Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 68(3): 182-196, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603142

ABSTRACT

Pain is a common symptom among patients with cancer. Adequate pain assessment and management are critical to improve the quality of life and health outcomes in this population. In this review, the authors provide a framework for safely and effectively managing cancer-related pain by summarizing the evidence for the importance of controlling pain, the barriers to adequate pain management, strategies to assess and manage cancer-related pain, how to manage pain in patients at risk of substance use disorder, and considerations when managing pain in a survivorship population. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:182-196. © 2018 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Cancer Pain/therapy , Acupuncture Therapy , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cancer Pain/diagnosis , Delayed-Action Preparations , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Injections, Epidural , Injections, Spinal , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Mindfulness , Nerve Block , Pain Measurement , Prescription Drug Misuse , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control
2.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 63(3): 423-429, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644615

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Given a shortage of specialty palliative care clinicians and geographic variation in availability, telemedicine has been proposed as one way to improve access to palliative care services for patients with cancer. However, the enduring digital divide raises questions about whether unequal access will exacerbate healthcare disparities. OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with utilization of telemedicine as compared to in-person visits by patients with cancer in the ambulatory palliative care setting. METHODS: We collected data on patients seen in Supportive Oncology clinic by palliative care clinicians with an in-person or telemedicine visit from March 1 to December 30, 2020. A logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was fit to assess the association between visit type and patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 491 patients and 1783 visits were identified, including 1061 (60%) in-person visits and 722 (40%) telemedicine visits. Female patients were significantly more likely to utilize telemedicine than male patients (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.11-1.90). Spanish-speaking patients (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.61), those without insurance (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.52), and those without an activated patient portal (Inactivated: OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.82; Pending Activation: OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.48) were less likely to utilize telemedicine. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals disparities in telemedicine utilization in the ambulatory palliative care setting for patients with cancer who are male, Spanish-speaking, uninsured, or do not have an activated patient portal. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, we can better meet the palliative care needs of patients with cancer through telemedicine only if equity is kept at the forefront of our discussions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Ambulatory Care , Female , Humans , Male , Palliative Care , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Oral Oncol ; 92: 1-5, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010616

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing radiation treatment (RT) for head and neck malignancies often suffer significant disease- and treatment-related pain requiring opioids for effective management. However, the prevalence and associated risk factors of prolonged opioid use in this population remain poorly characterized. We sought to quantify the rate of prolonged opioid use among opioid naïve patients receiving curative-intent RT for head and neck malignancies and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who had undergone RT for head and neck malignancies at our institution between Jan 2011 and Sept 2017. Our primary endpoint was persistent opioid use 6-months following completion of RT. Patients were included if they were opioid-naïve, underwent curative intent RT, had adequate follow-up, and did not have residual or recurrent disease within our follow-up period. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify risk factors for prolonged opioid use. RESULTS: We identified 311 patients meeting our inclusion criteria; 40 (12.9%) continued to use opioids 6-months following RT. Univariable analysis found current smoking, alcohol abuse, RT dose, treatment to the bilateral necks, induction chemotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, PEG tube, daily milligram morphine equivalents, and adjuvant analgesic medication use to be positively associated with prolonged opioid use; prior surgery was negatively associated with prolonged opioid use. Delivery of induction chemotherapy (OR 2.86, CI (95%) 1.32-6.21) and alcohol abuse (OR 3.75, CI (95%) 1.66-8.47) remained statistically significant on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of prolonged opioid use in previously opioid naïve patients undergoing curative intent head and neck RT was just under 13%. Patients with history of alcohol abuse and those who undergo induction chemotherapy were most at risk.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Opioid-Related Disorders/etiology , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL