Postoperative complications and surgical outcomes of robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide, with remarkable advances in early diagnosis, systemic treatments, and surgical techniques. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy has been trialled; however, the complication rates, surgical outcomes, and oncological safety of this approach remain obscure. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted from conception until September 2022. Studies examining complications and operative variables where robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy was compared with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy were included. Primary study outcomes were complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III complications, skin or nipple necrosis, seroma, haematoma, infection, implant loss, and wound dehiscence) and oncological safety (recurrence and positive margins). The secondary outcomes included operative variables, length of stay, cost-effectiveness, learning curve, and aesthetic outcome. RESULTS: A total of seven studies of overall fair quality, involving 1674 patients, were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Grade 3 complications were reduced in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy without statistical significance (OR 0.60 (95 per cent c.i. 0.35 to 1.05)). Nipple necrosis was significantly reduced in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy (OR 0.54 (95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.96); P = 0.03; I2 = 15 per cent). Operating time (mean difference +58.81 min (95 per cent c.i. +28.19 to +89.44 min); P = 0.0002) and length of stay (mean difference +1.23 days (95 per cent c.i. +0.64 to +1.81 days); P < 0.0001) were significantly increased in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy, whereas the opposite was true for blood loss (mean difference -53.18 ml (95 per cent c.i. -71.78 to -34.58 ml); P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Whilst still in its infancy, robotic breast surgery may become a viable option in breast surgery. Nonetheless, the oncological safety of this approach requires robust assessment.

Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy has been tried, but it is still not clear how often complications happen or how much better it is for cancer patients than conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy. The aim of this study was to compare robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy. A thorough search of all articles was performed from the start to September 2022. The studies that compared robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy with conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in terms of problems and surgical factors were included. Complications and cancer outcomes (recurrence and positive margins) were the most important things that the study looked at. Surgical time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, cost-effectiveness, learning curve, and patient-reported outcome measures were some of the other things that were studied. This systematic review and meta-analysis looked at seven studies with fair quality and included 1674 patients. Even though there were fewer major problems with robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy, the difference was not significant. In robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy, there was less nipple necrosis, but the overall time it took to operate was much longer and the cost was higher. The average amount of bleeding was less in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy. The robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy method had a better patient-reported outcome and a steep learning curve. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy is a safe method, with fewer problems than other methods. Future studies should look into if it is safe for cancer patients in the long run.

Assessment of the Safety and Effectiveness of Colorectal Robotic-Assisted Surgery: The First 50 Consecutive Cases at a Single Centre.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal robotic-assisted-surgery (RAS) is a novel technology with scarce real-world evidence. The aim of this retrospective review was to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of colorectal RAS. METHODS: The da Vinci® Xi™ robot system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used to perform the first 50 colorectal resections in our centre. Outcomes regarding safety and efficacy were analysed and learning curves (LC) were plotted using RStudio. RESULTS: The median patient age and BMI were 65 years (IQR, 50.25-76.5) and 28.3kg/m2 (IQR, 25.2-30.7), respectively, and 27 patients were female. Malignancy (66%) followed by rectal prolapse (18%) was the most frequent diagnosis, and all malignant tumours were completely resected. High anterior resection was the most frequently performed operation (36%). The median operative time was 256.5 minutes (IQR, 202.2-332.8). Twenty-seven patients had anastomosis (54%), a stoma was formed in 7 (14%) and 7 anastomoses required defunctioning loop ileostomy (14%). Two unexpected intra-operative events occurred, and neither required conversion to an open procedure. Thirty-eight complications occurred in 21 patients, and most were minor by the Clavien-Dindo classification: CD 1 (17, 44.7%) or 2 (11, 28.9%). Moreover, 5 patients developed an anastomotic leak (14.7%), 5 developed infections (10%), 2 required transfusions (4%) and 3 needed re-operation (6%). There was no 30-day mortality and the readmission rate was 8%. The median length of stay in hospital was 6 days (IQR,4-8). All resections, except for low anterior resections, resulted in a significantly longer stay compared to rectopexies. Finally, projections from LCs indicated that outcome optimization can be achieved after experience with 33-39 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal RAS in our centre was both safe and effective. In the initial 50 cases, there was no 30-day mortality and no need for conversion to an open surgery. The readmission and complication (>CD 2) rates were 8% and 20%, respectively.

