative consultations. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were implanted for unexplained syncope. Significant bradycardia occurred in 53 patients (22.4%): 23 (43.4%) caused by paroxysmal atrioventricular block and 30 (56.6%) caused by sinus node dysfunction, leading to permanent pacemaker implantation in 48 patients. Compared with younger patients, there was a 3.46-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.92-6.23; P<0.0001) in the risk of significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 years. Based on multivariable analysis, only "typical syncope" was associated with significant bradycardia occurrence (hazard ratio 3.14, 95% confidence interval 1.75-5.65; P=0.0001). There was no recurrence of significant bradycardia with traumatic complications among patients implanted for traumatic syncope. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that: (1) implantable loop recorders identify more significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 presenting with a first non-high-risk typical syncope, suggesting that an implantable loop recorder should be implanted after a first episode of unexplained syncope in such conditions; and (2) after traumatic syncope, implantable loop recorder implantation is safe, and is associated with little or no recurrence of traumatic syncope.

Advanced myocardial deformation echocardiography for evaluation of the athlete's heart: Functional and mechanistic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the athlete's heart is challenging because of a phenotypic overlap between reactive physiological adaptation and pathological remodelling. The potential value of myocardial deformation remains controversial in identifying early cardiomyopathy. AIM: To identify the echocardiographic phenotype of athletes using advanced two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging, and to define predictive factors of subtle left ventricular systolic dysfunction. METHODS: In total, 191 healthy male athletes who underwent a preparticipation medical evaluation at Nancy University Hospital between 2013 and 2020 were included. Clinical and echocardiographic data were compared with 161 healthy male subjects from the STANISLAS cohort. Borderline global longitudinal strain value was defined as<17.5%. RESULTS: Athletes demonstrated lower left ventricular ejection fraction (57.9±5.3% vs. 62.6±6.4%; P<0.01) and lower global longitudinal strain (17.5±2.2% vs. 21.1±2.1%; P<0.01). No significant differences were found between athletes with and without a borderline global longitudinal strain value regarding clinical characteristics, structural echocardiographic features and exercise capacity. A borderline global longitudinal strain value was associated with a lower endocardial global longitudinal strain (18.8±1.2% vs. 22.7±1.9%; P=0.02), a lower epicardial global longitudinal strain (14.0±1.1% vs. 16.6±1.2%; P<0.01) and a higher endocardial/epicardial global longitudinal strain ratio (1.36±0.07 vs. 1.32±0.06; P<0.01). No significant difference was found regarding mechanical dispersion (P=0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Borderline global longitudinal strain value in athletes does not appear to be related to structural remodelling, mechanical dispersion or exercise capacity. The athlete's heart is characterized by a specific myocardial deformation pattern with a more pronounced epicardial layer strain impairment.