Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 86
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Brain ; 146(4): 1328-1341, 2023 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36350566

ABSTRACT

Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is an important example of mitochondrial blindness with the m.11778G>A mutation in the MT-ND4 gene being the most common disease-causing mtDNA variant worldwide. The REFLECT phase 3 pivotal study is a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of bilateral intravitreal injection of lenadogene nolparvovec in patients with a confirmed m.11778G>A mutation, using a recombinant adeno-associated virus vector 2, serotype 2 (rAAV2/2-ND4). The first-affected eye received gene therapy; the fellow (affected/not-yet-affected) eye was randomly injected with gene therapy or placebo. The primary end point was the difference in change from baseline of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec versus placebo at 1.5 years post-treatment, expressed in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR). Forty-eight patients were treated bilaterally and 50 unilaterally. At 1.5 years, the change from baseline in BCVA was not statistically different between second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes receiving lenadogene nolparvovec and placebo (primary end point). A statistically significant improvement in BCVA was reported from baseline to 1.5 years in lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes: -0.23 LogMAR for the first-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients (P < 0.01); and -0.15 LogMAR for second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes of bilaterally treated patients and the first-affected eyes of unilaterally treated patients (P < 0.05). The mean improvement in BCVA from nadir to 1.5 years was -0.38 (0.052) LogMAR and -0.33 (0.052) LogMAR in first-affected and second-affected/not-yet-affected eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, respectively (bilateral treatment group). A mean improvement of -0.33 (0.051) LogMAR and -0.26 (0.051) LogMAR was observed in first-affected lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes and second-affected/not-yet-affected placebo-treated eyes, respectively (unilateral treatment group). The proportion of patients with one or both eyes on-chart at 1.5 years was 85.4% and 72.0% for bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients, respectively. The gene therapy was well tolerated, with no systemic issues. Intraocular inflammation, which was mostly mild and well controlled with topical corticosteroids, occurred in 70.7% of lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes versus 10.2% of placebo-treated eyes. Among eyes treated with lenadogene nolparvovec, there was no difference in the incidence of intraocular inflammation between bilaterally and unilaterally treated patients. Overall, the REFLECT trial demonstrated an improvement of BCVA in LHON eyes carrying the m.11778G>A mtDNA mutation treated with lenadogene nolparvovec or placebo to a degree not reported in natural history studies and supports an improved benefit/risk profile for bilateral injections of lenadogene nolparvovec relative to unilateral injections.


Subject(s)
Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber , Humans , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Genetic Therapy , Inflammation/etiology , Mutation/genetics , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/genetics , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/therapy
2.
Ophthalmology ; 128(5): 649-660, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33451738

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a single intravitreal injection of rAAV2/2-ND4 in subjects with visual loss from Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). DESIGN: RESCUE is a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with the m.11778G>A mitochondrial DNA mutation and vision loss ≤6 months from onset in 1 or both eyes were included. METHODS: Each subject's right eye was randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with rAAV2/2-ND4 (single injection of 9 × 1010 viral genomes in 90 µl) or to sham injection. The left eye received the treatment not allocated to the right eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the difference of the change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between rAAV2/2-ND4-treated and sham-treated eyes at week 48. Other outcome measures included contrast sensitivity, Humphrey visual field perimetry, retinal anatomic measures, and quality of life. Follow-up extended to week 96. RESULTS: Efficacy analysis included 38 subjects. Mean age was 36.8 years, and 82% were male. Mean duration of vision loss at time of treatment was 3.6 months and 3.9 months in the rAAV2/2-ND4-treated eyes and sham-treated eyes, respectively. Mean baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA (standard deviation) was 1.31 (0.52) in rAAV2/2-ND4-treated eyes and 1.26 (0.62) in sham-treated eyes, with a range from -0.20 to 2.51. At week 48, the difference of the change in BCVA from baseline between rAAV2/2-ND4-treated and sham-treated eyes was -0.01 logMAR (P = 0.89); the primary end point of a -0.3 logMAR (15-letter) difference was not met. The mean BCVA for both groups deteriorated over the initial weeks, reaching the worst levels at week 24, followed by a plateau phase until week 48, and then an improvement of +10 and +9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters equivalent from the plateau level in the rAAV2/2-ND4-treated and sham-treated eyes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At 96 weeks after unilateral injection of rAAV2/2-ND4, LHON subjects carrying the m.11778G>A mutation treated within 6 months after vision loss achieved comparable visual outcomes in the injected and uninjected eyes.


