Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 88
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842502

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogen increasingly responsible for difficult-to-treat nosocomial infections. OBJECTIVES: To describe the contemporary clinical characteristics and genome epidemiology of patients colonized or infected by S. maltophilia in a multicentre, prospective cohort. METHODS: All patients with a clinical culture growing S. maltophilia were enrolled at six tertiary hospitals across Japan between April 2019 and March 2022. The clinical characteristics, outcomes, antimicrobial susceptibility and genomic epidemiology of cases with S. maltophilia were investigated. RESULTS: In total, 78 patients were included representing 34 infection and 44 colonization cases. The median age was 72.5 years (IQR, 61-78), and males accounted for 53 cases (68%). The most common comorbidity was localized solid malignancy (39%). Nearly half of the patients (44%) were immunosuppressed, with antineoplastic chemotherapy accounting for 31%. The respiratory tract was the most common site of colonization (86%), whereas bacteraemia accounted for most infection cases (56%). The 30 day all-cause mortality rate was 21%, which was significantly higher in infection cases than colonization cases (35% versus 9%; adjusted HR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.22-11.96). Susceptibility rates to ceftazidime, levofloxacin, minocycline and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim were 14%, 65%, 87% and 100%, respectively. The percentage of infection ranged from 13% in the unclassified group to 86% in genomic group 6A. The percentage of non-susceptibility to ceftazidime ranged from 33% in genomic group C to 100% in genomic groups 6 and 7 and genomic group geniculate. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary multicentre cohort, S. maltophilia primarily colonized the respiratory tract, whereas patients with bacteraemia had the highest the mortality from this pathogen. Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim remained consistently active, but susceptibility to levofloxacin was relatively low. The proportions of cases representing infection and susceptibility to ceftazidime differed significantly based on genomic groups.

2.
J Infect Chemother ; 30(8): 734-740, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38350510

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) conditions (PCCs) beyond 3 years and identify factors associated with their persistence longer than 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. METHODS: We surveyed patients who had recovered from COVID-19 and visited our institution from February 2020 to November 2021. Demographic and clinical data and information on the presence and duration of PCCs were obtained. We identified factors associated with the persistence of PCCs longer than 2 years using multivariate linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 935 patients surveyed, 407 completed the survey. Among them, 360 patients had mild disease in the acute phase. The proportions of participants with at least one symptom at 1, 2, and 3 years after symptom onset or COVID-19 diagnosis were 33.2%, 29.8%, and 5.7%, respectively. The numbers of participants with and without any residual symptoms 2 years after the onset of COVID-19 were 87 and 193, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, persistence of PCCs longer than 2 years was associated with lower body mass index, presence of any underlying medical conditions, and number of symptoms lasting for more than 1 month ≥ 5. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PCCs decreased 2 years after symptom onset or COVID-19 diagnosis. We also identified factors associated with PCC persistence longer than 2 years, which could help primary care physicians and patients with PCCs predict the duration of PCCs and better understand their natural history, thus reducing patients' anxiety about their duration.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Time Factors , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Risk Factors
3.
J Infect Chemother ; 30(6): 488-493, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38042298

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Tecovirimat's application in treating mpox remains under-researched, leaving gaps in clinical and virological understanding. METHODS: The Tecopox study in Japan evaluated the efficacy and safety of tecovirimat in patients with smallpox or mpox, who were divided into oral tecovirimat and control groups. Patients with mpox enrolled between June 28, 2022, and April 30, 2023, were included. Demographic and clinical details along with blood, urine, pharyngeal swab, and skin lesion samples were gathered for viral analysis. A multivariable Tobit regression model was employed to identify factors influencing prolonged viral detection. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were allocated to the tecovirimat group, and no patients were allocated to the control group. The median age was 38.5 years, and all patients were males. Ten patients (52.6%) were infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Sixteen patients (84.2%) had severe disease. Nine of the 15 patients (60.0%) (four patients withdrew before day 14) had negative PCR results for skin lesion specimens 14 days after inclusion. The mortality rates were 0% on days 14 and 30. No severe adverse events were reported. HIV status and the number of days from symptom onset to tecovirimat administration were associated with lower Ct values (p = 0.027 and p < 0.001, respectively). The median number of days when PCR testing did not detect the mpox virus in each patient was 19.5 days. CONCLUSION: Early tecovirimat administration might reduce viral shedding duration, thereby mitigating infection spread. Moreover, patients infected with HIV showed prolonged viral shedding, increasing the transmission risk compared to those without HIV.

4.
J Infect Chemother ; 2024 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cefmetazole (CMZ) is a carbapenem-sparing option in the treatment of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacterial infection. In this pilot study, we aimed to compare the effects of antimicrobial treatment (meropenem [MP] and CMZ) with those of no antimicrobial treatment (control group) on the microbiome. METHODS: The study was a multicenter, prospective, observational pilot study conducted from October 2020 to October 2022. Feces and saliva samples were collected for microbiome analyses at two time points (early-period: days 1-3; and late-period: days 4-30) for the antimicrobial treatment group, and at one time point for the control group. RESULTS: Five feces (MP-F and CMZ-F) and five saliva (MP-S and CMZ-S) samples were included in the MP and the CMZ groups. Ten feces (C-F) and saliva (C-S) samples were included in the control group. Group α diversity was notably lower in the late-period MP-F group than the control group as determined with the Shannon richness index. ß diversity analysis of the feces samples based on weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances revealed distinctions in both the late-period CMZ-F and MP-F groups compared with the control group. Weighted UniFrac analysis showed that only the early-period MP-F group differed from the control group. In the saliva samples, weighted and unweighted UniFrac analyses showed significant differences between the control group and the early CMZ, late CMZ, and late MP groups. CONCLUSIONS: MP treatment may cause larger impact on the feces microbiome than CMZ in Japanese patients.

5.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 67(10): e0051023, 2023 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37702483

ABSTRACT

Cefmetazole is active against extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBLEC) and is a potential candidate for carbapenem-sparing therapy. This multicenter, observational study included patients hospitalized for invasive urinary tract infection due to ESBLEC between March 2020 and November 2021 at 10 facilities in Japan, for whom either cefmetazole or meropenem was initiated as a definitive therapy within 96 h of culture collection and continued for at least 3 d. Outcomes included clinical and microbiological effectiveness, recurrence within 28 d, and all-cause mortality (14 d, 30 d, in-hospital). Outcomes were adjusted for the inverse probability of propensity scores for receiving cefmetazole or meropenem. Eighty-one and forty-six patients were included in the cefmetazole and meropenem groups, respectively. Bacteremia accounted for 43% of the cefmetazole group, and 59% of the meropenem group. The crude clinical effectiveness, 14 d, 30 d, and in-hospital mortality for patients in the cefmetazole and meropenem groups were 96.1% vs 90.9%, 0% vs 2.3%, 0% vs 12.5%, and 2.6% vs 13.3%, respectively. After propensity score adjustment, clinical effectiveness, the risk of in-hospital mortality, and the risk of recurrence were similar between the two groups (P = 0.54, P = 0.10, and P = 0.79, respectively). In all cases with available data (cefmetazole : n = 61, meropenem : n = 22), both drugs were microbiologically effective. In all isolates, bla CTX-M was detected as the extended-spectrum ß-lactamase gene. The predominant CTX-M subtype was CTX-M-27 (47.6%). Cefmetazole showed clinical and bacteriological effectiveness comparable to meropenem against invasive urinary tract infection due to ESBLECs.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Cefmetazole/therapeutic use , Cefmetazole/pharmacology , Meropenem/therapeutic use , Meropenem/pharmacology , beta-Lactamases/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 849, 2023 Dec 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections has led to the development of several therapeutic agents, with tocilizumab becoming increasingly used to treat patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. This study compared the use of tocilizumab treatment with the standard of care (SOC) to determine its efficacy against severe COVID-19-related pneumonia in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in two different databases: the JA42434 single-arm study and COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP), with a synthetic control group from the COVIREGI-JP cohort as a benchmark for the tocilizumab group. The study's primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab in treating severe COVID-19-related pneumonia compared to the SOC among patients included in the above two databases. The SOC group was extracted as the synthetic control group using exact matching and a propensity score matching in sequence per subject. As a secondary objective, the efficacy of tocilizumab compared to the SOC was evaluated exclusively among patients included in the COVIREGI-JP database. In each objective, the primary endpoint was defined as the time to discharge or the status of awaiting discharge. RESULTS: For the primary endpoint, the hazard ratio (HR) of the tocilizumab group against the SOC group was 1.070 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.565-2.028). The median time from Study Day 1 to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge was 15 days in the tocilizumab group and 16 days in the SOC group. The HRs for the secondary endpoints, namely, time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were 1.112 (95% CI: 0.596-2.075), 0.628 (95% CI: 0.202-1.953), and 1.019 (95% CI: 0.555-1.871), respectively. Similarly, the HR of the primary endpoint for the secondary objective was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.582-1.230). CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab did not demonstrate a positive effect on time to discharge or the state of awaiting discharge. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences in other clinical outcomes, such as time to improvement in the clinical state, time to clinical failure, and time to recovery, were observed among the groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Routinely Collected Health Data , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
7.
J Epidemiol ; 33(1): 38-44, 2023 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35851563

