ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance is one of the biggest threats of modern public health. Although sub-Saharan Africa is highly burdened with infectious diseases, current data on antimicrobial resistance are sparse. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted between October 2018 and September 2019 to assess the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of clinical bacterial isolates obtained from four referral hospitals in Tanzania. We used standard media and Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion methods as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards. RESULTS: We processed a total of 2620 specimens of which 388 (14.8%) were culture-positive from patients with a median (IQR) age of 28 (12-44) years. Of the positive cultures, 52.3% (203) were from females. Most collected specimens were ear pus 28.6% (111), urine 24.0% (93), wound pus 20.6% (80), stool 14.9% (58), and blood 8.3% (32). Predominant isolates were S. aureus 28.4% (110), E. coli 15.2% (59), P. aeruginosa 10.6% (41), P. mirabilis 7.0% (27), V. cholerae 01 Ogawa 6.2% (24), Klebsiella spp. 5.2% (20) and Streptococcus spp. 4.6% (18). Generally, the isolates exhibited a high level of resistance to commonly used antibiotics such as Ampicillin, Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid, Erythromycin, Gentamicin, Tetracycline, Trimethoprim, third-generation Cephalosporins (Ceftriaxone and Ceftazidime), and reserved drugs (Clindamycin and Meropenem). S. aureus isolates were resistant to most of the antibiotics tested; 66.7% were classified as MRSA infections. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics was alarmingly high. Our findings emphasize the need for comprehensive national control programs to combat antibiotic resistance.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis remains grim, especially in resource-limited settings. Low quality of sputum, particularly among seriously ill, HIV/AIDS, and pediatric patients might result in missing the diagnosis. This study evaluated the performance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis on stool specimens as an alternative to respiratory specimens. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used to evaluate the performance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF to detect TB in stool specimens from presumptive TB patients. Sputum culture on Lowenstein-Jensen media was used as the gold standard. Recruitment of patients into the study was conducted in 12 selected health facilities in Tanzania. Two sputa and a stool specimen were collected from each study participant. Both sputa and stool samples were tested at their respective study sites of collection using GeneXpert, and their respective portions shipped to the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory for testing by stool GeneXpert and sputum culture in the LJ media. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA software version 14.1. RESULTS: A total of 590 presumptive tuberculosis patients were enrolled in this study. Their median age was 35 years (IQR = 21-47 years). More than half (57.5%, n = 339) of the study participants, were males. Children aged below 15 years constituted 17.6% (n = 104) of the study participants. A total of 75 tuberculosis cases were detected by sputum culture. The sensitivity and specificity of Stool GeneXpert conducted at CTRL was 84% (95% CI: 81.0-87.0%), and 93.4% (CI: 98.5-99.9%) respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of stool GeneXpert at the peripheral laboratories was 63.0% (95% CI: 47.8-76.1) and 76.7% (95% CI: 72.1-81.4), respectively. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study suggest that stool is a potential alternative to respiratory specimen for use in routine diagnosis of tuberculosis, especially when obtaining a respiratory specimen is challenging.