Subject(s)
Genetic Therapy , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Dependovirus/genetics , Double-Blind Method , Electroretinography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Vectors , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/diagnosis , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/genetics , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visual Field Tests , Visual Fields/physiology , Young Adult
3.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 41(3): 375-378, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34369470

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with typical features of pseudotumor cerebri syndrome (PTCS) must undergo lumbar puncture (LP) to demonstrate elevated opening pressure and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis to rule out alternative diagnoses. As LP may be associated with significant morbidity, this study aims to determine its necessity in diagnosing typical PTCS. METHODS: Retrospective chart review at 3 university-based neuro-ophthalmology practices included women aged 18-45 years with body mass index >25, papilledema, negative neuroimaging, and who met criteria for PTCS or probable PTCS. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six patients were enrolled. Seven (4.5%) had clinically insignificant CSF abnormalities. No diagnoses or management changed based on LP/CSF results. CONCLUSION: LP may not be routinely required in the initial evaluation of typical patients with PTCS evaluated by experienced clinicians We caution, however, that further prospective study is required to determine potential risks and benefits of LP as a tool in the diagnosis of IIH before recommending general practice changes.


Subject(s)
Intracranial Pressure/physiology , Papilledema/etiology , Pseudotumor Cerebri/diagnosis , Spinal Puncture/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papilledema/diagnosis , Pseudotumor Cerebri/complications , Pseudotumor Cerebri/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
4.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 41(3): 309-315, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34415265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: RESCUE and REVERSE were 2 Phase 3 clinical trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of intravitreal gene therapy with lenadogene nolparvovec (rAAV2/2-ND4) for the treatment of Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON). RESTORE is the long-term follow-up study of subjects treated in the RESCUE and REVERSE trials. METHODS: In RESCUE and REVERSE, 76 subjects with LHON because of the m.11778 G>A mutation in the mitochondrial gene ND4 received a single unilateral intravitreal injection of lenadogene nolparvovec. After 96 weeks, 61 subjects were enrolled in the long-term follow-up study RESTORE. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed over a period of up to 52 months after onset of vision loss. A locally estimated scatterplot smoothing regression model was used to analyze changes in BCVA over time. Vision-related quality of life was reported using the visual function questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25). RESULTS: The population of MT-ND4 subjects enrolled in RESTORE was representative of the combined cohorts of RESCUE and REVERSE for mean age (35.1 years) and gender distribution (79% males). There was a progressive and sustained improvement of BCVA up to 52 months after the onset of vision loss. The final mean BCVA was 1.26 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution 48 months after the onset of vision loss. The mean VFQ-25 composite score increased by 7 points compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: The treatment effect of lenadogene nolparvovec on BCVA and vision-related quality of life observed 96 weeks (2 years) after treatment in RESCUE and REVERSE was sustained at 3 years in RESTORE, with a maximum follow-up of 52 months (4.3 years) after the onset of vision loss.


Subject(s)
Genetic Therapy/methods , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/therapy , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Visual Acuity , Visual Fields , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , NADH Dehydrogenase/genetics , NADH Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/genetics , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Young Adult
5.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 41(3): 298-308, 2021 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34310464

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This report presents a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline characteristics of subjects with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy enrolled in the gene therapy trials RESCUE and REVERSE, to illustrate the evolution of visual parameters over the first year after vision loss. METHODS: RESCUE and REVERSE were 2 phase III clinical trials designed to assess the efficacy of rAAV2/2-ND4 gene therapy in ND4-LHON subjects. At enrollment, subjects had vision loss for ≤6 months in RESCUE, and between 6 and 12 months in REVERSE. Functional visual parameters (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], contrast sensitivity [CS], and Humphrey Visual Field [HVF]) and structural parameters assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were analyzed in both cohorts before treatment. The cross-sectional analysis of functional and anatomic parameters included the baseline values collected in all eyes at 2 different visits (Screening and Inclusion). RESULTS: Seventy-six subjects were included in total, 39 in RESCUE and 37 in REVERSE. Mean BCVA was significantly worse in RESCUE subjects compared with REVERSE subjects (1.29 and 1.61 LogMAR respectively, P = 0.0029). Similarly, mean CS and HVF were significantly more impaired in REVERSE vs RESCUE subjects (P < 0.005). The cross-sectional analysis showed that the monthly decrease in BCVA, ganglion cell layer macular volume, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was much more pronounced in the first 6 months after onset (+0.24 LogMAR, -0.06 mm3, and -6.00 µm respectively) than between 6 and 12 months after onset (+0.02 LogMAR, -0.01 mm3, and -0.43 µm respectively). CONCLUSION: LHON progresses rapidly in the first months following onset during the subacute phase, followed by relative stabilization during the dynamic phase.


