Whole-body distribution of tenofovir, emtricitabine and dolutegravir in non-human primates.

BACKGROUND: One major barrier to HIV cure is the persistence of virus, possibly linked to an insufficient antiretroviral drug (ARV) distribution into tissues. OBJECTIVES: To draw the whole-body distribution of three antiretroviral drugs-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine and dolutegravir-in non-human primates (NHPs). METHODS: Eight uninfected NHPs received a single injection of a solution containing the three ARVs. Forty-five different tissues were sampled 24 h after injection. RESULTS: Median tissue penetration factors (TPFs) were 45.4, 5.8 and 0.5 for tenofovir, emtricitabine and dolutegravir, respectively, and were statistically different between the three ARVs. Tissues were grouped by system, because TPFs were consistent according to these groups, and ranked in order of decreasing TPFs. The digestive system was the system with the highest tissue concentrations. Next came the two main sites of elimination, the liver and the kidney, as well as the tissues of the cardiopulmonary and urinary systems. Then, it was the whole lymphatic system. The next group included the reproductive system, the adipose tissue and the skin. The last two systems were the muscle and the CNS. The intra-tissue variability was rather low with a median coefficient of variation of the concentrations around 15% and no value greater than 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study determines the first whole-body distribution in a validated NHP model. These data have important implications for future preclinical and clinical studies for the development of novel HIV therapies towards an HIV cure.

Quantitative Imaging Analysis of the Spatial Relationship between Antiretrovirals, Reverse Transcriptase Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus RNA, and Collagen in the Mesenteric Lymph Nodes of Nonhuman Primates.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) persistence in tissue reservoirs is a major barrier to HIV cure. While antiretrovirals (ARVs) suppress viral replication, antiretroviral therapy (ART) interruption results in rapid rebound viremia that may originate from lymphoid tissues. To understand the relationship between anatomic distribution of ARV exposure and viral expression in lymph nodes, we performed mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) of 6 ARVs, RNAscope in situ hybridization for viral RNA (vRNA), and immunohistochemistry of collagen in mesenteric lymph nodes from 8 uninfected and 10 reverse transcriptase simian/human immunodeficiency virus (RT-SHIV)-infected rhesus macaques dosed to steady state with combination ART. MATLAB-based quantitative imaging analysis was used to evaluate spatial and pharmacological relationships between these ARVs, viral RNA (both vRNA+ cells and follicular dendritic cell [FDC]-bound virions), and collagen deposition. Using MSI, 31% of mesenteric lymph node tissue area was found to be not covered by any ARV. Additionally, 28% of FDC-trapped virions and 21% of infected cells were not exposed to any detected ARV. Of the 69% of tissue area that was covered by cumulative ART exposure, nearly 100% of concentrations were greater than in vitro 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values; however, 52% of total tissue coverage was from only one ARV, primarily maraviroc. Collagen covered ∼35% of tissue area but did not influence ARV distribution heterogeneity. Our findings are consistent with our hypothesis that ARV distribution, in addition to total-tissue drug concentration, must be considered when evaluating viral persistence in lymph nodes and other reservoir tissues.

A cross-species comparison of antiretroviral penetration into lymph nodes using novel physiologically based pharmacokinetic models.

BACKGROUND: Investigating antiretroviral (ARV) penetration and pharmacology in lymph nodes is crucial to understanding mechanisms of HIV persistence in tissue, but sampling these tissues in humans is invasive and costly. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling is a non-invasive solution for understanding lymph node penetration of ARVs across multiple species. OBJECTIVES: To develop customized PBPK models with a novel lymph node compartment, and use these models to describe the distribution of three ARVs-tenofovir, emtricitabine and efavirenz-into the plasma and lymph nodes of non-human primates (NHPs) and humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this analysis, we utilized standard monkey and human PBPK models in PK-Sim, and added a novel lymph node compartment using MoBi. We used these models to describe the distribution of tenofovir, emtricitabine and efavirenz into NHP and human plasma and lymph nodes, and compared model-predicted versus observed AUC and Cmax. RESULTS: For all three ARVs, population simulations using the base and final models reasonably characterized observed plasma and tissue data in NHPs and humans, with predicted/observed AUC and Cmax ratios within 0.7-2.0. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our novel PBPK model provides a framework for understanding lymph node penetration of ARVs or future HIV cure therapies.

The Lymph Node Reservoir: Physiology, HIV Infection, and Antiretroviral Therapy.

Despite advances in treatment, finding a cure for HIV remains a top priority. Chronic HIV infection is associated with increased risk of comorbidities, such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, people living with HIV must remain adherent to daily antiretroviral therapy, because lapses in medication adherence can lead to viral rebound and disease progression. Viral recrudescence occurs from cellular reservoirs in lymphoid tissues. In particular, lymph nodes are central to the pathology of HIV due to their unique architecture and compartmentalization of immune cells. Understanding how antiretrovirals (ARVs) penetrate lymph nodes may explain why these tissues are maintained as HIV reservoirs, and how they contribute to viral rebound upon treatment interruption. In this report, we review (i) the physiology of the lymph nodes and their function as part of the immune and lymphatic systems, (ii) the pathogenesis and outcomes of HIV infection in lymph nodes, and (iii) ARV concentrations and distribution in lymph nodes, and the relationship between ARVs and HIV in this important reservoir.