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prioritization for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related health policies usually considers age and certain other characteristics, but sex is rarely included, despite the higher risk of severe disease in men. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of sex and age on the severity of COVID-19 by estimating the age difference in years for which the risk for men versus women is the same. METHODS: We analyzed 23,414 Japanese COVID-19 inpatients aged 20-89 years (13,360 men and 10,054 women). We graded the severity of COVID-19 (0 to 5) according to the most intensive treatment required during hospitalization. The risk of grade 2/3/4/5 (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/death), grade 3/4/5, and separately grade 5 was analyzed using a multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) of grades 2/3/4/5, 3/4/5 (primary outcome), and 5 for men relative to women was 2.76 (95% CI, 2.44-3.12), 2.78 (95% CI, 2.42-3.19), and 2.60 (95% CI, 2.23-3.03), respectively, after adjustment for age and date of admission. These risks for men were equivalent to those for women 14.1 (95% CI, 12.3-15.8), 11.2 (95% CI, 9.7-12.8), and 7.5 (95% CI, 6.3-8.7) years older, respectively. CONCLUSION: The risks of worse COVID-19 prognosis (grades 3/4/5) in men were equivalent to those of women 11.2 years older. Reanalyzing data extracted from four previous studies also revealed a large impact of sex difference on the severity of COVID-19. We should pay more attention to sex differences to predict the risk of COVID-19 severity and to formulate public health policy accordingly.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sex Characteristics , SARS-CoV-2 , Japan/epidemiology , Prognosis , Hospitalization , Retrospective Studies
8.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 62(3): 103638, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610860

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the neutralizing IgG activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as well as the coagulation factors of convalescent plasmas which we manufactured in-house without a fast-freezing technique. METHODS: We collected plasmas from eligible participants who had confirmed certain titers of neutralizing antibodies. The plasmas were frozen and stored in the ordinary biofreezer without a fast-freezing function. The purified-IgG neutralizing activity of 20 samples from 19 participants and the coagulation factors of 49 samples from 40 participants were evaluated before and after freezing. RESULTS: Purified-IgG maintained its neutralizing activities, with the median 50 % inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 10.11 mg/ml (IQR 6.53-18.19) before freezing and 8.90 m g/ml (IQR 6.92-28.27) after thawing (p = 0.956). On the contrary, fibrinogen and factor Ⅷ decreased significantly after freezing and thawing in our environment. No significant temperature deviation was observed during the storage period. CONCLUSION: Neutralizing IgG activity, which largely contributes to the antiviral activity of convalescent plasma, did not change through our in-house manufacturing, without fastfreezing and storage conditions for more than 200 days. Ordinary freezers without the fast-freezing function are suitable enough to manufacture and store convalescent plasmas. Hospitals or facilities without specified resources could easily collect and store convalescent plasmas in case of upcoming emerging or re-emerging infectious diseases on-demand with appropriate neutralizing antibody levels measurements.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , Immunization, Passive , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Antibodies, Viral , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Immunoglobulin G
9.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 62(3): 103687, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964059

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Since 2020, the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) has spread globally. A few studies have investigated the safety of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) apheresis from COVID-19. This study was the first retrospective observational study of CCP in Japan. METHODS: We recruit donors from April 2020 to November 2021 and plasmapheresis in our center (NCGM: national center for global health and medicine). We set the primary endpoint as the Donors Adverse Event (DAE) occurrence at the time of the CCP collection. Variable selection was used to explore the determinants of DAE. RESULTS: Mean and SD age was 50.5 (10.6) years old. Seventy-three (42.2 %) were female, and 87 (33.3 %) were multiple-times donors. Twelve (6.97 % by donors and 4.6 % in total collections) adverse events occurred. The DAEs were VVR (Vaso Vagal Reaction), paresthesia, hypotension, agitation, dizziness, malaise, and hearing impairment/paresthesia. Half of them were VVR during apheresis. DAE occurred only in first-time donors and more in severe illnesses such as using ventilation and ECMO. From the donor characteristics and variable selection, the risk factors are as follows: younger age, female, the severity of disease at the time of the disease, and lower SBP before initiation. Our DAE incidence did not differ from previous studies. DAEs were more likely to occur in CCP apheresis than in healthy donors. CONCLUSION: We confirm the safety of CCP apheresis in this study, although DAEs were more than healthy donors. More caution should be exercised in the plasma collection for future outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/etiology , Japan/epidemiology , Paresthesia/etiology , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Blood Component Removal/adverse effects , Blood Donors , Immunization, Passive/adverse effects
10.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(4): 418-421, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690208

ABSTRACT

Outbreaks of monkeypox in Europe and North America have been reported since May 2022. At the end of July, we encountered the first two cases of monkeypox diagnosed in Japan. Case 1 was a white man who traveled to Spain where he had sexual intercourse with men. He presented to our hospital with fever, rash, and tiredness, and was diagnosed with monkeypox based on positive PCR test results from the skin lesions. He was admitted to our hospital, received tecovirimat 600 mg twice daily, and was discharged on day 15. Case 2 involved a Japanese man who visited us because of fatigue, muscle pain, headache, and oral ulcers. He was living in New York and traveled to Japan one day before presentation. He had experienced sexual intercourse with men four times during the previous month. The patient was diagnosed with monkeypox based on positive PCR results from the blood. He was admitted to our hospital, received tecovirimat 600 mg twice daily, and was discharged on day 14. These were the first two cases of monkeypox diagnosed in Japan. Based on their history and epidemiology, the viruses seem to have been imported from Europe and North America, respectively. After initiation of tecovirimat, both patients showed mild symptoms and immediate disappearance of viral DNA. The second case was notable for being diagnosed without skin rash. Our report suggests that tecovirimat could decrease the viral load rapidly, and that our prompt diagnosis contributed to the prevention of a monkeypox outbreak in Japan.