Subject(s)
Genetic Therapy/methods , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/physiopathology , Visual Acuity , Visual Fields/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/genetics , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/therapy , Retinal Ganglion Cells/pathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Young Adult
6.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 43(9): 992-999, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32567072

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the risk of subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) compared to those with cryptogenic stroke using implantable loop recorders (ILR). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 273 consecutive patients who had ILRs inserted at our institution for either cryptogenic stroke (n = 227) or CRAO (n = 46). Our primary endpoint was a time to event analysis for the new diagnosis of AF by ILR. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the predictors of time-to-AF. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were found to have newly diagnosed AF by remote monitoring of the ILR. AF was detected in 57 of 227 (25%) cryptogenic stroke patients by the end of a maximum 5.1 years follow-up and in seven of 46 (15%) CRAO patients by the end of a maximum 3.6 years follow-up (P = .215, log-rank test). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from AF was 59.4% for CRAO and 66.6% for cryptogenic stroke (P = NS, log-rank test). Baseline variables predicting AF included older patients, higher CHADS2 VASC score, longer PR interval on initial EKG evaluation, and mitral annular calcification on transthoracic echocardiogram. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRAO are at risk for subclinical AF, similar to those with cryptogenic stroke. Long-term monitoring to detect AF may lead to changes in pharmacotherapy to reduce the risk for subsequent stroke.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/etiology , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Retinal Artery Occlusion/complications , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/physiopathology , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
7.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 39(1): 8-13, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29697441

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a well-known cause of transient and permanent vision loss, diplopia as a presenting symptom of this condition is uncommon. We compared symptoms and signs of patients presenting with diplopia from GCA to those from other causes. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study comparing the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with diplopia from GCA with age-matched controls. Demographic information, review of symptoms, ophthalmic examination, and laboratory data of biopsy-proven patients with GCA were compared with those of age-matched controls presenting with diplopia. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients presented with diplopia from GCA, 19 with constant diplopia, and 8 with transient diplopia. All patients with constant diplopia from GCA were matched with 67 control subjects who had diplopia from other etiologies. Patients with GCA were more likely to describe other accompanying visual symptoms (58% vs 25%, P = 0.008), a greater number of systemic GCA symptoms (3.5, GCA vs 0.6, controls, P < 0.001) such as headache (94% [17/18] vs 39% [23/67]; P < 0.001), jaw claudication (80% [12/15] vs 0% [0/36]; P < 0.001), and scalp tenderness (44% [7/16] vs 7% [3/43]; P < 0.001). Ocular ischemic lesions (26% vs 1%, P < 0.001) were also common in patients with diplopia from GCA. Inflammatory markers were elevated significantly in patients with GCA vs controls (erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 91% [10/11] vs 12% [3/25], P < 0.001; C-reactive protein: 89% [8/9] vs 11% [2/19], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GCA is a rare but serious cause of diplopia among older adults and must be differentiated from other more common benign etiologies. Our study suggests that most patients with diplopia from GCA have concerning systemic symptoms and/or elevated inflammatory markers that should trigger further work-up. Moreover, careful ophthalmoscopic examination should be performed to look for presence of ocular ischemic lesions in older patients presenting with acute diplopia.


Subject(s)
Diplopia/etiology , Giant Cell Arteritis/complications , Temporal Arteries/pathology , Vision, Binocular/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Aged , Biopsy , Blood Sedimentation , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Diplopia/diagnosis , Diplopia/physiopathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/metabolism , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
8.
Retina ; 38(2): 364-378, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28198785

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To explore a possible association between full-field electroretinograms with vitreomacular adhesion resolution and best-corrected visual acuity as part of the prospective, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled Ocriplasmin for Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion Including Macular Hole (OASIS) trial studying ocriplasmin. METHODS: The ERG substudy enrolled 62 of 220 OASIS subjects (randomized 2:1) and analyzed full-field electroretinograms and their association with both vitreomacular adhesion resolution and best-corrected visual acuity from baseline through Month 24. Electroretinogram reductions were defined as acute full-field electroretinogram reductions in amplitude of ≥40% from baseline occurring at postinjection Day 7 or Day 28. RESULTS: In the ocriplasmin group, 16/40 (40%) subjects developed ERG reductions, compared to 1/21 (4.8%) in the sham group; 13/16 (81.3%) and 1/1 (100%) resolved by study end, respectively. A total of 11/16 (68.8%) ocriplasmin-treated subjects with ERG reductions achieved vitreomacular adhesion resolution, compared to those without (9/24, 37.5%). The ocriplasmin-treated subjects with ERG reductions also gained more letters on average (11.3 vs. 9.3 letters) from baseline and had a difference of 6.7 letters in mean best-corrected visual acuity by study end compared to those without ERG reductions. CONCLUSION: Ocriplasmin-treated subjects with ERG reductions had a higher rate of vitreomacular adhesion resolution and showed better visual improvement than their counterparts without ERG reductions or sham subjects by study end.


