GALAD Score Detects Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma in an International Cohort of Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing. However, strategies for detection of early-stage HCC in patients with NASH have limitations. We assessed the ability of the GALAD score, which determines risk of HCC based on patient sex; age; and serum levels of α-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP isoform L3 (AFP-L3), and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), to detect HCC in patients with NASH. METHODS: We performed a case-control study of 125 patients with HCC (20% within Milan Criteria) and 231 patients without HCC (NASH controls) from 8 centers in Germany. We compared the performance of serum AFP, AFP-L3, or DCP vs GALAD score to identify patients with HCC using receiver operating characteristic curves and corresponding area under the curve (AUC) analyses. We also analyzed data from 389 patients with NASH under surveillance for HCC in Japan, followed for a median of 167 months. During the 5-year screening period, 26 patients developed HCC. To compensate for irregular intervals of data points, we performed locally weighted scatterplot smoothing, linear regression, and a non-linear curve fit to assess development of GALAD before HCC development. RESULTS: The GALAD score identified patients with any stage HCC with an AUC of 0.96 - significantly greater than values for serum levels of AFP (AUC, 0.88), AFP-L3 (AUC, 0.86) or DCP (AUC, 0.87). AUC values for the GALAD score were consistent in patients with cirrhosis (AUC, 0.93) and without cirrhosis (AUC, 0.98). For detection of HCC within Milan Criteria, the GALAD score achieved an AUC of 0.91, with a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 95% at a cutoff of -0.63. In a pilot Japanese cohort study, the mean GALAD score was higher in patients with NASH who developed HCC than in those who did not develop HCC as early as 1.5 years before HCC diagnosis. GALAD scores were above -0.63 approximately 200 days before the diagnosis of HCC. CONCLUSIONS: In a case-control study performed in Germany and a pilot cohort study in Japan, we found the GALAD score may detect HCC with high levels of accuracy in patients with NASH, with and without cirrhosis. The GALAD score can detect patients with early-stage HCC, and might facilitate surveillance of patients with NASH, who are often obese, which limits the sensitivity of detection of liver cancer by ultrasound.

Bridging treatment prior to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization or transarterial chemoembolization?

BACKGROUND: In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, intraarterial therapies are regularly employed as a bridge to liver transplantation to prevent tumor progression during waiting time. Objective of this study was to compare HCC recurrence after liver transplantation following TACE or radioembolization bridging treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on 131 consecutive HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 2007 and December 2017 at our liver transplant center (radioembolization n = 44, TACE n = 87). Multivariable logistic regression and cox proportional hazard regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with tumor recurrence and post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Between groups, patients were comparable with regards to age and gender. In the radioembolization group, Milan criteria for HCC were met significantly less frequently (20.5% vs. 65.5%, p < 0.0001). Patients in the radioembolization group required significantly fewer intraarterial treatments (1 [1-2] vs. 1 [1-7], p = 0.0007). On explant specimen, tumor differentiation, microvascular invasion and tumor necrosis were comparable between the groups. HCC recurrence and overall survival were similar between the groups. Multivariable analysis detected increasing recipient age, male gender, complete tumor necrosis and absence of microvascular invasion being independently associated with decreased odds for HCC recurrence. Increasing model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and tumor recurrence were independently associated with increased odds of post-transplant death. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarterial bridging treatment leading to tumor necrosis may not only prevent waitlist drop-out but also facilitate long-term successful liver transplantation in HCC patients. Both radioembolization and TACE represent potent treatment strategies.