Outcome of early cholecystectomy compared to percutaneous drainage of gallbladder and delayed cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Compare outcomes of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) and percutaneous trans-hepatic drainage of gallbladder (PTGBD) as an initial intervention for AC and to compare operative outcomes of ELC and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC). METHODS: English-language studies published until December 2020 were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies compared EC and PTGBD with delayed cholecystectomy for patients presented with acute cholecystitis were considered. Main outcomes were mortality, conversion to open, complications and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Out of 1347 records, 14 studies were included. 205,361 (94.7%) patients had EC and 11,565 (5.3%) patients had PTGBD as an initial intervention for AC. Mortality was higher in PTGBD; HR, 95% CI: [3.68 (2.13, 6.38)]. In contrast, complication rate was significantly higher in EC group (47%) vs PTGBD group (8.7%) in patients admitted to ICU; P-value = 0.011. Patients who had ELC were at higher risk of post-operative complications compared to DLC; RR [95% CI]: 2.88 [1.78, 4.65]. Risk of bile duct injury was six folds more in ELC; RR [95% CI]: 6.07 [1.67, 21.99]. CONCLUSION: ELC may be a preferred treatment option over PTGBD in AC. However, patient and disease specific factors should be considered to avoid unfavourable outcomes with ELC.

Can macrophages within the microenvironment of locally invasive rectal cancers predict response to radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Only half of patients with locally invasive rectal carcinoma respond to short-course preoperative radiotherapy. A predictive test enabling better patient selection could avoid unneccessary radiation exposure to poor responders. Macrophages within the tumour immune microenvironment with tumoricidal M1 and tumour-protective M2 phenotypes could be modulating this response. This study investigated the possible predictive value of M1 and M2 subpopulations in identifying patients' likely response to short-course preoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: Biopsy samples were taken from 29 patients with locally invasive rectal carcinoma before treatment with short-course radiotherapy and surgical specimens obtained after resection following short-course preoperative radiotherapy. Dual-staining immunohistochemistry was performed with CD68 as macrophage marker, HLA-DR as M1 marker, and CD163 as M2 marker. Samples were scored for hot-and-random spots by Nuance software (version 3.0.2) and compared with patients' outcome data. Tumour response was measured by assessment of reduction of tumour-cell density. FINDINGS: Samples revealing a low score for HLA-DR positive M1 macrophages exhibited a better response to short-course radiotherapy with up to 80% (median 80·38% [IQR 46·94-84·73]) reduction in the tumour cell density. On the other hand those with a high score exhibited a poor response with only up to 20% (20·26 [0-48·19]) reduction. The difference in response between the two groups was significant (p=0·017). No such trends were observed for CD163+ M2 macrophages. The ratio of HLA-DR+ to CD163+ macrophages for biopsy and resection samples was significantly different, showing a drop in the HLA-DR positive macrophages in the resection samples (p=0·024). The mean of the difference between the biopsy (median 2·53 [IQR 1·98-3·08]) and resection (1·38 [0·96-1·8]) was 1·15 (p=0·024). INTERPRETATION: Patients with a variable macrophage phenotype composition within biopsy samples from patients with locally invasive rectal carcinoma respond differently to short-course preoperative radiotherapy. Further investigation involving a panel of macrophage and other immune-cell markers could verify and validate these findings and develop them as predictive tests identifying good responders to radiotherapy in patients with locally invasive rectal carcinoma. FUNDING: None.

The RoboCOS Study: Development of an international core outcome set for the comprehensive evaluation of patient, surgeon, organisational and population level impacts of robotic assisted surgery.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of robot-assisted surgery is costly and requires whole system transformation, which makes the assessment of benefits (or drawbacks) complex. To date, there has been little agreement on which outcomes should be used in this regard. The aim of the RoboCOS study was to develop a core outcome set for the evaluation of robot-assisted surgery that would account for its impact on the whole system. METHODS: Identification of a long-list of potentially relevant outcomes through systematic review of trials and health technology assessments; interviews with individuals from a range of stakeholder groups (surgeons, service managers, policy makers and evaluators) and a focus group with patients and public; prioritisation of outcomes via a 2-round online international Delphi survey; consensus meeting. RESULTS: 721 outcomes were extracted from the systematic reviews, interviews and focus group which were conceptualised into 83 different outcome domains across four distinct levels (patient, surgeon, organisation and population) for inclusion in the international Delphi prioritisation survey (128 completed both rounds). The consensus meeting led to the agreement of a 10-item core outcome set including outcomes at: patient level (treatment effectiveness; overall quality of life; disease-specific quality of life; complications (including mortality); surgeon level (precision/accuracy; visualisation); organisation (equipment failure; standardisation of operative quality; cost-effectiveness); and population (equity of access). CONCLUSION: The RoboCOS core outcome set, which includes the outcomes of importance to all stakeholders, is recommended for use in all future evaluations of robot-assisted surgery to ensure relevant and comparable reporting of outcomes.

Intrathecal Morphine and Post-Operative Pain Relief in Robotic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Despite the potential benefits of intrathecal morphine (ITM), the precise role and dosing of ITM in robotic assisted surgery (RAS) remains unclear. This systematic review explores real-world evidence to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of ITM in patients undergoing RAS. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted on four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and APA PsycInfo. Primary outcomes included pain scores at rest and on exertion at 24- and 48-h time intervals, and secondary outcomes aimed to explore the side effects of ITM. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine mean differences. A risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. A total of 9 RCTs involving 619 patients were included in this review, of which 298 patients were administered ITM. Significant pain score reductions were observed both at rest (MD = -27.15; 95% CI [-43.97, -10.33]; I2 = 95%; p = 0.002) and on exertion (MD = -25.88; 95% CI [-37.03, -14.72]; I2 = 79%; p = 0.0003) 24 h postoperatively in the ITM groups, accompanied by a notable decrease in postoperative IV morphine equivalent consumption at 24 h (MD = -20.13; 95% CI [-30.74, -9.52]; I2 = 77%; p = 0.0002). ITM improved pain scores both at rest and on exertion at 24 and 48 h intervals, concurrently reducing the need for postoperative opioid consumption, but at the cost of an increased incidence of adverse events.

National complicated acute diverticulitis (CADS) study: a protocol for a prospective observational scoping study for acute diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Diverticular disease is a widely prevalent disease in western society, and acute diverticulitis is a common acute surgical presentation. However, there is a lack of level 1 evidence addressing the multifaceted presentations associated with acute diverticulitis. There is also a lack of robust epidemiological data that could be used to meaningfully inform randomised controlled trials. The National CADS project aims to generate baseline data for a cohort of patients managed for clinically suspected acute diverticulitis and evaluate the impact of variability in the management approach on patient outcomes in the short (3 months) and long (2 years) term. METHOD: A Unit policy questionnaire will be completed by the principal investigator from all participating centres prior to study initiation. All patients aged above 18 years admitted with clinical suspicion of acute diverticulitis will be included from UK hospitals providing acute surgical care. Demographic, clinical, inpatient stay and outpatient follow-up data will be collected for index admissions between July and September 2014, 3 months follow-up and finally a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The study attracted participation from 108 centres nationally and has so far generated data on 2500 patients admitted between 1 July 2014 and 30 September 2014. Short-term follow-up data have been obtained for this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The National CADS study is currently ongoing with the long-term outcomes data anticipated to be submitted in autumn of 2016.

The nurse cystoscopist. Extending the role.

Nurse-led cystoscopy has become an established service for bladder tumour surveillance patients. The role of the nurse cystoscopist has been developed to include diagnostic cystoscopy with telephone follow-up and counselling. Direct access to the service has reduced waiting times from presentation to diagnosis. The telephone follow-up has improved patients' experience of a diagnostic urology service.

Spontaneous dissection of an anomalous systemic artery in the lung during pregnancy: a rare cause of hemoptysis.

We report a rare case of spontaneous dissection of an anomalous systemic artery supplying a normal basal segment of the right lung during pregnancy, leading to recurrent hemoptysis. This article aims to discuss the clinical presentation, diagnostic curiosity, management using a minimally invasive technique (video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy), and finally the histopathologic findings.