Subject(s)
Electroretinography/drug effects , Fibrinolysin/administration & dosage , Macula Lutea/pathology , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Retinal Perforations/drug therapy , Visual Acuity , Vitreous Body/pathology , Vitreous Detachment/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Macula Lutea/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retinal Perforations/complications , Retinal Perforations/physiopathology , Time Factors , Tissue Adhesions/drug therapy , Tissue Adhesions/etiology , Tissue Adhesions/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Vitreous Body/physiopathology , Vitreous Detachment/complications , Vitreous Detachment/physiopathology
9.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 33(5): 340-344, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27608286

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of orbital color Doppler imaging (CDI) and conventional neuroimaging (CT/MRI) compared with cerebral angiography in patients with carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs). METHODS: The study design was a retrospective patient chart and imaging review. The authors reviewed 655 charts of all patients who underwent CDI and neuroimaging (CT/MRI) between 2006 and 2015 at one institution. Sixty patients had a presumptive diagnosis of CCF without thrombosis. Thirty-seven patients with 43 events met the inclusion criteria of the study. The diagnostic sensitivity of the 3 noninvasive imaging modalities (CDI, CT, MRI) for CCF was compared with the gold standard 6-vessel cerebral angiography. Significance testing was performed using the 2-tailed Fisher test. RESULTS: Color Doppler imaging had high sensitivity (96.8%) but low specificity (41.7%) for the diagnosis of CCFs with anterior orbital findings. A negative CDI had more diagnostic value than a positive CDI. While an arterial wave form in the superior ophthalmic vein was the most common finding of CCF on CDI, enlargement of the superior ophthalmic vein was the only statistically significant finding. Posterior cortical venous drainage was noted in about 10% of the patients with indirect (low-flow) fistulas, who presented with unilateral orbital signs and symptoms, a finding not previously reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: Color Doppler imaging is a useful noninvasive, radiation-free modality for diagnosis of CCF with anterior drainage, with higher sensitivity than CT or MRI, but equivalent specificity. A significant limitation of CDI is the lack of usefulness in diagnosing fistulas with posterior cortical venous drainage, which carry a risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and stroke. In this series, 10% of unilateral CCFs with anterior orbital signs and symptoms showed angiographic evidence of posterior cortical venous drainage.


Subject(s)
Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula/diagnosis , Cerebral Angiography , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuroimaging/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
10.
Epilepsia ; 57(10): 1634-1642, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27580566

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate visual-field and retinal-structure changes following adjunctive vigabatrin treatment in vigabatrin-naive adults with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS). METHODS: Prospective, longitudinal, single-arm, open-label study (NCT01278173). Eligible patients (≥2 seizures/month who failed ≥3 therapies) who could reliably perform perimetry (Humphrey automated static) and retinal-structure assessment (spectral-domain optical coherence tomography) prior to vigabatrin exposure. Following vigabatrin initiation, testing occurred within 1 month (reference) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. End points included mean change from reference in mean deviation (dB) and average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, visual-acuity changes from baseline, and number of patients who met predefined vision-parameter changes at two (confirmed) or three (persistent) consecutive visits. RESULTS: Sixty-five of 91 screened patients received ≥1 vigabatrin dose (all-patients-treated set [APTS]); 55 had valid reference and ≥1 post-reference assessments (full-analysis set [FAS]). Thirty-six APTS patients with valid pre-/post-reference values completed all planned visits (per-protocol set [PPS]). Thirty-eight (59%) APTS patients completed the study; 27 (42%) withdrew (none for visual-field changes); 32% and 15% had abnormally thin RNFL and abnormal visual acuity at baseline, respectively; 20% had abnormal central 30 degree visual fields in the reference period. No significant mean near visual-field changes were observed (PPS); mean change in average RNFL thickness increased significantly (1-year data: Left-eye: 6.37 µm, confidence interval (CI) 4.66-8.09; right-eye: 7.24 µm CI 5.47-9.01; PPS). No confirmed three-line decreases in visual acuity (FAS) were observed; five patients had predefined confirmed/persistent visual-field changes (FAS). All vision-related adverse events were nonserious; the most common was vision blurred (9%). SIGNIFICANCE: Prior to vigabatrin initiation, rCPS patients may already exhibit vision deficits. Up to 1 year of adjunctive vigabatrin treatment did not significantly change population near visual fields. Five patients met predefined visual-field-change criteria. RNFL thickening of unknown clinical significance was observed. Limitations include single-arm, open-label design; patients' inability to perform ophthalmic/visual-field examinations; and limited vigabatrin-exposure duration.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Epilepsy, Complex Partial/drug therapy , Retina/drug effects , Vigabatrin/adverse effects , Vision Disorders/chemically induced , Visual Fields/drug effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Nerve Fibers/drug effects , Nerve Fibers/pathology , Retina/pathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Visual Field Tests
11.
Epilepsy Behav ; 60: 174-180, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27208827