LiMAx Prior to Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma as an Additional Tool for Patient Selection in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Radioembolization (RE) has recently demonstrated a non-inferior survival outcome compared to systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, current guidelines recommend RE for patients with advanced HCC and preserved liver function who are unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or systemic therapy. However, despite the excellent safety profile of RE, post-therapeutic hepatic decompensation remains a serious complication that is difficult to predicted by standard laboratory liver function parameters or imaging modalities. LiMAx® is a non-invasive test for liver function assessment, measuring the maximum metabolic capacity for 13C-Methacetin by the liver-specific enzyme CYP 450 1A2. Our study investigates the potential of LiMAx® for predicting post-interventional decompensation of liver function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 50 patients with HCC with or without liver cirrhosis and not amenable to TACE or systemic treatments were included in the study. For patients prospectively enrolled in our study, LiMAx® was carried out one day before RE (baseline) and 28 and 90 days after RE. Established liver function parameters were assessed at baseline, day 28, and day 90 after RE. The relationship between baseline LiMAx® and pre-and post-interventional liver function parameters, as well as the ability of LiMAx® to predict hepatic decompensation, were analyzed. RESULTS: We observed a strong association between baseline LiMAx® and bilirubin, albumin, ALBI grade, and MELD score. Patients presenting with Child-Pugh score B 28 days after RE or with a deterioration in Child-Pugh score by at least one point had a significantly lower baseline LiMAx® compared to those with Child-Pugh score A or with stable Child-Pugh score. The ability of LiMAx® to predict hepatic decompensation after RE was determined using ROC curve analysis and was compared to MELD score and ALBI grade. LiMAx® achieved a substantial AUC of 0.8117, comparable to MELD score and ALBI grade. CONCLUSION: Patients with lower LiMAx® values at baseline have a significantly increased risk for hepatic decompensation after RE, despite being categorized as Child-Pugh A. Therefore, LiMAx® can be used as an additional tool to identify patients at high risk of post-interventional hepatic failure.

GALAD Score Detects Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a European Cohort of Chronic Hepatitis B and C Patients.

Despite vaccination programs and direct antiviral treatments, the incidence of virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains high, while ultrasound-based detection rates for early-stage HCC is continuously low. To address this insufficiency, we set out to characterize whether the GALAD score, which incorporates gender, age, and serum levels of AFP, AFP isoform L3 (AFP-L3), and des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin (DCP), can improve early-stage HCC detection in a Caucasian HBV/HCV cohort. In a retrospective German single-center study, 182 patients with HBV, 223 with HCV and 168 with other etiology (OE) of chronic liver disease (CLD) were enrolled. HCC was confirmed in 52 HBV, 84 HCV and 60 OE CLD patients. The diagnostic performance of the single biomarkers in HCC detection was compared to the GALAD model. At initial diagnosis, most patients were at (very) early BCLC 0 (n = 14/7%) or A (n = 56/29%) or intermediate stage BCLC B (n = 93/47%) HCC in all three subgroups. In the BCLC 0/A cohort, GALAD exhibited an AUC of 0.94 discriminating HCC from non-HCC, surpassing AFP (AUC 0.86), AFP-L3 (AUC 0.83) and DCP (AUC 0.83). In the HBV population, GALAD achieved an AUC of 0.96, in HCV an AUC of 0.98 and in OE an AUC of 0.99, clearly superior to the biomarkers alone. Furthermore, in HCV patients GALAD showed a significantly higher specificity (89%) versus AFP (64%) alone. In chronic viral hepatitis, the GALAD model showed superior performance in detection of early-stage HCC, while exhibiting higher specificity in HCV patients compared to AFP alone. We conclude that the GALAD score shows potential for HCC surveillance in Caucasian HBV/HCV patients.

DSM-TACE of HCC: Evaluation of Tumor Response in Patients Ineligible for Other Systemic or Loco-Regional Therapies.

PURPOSE: To analyze tumor response, survival and safety in patients with non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial hepatic chemoembolization using degradable starch microspheres (DSM-TACE) combined with doxorubicin who had no local interventional or systemic therapy alternative according to an interdisciplinary conference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 28 patients (23 male, 5 female, median age 67 years) with unresectable HCC, serum bilirubin levels < 3 mg/dl and contraindications to Sorafenib, RFA, SIRT or cTACE were included. DSM-TACE was performed using Embocept® S (15 ml) and doxorubicin (50 mg/25 ml) three times every 4-6 weeks. Patients were initially staged using the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer System (BCLC). Basic liver function was evaluated with the MELD-score. Tumor response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). RESULTS: DSM-TACE could be technically successfully performed in all 28 patients. At control imaging after three treatments, the overall rates of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were 14.3 %, 25 %, 39.3 % and 21.4 %, respectively, according to mRECIST. With regard to BCLC stages, the results were as follows (CR, PR, PD): BCLC A (n = 8): 7.1 %, 7.1 %, 10.7 %, 1.2 %; BCLC B (n = 12): 0 %, 10.7 %, 17.9 %, 14.3 %; BCLC C (n = 5): 0 %, 3.6 %, 10.7 %, 3.6 %; BCLC D (n = 3): 3.6 %, 3.6 %, 0 %, 3.6 %. According to this, DSM-TACE showed an overall good median survival of 682 days, although the patients' survival was strictly dependent on BCLC stage. CONCLUSION: DSM-TACE is a safe and promising treatment alternative for patients with unresectable HCC who are ineligible for other loco-regional therapies. KEY POINTS: · DSM-TACE is a safe treatment alternative for patients ineligible for other local or systemic treatments.. · DSM-TACE did not influence the MELD-score in our study population.. · Patients treated with DSM-TACE showed an overall good median survival of 682 days, strictly dependent on BCLC stage.. CITATION FORMAT: · Haubold J, Reinboldt MP, Wetter A et al. DSM-TACE of HCC: Evaluation of Tumor Response in Patients Ineligible for Other Systemic or Loco-Regional Therapies. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 862 - 869.

