Late life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with Brugada syndrome: Results from long-term follow-up in a large Japanese cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) are first diagnosed in their 40s, with sudden cardiac death (SCD) often occurring in their 50s. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) may occur in some patients with BrS despite having been asymptomatic for a long period. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors for late life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with BrS. METHODS: Patients with BrS (n = 523; mean age, 51 ± 13 years; male, n = 497) were enrolled. The risk of late life-threatening arrhythmia was investigated in 225 patients who had experienced no cardiac events (CEs: SCD or ventricular tachyarrhythmia) for at least 10 years after study enrollment. The incidence of CEs during the follow-up period was examined. RESULTS: During the follow-up of the 523 patients, 59 (11%) experienced CEs. The annual incidences of CEs were 2.87%, 0.77%, and 0.09% from study enrollment to 3, 3-10, and after 10 years, respectively. Among 225 patients who had experienced no CEs for at least 10 years after enrollment, four patients (1.8%) subsequently experienced CEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in the incidence of late CEs between patients with and without a history of symptoms (p = .032). The positive and negative predictive values of late CEs for the programmed electrical stimulation (PES) test were 2.9% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients with BrS who are asymptomatic and have no ventricular tachycardia/VF inducibility by PES are at extremely low risk of experiencing late life-threatening arrhythmias.

Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry.

AIMS: Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is the most common complication during cryoballoon ablation. Currently, two cryoballoon systems are available, yet the difference is unclear. We sought to compare the acute procedural efficacy and safety of the two cryoballoons. METHODS: This prospective observational study consisted of 2,555 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either conventional (Arctic Front Advance) (AFA-CB) or novel cryoballoons (POLARx) (POLARx-CB) at 19 centers between January 2022 and October 2023. RESULTS: Among 2,555 patients (68.8 ± 10.9 years, 1,740 men, paroxysmal AF[PAF] 1,670 patients), PVIs were performed by the AFA-CB and POLARx-CB in 1,358 and 1,197 patients, respectively. Touch-up ablation was required in 299(11.7%) patients. The touch-up rate was significantly lower for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (9.5% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.002), especially for right inferior PVs (RIPVs). The touch-up rate was significantly lower for PAF than non-PAF (8.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and was similar between the two cryoballoons in non-PAF patients. Right PNI occurred in 64(2.5%) patients and 22(0.9%) were symptomatic. It occurred during the right superior PV (RSPV) ablation in 39(1.5%) patients. The incidence was significantly higher for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (3.8% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) as was the incidence of symptomatic PNI (1.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001). The difference was significant during RSPV (2.5% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) but not RIPV ablation. The PNI recovered more quickly for the AFA-CB than POLARx-CB. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of right PNI and lower touch-up rate for the POLARx-CB than AFA-CB in the real-world clinical practice.

Initial clinical experience with the novel POLARx FIT cryoballoon system for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Background: The POLARx FIT system (Boston Scientific, MA, USA) is a novel cryoballoon (CB) ablation technology in which the balloon diameter can be expanded from 28 to 31 mm. The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and safety of the new POLARx FIT system to those of the existing POLARx system currently in use for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: The first 70 consecutive patients who underwent CB-based PVI with the POLARx FIT system were retrospectively compared with 200 consecutive patients treated with the POLARx system at Sakakibara Heart Institute from October 2021 to May 2023. Results: The POLARx FIT system yielded a higher mean ± standard deviation nadir temperature in the right inferior PV (-59.2 ± 5.29 °C vs. - 62.0 ± 5.08 °C, p = 0.006), but this required a balloon size reduction to 28 mm in 30 % of cases. No significant differences were detected in the time to isolation and thaw time of any PV between the two groups. After the CB-based PVI procedure, no residual PV carina potentials were observed with the POLARx FIT system, whereas 4/20 were with the POLARx system (p = 0.04). Conclusions: The POLARx FIT system had comparable effectiveness and safety to the basic POLARx system. This technology may improve the ablation area, including the PV carina. However, the 31-mm balloon alone was not sufficient to isolate certain PVs.

A randomized controlled trial of the size-adjustable cryoballoon vs conventional cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The CONTRAST-CRYO II trial rationale and design.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon technology is a well-established therapy for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, a size-adjustable cryoballoon (POLARxTM FIT) that enables delivery in a standard 28-mm or an expanded 31-mm size was introduced. Objective: The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this novel cryoballoon compared to the conventional cryoballoon. Methods: The CONTRAST-CRYO II trial is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial in which 214 patients with paroxysmal AF will be randomized 1:1 to cryoballoon ablation with either a conventional cryoballoon (Arctic Front AdvanceTM Pro) or a size-adjustable cryoballoon (POLARx FIT). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at all investigational sites and has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000052500). Results: The primary endpoint of this study will be the incidence of phrenic nerve injury. Secondary endpoints include procedural success, chronic success through 12 months, procedure-related adverse events, biophysiological parameters during applications for each pulmonary vein (PV), total procedural and fluoroscopy times, level of PVI and isolation area, and probability of non-PV foci initiating AF. Conclusion: The CONTRAST-CRYO II trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the POLARx FIT vs the Arctic Front Advance Pro. The findings from this trial will provide additional utility data on the efficacy of the size-adjustable cryoballoon for isolating PVs in patients with paroxysmal AF.