ABSTRACT

Vigabatrin (Sabril®) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) currently indicated in the US as a monotherapy for patients 1month to 2years of age with infantile spasms (IS) and as adjunctive therapy for patients ≥10years of age with refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) whose seizures have inadequately responded to several alternative treatments and for whom the potential benefits outweigh the risk of vision loss. The approval required an FDA mandated registry. This article describes 5years of demographic and treatment exposure data from US pediatric patients (<17years). Participation is mandatory for all US Sabril® prescribers and patients. A benefit-risk assessment must be documented for patient progression to maintenance therapy. This includes demographic diagnosis and reports of ophthalmologic assessments (where available). Patient data were grouped by age as proxies for indication (IS: <3years, rCPS: ≥3 to <17years). As of August 26, 2014, 5546/6823 enrolled patients were pediatric/total; 4472 (81%) were vigabatrin-naïve. Seventy-one percent of patients were <3years of age; 29% were ≥3 to <17years of age. Etiologies of IS were identified as cryptogenic (21%), symptomatic tuberous sclerosis (17%), and symptomatic other (42%). The majority of patients with IS (56%) attempted no prior treatments; 16% received adrenocorticotropic hormone prior to vigabatrin. A third of patients with IS were receiving 1 concomitant treatment with vigabatrin. For patients with rCPS, 39% attempted 1-3 prior treatments; 27% were receiving 2 concomitant treatments at enrollment. A total of 1852 (41%) patients did not undergo baseline ophthalmological assessment; 25% of patients with IS and 42% of patients with rCPS were exempted for neurologic disabilities. Kaplan-Meier estimates predict that 71% and 65% of vigabatrin-naïve patients with IS and rCPS, respectively, would remain in the registry at 6months. Most pediatric vigabatrin patients have IS as an underlying diagnosis, especially those <3years of age. A proportion of those with rCPS remain on long-term vigabatrin despite the risk of adverse events.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy, Complex Partial/drug therapy , Registries , Spasms, Infantile/drug therapy , United States Food and Drug Administration/standards , Vigabatrin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Child , Epilepsy, Complex Partial/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Complex Partial/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Risk Assessment , Spasms, Infantile/diagnosis , Spasms, Infantile/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Vigabatrin/adverse effects , Vision Disorders/chemically induced , Vision Disorders/epidemiology
12.
Epilepsy Behav ; 56: 15-9, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26807550

ABSTRACT

Vigabatrin (Sabril®), approved in the US in 2009, is currently indicated as adjunctive therapy for refractory complex partial seizures (rCPS) in patients ≥ 10 years old who have responded inadequately to several alternative treatments and as monotherapy for infantile spasms (IS) in patients 1 month to 2 years of age. Because of reports of vision loss following vigabatrin exposure, FDA approval required a risk evaluation mitigation strategy (REMS) program. Vigabatrin is only available in the US through Support, Help, And Resources for Epilepsy (SHARE), which includes a mandated registry. This article describes 5 years of demographic and treatment exposure data from adult patients (≥ 17 years old) in the US treated with vigabatrin and monitored in the ongoing Sabril® registry. Registry participation is mandatory for all US Sabril® prescribers and patients. A benefit-risk assessment must be documented by the physician for a patient to progress to maintenance therapy, defined as 1 month of vigabatrin treatment for patients with IS and 3 months for patients with rCPS. Ophthalmologic assessments must be documented during and after completion of therapy. As of August 26, 2014, a total of 6823 patients were enrolled in the registry, of which 1200 were adults at enrollment. Of these patients, 1031 (86%) were naïve to vigabatrin. The majority of adult patients (n=783, 65%) had previously been prescribed ≥ 4 AEDs, and 719 (60%) were receiving ≥ 3 concomitant AEDs at vigabatrin initiation. Prescribers submitted an initial ophthalmological assessment form for 863 patients; an ophthalmologic exam was not completed for 300 (35%) patients and thus, were considered exempted from vision testing. Of these patients, 128 (43%) were exempted for neurologic disabilities. Clinicians discontinued treatment in 8 patients because of visual field deficits (VFD) (5 patients naïve to vigabatrin and 3 patients previously exposed). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, it is estimated that approximately 71%, 55%, and 40% of adult patients naïve to vigabatrin would remain in the registry at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. These demographic data suggest that a proportion of adult patients remain on vigabatrin long-term despite the risks of adverse events and significant underlying AED resistance and neurologic disease.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Vigabatrin/adverse effects , Vigabatrin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Vision Disorders/chemically induced , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Vision Tests , Visual Field Tests , Young Adult
13.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 86(7): 799-808, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25355373

ABSTRACT

Clinical case reports and prospective trials have demonstrated a reproducible benefit of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis modulation on the rate of recovery from acute inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) demyelination. As a result, corticosteroid preparations and adrenocorticotrophic hormones are the current mainstays of therapy for the treatment of acute optic neuritis (AON) and acute demyelination in multiple sclerosis.Despite facilitating the pace of recovery, HPA axis modulation and corticosteroids have failed to demonstrate long-term benefit on functional recovery. After AON, patients frequently report visual problems, motion perception difficulties and abnormal depth perception despite 'normal' (20/20) vision. In light of this disparity, the efficacy of these and other therapies for acute demyelination require re-evaluation using modern, high-precision paraclinical tools capable of monitoring tissue injury.In no arena is this more amenable than AON, where a new array of tools in retinal imaging and electrophysiology has advanced our ability to measure the anatomic and functional consequences of optic nerve injury. As a result, AON provides a unique clinical model for evaluating the treatment response of the derivative elements of acute inflammatory CNS injury: demyelination, axonal injury and neuronal degeneration.In this article, we examine current thinking on the mechanisms of immune injury in AON, discuss novel technologies for the assessment of optic nerve structure and function, and assess current and future treatment modalities. The primary aim is to develop a framework for rigorously evaluating interventions in AON and to assess their ability to preserve tissue architecture, re-establish normal physiology and restore optimal neurological function.


Subject(s)
Optic Neuritis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Optic Neuritis/diagnosis , Optic Neuritis/physiopathology , Plasma Exchange , Scanning Laser Polarimetry
14.
Retina ; 35(6): 1111-27, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25635577

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report the safety of intravitreal ocriplasmin injection based on 2 Phase 3 clinical trials in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/vitreomacular traction, including when associated with full-thickness macular holes. METHODS: Safety analyses were based on 2 completed Phase 3 studies assessing intravitreal ocriplasmin injection. Adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and suspected adverse drug reactions are reported. The authors also report AEs of special interest from 8 other completed Phase 2 studies and 2 ongoing studies. RESULTS: A total of 465 eyes were injected with ocriplasmin (125 µg), and 187 eyes were treated with placebo injection in Phase 3 studies. Overall AE rate was 69.0% in the placebo group and 76.6% for ocriplasmin-treated patients. Most AEs were in the study eye, mild or moderate in severity, and transient. All suspected adverse drug reactions were ocular; the majority was nonserious, of mild intensity, and transient. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal ocriplasmin injection provides a generally well-tolerated pharmacologic treatment option for patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion/vitreomacular traction, including when associated with full-thickness macular holes ≤400 µm in diameter.


Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Eye Diseases/drug therapy , Fibrinolysin/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Vitreous Body/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract/chemically induced , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fibrinolysin/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Peptide Fragments/therapeutic use , Tissue Adhesions/drug therapy , Visual Acuity/drug effects , Young Adult
15.
J Neuroophthalmol ; 34 Suppl: S24-8, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25133967

ABSTRACT

Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) changed 3 worlds: clinical care, clinical research, and the regulatory environment of phases 2, 3, and 4 pharmaceutical and surgical trials. OCT is now undergoing another transformation with multicolor technology, which acquires images using data from 3 simultaneous lasers: red, green, and blue, taking advantage of the different wavelengths of each of these colors to most precisely image 3 different zones of the retina. Rather than seeing only the surface of the retina and optic disc and any large lesions in the deeper retina, this technology provides a topographic map of the outer (red), mid (green), and inner (blue) retina somewhat similar to what is observed with fundus autoflourescence of deep retina, retinal pigment epithelium, and choroid. Multicolor imaging will supplement and help to define what is observed with traditional fundus photography and SD-OCT. In addition, it may demonstrate abnormalities when routine photography is normal and when SD-OCT findings are equivocal. This review will illustrate the basic principles of multicolor imaging and will show clinical examples of how this technique can further define retinal and optic nerve pathology.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological , Retina/anatomy & histology , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Visual Pathways/anatomy & histology , Fluorescein Angiography , Humans , Optic Disk , Retinal Pigment Epithelium
16.
Neuroophthalmology ; 38(4): 230-237, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27928305

ABSTRACT

An 11-year-old female developed bilateral oculomotor nerve palsies without pupillary involvement and bilateral optic neuropathy as the presenting signs of paediatric multiple sclerosis (MS). Although ocular mono-neuropathies have been reported, this is the first bilateral mono-neuropathy reported in a paediatric patient due to MS. The differential diagnosis and evaluation for bilateral ophthalmoplegia are discussed in detail.

17.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ; 32: 101965, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38077787

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To describe the ophthalmological manifestations in transgender patients on gender-affirming hormone therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review study was conducted. Female-to-male (FTM) and male-to-female (MTF) transgenders on gender-affirming hormone therapy evaluated at a single center were included. Candidates were collected using a phrase-identifying search tool within the electronic medical record system. Descriptive analyses were conducted to report the demographics, hormonal therapies, clinical findings, and visual outcomes. Results: A total of 17 patients were included, seven were FTM, and ten were MTF transgenders. The median age was 26.0 years (range; 20.0-30.0) in the FTM group and 35.0 years (range; 23.0-67.0) in the MTF group. Testosterone therapy in FTM patients comprised 30-60 mg of intramuscular injections weekly or 50 mg of transdermal gel daily. MTF patients used mainly 2-4 mg of estradiol and 100-300 mg of spironolactone tablets daily. A total of 27 eyes were affected, 12 in FTM and 15 in MTF patients. The median visual acuity was 20/25 in FTM (range; 20/20-20/60) and 20/25 in MTF (range; 20/20-20/400). The most common diagnoses in FTM patients were neurologic (71.4 %), particularly idiopathic intracranial hypertension, while MTF transgenders presented mainly with chorioretinal diseases (40.0 %). Compliance with medical recommendations and follow-up appointments was seen in 71.4 % of FTM and 50.0 % of MTF patients. At the last visit, the median visual acuity was 20/50 (range; 20/20-20/70) in FTM and 20/25 (range; 20/20-20/70) in MTF patients. Conclusions and importance: Transgenders presented a variety of ocular findings. A cause-and-effect association cannot be stated, yet eye specialists must be cognizant of these findings to provide appropriate treatment.

18.
Front Neurol ; 14: 1114667, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36873431

ABSTRACT

Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare, autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that produces acute, unpredictable relapses causing cumulative neurological disability. Satralizumab, a humanized, monoclonal recycling antibody that targets the interleukin-6 receptor, reduced NMOSD relapse risk vs. placebo in two Phase 3 trials: SAkuraSky (satralizumab ± immunosuppressive therapy; NCT02028884) and SAkuraStar (satralizumab monotherapy; NCT02073279). Satralizumab is approved to treat aquaporin-4 IgG-seropositive (AQP4-IgG+) NMOSD. SAkuraBONSAI (NCT05269667) will explore fluid and imaging biomarkers to better understand the mechanism of action of satralizumab and the neuronal and immunological changes following treatment in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. Objectives: SAkuraBONSAI will evaluate clinical disease activity measures, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), pharmacokinetics, and safety of satralizumab in AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. Correlations between imaging markers (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and optical coherence tomography [OCT]) and blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers will be investigated. Study design: SAkuraBONSAI is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, international, Phase 4 study that will enroll approximately 100 adults (18-74 years) with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. This study includes two patient cohorts: newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients (Cohort 1; n = 60); and inadequate responders to recent (<6 months) rituximab infusion (Cohort 2; n = 40). Satralizumab monotherapy (120 mg) will be administered subcutaneously at Weeks 0, 2, 4, and Q4W thereafter for a total of 92 weeks. Endpoints: Disease activity related to relapses (proportion relapse-free, annualized relapse rate, time to relapse, and relapse severity), disability progression (Expanded Disability Status Scale), cognition (Symbol Digit Modalities Test), and ophthalmological changes (visual acuity; National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25) will all be assessed. Peri-papillary retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex thickness will be monitored using advanced OCT (retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell plus inner plexiform layer thickness). Lesion activity and atrophy will be monitored by MRI. Pharmacokinetics, PROs, and blood and CSF mechanistic biomarkers will be assessed regularly. Safety outcomes include the incidence and severity of adverse events. Conclusions: SAkuraBONSAI will incorporate comprehensive imaging, fluid biomarker, and clinical assessments in patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD. SAkuraBONSAI will provide new insights into the mechanism of action of satralizumab in NMOSD, while offering the opportunity to identify clinically relevant neurological, immunological, and imaging markers.