Subject(s)
Exanthema , Mpox (monkeypox) , Male , Humans , Japan , Hospitalization , Patient Discharge , Benzamides , Fatigue
11.
J Infect Chemother ; 29(9): 869-874, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178973

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is a potential therapeutic option for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite its use for treating several viral infections, we lack comprehensive data on its efficacy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma therapy with high neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 in high-risk patients within five days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. The primary endpoint was the time-weighted average change in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs from days 0-5. RESULTS: Between February 24, 2021, and November 30, 2021, 25 patients were randomly assigned to either convalescent plasma (n = 14) or standard of care (n = 11) groups. Four patients discontinued their allocated convalescent plasma, and 21 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The median interval between the symptom onset and plasma administration was 4.5 days (interquartile range, 3-5 days). The primary outcome of the time-weighted average change in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs did not significantly differ between days 0-5 (1.2 log10 copies/mL in the convalescent plasma vs. 1.2 log10 copies/mL in the standard of care (effect estimate, 0.0 [95% confidence interval, -0.8-0.7]; P = 0.94)). No deaths were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The early administration of convalescent plasma with high neutralizing activity did not contribute to a decrease in the viral load within five days compared with the standard of care alone.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Japan , COVID-19 Serotherapy , Immunization, Passive/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
12.
Gerontology ; 68(9): 1027-1037, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34999588

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Old age is an independent risk factor (RF) for severe COVID-19; evidence for clinico-epidemiological characteristics among elderly COVID-19 patients is scarce. We aimed to analyze clinical and epidemiological characteristics and comorbidities associated with COVID-19 inpatients in age-stratified populations of an elderly COVID-19 cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, using nationwide registry data of COVID-19 patients hospitalized before October 31, 2020 (major information entered in the registry as of December 28, 2020). Participants were divided by age according to the Japan Geriatrics Society and the Japan Gerontological Society: pre-old (65-74 years), old (75-89 years), and super-old (≥90 years). Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) analyses were conducted to identify stratified risk and relationships with comorbidities associated with worse outcomes in different age-groups of elderly patients. Demographics and supportive care were evaluated by category. RESULTS: Data of 4,701 patients from 444 hospitals were included. Most patients (79.3%) had at least one comorbidity; the proportion of patients with hypertension was high in all categories. The proportion of patients with dementia, cardiovascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease increased with age. The percentage of patients who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was lower in the super-old group. In total, 11.5% of patients died (5.3%, pre-old; 15.2%, old; and 22.4%, super-old). MLR showed that the risk of critical illness differed among age-groups. Male sex was a significant RF in all ages. Collagen disease, moderate to severe renal disorder, and dialysis were significant RFs in older patients, while hematological malignancies and metastatic tumors were more important RFs for severe disease in relatively younger patients. Most of the RFs for critical illnesses were associated with death. CONCLUSION: Differences in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics among the different age-groups were found.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Hospitalization , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
13.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(12): 1704-1706, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36067912

ABSTRACT

Vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have shown high efficacy in preventing the onset of disease. However, the immune response to infection immediately after the first vaccination remains unknown. We examined the anti-SARS-CoV-2-binding-antibody titers and neutralizing activity in patients who developed coronavirus disease 2019 after the first vaccination. The amount of anti-SARS-CoV-2-binding antibodies and neutralizing activity drastically increased from the first to the second collection. Our results may provide important data on the course of immune response following vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Neutralization Tests/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
14.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(9): 1340-1343, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35644734

ABSTRACT

The Omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has multiple amino acid mutations in its spike proteins, which may allow it to evade immunity elicited by vaccination. We examined the neutralising activity and S1-IgG titres in patients with breakthrough infections caused by the Omicron variant after two doses of vaccination. We found that neutralising activity was significantly lower for the Omicron variant than for the Wuhan strain. Two doses of vaccination might not induce sufficient neutralising activity for the Omicron variant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Humans , Japan , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
15.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(9): 1242-1248, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35595598

