ABSTRACT
Triage strategies are needed for primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening to identify women requiring colposcopy/biopsy. We assessed the performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained (DS) immunocytochemistry to triage HPV-positive women and compared it to cytology, with or without HPV16/18 genotyping. A prospective observational screening study enrolled 35 263 women aged 25 to 65 years at 32 U.S. sites. Cervical samples had HPV and cytology testing, with colposcopy/biopsy for women with positive tests. Women without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 2 or worse (≥CIN2) at baseline (n = 3876) were retested after 1 year. In all, 4927 HPV-positive women with valid DS results were included in this analysis. DS sensitivity for ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 at baseline was 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8%-94.2%) and 91.9% (95% CI: 86.1%-95.4%), respectively, in HPV16/18-positive women and 83.0% (95% CI: 78.4%-86.8%) and 86.0% (95% CI: 77.5%-91.6%) in women with 12 "other" genotypes. Using DS alone to triage HPV-positive women showed significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology triage of 12 "other" genotypes, and substantially higher sensitivity but lower specificity than using cytology alone. The risk of ≥CIN2 was significantly lower in HPV-positive, DS-negative women (3.6%; 95% CI: 2.9%-4.4%), compared to triage-negative women using HPV16/18 genotyping with cytology for 12 "other" genotypes (7.4%; 95% CI: 6.4%-8.5%; P < .0001) or cytology alone (7.5%; 95% CI: 6.7%-8.4%; P < .0001). DS showed better risk stratification than cytology-based strategies and provided high reassurance against pre-cancers both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up, irrespective of the HPV genotype. DS allows for the safe triage of primary screening HPV-positive women.
Subject(s)
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/analysis , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Ki-67 Antigen/analysis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Aged , Colposcopy , Female , Genotype , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Triage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/chemistry , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections. However, only a small percentage of high-risk (HR) HPV infections progress to cervical precancer and cancer. In this study, we investigated the role of the cervicovaginal microbiome (CVM) in the natural history of HR-HPV. METHODS: This study was nested within the placebo arm of the Costa Rica HPV Vaccine Trial that included women aged 18-25 years of age. Cervical samples from two visits of women with an incident HR-HPV infection (n = 273 women) were used to evaluate the prospective role of the CVM on the natural history of HR-HPV. We focus specifically on infection clearance, persistence, and progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and 3 (CIN2+). The CVM was characterized by amplification and sequencing the bacterial 16S V4 rRNA gene region and the fungal ITS1 region using an Illumina MiSeq platform. OTU clustering was performed using QIIME2. Functional groups were imputed using PICRUSt and statistical analyses were performed using R. RESULTS: At Visit 1 (V1) abundance of Lactobacillus iners was associated with clearance of incident HR-HPV infections (Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA)>4.0), whereas V1 Gardnerella was the dominant biomarker for HR-HPV progression (LDA>4.0). At visit 2 (V2), increased microbial Shannon diversity was significantly associated with progression to CIN2+ (p = 0.027). Multivariate mediation analysis revealed that the positive association of V1 Gardnerella with CIN2+ progression was due to the increased cervicovaginal diversity at V2 (p = 0.040). A full multivariate model of key components of the CVM showed significant protective effects via V1 genus Lactobacillus, OR = 0.41 (0.22-0.79), V1 fungal diversity, OR = 0.90 (0.82-1.00) and V1 functional Cell Motility pathway, OR = 0.75 (0.62-0.92), whereas V2 bacterial diversity, OR = 1.19 (1.03-1.38) was shown to be predictive of progression to CIN2+. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that features of the cervicovaginal microbiome are associated with HR-HPV progression in a prospective longitudinal cohort. The analyses indicated that the association of Gardnerella and progression to CIN2+ may actually be mediated by subsequent elevation of microbial diversity. Identified features of the microbiome associated with HR-HPV progression may be targets for therapeutic manipulation to prevent CIN2+. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00128661.
Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri , Gardnerella , Lactobacillus , Microbiota , Papillomaviridae/metabolism , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Vagina , Adolescent , Adult , Cervix Uteri/metabolism , Cervix Uteri/microbiology , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Female , Gardnerella/classification , Gardnerella/genetics , Gardnerella/metabolism , Humans , Lactobacillus/classification , Lactobacillus/genetics , Lactobacillus/metabolism , Longitudinal Studies , Papillomavirus Infections/metabolism , Papillomavirus Infections/microbiology , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/metabolism , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/microbiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vagina/metabolism , Vagina/microbiology , Vagina/pathology , Vagina/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/metabolism , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/microbiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An increase in human papillomavirus test volumes is expected in the near future because human papillomavirus-based screening protocols are expected to become more widely adopted. OBJECTIVE: The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial, a prospective, multicenter, US-based cervical cancer screening trial, was conducted to obtain US Food and Drug Administration approvals for the new, high-throughput cobas human papillomavirus (cobas HPV) test for use on the cobas 6800/8800 Systems (cobas HPV) for detecting cervical precancerous and cancerous cells (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse and grade 3 or worse). Here, the baseline demographics, human papillomavirus test results, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results are presented. In addition, the baseline and 1-year risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse and grade 3 or worse associated with the human papillomavirus results are reported. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 35,263 women aged between 25 and 65 years undergoing routine screening were enrolled; liquid-based cytology and 2 polymerase chain reaction-based tests for high-risk human papillomavirus were performed. Women with abnormal Papanicolaou cytology, women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus by either of the 2 human papillomavirus tests, and a random subset of women negative according to the Papanicolaou cytology and the 2 human papillomavirus tests were referred for a colposcopy and cervical biopsy. Women who did not meet the study endpoint were eligible for the 1-year follow-up study phase. Verification bias-adjusted cervical disease prevalence and risks and 95% confidence intervals were computed. RESULTS: The prevalence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and worse than atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cytology were 6.5% and 3.2%, respectively. Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus, human papillomavirus 16, and human papillomavirus 18 based on the new cobas HPV test were 15.1%, 3.1%, and 1.4%, respectively. Both cytologic abnormalities and human papillomavirus positivity declined with increasing age. Among women who had a colposcopy and biopsy, the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse and grade 3 or worse were 8.8% and 3.6%, respectively. The baseline and 1-year cumulative risks for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse were 13.6% and 16.9%, respectively, among women who tested positive for human papillomavirus 16. Women who tested negative for human papillomavirus had the lowest 1-year cumulative risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (0.06%). CONCLUSION: The contemporary, age-specific prevalence of human papillomaviruses (including human papillomavirus 16 and 18), cytologic abnormalities, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large, US-based cervical cancer screening population provides benchmarks for healthcare policies, screening programs, and for laboratories and clinicians.
Subject(s)
Colposcopy , Early Detection of Cancer , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virologyABSTRACT
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006866.].
ABSTRACT
A small percentage of women with cervical HPV infection progress to cervical neoplasia, and the risk factors determining progression are incompletely understood. We sought to define the genetic loci involved in cervical neoplasia and to assess its heritability using unbiased unrelated case/control statistical approaches. We demonstrated strong association of cervical neoplasia with risk and protective HLA haplotypes that are determined by the amino-acids carried at positions 13 and 71 in pocket 4 of HLA-DRB1 and position 156 in HLA-B. Furthermore, 36% (standard error 2.4%) of liability of HPV-associated cervical pre-cancer and cancer is determined by common genetic variants. Women in the highest 10% of genetic risk scores have approximately >7.1% risk, and those in the highest 5% have approximately >21.6% risk, of developing cervical neoplasia. Future studies should examine genetic risk prediction in assessing the risk of cervical neoplasia further, in combination with other screening methods.
Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genome-Wide Association Study , HLA-B Antigens/genetics , HLA-DRB1 Chains/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Alleles , Case-Control Studies , Female , Genotyping Techniques , Haplotypes , Humans , Linkage Disequilibrium , Logistic Models , Major Histocompatibility Complex , Papillomaviridae , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virologyABSTRACT
Background: Studies on the role of antibodies produced after infection with human papillomavirus 18 (HPV-18) and subsequent protection from HPV-18 infection have been conflicting, mainly due to inadequate sample size. Methods: We pooled data from the control arms of the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial and the PATRICIA trial. Using Poisson regression we compared the risk of newly detected 1-time HPV-18 infection, HPV-18 1-year persistent infection (12MPI), and HPV-18-associated atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater (ASC-US+) lesions between HPV-18 seropositive and seronegative women. Results: High HPV-18 antibodies at enrollment was associated with reduced subsequent HPV-18 detection (P trend = 0.001; relative rate [RR] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-1.01 for the third quartile; RR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94 for the fourth quartile, compared to seronegative). The risk of 12MPI showed a decreasing trend with increasing antibodies (P trend = 0.06; RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.29-1.77; RR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.13-1.32 for the third and fourth quartiles, respectively). Lastly, we observed a significant decreased risk of HPV-18 ASC-US+ with increasing antibody (P trend = 0.01; RR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-0.97 for the fourth quartile). We also observed a significant decreased risk of HPV-16 infection, 12MPI, and ASC-US+ with increasing HPV-16 antibody level. Conclusions: High HPV-18 naturally acquired antibodies were associated with partial protection from future HPV-18 infections and associated lesions. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00128661 and NCT001226810.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/virology , Costa Rica/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Risk Assessment , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women, and we recently reported human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles showing strong associations with cervical neoplasia risk and protection. HLA ligands are recognized by killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) expressed on a range of immune cell subsets, governing their proinflammatory activity. We hypothesized that the inheritance of particular HLA-KIR combinations would increase cervical neoplasia risk. Methods: Here, we used HLA and KIR dosages imputed from single-nucleotide polymorphism genotype data from 2143 cervical neoplasia cases and 13858 healthy controls of European decent. Results: The following 4 novel HLA alleles were identified in association with cervical neoplasia, owing to their linkage disequilibrium with known cervical neoplasia-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles: HLA-DRB3*9901 (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; P = 2.49 × 10-9), HLA-DRB5*0101 (OR, 1.29; P = 2.26 × 10-8), HLA-DRB5*9901 (OR, 0.77; P = 1.90 × 10-9), and HLA-DRB3*0301 (OR, 0.63; P = 4.06 × 10-5). We also found that homozygosity of HLA-C1 group alleles is a protective factor for human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16)-related cervical neoplasia (C1/C1; OR, 0.79; P = .005). This protective association was restricted to carriers of either KIR2DL2 (OR, 0.67; P = .00045) or KIR2DS2 (OR, 0.69; P = .0006). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that HLA-C1 group alleles play a role in protecting against HPV16-related cervical neoplasia, mainly through a KIR-mediated mechanism.
Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , HLA-C Antigens/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Receptors, KIR/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Gene Dosage , Genotype , HLA-C Antigens/immunology , Human papillomavirus 16 , Humans , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, KIR/immunologyABSTRACT
Temporal variation in microbiome measurements can reduce statistical power in research studies. Quantification of this variation is essential for designing studies of chronic disease. We analyzed 16S ribosomal RNA profiles in paired biological specimens separated by 6 months from 3 studies conducted during 1985-2013 (a National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer study, a Costa Rica study, and the Human Microbiome Project). We evaluated temporal stability by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Sample sizes needed in order to detect microbiome differences between equal numbers of cases and controls for a nested case-control design were calculated on the basis of estimated ICCs. Across body sites, 12 phylum-level ICCs were greater than 0.5. Similarly, 11 alpha-diversity ICCs were greater than 0.5. Fecal beta-diversity estimates had ICCs over 0.5. For a single collection with most microbiome metrics, detecting an odds ratio of 2.0 would require 300-500 cases when matching 1 case to 1 control at P = 0.05. Use of 2 or 3 sequential specimens reduces the number of required subjects by 40%-50% for low-ICC metrics. Relative abundances of major phyla and alpha-diversity metrics have low temporal stability. Thus, detecting associations of moderate effect size with these metrics will require large sample sizes. Because beta diversity for feces is reasonably stable over time, smaller sample sizes can detect associations with community composition. Sequential prediagnostic specimens from thousands of prospectively ascertained cases are required to detect modest disease associations with particular microbiome metrics.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Inflammation is proposed to increase risk of developing endometrial cancer, but few prospective epidemiologic studies have investigated the relationship between circulating inflammation markers and endometrial cancer risk. In a nested case-control study within the PLCO Screening Trial we measured serum levels of 64 inflammation-related biomarkers in 284 incident endometrial cancer cases and 284 matched controls. Using multivariable logistic regression inflammation markers were evaluated individually and combined into a cross-validated inflammation score. Of 64 markers, 22 were associated with endometrial cancer risk at p < 0.05 and 17 of 22 markers remained associated after multiple testing corrections. After adjusting for BMI and estradiol, SERPINE1 [quartile(Q)4 vs. Q1 odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)), p trend = 2.43 (0.94-6.29), 0.03] and VEGFA [2.56 (1.52-4.30), 0.0002] were positively associated with endometrial cancer risk, while CCL3 [0.46 (0.27-0.77), 0.01], IL13 [0.55 (0.33-0.93), 0.01], IL21 [0.52 (0.31-0.87), 0.01], IL1B [0.51 (0.30-0.86), 0.01] and IL23 [0.60 (0.35-1.03), 0.02] were inversely associated with risk. We observed large differences in ORs across BMI-inflammation score categories. Endometrial cancer risk was most pronounced among obese women with the highest inflammation score tertile (T) [10.25 (3.56-29.55) vs. normal BMI/T1]. Several inflammation markers were prospectively associated with endometrial cancer, including adipokines, pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, angiogenic factors and acute phase proteins. Inverse associations with anti-inflammatory markers (IL13, IL21), other inflammation markers/mediators (CCL3, IL1B, IL23), and a robust positive association between VEGFA and endometrial cancer risk were independent of BMI and estradiol, suggesting that these factors may influence risk through other mechanisms.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/etiology , Inflammation/complications , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adipokines/blood , Case-Control Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Cytokines/blood , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Endometrial Neoplasms/blood , Endometrial Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Humans , Inflammation/blood , Logistic Models , Lung Neoplasms/blood , Male , Odds Ratio , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies have been mixed on whether naturally acquired human papillomavirus (HPV) antibodies may protect against subsequent HPV infection. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether naturally acquired HPV antibodies protect against subsequent genital HPV infection (ie, natural immunity). METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies examining natural HPV immunity against subsequent genital type-specific HPV infection in female and male subjects. We used random-effects models to derive pooled relative risk (RR) estimates for each HPV type. RESULTS: We identified 14 eligible studies that included >24,000 individuals from 18 countries that examined HPV natural immunity. We observed significant protection against subsequent infection in female subjects with HPV-16 (pooled RR, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, .50-.80) and HPV-18 (0.70; .43-.98) but not in male subjects (HPV-16: 1.22; .67-1.77 [P= .05 (test for heterogeneity)]; HPV-18: 1.50; .46-2.55; [P= .15]). We also observed type-specific protection against subsequent infection for a combined measure of HPV-6/11/31/33/35/45/52/58 in female subjects (pooled RR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, .57-.92). Natural immunity was also evident in female subjects when analyses were restricted to studies that used neutralizing assays, used HPV persistence as an outcome, or reported adjusted analyses (each P< .05). CONCLUSIONS: HPV antibodies acquired through natural infection provide modest protection against subsequent cervical HPV infection in female subjects.
Subject(s)
Adaptive Immunity , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Epidemiologic cross-sectional, case-cohort, or case-control studies often select augmentation samples to supplement an existing (baseline) sample, primarily for the two reasons: (1) to increase the sample sizes from certain subdomains of interest that were not originally considered in the design of the baseline study and (2) to obtain samples from an extension of the target population. To address these two objectives, two-stage stratified sample designs are considered, where the stratification based on the expanded population at the second stage is not nested in the first stage strata. The sample weighting and Taylor linearization variance estimation for the two-stage stratified sample designs, involving re-stratification and population expansion, are provided for estimating population totals and logistic regression coefficients. Results from limited simulation studies and a logistic regression analysis of a study of human papillomavirus serology are provided.
Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Research Design , Logistic Models , Patient Selection , Adult , Female , Humans , Sample Size , Seroepidemiologic StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies of the carcinogenic stomach bacterium Helicobacter pylori have been limited by the lack of noninvasive detection and genotyping methods. We developed a new stool-based method for detection, quantification, and partial genotyping of H. pylori using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which allows for increased sensitivity and absolute quantification by PCR partitioning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stool-based ddPCR assays for H. pylori 16S gene detection and cagA virulence gene typing were tested using a collection of 50 matched stool and serum samples from Costa Rican volunteers and 29 H. pylori stool antigen-tested stool samples collected at a US hospital. RESULTS: The stool-based H. pylori 16S ddPCR assay had a sensitivity of 84% and 100% and a specificity of 100% and 71% compared to serology and stool antigen tests, respectively. The stool-based cagA genotyping assay detected cagA in 22 (88%) of 25 stools from CagA antibody-positive individuals and four (16%) of 25 stools from CagA antibody-negative individuals from Costa Rica. All 26 of these samples had a Western-type cagA allele. Presence of serum CagA antibodies was correlated with a significantly higher load of H. pylori in the stool. CONCLUSIONS: The stool-based ddPCR assays are a sensitive, noninvasive method for detection, quantification, and partial genotyping of H. pylori. The quantitative nature of ddPCR-based H. pylori detection revealed significant variation in bacterial load among individuals that correlates with presence of the cagA virulence gene. These stool-based ddPCR assays will facilitate future population-based epidemiologic studies of this important human pathogen.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/analysis , Bacterial Load/methods , Bacterial Proteins/analysis , Feces/microbiology , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Virulence Factors/analysis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Child , Child, Preschool , Costa Rica , Female , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Helicobacter pylori/genetics , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , United States , Virulence Factors/genetics , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is some evidence to suggest that one or two doses of the HPV vaccine provides similar protection to the three-dose regimen. The main aim of the study was to ascertain HPV-16/18 vaccine efficacy in both full and naive cohorts and to explore protection conferred against non-vaccine HPV types, by number of doses received. METHODS: Summary data from the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (CVT; NCT00128661) and ~the PATRICIA trial (NCT001226810), two phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trials of the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in young women, were combined in a post-hoc analysis (GlaxoSmithKline [GSK] e-track number 202142) to investigate the efficacy of fewer than three doses of the HPV-16/18 vaccine after 4 years of follow-up. Women were randomly assigned to receive three doses of the HPV-16/18 vaccine or to a control vaccine; yet, some received fewer doses. After exclusion of women with less than 12 months of follow-up or those who were HPV-16/18 DNA-positive at enrolment (for the HPV-16/18 endpoint), we calculated vaccine efficacy against one-time detection of incident HPV infections after three, two, and one dose(s). The primary study endpoint was one-time detection of first incident HPV-16/18 infections accumulated during the follow-up phase. FINDINGS: We assessed vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-16/18 infection in the modified total vaccinated cohort (22â327 received three doses, 1185 two doses, 543 one dose). Vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-16/18 infections for three doses was 77·0% (95% CI 74·7-79·1), two doses was 76·0% (62·0-85·3), and one dose was 85·7% (70·7-93·7). Vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-31/33/45 infections for three doses was 59·7% (56·0-63·0), two doses was 37·7% (12·4-55·9), and one dose was 36·6% (-5·4 to 62·2). Vaccine efficacy against incident HPV-16/18 infection for two-dose women who received their second dose at 1 month was 75·3% (54·2-87·5) and 82·6% (42·3-96·1) for those who received the second dose at 6 months (CVT data only). Vaccine efficacy against HPV-31/33/45 for two-dose women who received their second dose at 6 months (68·1%, 27·0-87·0; CVT data only), but not those receiving it at one month (10·1%, -42·0 to 43·3), was similar to the three-dose group. INTERPRETATION: 4 years after vaccination of women aged 15-25 years, one and two doses of the HPV-16/18 vaccine seem to protect against cervical HPV-16/18 infections, similar to the protection provided by the three-dose schedule. Two doses separated by 6 months additionally provided some cross-protection. These data argue for a direct assessment of one-dose efficacy of the HPV-16/18 vaccine. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health, and Ministry of Health of Costa Rica (CVT); GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (PATRICIA).
Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Costa Rica , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Humans , Risk Assessment , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Vaccination/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vaccine efficacy (VE) against vulvar human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has not been reported and data regarding its epidemiology are sparse. METHODS: Women (n = 5404) age 22-29 present at the 4-year study visit of the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial provided vulvar and cervical samples. A subset (n = 1044) was tested for HPV DNA (SPF10/LiPA25 version 1). VE against 1-time detection of vulvar HPV16/18 among HPV vaccinated versus unvaccinated women was calculated and compared to the cervix. Prevalence of and risk factors for HPV were evaluated in the control arm (n = 536). RESULTS: Vulvar HPV16/18 VE (54.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9%-79.1%) was comparable to cervix (45.8%; 95% CI, 6.4%-69.4%). Vulvar and cervical HPV16 prevalence within the control arm was 3.0% and 4.7%, respectively. Independent risk factors for vulvar HPV were similar to cervix and included: age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.5 [95% CI, .3-.9] ≥28 vs 22-23]); marital status (aOR 2.3 [95% CI, 1.5-3.5] single vs married/living-as-married); and number of sexual partners (aOR 3.6 [95% CI, 1.9-7.0] ≥6 vs 1). CONCLUSIONS: In this intention-to-treat analysis, VE against vulvar and cervical HPV16/18 were comparable 4 years following vaccination. Risk factors for HPV were similar by anatomic site. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00128661.
Subject(s)
Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Vulvar Diseases/epidemiology , Vulvar Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Cervix Uteri/virology , Costa Rica/epidemiology , DNA, Viral/genetics , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Vulva/virology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We examined risk of newly detected human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical abnormalities in relation to HPV type 16/18 antibody levels at enrollment in PATRICIA (Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults; NCT00122681). METHODS: Using Poisson regression, we compared risk of newly detected infection and cervical abnormalities associated with HPV-16/18 between seronegative vs seropositive women (15-25 years) in the control arm (DNA negative at baseline for the corresponding HPV type [HPV-16: n = 8193; HPV-18: n = 8463]). RESULTS: High titers of naturally acquired HPV-16 antibodies and/or linear trend for increasing antibody levels were significantly associated with lower risk of incident and persistent infection, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or greater (ASCUS+), and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1/2 or greater (CIN1+, CIN2+). For HPV-18, although seropositivity was associated with lower risk of ASCUS+ and CIN1+, no association between naturally acquired antibodies and infection was demonstrated. Naturally acquired HPV-16 antibody levels of 371 (95% confidence interval [CI], 242-794), 204 (95% CI, 129-480), and 480 (95% CI, 250-5756) EU/mL were associated with 90% reduction of incident infection, 6-month persistent infection, and ASCUS+, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Naturally acquired antibodies to HPV-16, and to a lesser extent HPV-18, are associated with some reduced risk of subsequent infection and cervical abnormalities associated with the same HPV type.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , DNA, Viral/genetics , Double-Blind Method , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Humans , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Risk Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/etiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Young Adult , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virologyABSTRACT
Although persistent carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is necessary for cervical carcinogenesis, the cofactors involved in HPV persistence and disease progression are poorly understood. Chronic cervical inflammation may increase risk, but few studies have measured immune markers (cytokines, chemokines and soluble receptors) in cervical secretions. We evaluated the performance of 74 multiplexed, bead-based immune markers in cervical secretions from three groups of women with biopsy evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), (i) Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood
, Papillomavirus Infections/complications
, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis
, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
, Adult
, Disease Progression
, Female
, Follow-Up Studies
, Humans
, Luminescent Measurements
, Neoplasm Staging
, Papillomaviridae
, Papillomavirus Infections/virology
, Prognosis
, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/etiology
, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/metabolism
, Young Adult
, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/etiology
, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/metabolism
ABSTRACT
Prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination with 3 doses of either of 2 commercially available vaccines is highly efficacious in preventing infections with the most carcinogenic types of HPV (HPV 16 and HPV 18) at the cervix and other anatomical sites at which HPV-related cancers develop. Concern has been raised that eradicating the most virulent HPV types, 16 and 18, could result in 1 or more of the types that are not targeted by the vaccine occupying the ecological niche created by the elimination of these types, referred to as type replacement. In this issue of the Journal, Yang et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(11):1066-1075) report on concurrent infections with multiple HPV types in unvaccinated women who underwent cervical screening in New Mexico (December 2007-April 2009) to identify possible interactions between HPV types, which if present could suggest the possibility of type replacement. Consistent with previous reports, they show minimal type-specific interactions among women with normal cytology, which they consider an indication that type replacement of HPV 16/18 is unlikely to be an issue in the general population postvaccination. Type replacement may be of less concern with the introduction of multivalent vaccines that include most of the carcinogenic HPV types; continued surveillance postvaccination should improve our understanding of the impact of HPV vaccination on type distribution and screening performance.
Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Diseases/epidemiology , Female , HumansABSTRACT
Two trials of clinically approved human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Females United to Unilaterally Reduce Endo/Ectocervical Disease (FUTURE I/II) and the Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults (PATRICIA), reported a 22% difference in vaccine efficacy (VE) against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in HPV-naïve subcohorts; however, serological testing methods and the HPV DNA criteria used to define HPV-unexposed women differed between the studies. We applied previously described methods to simulate these HPV-naïve subcohorts within the Costa Rica HPV16/18 Vaccine Trial and assessed how these criteria affect the estimation of VE. We applied 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) thresholds for HPV16 and HPV18 seropositivity (8 and 7 ELISA units/mL, respectively, for PATRICIA; 54 and 65 ELISA units/mL, respectively, for FUTURE I/II (to approximate the competitive Luminex immunoassay)) and 2 criteria for HPV DNA positivity (12 oncogenic HPV types, plus HPV66 and 68/73 for PATRICIA; or plus HPV6 and 11 for FUTURE I/II). VE was computed in the 2 naïve subcohorts. Using the FUTURE I/II and PATRICIA criteria, VE estimates against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, regardless of HPV type, were 69.0% (95% confidence interval: 40.3%, 84.9%) and 80.8% (95% confidence interval: 52.6%, 93.5%), respectively (P = 0.1). Although the application of FUTURE I/II criteria to our cohort resulted in the inclusion of more sexually experienced women, methodological differences did not fully explain the VE differences.
Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Serologic Tests/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/analysis , DNA, Viral/analysis , Double-Blind Method , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/genetics , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/genetics , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Humans , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several assays are used to measure type-specific serological responses to human papillomavirus (HPV), including the bead-based glutathione S-transferase (GST)-L1 multiplex serology assay and virus-like particle (VLP)-based ELISA. We evaluated the high-throughput GST-L1, which is increasingly used in epidemiologic research, as a measure of cumulative HPV infection and future immune protection among HPV-unvaccinated women. METHODS: We tested enrollment sera from participants in the control arm of the Costa Rica Vaccine Trial (n = 488) for HPV16 and HPV18 using GST-L1, VLP-ELISA, and two assays that measure neutralizing antibodies (cLIA and SEAP-NA). With statistical adjustment for sampling, we compared GST-L1 serostatus to established HPV seropositivity correlates and incident cervical HPV infection using odds ratios. We further compared GST-L1 to VLP-ELISA using pair-wise agreement statistics and by defining alternate assay cutoffs. RESULTS: Odds of HPV16 GST-L1 seropositivity increased with enrollment age (OR = 1.20 per year, 95%CI 1.03-1.40) and lifetime number of sexual partners (OR = 2.06 per partner, 95%CI 1.49-2.83), with similar results for HPV18. GST-L1 seropositivity did not indicate protection from incident infection over 4 years of follow-up (HPV16 adjusted OR = 1.72, 95%CI 0.95-3.13; HPV18 adjusted OR = 0.38, 95%CI 0.12-1.23). Seroprevalence by GST-L1 (HPV16 and HPV18, respectively) was 5.0% and 5.2%, compared to 19.4% and 23.8% by VLP-ELISA, giving positive agreement of 39.2% and 20.8%. Lowering GST-L1 seropositivity cutoffs improved GST-L1/VLP-ELISA positive agreement to 68.6% (HPV16) and 61.5% (HPV18). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support GST-L1 as a marker of cumulative HPV infection, but not immune protection. At lower seropositivity cutoffs, GST-L1 better approximates VLP-ELISA.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Glutathione Transferase/blood , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Costa Rica , DNA, Viral/analysis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Epidemiologic Studies , Female , Human papillomavirus 16 , Human papillomavirus 18 , Humans , Odds Ratio , Papillomavirus Infections/blood , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the epidemiology of oral human papillomavirus (HPV) in Latin America. METHODS: Women (N = 5838) aged 22-29 in the control and vaccine arms of an HPV-16/18 vaccine trial in Costa Rica had oral, cervical, and anal specimens collected. Samples were tested for alpha mucosal HPV types (SPF10/LiPA25 version 1); a subset of oral samples (n = 500) was tested for cutaneous HPV types in the genera alpha, beta, gamma, mu, and nu. RESULTS: In the control arm (n = 2926), 1.9% of women had an oral alpha mucosal HPV detected, 1.3% had carcinogenic HPV, and 0.4% had HPV-16; similar patterns for non-16/18 HPV types were observed in the vaccine arm. Independent risk factors for any oral alpha mucosal HPV among women in the control arm included marital status (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-5.7 for single compared to married/living as married), number of sexual partners (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-6.1 for ≥4 partners compared to 0-1 partners), chronic sinusitis (AOR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.7), and cervical HPV infection (AOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.6). Detection of beta HPV was common (18.6%) and not associated with sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike cutaneous HPV types, alpha mucosal HPV types were uncommon in the oral region and were predominately associated with sexual behavior. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00128661.