NAFLD-Associated Comorbidities in Advanced Stage HCC Do Not Alter the Safety and Efficacy of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may not be suitable for systemic therapy due to metabolic syndrome-related diseases. Recent trials did not show a survival benefit of radioembolization (RE) compared to sorafenib in advanced stage HCC but RE may represent an adequate alternative in patients with contraindications to systemic therapy due to its favorable safety profile. AIM: To investigate the impact of NAFLD-related comorbidities on safety and efficacy of RE for HCC treatment in a retrospective monocentric cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Safety and efficacy of RE were evaluated in patients with NAFLD-associated HCC. Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC patients served as controls, exhibiting matching Barcelona Liver Cancer Clinic (BCLC) stages while showing significantly fewer metabolic comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, 87 HCC patients with NAFLD (mean age 71.3 ± 6.9 years) and 62 HCC patients with HBV (mean age 58.8 ± 10.9 years) not amenable to surgical or conventional locoregional treatments were included. Patients with HBV-related HCC had a comparable liver function to HCC patients with NAFLD. RE treatment-related toxicity did not differ between the two groups (increase in bilirubin Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade in 29 [38.7%] NAFLD and 20 [39.2%] HBV patients, p = 0.91). Overall survival was similar in HCC patients with NAFLD and HBV (11.1 [interquartile range, IQR, 18.27] vs. 9.3 months [IQR 14.73], p = 0.38), also in the subgroup analyses of BCLC B and C stages. CONCLUSION: RE showed similar survival outcomes at a comparable toxicity profile in HCC patients with NAFLD and HBV. NAFLD-associated metabolic comorbidities did not exhibit limitations for RE while offering comparable therapeutic efficacy as compared to HBV patients.

Tivantinib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide with a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis in the majority of cases. Physicians are frequently confronted with patients who are not eligible for curative or locoregional treatments any more. In this scenario, the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib remains the only systemic first-line treatment option providing modest survival benefit compared to placebo with significant but for most patients acceptable adverse effects. Areas covered: Tivantinib was the first antiproliferative agent to be been applied in a phase III trial based on receptor overexpression analyses after disease progression on sorafenib. While phase I and II trials with tivantinib in second line showed encouraging results, a recent press release announced that the METIV-HCC phase III study of tivantinib in HCC did not meet its primary endpoint of improving overall survival. Expert commentary: Evidence for antiangiogenetic therapy inducing tumor hypoxia leading to overexpression of proliferative genes, including cMET, underlines the potential of tivantinib as second-line treatment. However, as the mechanism of action of tivantinib through cMET inhibition has recently been questioned by several groups, identification of alternative proliferative markers or targets is mandatory.

Novel implications in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, associated with a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis in the majority of cases. Physicians at care are frequently confronted with patients who are ineligible for curative treatment such as liver resection, transplantation or radiofrequency ablation. Besides established palliative locoregional therapies, such as ablation or chemoembolization, new treatment options, such as microwave ablation, drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization or selective internal radiation therapy, are emerging; however, data from randomized controlled trials are still lacking. In order to achieve optimal tumor control, patients should receive tailored treatment concepts, considering their tumor burden, liver function and performance status, instead of strictly assigning patients to treatment modalities following algorithms that may be partly very restrictive. Palliative locoregional pretreatment might facilitate downstaging to ensure later curative resection or transplantation. In addition, the combined utilization of different locoregional treatment options or systemic co-treatment has been the subject of several trials. In cases where local tumor control cannot be achieved, or in the scenario of extrahepatic spread, sorafenib remains the only approved systemic therapy option. Alternative targeted therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown encouraging preliminary results, while data from phase III studies are pending.