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The post-COVID condition has become a social concern. Although the patient characteristics associated with the development of this condition are partially known, those associated with its persistence have not been identified. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey among patients who had recovered from COVID-19 and visited the National Center for Global Health and Medicine between February 2021 and March 2021. Demographic and clinical data, and data regarding the presence and duration of post-COVID conditions were obtained. We identified factors associated with the development and persistence of post-COVID conditions using multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: We analyzed 457 of 526 responses (response rate, 86.9%). The median patient age was 47 years. Of these, 378 patients (84.4%) had mild disease in the acute phase. The number of patients with symptoms at 6 and 12 months after onset or diagnosis was 120 (26.3%) and 40 (8.8%), respectively. Women were at risk of developing fatigue (odds ratio [OR]: 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-3.14), dysosmia (OR: 1.91, 95%CI: 1.24-2.93), dysgeusia (OR: 1.56, 95%CI: 1.02-2.39), hair loss (OR: 3.00, 95%CI: 1.77-5.09), and persistence of any symptoms (coefficient: 38.0, 95%CI: 13.3-62.8). Younger age and low body mass index were factors for developing dysosmia (OR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.94-0.98 and OR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, respectively) and dysgeusia (OR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.96-1.00 and OR: 0.93, 95%CI: 0.88-0.98, respectively). CONCLUSION: We identified factors involved in the development and persistence of post-COVID conditions. Many patients, even those with mild conditions, experience long-term residual symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dysgeusia/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2
16.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(2): 206-210, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756573

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The ability to predict which patients with a history of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) will exhibit a high antibody titer is necessary for more efficient screening of potential convalescent plasma donors. We aimed to identify factors associated with a high immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer in Japanese convalescent plasma donors after COVID-19. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included volunteers undergoing screening for convalescent plasma donation after COVID-19. Serum anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) S-protein IgG antibodies were measured using a high-sensitivity chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: IgG antibodies were measured in 581 patients, 534 of whom had full information of selected independent variables. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that increasing age (1.037 [1,025, 1.048]), days from symptom onset to sampling (0.997 [0.995, 0.998]), fever (1.664 [1.226, 2.259]), systemic corticosteroid use during SARS-CoV-2 infection (2.382 [1.576, 3.601]), and blood type AB (1.478 [1.032, 2.117]) predict antibody titer. CONCLUSION: Older participants, those who experienced fever during infection, those treated with systemic corticosteroids during infection, those from whom samples were obtained earlier after symptom onset, and those with blood type AB are the best candidates for convalescent plasma donation. Therefore, these factors should be incorporated into the screening criteria for convalescent plasma donation after SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 , Blood Donors , COVID-19/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Japan/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Serotherapy
17.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(12): 1632-1638, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36049613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) has emerged as a critical issue in the intensive care unit (ICU) because of its high burden on patients and medical staff. Here, we examined the potential for reducing VAP incidence through physical oral care interventions without any medication. METHODS: This prospective interventional study compared VAP incidence during an 8-month baseline period (usual oral care) and a 9-month intervention period (physical oral care with sponge brush) among patients who received mechanical ventilation for >48 h in a tertiary care hospital in Vietnam from 2017 to 2019. Physical oral care was provided by general ICU nurses who had been trained by dentists and infection control nurses. VAP was diagnosed using the Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score. RESULTS: In total, 423 patients were enrolled in the baseline group and 454 patients were enrolled in the intervention group; 303 and 300 patients, respectively, were included in the analysis. Two hundred thirty-eight VAP episodes were identified: 135 (44.6%) during the baseline period and 103 (34.3%) during the intervention period. Univariate analysis revealed significant reduction of VAP occurrence in the intervention period (odds ratio = 0.65; 95% confidence interval = 0.47-0.90; P = 0.010). The incidences of VAP per 1000 ventilator-days were 63.4 (135/2128) during the baseline period and 48.4 (103/2128) during the intervention period (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Physical oral care without any medication (e.g., chlorhexidine) reduced VAP incidence in the ICU. This method could be used to reduce VAP incidence, particularly in countries with limited medical resources.


Subject(s)
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Humans , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Vietnam/epidemiology
18.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(2): 217-223, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756574

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To alleviate the overflow of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in hospitals, less invasive and simple criteria are required to triage the patients. We evaluated the relationship between COVID-19 severity and fatty liver on plain computed tomography (CT) scan performed on admission. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we considered all COVID-19 patients at a large tertiary care hospital between January 31 and August 31, 2020. COVID-19 severity was categorized into severe (moderate and severe) and non-severe (asymptomatic and mild) groups, based on the Japanese National COVID-19 guidelines. Fatty liver was detected on plain CT scan. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with severe COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 222 patients (median age: 52 years), 3.2%, 58.1%, 20.7%, and 18.0% presented with asymptomatic, mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19, respectively. Although 59.9% had no fatty liver on plain CT, mild, moderate, and severe fatty liver occurred in 13.1%, 18.9%, and 8.1%, respectively. Age and presence of fatty liver were significantly associated with severe COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that fatty liver on plain CT scan on admission can become a risk factor for severe COVID-19. This finding may help clinicians to easily triage COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fatty Liver , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(11): e3677-e3689, 2021 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32986793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited understanding of the characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring hospitalization in Japan. METHODS: This study included 2638 cases enrolled from 227 healthcare facilities that participated in the COVID-19 Registry Japan (COVIREGI-JP). The inclusion criteria for enrollment of a case in COVIREGI-JP are both (1) a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test and (2) inpatient treatment at a healthcare facility. RESULTS: The median age of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR], 40-71 years). More than half of cases were male (58.9%, 1542/2619). Nearly 60% of the cases had close contact to confirmed or suspected cases of COVID-19. The median duration of symptoms before admission was 7 days (IQR, 4-10 days). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (15%, 396/2638) and diabetes without complications (14.2%, 374/2638). The number of nonsevere cases (68.2%, n = 1798) was twice the number of severe cases (31.8%, n = 840) at admission. The respiratory support during hospitalization includes those who received no oxygen support (61.6%, 1623/2636) followed by those who received supplemental oxygen (29.9%, 788/2636) and invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (8.5%, 225/2636). Overall, 66.9% (1762/2634) of patients were discharged home, while 7.5% (197/2634) died. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the clinical epidemiological features of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients in Japan. When compared with existing inpatient studies in other countries, these results demonstrated fewer comorbidities and a trend towards lower mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Hospitalization , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33257451

ABSTRACT

IMP-type carbapenemase, found in various Gram-negative bacteria, has been increasingly detected worldwide. We aimed to study the outcomes and risk factors for acquisition of IMP-type carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (IMP-CRE), as this has not been evaluated in detail. We conducted a matched case-case-control study of patients from whom IMP-CRE isolates were obtained. All patients who tested positive for IMP-CRE were included; they were matched with patients with carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (CSE) and with controls at a ratio of 1:1:2. The risk factors for acquisition for the CRE and CSE groups and mortality rates, which were calculated using multivariate logistic regression models with weighting according to the inverse probability of propensity scores, were compared. In total, 192 patients (96 patients each in the CRE and CSE groups, with 130 Enterobacter cloacae isolates and 62 Klebsiella sp. isolates) were included. The IMP-11 type was present in 43 patients, IMP-1 in 33, and IMP-60 and IMP-66 in 1 each; 31 patients with CRE (32.3%) and 34 with CSE (35.4%) developed infections. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: gastrostomy, history of intravenous therapy or hemodialysis, and previous exposure to broad-spectrum ß-lactam antibiotics, including penicillin with ß-lactamase inhibitors, cephalosporins, and carbapenems. In propensity score-adjusted analysis, mortality rates for the CRE and CSE groups were similar (15.0% and 19.5%, respectively). We found that IMP-CRE may not contribute to worsened clinical outcomes, compared to CSE, and gastrostomy, previous intravenous therapy, hemodialysis, and broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure were identified as risk factors for CRE isolation. Fluoroquinolone and aminoglycosides are potentially useful antibiotics for IMP-CRE infections.


Subject(s)
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae , Enterobacteriaceae Infections , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Case-Control Studies , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Japan , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL