[Prognostic Value of Basal Marker Expression in Early Stage Breast Cancer].

The expression of basal marker could be a significant factor for poor prognosis in early stage breast cancer. We evaluated the prognostic value of basal marker in each breast cancer subtype. According to immunohistochemistry assay, CK5/6-posi- tive and/or EGFR-positive was defined as basal marker-positive. A total of 497 consecutive, non-metastatic invasive breast cancers were evaluated, and 166 cases(33%)were defined as basal marker-positive. Overall, basal marker expression was not a significant prognostic factor for breast cancer recurrence. However, according to Cox regression analysis, basal markerpositivity was significantly associated with poor recurrence-free survival in 63 cases with TNBC(hazard ratio: 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-5.8, p=0.001). Therefore, evaluation of basal marker expression could be useful for the risk estimation of recurrence in TNBC.

[Auto-analysis of immunohistochemical findings for breast cancer using specified software and virtual microscopy].

Currently, the therapeutic strategy for a breast cancer patient is designed according to their histopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular findings. These findings are obtained through the collected efforts of many individual pathologists or medical technologists (MTs) and are, thus, limited by intra-observer error and potentially subjective decision making. Twenty five breast cancer specimens collected between November 2009 and February 2010 were examined for immunohistochemical expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2, Ki-67, Topoisomerase II alpha (Topo IIalpha). Fifty one cancer specimens collected November 2009 and June 2010 were examined for human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using auto-stainers (Ventana) and the results were stored digitally after examination by virtual microscopy (Hamamatsu Photonics). Data analysis was performed with the Genie/Aperio software package on a desk-top computer. For all the antibodies used expect for HER2, concordant results were obtained in 100% of 24 ER positive cases. Ki-67 index (r=0.96) and Topo IIalpha index (r=0.95) also showed a significant correlation (p<0.001). For HER2, all four specimens with Hercep-score 2 by ocular observation but auto-analysis score 1 revealed no HER2 gene amplification. Well-organized auto-analysis is more likely to result in an objective observation and to provide a means by which to standardize the methods for immunohistochemical detection of breast cancer.

Comparison of CK-IHC assay on serial frozen sections, the OSNA assay, and in combination for intraoperative evaluation of SLN metastases in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative evaluations of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases are performed for providing appropriate and immediate axillary treatments in breast cancer patients who do not meet Z0011 criteria; however, standard intraoperative procedure has not yet been established. METHODS: We consecutively performed intraoperative evaluation for SLN metastases using both a cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (CK-IHC) assay on serial frozen sections and a one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay of the remaining whole node in patients with invasive breast cancer. In this article, we compared the intraoperative diagnostic ability of CK-IHC assay, the OSNA assay, and in combination. RESULTS: Between August 2009 and May 2017, 1,103 SLNs from 499 consecutive clinically node-negative invasive breast cancers were intraoperatively evaluated for SLN metastases using an OSNA and CK-IHC assay. The detection rates of SLN metastases by the OSNA and CK-IHC assays and in combination were 11.8, 12.1, and 14.5%, respectively. The concordance rate between the intraoperative SLN findings of the OSNA and CK-IHC assays was 94.9% (95% confidence interval 93.6-96.2%). The false negative rate for the OSNA assay was 3.1% (30/973), including 3 (0.3%) macrometastases and 27 (2.8%) micrometastases, and for the CK-IHC assay was 2.7% (26/969), including 1 (0.1%) OSNA ++ and 25 (2.6%) OSNA +. CONCLUSIONS: The CK-IHC assay and the OSNA assay have compatible diagnostic abilities in intraoperative evaluations for SLN metastases. The low incidence of false negative results with limited disease burden suggests that both assays can be reliable techniques for intraoperative diagnoses of SLN metastases in breast cancer patients.

Overexpression of topoisomerase II alpha protein is a factor for poor prognosis in patients with luminal B breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value and the best method of testing of topoisomerase II alpha (TOP2A) status have not been established in modern tailored therapy based on breast cancer subtype. RESULTS: The frequencies of TOP2A overexpression and TOP2A amplified were 55.8% and 9.5%, respectively. TOP2A overexpression correlated strongly with non-luminal A subtype (χ2-test, p < 0.001). TOP2A overexpression was significantly associated with relapse-free survival in luminal B breast cancer (n = 316; log rank test, p < 0.001) but not in other breast cancer subtypes. Cox regression analysis showed that TOP2A overexpression is a significant prognostic factor in luminal B breast cancer (hazard ratio (HR) 4.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-9.54, p = 0.002). TOP2A amplified was recognized in HER2 positive breast cancer (p < 0.001). In HER2 positive breast cancer, TOP2A amplified (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.085-1.07, p = 0.063) appeared to be a better prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: In modern tailored therapy, TOP2A overexpression can be a poor prognostic factor in luminal B breast cancer. In contrast, TOP2A amplified could be a better prognostic factor in HER2 positive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2005 and April 2015, a total of 643 consecutive non-metastatic invasive breast cancers were evaluated for TOP2A amplified using fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis (FISH) and for TOP2A overexpression using the immunohistochemistry assay. FISH ratios of 2 or higher were designated as TOP2A amplified, and TOP2A staining >10% was defined as TOP2A overexpression. The prognostic values of TOP2A amplified and TOP2A overexpression were retrospectively evaluated.