ABSTRACT
Nintedanib, a multi-intracellular tyrosine kinase inhibitor, reduces progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and has been approved to use in other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD) recently. However, the factors that affect the discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events is uncertain. The dorsal muscle group area at the T12 vertebral level (T12DMA) assessed on computed tomography (CT) images has been reported to be associated with mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other diseases. The relationship between T12DMA and the discontinuation of nintedanib remains unclear. METHODS: 39 patients with IPF or other progressive fibrosing ILDs who started nintedanib at a regular dose (300 mg/day) were enrolled. We compared the characteristics between patients who stopped nintedanib at a regular dose before 6 months and/or continue to take nintedanib at a low dose (150 mg/day) and patients who were still taking nintedanib at a regular dose over 6 months. This study retrospectively investigated clinical parameters including T12DMA index (T12DMA/height2) to evaluate whether these parameters might serve as risk factor for the tolerability of nintedanib in patients with IPF and other progressive fibrosing ILDs. RESULTS: Discontinuation or dose reductions of nintedanib due to adverse events were observed in 14 (35.8%) patients. A multiple logistic regression model showed T12DMA index to be the only significant risk factor for predicting for the early termination of nintedanib (odd rate, 0.549; 95% confidence interval, 0.327-0.922; Pâ =â .023). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that T12DMA index was a risk factor for the early termination of nintedanib. The initial dose of nintedanib adjusted to the differences in skeletal muscle mass and careful management of adverse events may contribute to the longer nintedanib treatment, which would lead to a better clinical outcome.
Subject(s)
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , Indoles , Humans , Indoles/adverse effects , Indoles/administration & dosage , Indoles/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Aged , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Disease Progression , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
Background: The mortality rate of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains high. Therefore, patients with ACS should undergo early risk stratification, for which various risk calculation tools are available. However, it remains uncertain whether the predictive performance varies over time between risk calculation tools for different target periods. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of risk calculation tools in estimating short- and long-term mortality risks in patients with ACS, while considering different observation periods using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Methods: This study included 404 consecutive patients with ACS who underwent coronary angiography at our hospital from March 2017 to January 2021. The ACTION and GRACE scores for short-term risk stratification purposes and CRUSADE scores for long-term risk stratification purposes were calculated for all participants. The participants were followed up for 36 months to assess mortality. Using time-dependent ROC analysis, we evaluated the area under the curve (AUC) of the ACTION, CRUSADE, and GRACE scores at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Results: Sixty-six patients died during the observation periods. The AUCs at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months of the ACTION score were 0.942, 0.925, 0.889, 0.856, and 0.832; those of the CRUSADE score were 0.881, 0.883, 0.862, 0.876, and 0.862; and those of the GRACE score 0.949, 0.928, 0.888, 0.875, and 0.860, respectively. Conclusions: The ACTION and GRACE scores were excellent risk stratification tools for mortality in the short term. The prognostic performance of each risk score was almost similar in the long term, but the CRUSADE score might be a superior risk stratification tool in the longer term than 3 years.