ABSTRACT
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are myeloid neoplasms presenting with dysplasia in the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral cytopenia. In most patients anemia develops. We screened for genes that are expressed abnormally in erythroid progenitor cells (EP) and contribute to the pathogenesis of MDS. We found that the Coxsackie-Adenovirus receptor (CAR = CXADR) is markedly downregulated in CD45low/CD105+ EP in MDS patients compared to control EP. Correspondingly, the erythroblast cell lines HEL, K562, and KU812 stained negative for CAR. Lentiviral transduction of the full-length CXADR gene into these cells resulted in an increased expression of early erythroid antigens, including CD36, CD71, and glycophorin A. In addition, CXADR-transduction resulted in an increased migration against a serum protein gradient, whereas truncated CXADR variants did not induce expression of erythroid antigens or migration. Furthermore, conditional knock-out of Cxadr in C57BL/6 mice resulted in anemia and erythroid dysplasia. Finally, decreased CAR expression on EP was found to correlate with high-risk MDS and decreased survival. Together, CAR is a functionally relevant marker that is down-regulated on EP in MDS and is of prognostic significance. Decreased CAR expression may contribute to the maturation defect and altered migration of EP and thus their pathologic accumulation in the BM in MDS.
Subject(s)
Anemia , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Humans , Animals , Mice , Receptors, Virus/genetics , Bone Marrow Cells/metabolism , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/metabolism , Cell Adhesion Molecules/metabolism , Cell Differentiation , Anemia/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with refractory or relapsed haematological malignancies have few treatment options and short survival times. Identification of effective therapies with genomic-based precision medicine is hampered by intratumour heterogeneity and incomplete understanding of the contribution of various mutations within specific cancer phenotypes. Ex-vivo drug-response profiling in patient biopsies might aid effective treatment identification; however, proof of its clinical utility is limited. METHODS: We investigated the feasibility and clinical impact of multiparametric, single-cell, drug-response profiling in patient biopsies by immunofluorescence, automated microscopy, and image analysis, an approach we call pharmacoscopy. First, the ability of pharmacoscopy to separate responders from non-responders was evaluated retrospectively for a cohort of 20 newly diagnosed and previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Next, 48 patients with aggressive haematological malignancies were prospectively evaluated for pharmacoscopy-guided treatment, of whom 17 could receive the treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in pharmacoscopy-treated patients, as compared with their own progression-free survival for the most recent regimen on which they had progressive disease. This trial is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03096821. FINDINGS: Pharmacoscopy retrospectively predicted the clinical response of 20 acute myeloid leukaemia patients to initial therapy with 88·1% accuracy. In this interim analysis, 15 (88%) of 17 patients receiving pharmacoscopy-guided treatment had an overall response compared with four (24%) of 17 patients with their most recent regimen (odds ratio 24·38 [95% CI 3·99-125·4], p=0·0013). 12 (71%) of 17 patients had a progression-free survival ratio of 1·3 or higher, and median progression-free survival increased by four times, from 5·7 (95% CI 4·1-12·1) weeks to 22·6 (7·4-34·0) weeks (hazard ratio 3·14 [95% CI 1·37-7·22], p=0·0075). INTERPRETATION: Routine clinical integration of pharmacoscopy for treatment selection is technically feasible, and led to improved treatment of patients with aggressive refractory haematological malignancies in an initial patient cohort, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: Austrian Academy of Sciences; European Research Council; Austrian Science Fund; Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy; National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development; Anniversary Fund of the Austrian National Bank; MPN Research Foundation; European Molecular Biology Organization; and Swiss National Science Foundation.