ABSTRACT
Sex hormones appear to play a role in the regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. The objective was to isolate the effects of estradiol (E2) on central activation of the HPA axis. We hypothesized that the HPA axis response to corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) under dexamethasone (Dex) suppression would be exaggerated in response to chronic ovarian hormone suppression and that physiologic E2 add-back would mitigate this response. Thirty premenopausal women underwent 20 wk of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy (GnRHAG) and transdermal E2 (0.075 mg per day, GnRHAG + E2, n = 15) or placebo (PL) patch (GnRHAG + PL, n = 15). Women in the GnRHAG + PL and GnRHAG + E2 groups were of similar age (38 (SD 5) yr vs. 36 (SD 7) yr) and body mass index (27 (SD 6) kg/m2 vs. 27 (SD 6) kg/m2). Serum E2 changed differently between the groups ( P = 0.01); it decreased in response to GnRHAG + PL (77.9 ± 17.4 to 23.2 ± 2.6 pg/ml; P = 0.008) and did not change in response to GnRHAG + E2 (70.6 ± 12.4 to 105 ± 30.4 pg/ml; P = 0.36). The incremental area under the curve (AUCINC) responses to CRH were different between the groups for total cortisol ( P = 0.03) and cortisone ( P = 0.04) but not serum adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) ( P = 0.28). When examining within-group changes, GnRHAG + PL did not alter the HPA axis response to Dex/CRH, but GnRHAG + E2 decreased the AUCINC for ACTH (AUCINC, 1,623 ± 257 to 1,211 ± 236 pg/ml·min, P = 0.004), cortisone (1,795 ± 367 to 1,090 ± 281 ng/ml·min, P = 0.009), and total cortisol (7,008 ± 1,387 to 3,893 ± 1,090 ng/ml·min, P = 0.02). Suppression of ovarian hormones by GnRHAG therapy for 20 wk did not exaggerate the HPA axis response to CRH, but physiologic E2 add-back reduced HPA axis activity compared with preintervention levels.
Subject(s)
Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/pharmacology , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System/drug effects , Pituitary-Adrenal System/drug effects , Premenopause/physiology , Adiposity/drug effects , Adrenocorticotropic Hormone/blood , Adult , Body Composition/drug effects , Cortisone/analysis , Cortisone/metabolism , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Estradiol/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Middle AgedABSTRACT
White adipocytes in adults are typically derived from tissue resident mesenchymal progenitors. The recent identification of de novo production of adipocytes from bone marrow progenitor-derived cells in mice challenges this paradigm and indicates an alternative lineage specification that adipocytes exist. We hypothesized that alternative lineage specification of white adipocytes is also present in human adipose tissue. Bone marrow from transgenic mice in which luciferase expression is governed by the adipocyte-restricted adiponectin gene promoter was adoptively transferred to wild-type recipient mice. Light emission was quantitated in recipients by in vivo imaging and direct enzyme assay. Adipocytes were also obtained from human recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DNA was isolated, and microsatellite polymorphisms were exploited to quantify donor/recipient chimerism. Luciferase emission was detected from major fat depots of transplanted mice. No light emission was observed from intestines, liver, or lungs. Up to 35% of adipocytes in humans were generated from donor marrow cells in the absence of cell fusion. Nontransplanted mice and stromal-vascular fraction samples were used as negative and positive controls for the mouse and human experiments, respectively. This study provides evidence for a nontissue resident origin of an adipocyte subpopulation in both mice and humans.
Subject(s)
Adipocytes, White/physiology , Adipose Tissue/physiology , Stem Cells/physiology , Animals , Bone Marrow Cells/physiology , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Cell Fusion/methods , Cell Lineage/genetics , Cell Lineage/physiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/physiology , Humans , Male , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Promoter Regions, Genetic/geneticsABSTRACT
An exercise-induced decrease in serum ionized calcium (iCa) is thought to trigger an increase in parathyroid hormone (PTH), which can stimulate bone resorption. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether taking a chewable calcium (Ca) supplement 30 min before exercise mitigates disruptions in Ca homeostasis and bone resorption in competitive male cyclists. METHODS: Fifty-one men (18 to 45 yr old) were randomized to take either 1000 mg Ca (CA) or placebo (PL) 30 min before a simulated 35-km cycling time trial. Serum iCa and PTH were measured before and immediately after exercise and a marker of bone resorption (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen) was measured before and 30 min after exercise. RESULTS: Serum iCa decreased in both groups from before to after exercise (mean ± SD, CA = 4.89 ± 0.16 to 4.76 ± 0.11 mg·dL, PL = 4.92 ± 0.15 to 4.66 ± 0.22 mg·dL, both P ≤ 0.01); the decrease was greater (P = 0.03) in the PL group. There was a nonsignificant (P = 0.07) attenuation of the increase in PTH by Ca supplementation (CA = 30.9 ± 13.0 to 79.7 ± 42.6 pg·mL, PL = 37.1 ± 14.8 to 111.5 ± 49.4 pg·mL, both P ≤ 0.01), but no effect of Ca on the change in C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, which increased in both groups (CA = 0.35 ± 0.17 to 0.50 ± 0.21 ng·mL, PL = 0.36 ± 0.13 to 0.54 ± 0.22 ng·mL, both P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: It is possible that ingesting Ca only 30 min before exercise was not a sufficient time interval to optimize gut Ca availability during exercise. Further studies will be needed to determine whether adequate Ca supplementation before and/or during exercise can fully mitigate the exercise-induced decrease in serum iCa and increases in PTH and bone resorption.
Subject(s)
Bone Resorption/physiopathology , Calcium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Calcium/blood , Dietary Supplements , Exercise/physiology , Homeostasis , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Collagen Type I/blood , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Peptides/blood , Young AdultABSTRACT
Suppressing sex hormones in women for 1 wk reduces resting energy expenditure (REE). The effects of more chronic suppression on REE and other components of total energy expenditure (TEE), and whether the reduction in REE is specifically due to loss of estradiol (E2), are not known. We compared the effects of 5 mo of sex hormone suppression (gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist therapy, GnRHAG) with placebo (PL) or E2 add-back therapy on REE and the components of TEE. Premenopausal women received GnRHAG (leuprolide acetate 3.75 mg/mo) and were randomized to receive transdermal therapy that was either E2 (0.075 mg/d; n = 24; means ± SD, aged = 37 ± 8 yr, BMI = 27.3 ± 6.2 kg/m(2)) or placebo (n = 21; aged = 34 ± 9 yr, BMI = 26.8 ± 6.2 kg/m(2)). REE was measured by using a metabolic cart, and TEE, sleep EE (SEE), exercise EE (ExEE, 2 × 30 min bench stepping), non-Ex EE (NExEE), and the thermic effect of feeding (TEF) were measured by using whole room indirect calorimetry. REE decreased in GnRHAG+PL [mean (95% CI), -54 (-98, -15) kcal/d], but not GnRHAG+E2 [+6 (-33, +45) kcal/d] (difference in between-group changes, P < 0.05). TEE decreased in GnRHAG+PL [-128 (-214, -41) kcal/d] and GnRHAG+E2 [-96 (-159, -32) kcal/d], with no significant difference in between-group changes (P = 0.55). SEE decreased similarly in both GnRHAG+PL [-0.07 (-0.12, -0.03) kcal/min] and GnRHAG+E2 [-0.07 (-0.12, -0.02) kcal/min]. ExEE decreased in GnRHAG+PL [-0.46 (-0.79, -0.13) kcal/min], but not GnRHAG+E2 [-0.30 (-0.65, +0.06) kcal/min]. There were no changes in TEF or NExEE in either group. In summary, chronic pharmacologic suppression of sex hormones reduced REE and this was prevented by E2 therapy.
Subject(s)
Energy Metabolism/drug effects , Estradiol/pharmacology , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Leuprolide/adverse effects , Resistance Training , Adult , Body Composition , Bone Density , Double-Blind Method , Exercise , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Premenopause , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Suppression of ovarian hormones in premenopausal women on gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH(AG)) therapy can cause fat mass (FM) gain and fat-free mass (FFM) loss. Whether this is specifically caused by a decline in serum estradiol (E2) is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the effects of GnRH(AG) with placebo (PL) or E2 add-back therapy on FM, FFM, and bone mineral density (BMD). Our exploratory aim was to evaluate the effects of resistance exercise training on body composition during the drug intervention. METHODS: Seventy healthy premenopausal women underwent 5 months of GnRH(AG) therapy and were randomized to receive transdermal E2 (GnRH(AG) + E2, nâ=â35) or PL (GnRH(AG) + PL, nâ=â35) add-back therapy. As part of our exploratory aim to evaluate whether exercise can minimize the effects of hormone suppression, some women within each drug arm were randomized to undergo a resistance exercise program (GnRH(AG) + E2 + Ex, nâ=â12; GnRH(AG) + PL + Ex, nâ=â12). RESULTS: The groups did not differ in mean (SD) age (36 [8] and 35 [9] y) or mean (SD) body mass index (both 28 [6] kg/m). FFM declined in response to GnRH(AG) + PL (mean, -0.6âkg; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.3) but not in response to GnRH(AG) + E2 (mean, 0.3âkg; 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.8) or GnRH(AG) + PL + Ex (mean, 0.1âkg; 95% CI, -0.6 to 0.7). Although FM did not change in either group, visceral fat area increased in response to GnRH(AG) + PL but not in response to GnRH(AG) + E2. GnRH(AG) + PL induced a decrease in BMD at the lumbar spine and proximal femur that was prevented by E2. Preliminary data suggest that exercise may have favorable effects on FM, FFM, and hip BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Suppression of ovarian E2 results in loss of bone and FFM and expansion of abdominal adipose depots. Failure of hormone suppression to increase total FM conflicts with previous studies of the effects of GnRH(AG). Further research is necessary to understand the role of estrogen in energy balance regulation and fat distribution.
Subject(s)
Body Composition/drug effects , Bone Density/drug effects , Estrogens, Conjugated (USP)/administration & dosage , Exercise , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Ovary/drug effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Disruptions in calcium (Ca) homeostasis during exercise may influence skeletal adaptations to exercise training. In young men, vigorous cycling causes increases in parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone resorption (C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen [CTX]); responses are attenuated by Ca supplementation. The study aimed to determine whether vigorous walking causes similar increases in PTH and CTX in older women and how the timing of Ca supplementation before and during exercise influences these responses. METHODS: In experiment 1, 10 women (61 ± 4 yr) consumed 125 mL of either a Ca-fortified (1 g·L) or control beverage every 15 min during exercise starting 60 min before and continuing during 60 min of exercise. In experiment 2, 23 women (61 ± 4 yr) consumed 200 mL of a Ca-fortified (1 g·L) or control beverage every 15 min starting 15 min before and continuing during 60 min of exercise. The exercise was treadmill walking at 75%-80% VËO2peak. RESULTS: In experiment 1, serum ionized Ca decreased in the control condition (P < 0.001), but not with Ca supplementation. PTH increased after exercise on both days (Ca, P = 0.05; control, P = 0.009) but was attenuated by Ca supplementation (8.3 vs 26.1 pg·mL; P = 0.03). CTX increased only on the control day (P = 0.02). In experiment 2, serum ionized Ca decreased on Ca and control days (Ca and control, P < 0.001), but less so on the Ca day (P = 0.04). PTH (Ca and control, P < 0.001) and CTX (Ca, P = 0.02; control P = 0.007) increased on the Ca and control day, and there were no differences in the changes. CONCLUSION: The timing of Ca supplementation may be a key mediator of Ca homeostasis during acute exercise. Further research is necessary to determine how this influences skeletal adaptations to training.