19.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 249: 108-125, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36496192

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety profile of lenadogene nolparvovec (Lumevoq) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. DESIGN: Pooled analysis of safety data from 5 clinical studies. METHODS: A total of 189 patients received single unilateral or bilateral intravitreal injections of a recombinant adeno-associated virus 2 (rAAV2/2) vector encoding the human wild-type ND4 gene. Adverse events (AEs) were collected throughout the studies, up to 5 years. Intraocular inflammation and increased intraocular pressure (IOP) were ocular AEs of special interest. Other assessments included ocular examinations, vector bio-dissemination, and systemic immune responses against rAAV2/2. RESULTS: Almost all patients (95.2%) received 9 × 1010 viral genomes and 87.8% had at least 2 years of follow-up. Most patients (75.1%) experienced at least one systemic AE, but systemic treatment-related AEs occurred in 3 patients; none were serious. Intraocular inflammation was reported in 75.6% of lenadogene nolparvovec-treated eyes. Almost all intraocular inflammations occurred in the anterior chamber (58.8%) or in the vitreous (40.3%), and were of mild (90.3%) or moderate (8.8%) intensity; most resolved with topical corticosteroids alone. All IOP increases were mild to moderate in intensity. No AE led to study discontinuation. Bio-dissemination of lenadogene nolparvovec and systemic immune response were limited. The safety profile was comparable for patients treated bilaterally and unilaterally. CONCLUSIONS: Lenadogene nolparvovec had a good overall safety profile with excellent systemic tolerability, consistent with limited bio-dissemination. The product was well tolerated, with mostly mild ocular side effects responsive to conventional ophthalmologic treatments.


Subject(s)
Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber , Parvovirinae , Humans , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/drug therapy , Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber/genetics , Genetic Vectors , Parvovirinae/genetics , Genetic Therapy , Inflammation/etiology
20.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 12(1): 401-429, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36449262

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Lenadogene nolparvovec is a promising novel gene therapy for patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) carrying the m.11778G>A ND4 mutation (MT-ND4). A previous pooled analysis of phase 3 studies showed an improvement in visual acuity of patients injected with lenadogene nolparvovec compared to natural history. Here, we report updated results by incorporating data from the latest phase 3 trial REFLECT in the pool, increasing the number of treated patients from 76 to 174. METHODS: The visual acuity of 174 MT-ND4-carrying patients with LHON injected in one or both eyes with lenadogene nolparvovec from four pooled phase 3 studies (REVERSE, RESCUE and their long-term extension trial RESTORE; and REFLECT trial) was compared to the spontaneous evolution of an external control group of 208 matched patients from 11 natural history studies. RESULTS: Treated patients showed a clinically relevant and sustained improvement in their visual acuity when compared to natural history. Mean improvement versus natural history was - 0.30 logMAR (+ 15 ETDRS letters equivalent) at last observation (P < 0.01) with a maximal follow-up of 3.9 years after injection. Most treated eyes were on-chart as compared to less than half of natural history eyes at 48 months after vision loss (89.6% versus 48.1%; P < 0.01) and at last observation (76.1% versus 44.4%; P < 0.01). When we adjusted for covariates of interest (gender, age of onset, ethnicity, and duration of follow-up), the estimated mean gain was - 0.43 logMAR (+ 21.5 ETDRS letters equivalent) versus natural history at last observation (P < 0.0001). Treatment effect was consistent across all phase 3 clinical trials. Analyses from REFLECT suggest a larger treatment effect in patients receiving bilateral injection compared to unilateral injection. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of lenadogene nolparvovec in improving visual acuity in MT-ND4 LHON was confirmed in a large cohort of patients, compared to the spontaneous natural history decline. Bilateral injection of gene therapy may offer added benefits over unilateral injection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02652780 (REVERSE); NCT02652767 (RESCUE); NCT03406104 (RESTORE); NCT03293524 (REFLECT); NCT03295071 (REALITY).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL