Equivalence of single and standard doses of antenatal corticosteroids for late preterm neonatal outcomes: insights from a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: The recent paradigm shift of treating individuals at risk of late preterm birth with antenatal corticosteroids warrants an assessment of the effect of single dosage. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of neonates born in the late preterm period (34.0-36.6 weeks) after a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids vs placebo. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial. All individuals enrolled in the parent trial who received only a single dose of either antenatal corticosteroids or placebo and delivered within 24 hours were included. Primary outcome was a composite of respiratory support at 72 hours, including continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula ≥2 hours, oxygen with an inspired fraction of ≥30% for ≥4 hours, or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Of the 2831 individuals in the parent trial, 1083 (38.3%) met inclusion criteria; of them, 539 (49.8%) received a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids and 544 (50.2%) a single placebo dose. The placebo and antenatal corticosteroids groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference in the rate of the primary respiratory outcome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.47) or in the rate of respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.26) between those who received a single antenatal corticosteroids dose and placebo. An exploratory stratification by randomization-to-delivery intervals of 12-hour increments also showed no association with lower primary respiratory outcome rates. CONCLUSION: In individuals with late preterm birth pregnancies who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered before a second dose, there were no differences in neonatal respiratory morbidities compared with placebo. However, this study is not powered to detect treatment efficacy.

Expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features diagnosed at less than 24 weeks.

BACKGROUND: The recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin offers no guidance on the management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation. Historically, immediate delivery was recommended because of poor perinatal outcomes and high maternal morbidity. Recently, advances in neonatal resuscitation have led to increased survival at periviable gestational ages. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report perinatal and maternal outcomes after expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case series of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation at a level 4 center between 2017 and 2023. Individuals requiring delivery within 24 hours of diagnosis were excluded. Perinatal and maternal outcomes were analyzed. Categorical variables from our database were compared with previously published data using chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 41 individuals were diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation. After the exclusion of delivery within 24 hours, 30 individuals (73%) were evaluated. The median gestational age at diagnosis was 22 weeks (interquartile range, 22-23). Moreover, 16% of individuals had assisted reproductive technology, 27% of individuals had chronic hypertension, 13% of individuals had pregestational diabetes mellitus, 30% of individuals had previous preeclampsia, and 73% of individuals had a body mass index of >30 kg/m2. The median latency periods at 22 and 23 weeks of gestation were 7 days (interquartile range, 4-23) and 8 days (interquartile range, 4-13). In preeclampsia with severe features, neonatal survival rates were 44% (95% confidence interval, 3%-85%) at 22 weeks of gestation and 29% (95% confidence interval, 1%-56%) at 23 weeks of gestation. There were 2 cases of acute kidney injury (7%) and 2 cases of pericardial or pleural effusions (7%). Overall perinatal survival at <24 weeks of gestation was 30% in our current study vs 7% in previous reports (P=.02). CONCLUSION: For cases of expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation, our findings showed an increased perinatal survival rate with decreased maternal morbidity compared with previously published data. This information may be used when counseling on expectant management of preeclampsia with severe features at <24 weeks of gestation.

Implementing a Bundle for Evidence-based Cesarean Delivery May Not Be As Beneficial as Expected: A Multi-center, Pre- and Post- Study.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of procedures improves outcomes. Though systematic reviews have summarized the evidence-based steps (EBS) of cesarean delivery (CD), their bundled implementation has not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: In this pre- and post-implementation trial, we sought to ascertain if bundled EBS of CD, compared to surgeon's preference, improves outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A StaRI (Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies) compliant, multi-center pre- and post-implementation trial at 4 teaching hospitals was conducted. The pre-implementation period consisted of CD done based on the physicians' preferences for 3 months; educational intervention (e.g., didactics, badge cards, posters, video) occurred at the 4th month. CDs in post-implementation period employed the bundled EBS. A pre-planned 10% randomized audit of both groups assessed adherence and uptake of EBS. The primary outcome was a composite maternal morbidity (CMM), which included estimated blood loss > 1,000 mL, blood transfusion, endometritis, post-partum fever, wound complications, sepsis, thrombosis, ICU admission, hysterectomy, or death. The secondary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity (CNM) and some of its components were 5-min Apgar score < 7, positive pressure oxygen use, hypoglycemia, or sepsis. A priori Bayesian sample size calculation indicated 700 CD in each group was needed to demonstrate 20% relative reduction (from 15% to 12%) of CMM with 75% certainty. Bayesian logistic regression with neutral priors was used to calculate likelihood of net-improvement in adjusted relative risk (aRR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). RESULTS: A total of 1,425 consecutive CD (721 in pre- and 704 in post-implementation group) were examined. Audited data indicated that the baseline EBS utilization rate during the pre-implementation period was 79%; after the implementation bundled EBS of CD the audited adherence was 89%-an uptake of 10.0% of the EBS. In four aspects, the maternal characteristics differed significantly in the pre- and post-implementation periods: race/ethnicity, hypertensive disorder, and the relative contribution of the 4 centers to the cohorts and the gestational age at delivery, but the indications for CD and whether its duration was < versus > 60 min did not. The rates of CMM in the pre- and post-implementation groups were 26% and 22%, respectively (aRR, 0.88; 95% CrI, 0.73-1.04), with a 94 % Bayesian probability of a reduction in CMM. The CNM occurred in 37% of the pre- and in 41% of the post-implementation group (aRR, 1.12; 95% CrI 0.98-1.39), with a 95% Bayesian probability of worsening in CNM. When CMM were segregated by preterm (<37 wks) and term (> 37 weeks) CD, the improvement in maternal outcomes persisted; when CNM were segregated by gestational age subgroupsthe potential for worsening neonatal outcomes persisted as well. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of the evidence-based bundled steps of cesarean delivery resulted in a modest reduction of the composite maternal outcome; however, a paradoxical increase in neonatal composite morbidity was noted. Although individual evidence-based steps may be of value, while awaiting additional intervention trials a formal bundling of such steps is currently not recommended.

Permissive Intrapartum Glucose Control: An Equivalence Randomized Control Trial (PERMIT).

BACKGROUND: There is limited high quality data to determine best practices for maternal blood glucose management during labor. OBJECTIVE: We compared permissive care (target maternal blood glucose 70-180 mg/dL) to usual care (blood glucose 70-110 mg/dL) among laboring individuals with diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a two-site equivalence randomized control trial for individuals with diabetes (pregestational or gestational) at ≥ 34 weeks in labor. Individuals were randomly allocated to usual care or permissive care. Maternal blood glucose was evaluated by capillary blood glucose monitoring in latent and active labor every 4 and 2 hours. Insulin drip was initiated if maternal blood glucose exceeded the upper bounds of the allocated target. The primary outcome was first neonatal heel stick glucose within two hours of birth before feeding. We assumed a mean first neonatal blood glucose of 50 ±10 mg/dL. To ensure that the use of permissive care did not increase or decrease the first neonatal blood glucose >10 mg/dL (two-tailed, α= 0.05, ß= 0.1), 96 total participants were required. We calculated adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) in an intention-to-treat analysis. A Bayesian analysis was preplanned to estimate the probability of equivalence with a neutral informative prior. RESULTS: Of 511 deliveries with diabetes assessed for eligibility (10/2022 - 6/2023), 280 (54.8%) met eligibility criteria, and 96 (34.3%) agreed and were randomized. In the usual care group, 17% required an insulin drip compared to none in permissive care. There was equivalence in the primary outcome between usual and permissive care (57.9 vs. 57.1 mg/dL, adjusted mean difference -0.72, 95% CI -8.87,7.43). Bayesian analysis indicated 98% posterior probability of mean difference not being greater than ±10 mg/dL. The rate of neonatal hypoglycemia was 25% in the usual care group and 29% in permissive group (adjusted relative risk 1.14, 95% CI 0.60, 2.17). There was no difference in other neonatal or maternal outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this randomized control trial, while almost 1 in 6 individuals with diabetes required an insulin drip with usual intrapartum maternal blood glucose care, permissive care was associated with equivalent neonatal blood glucose.

Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Stratified by Severity.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcome (CMHO) among individuals with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), stratified by disease severity. Additionally, we investigated the composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO) among individuals with HDP who had postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) versus did not have PPH. STUDY DESIGN: Our retrospective cohort study included all singletons who delivered at a Level IV center over two consecutive years. The primary outcome was the rate of CMHO, defined as blood loss ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics, mechanical tamponade, surgical techniques for atony, transfusion, venous thromboembolism, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, or maternal death. A subgroup analysis was performed to investigate the primary outcome stratified by (1) chronic hypertension, (2) gestational hypertension and preeclampsia without severe features, and (3) preeclampsia with severe features. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to investigate the association of HDP with and without PPH on a CNAO which included APGAR <7 at 5 minutes, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, seizures, neonatal sepsis, meconium aspiration syndrome, ventilation >6 hours, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or neonatal death. RESULTS: Of 8,357 singletons, 2,827 (34%) had HDP. Preterm delivery <37 weeks, induction of labor, prolonged oxytocin use, and magnesium sulfate usage were more common in those with versus without HDP (p < 0.001). CMHO was higher among individuals with HDP than those without HDP (26 vs. 19%; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22). In the subgroup analysis, only individuals with preeclampsia with severe features were associated with higher CMHO (n = 802; aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.32-1.75). There was a higher likelihood of CNAO in individuals with both HDP and PPH compared to those with HDP without PPH (aRR 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-2.09). CONCLUSION: CMHO was higher among those with HDP. After stratification, only those with preeclampsia with severe features had an increased risk of CMHO. Among individuals with HDP, those who also had a PPH had worse neonatal outcomes than those without hemorrhage. KEY POINTS: · Individuals with HDP had an 11% higher likelihood of CMHO.. · After stratification, increased CMHO was limited to those with preeclampsia with severe features.. · There was a higher likelihood of CNAO in those with both HDP and PPH compared to HDP without PPH..

Trends and Outcomes among Pregnancy and Nonpregnancy-Related Hospitalizations with Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

OBJECTIVE: The study's primary objective was to evaluate adverse outcomes among reproductive-age hospitalizations with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), comparing those that are pregnancy-related versus nonpregnancy-related and evaluating temporal trends. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with DKA among reproductive-age women (15-49 years) in the United States (2016-2020). DKA in pregnancy hospitalizations was compared with DKA in nonpregnant hospitalizations. Adverse outcomes evaluated included mechanical ventilation, coma, seizures, renal failure, prolonged hospital stay, and in-hospital death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Annual percent change (APC) was used to calculate the change in DKA rate over time. RESULTS: Among 35,210,711 hospitalizations of reproductive-age women, 447,600 (1.2%) were hospitalized with DKA, and among them, 13,390 (3%) hospitalizations were pregnancy-related. The rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased over time (APC = 3.8%, 95% CI = 1.5-6.1). After multivariable adjustment, compared with pregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA, the rates of mechanical ventilation (aRR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.18-2.06), seizures (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.72-2.97), renal failure (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 2.05-2.50), coma (aRR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.68-3.83), and in-hospital death (aRR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.06-5.36) were higher among nonpregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA. CONCLUSION: A nationally representative sample of hospitalizations indicates that over the 5-year period, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased among reproductive age women, and a higher risk of adverse outcomes was observed when compared with pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations. KEY POINTS: · Over 5 years, the rate of pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations was stable.. · Over 5 years, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased.. · There is a higher risk of adverse outcomes with DKA outside of pregnancy..

Factors Associated with Refractory Severe Hypertension in Patients with Preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify factors associated with refractory severe hypertension that does not resolve after an initial dose of antihypertensive medication in patients with preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of all pregnant and postpartum individuals with a diagnosis of preeclampsia, superimposed preeclampsia, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet) syndrome, or eclampsia who delivered at 22 weeks or greater at a single academic institution from 2010 to 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients with preeclampsia who developed severe hypertension (systolic pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure ≥110 mm Hg) and received antihypertensive medications for acute severe hypertension. We defined refractory severe hypertension as a systolic blood pressure of ≥160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥110 mm Hg that did not improve after receiving the initial treatment. To evaluate for factors associated with refractory severe hypertension, we developed multivariable modified Poisson regression using all variables with p-value <0.1 on bivariable analysis and calculated adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Of 850, 386 (45.4%) had refractory severe hypertension and 464 (54.6%) responded to the initial antihypertensive medications. Factors associated with refractory severe hypertension included higher body mass index (BMI), chronic hypertension, and higher systolic pressure. Every 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with a 7% increased risk of refractory severe hypertension (aRR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.02-1.12). Every 10 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure was associated with a 10% increased risk of refractory severe hypertension (aRR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17). Chronic hypertension was associated with a 25% increased risk of refractory severe hypertension (aRR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.01-1.56) in the diastolic pressure model. CONCLUSION: Refractory severe hypertension was associated with elevated BMI, chronic hypertension, and higher systolic blood pressure. KEY POINTS: · Risk factors for refractory severe hypertension are not well-known.. · Almost half of the patients had refractory severe hypertension.. · Higher BMI, chronic hypertension, and higher systolic pressure were the risk factors.. · These patients would require closer follow-up and prompt response to vital signs..

Association of Mild Iodine Insufficiency during Pregnancy with Child Neurodevelopment in Patients with Subclinical Hypothyroidism or Hypothyroxinemia.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate whether iodine status in pregnant patients with either subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia in the first half of pregnancy is associated with measures of behavior and neurodevelopment in children through the age of 5 years. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter study consisting of two randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled treatment trials conducted in parallel. Patients with a singleton gestation before 20 weeks' gestation underwent thyroid screening using serum thyrotropin and free thyroxine. Participants with subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia were randomized to levothyroxine replacement or an identical placebo. At randomization, maternal urine was collected and stored for subsequent urinary iodine excretion analysis. Urinary iodine concentrations greater than 150 µg/L were considered iodine sufficient, and concentrations of 150 µg/L or less were considered iodine insufficient. The primary outcome was a full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) score at the age of 5 years, the general conceptual ability score from the Differential Ability Scales-II at the age of 3 if IQ was not available, or death before 3 years. RESULTS: A total of 677 pregnant participants with subclinical hypothyroidism and 526 with hypothyroxinemia were randomized. The primary outcome was available in 1,133 (94%) of children. Overall, 684 (60%) of mothers were found to have urinary iodine concentrations >150 µg/L. Children of iodine-sufficient participants with subclinical hypothyroidism had similar primary outcome scores when compared to children of iodine-insufficient participants (95 [84-105] vs. 96 [87-109], P adj = 0.73). After adjustment, there was also no difference in IQ scores among children of participants with hypothyroxinemia at 5 to 7 years of age (94 [85 - 102] and 91 [81 - 100], Padj 1/4 0.11). Treatment with levothyroxine was not associated with neurodevelopmental or behavioral outcomes regardless of maternal iodine status (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Maternal urinary iodine concentrations ≤150 µg/L were not associated with abnormal cognitive or behavioral outcomes in offspring of participants with either subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroxinemia. KEY POINTS: · Most pregnant patients with subclinical thyroid disease are iodine sufficient.. · Mild maternal iodine insufficiency is not associated with lower offspring IQ at 5 years.. · Iodine supplementation in subclinical thyroid disease is unlikely to improve IQ..

Emerging concepts since the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial.

The recent publication of the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) trial has already changed the management of pregnant people with mild chronic hypertension. However, similar to any new intervention or change in management, we have encountered confusion regarding the management and implementation of the "Treatment for mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy" trial findings. In this clinical opinion, we addressed the aspects relating to the implementation that cannot be gleaned from the manuscript but were part of the trial conduct. Furthermore, we discussed several clinical questions that may affect the management of a patient with chronic hypertension following the "Treatment for mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy" trial and provided suggestions based on our experience and opinion.

Gestational hypertension and "severe" disease: time for a change.

Our understanding and management of gestational hypertension and its variants are substantially hindered by a reliance on antiquated terminology and on practice recommendations based largely on tradition rather than outcomes-based evidence. Unsurprisingly, gestational hypertension remains a major contributor to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates, with little improvement seen over the past half century except as it relates to better newborn care. Reliance on a binary classification of vastly disparate types and degrees of organ dysfunction (severe or not severe) and the use of nonphysiological and largely arbitrary gestational age cutoffs are particularly problematic. If this situation is to improve, it will be necessary to abandon current misleading terminology and non-evidence-based traditional practice patterns and start again, building on management approaches validated by outcomes-based data.

Oral combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril vs nifedipine for postpartum hypertension: a comparative-effectiveness pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics may be underutilized for postpartum hypertension because of their teratogenicity during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether combined oral hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produced superior short-term blood pressure control when compared with nifedipine among postpartum individuals with hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial (October 2021 to June 2022) that included individuals with chronic hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with 2 systolic blood pressure measurements ≥150 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure measurements ≥100 mm Hg within 72 hours after delivery. Participants were randomized to receive either combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy or nifedipine therapy after stratifying the participants by diagnosis (chronic hypertension vs hypertensive disorders of pregnancy). The primary outcome was stage 2 hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) determined using a home blood pressure monitor on days 7 to 10 after delivery or at readmission to the hospital for blood pressure control. The secondary outcomes included severe maternal morbidity (any of the following: intensive care unit admission; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count syndrome; eclampsia; stroke; cardiomyopathy; or maternal death), need for intravenous medications after randomization, hospital length of stay, blood pressure during first clinic visit, medication compliance, and adverse events. A pilot trial with 70 individuals was planned given the limited available data on combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy use in postpartum care. We calculated relative risks and 95% credible intervals in an intention-to-treat analysis. Finally, we conducted a preplanned Bayesian analysis to estimate the probability of benefit or harm with a neutral informative prior. RESULTS: Of 111 eligible individuals, 70 (63%) agreed and were randomized (31 in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and 36 in the nifedipine group; 3 withdrew consent after randomization), and the characteristics were similar at baseline between the groups. The primary outcome was unavailable for 9 (12.8%) participants. The primary outcome occurred in 27% of participants in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and in 43% of the participants in the nifedipine group (posterior adjusted relative risk, 0.74; 95% credible interval, 0.40-1.31). Bayesian analysis indicated an 85% posterior probability of a reduction in the primary outcome with combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy relative to nifedipine treatment. No differences were noted in the secondary outcomes or adverse medication events. CONCLUSION: The results of the pilot trial suggest a high probability that combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produces superior short-term BP control when compared with nifedipine. These findings should be confirmed in a larger trial.

Continuous glucose monitoring in individuals undergoing gestational diabetes screening.

BACKGROUND: Among guidelines on gestational diabetes mellitus, there is an incongruity about the threshold of maternal hyperglycemia to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain the association between continuous glucose monitoring metrics and adverse outcomes among individuals undergoing gestational diabetes mellitus screening. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study (from June 2020 to January 2022) of individuals who underwent 2-step gestational diabetes mellitus screening at ≤30 weeks of gestation. The participants wore a blinded continuous glucose monitoring device (Dexcom G6 Pro; Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA) for 10 days starting when they took the 50-g glucose challenge test. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia or neonatal injury, respiratory distress, need for intravenous glucose treatment for hypoglycemia, or fetal or neonatal death). The secondary neonatal outcomes included preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure, hyperbilirubinemia, and hospital length of stay. The secondary maternal outcomes included weight gain during pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, induction of labor, cesarean delivery, and postpartum complications. Time within the target range (63-140 mg/dL), time above the target range (>140 mg/dL) expressed as a percentage of all continuous glucose monitoring readings, and mean glucose level were analyzed. The Youden index was used to choose the threshold of ≥10% for the time above the target range and association with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Of 136 participants recruited, data were available from 92 individuals (67.6%). The 2-step method diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus in 2 individuals (2.2%). Continuous glucose monitoring indicated that 17 individuals (18.5%) had time above the target range of ≥10%. Individuals with time above the target range of ≥10% had a significantly higher likelihood of composite adverse neonatal outcomes than individuals with time above the target range of <10% (63% vs 18%; P=.001). Furthermore, compared with neonates born to individuals with time above the target range of <10%, neonates born to individuals with time above the target range of ≥10% had an increased likelihood for hypoglycemia (14.5% vs 47%; P=.009) and had a longer length of stay (2 vs 4 days; P=.03). No difference in maternal outcomes was noted between the groups. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study of individuals undergoing gestational diabetes mellitus screening, a cutoff of the time above the target range of ≥10% using continuous glucose monitoring was associated with a higher rate of neonatal adverse outcomes. A randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring vs 2-step screening for gestational diabetes mellitus to lower the rate of adverse outcomes is underway (identification number: NCT05430204).

HELLP syndrome at <23 weeks' gestation: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review to evaluate the clinical presentation and maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with early-onset HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried from inception through January 1, 2023 with the following terms: "HELLP syndrome," "HELLP," "hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets," "hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome," "pre-viable," "peri-viable," "previable," "periviable," "first trimester," "second trimester," "before 23 weeks," "<23 weeks," "<23 week gestation," and "before 23 weeks gestation." We also included an additional case from our institution. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Abstracts, unpublished studies, and review articles were excluded, yielding 46 studies that met our inclusion criteria. METHODS: Two reviewers (N.S.I. and M.H.M.) performed the study selection and subsequent data extraction independently, after which the results were reviewed together. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and our study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021292692). RESULTS: A total of 55 patients had 58 pregnancies complicated by early-onset HELLP syndrome, including 3 with recurrent HELLP. The most common presenting signs/symptoms were abdominal pain (35/45; 78%), hypertension (32/49; 65%), nausea/vomiting (16/45; 36%), headache (13/45; 29%), and edema (8/45; 18%). Lactate dehydrogenase ≥600 IU/L was observed in 21 of 31 (68%) cases, whereas liver enzyme abnormalities and thrombocytopenia were reported in 48 of 51 (94%) and 50 of 54 (93%) cases, respectively. Maternal complications were encountered in 25 of 56 (45%) cases. The most common complications were hepatic (13/56; 23%), central nervous system-related (11/56; 20%), and respiratory (11/56; 20%). In 36 of 57 (63%) cases, pregnancy was terminated. Of the 21 continued pregnancies, early fetal death (at <20 weeks' gestation) was reported in 10 (48%), stillbirth in 6 (28%), and neonatal demise in 2 (10%). Living neonates were reported in 3 of 21 (14%) cases, all delivered at 23 weeks. The perinatal mortality rate was 73% (8/11). One case (2%) reported maternal death. Antiphospholipid syndrome was diagnosed in 14 of 29 (48%) cases. CONCLUSION: Early-onset HELLP syndrome presents with symptoms similar to those observed in later gestation. Maternal complications are life-threatening, with the most common complications being hepatic, central nervous system-related, and respiratory. Fetal outcomes are poor.

Factors associated with exclusive formula feeding among individuals with low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Better understanding of the factors associated with formula feeding during the hospital stay can help in identifying potential lactation problems and promote early intervention. Our aim was to ascertain factors associated with exclusive formula feeding in newborns of low-risk pregnancies. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective study using the United States vital statistics datasets (2014-2018) evaluating low-risk pregnancies with a nonanomalous singleton delivery from 37 to 41 weeks. People with hypertensive disorders, or diabetes, were excluded. Primary outcome was newborn feeding (breast vs exclusive formula feeding) during hospital stay. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 19 623 195 live births during the study period, 11 605 242 (59.1%) met inclusion criteria and among them, 1 929 526 (16.6%) were formula fed. Factors associated with formula feeding included: age < 20 years (aRR 1.31 [95% CI 1.31-1.32]), non-Hispanic Black (1.42, 1.41-1.42), high school education (1.69, 1.69-1.70) or less than high school education (1.94, 1.93, 1.95), Medicaid insurance (1.52, 1.51, 1.52), body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 (1.10, 1.09-1.10), BMI 25-29.9 (1.09, 1.09-1.09), BMI 30-34.9 (1.19, 1.19-1.20), BMI 35-39.9 (1.31, 1.30-1.31), BMI ≥ 40 (1.43, 1.42-1.44), multiparity (1.29, 1.29-1.30), lack of prenatal care (1.49, 1.48-1.50), smoking (1.75, 1.74-1.75), and gestational age (ranged from 37 weeks [1.44, 1.43-1.45] to 40 weeks [1.11, 1.11-1.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Using a large cohort of low-risk pregnancies, we identified several modifiable factors associated with newborn feeding (eg, prepregnancy BMI, access to prenatal care, and smoking cessation). Improving the breast feeding initiation rate should be a priority in our current practice to ensure equitable care for all neonates.

Maternal Sepsis: A Review of National and International Guidelines.

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by the body's response to infection. The Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) suggests sepsis plays a larger role in maternal morbidity and mortality than previously thought. We therefore sought to compare national and international guidelines for maternal sepsis to determine their consistency with each other and the Third International Consensus for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS-3). Using Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, Google Scholar, and organization Web sites, we identified seven guidelines on maternal sepsis in the English language-The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and World Health Organization. Guidelines were reviewed to ascertain the commonality and variation, if any, in definitions of maternal sepsis, tools and criteria utilized for diagnosis, obstetric warning systems used, as well as evaluation and management of maternal sepsis. These variables were also compared with SEPSIS-3. All guidelines provided definitions consistent with a version of the SEPSIS, although the specific version utilized were varied. Clinical variables and tools employed for diagnosis of maternal sepsis were also varied. Evaluation and management of maternal sepsis and septic shock were similar. In conclusion, national and international maternal sepsis guidelines were incongruent with each other and SEPSIS-3 in diagnostic criteria and tools but similar in evaluation and management recommendations. KEY POINTS: · Definitions for maternal sepsis and septic shock are varied.. · Maternal sepsis guidelines differ in proposed criteria and tools.. · Maternal sepsis guidelines have similar management recommendations..

Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity after Cesarean Delivery for Active Phase Arrest following Adoption of the Obstetric Care Consensus Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: In an effort to reduce the primary cesarean delivery (CD) rate, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended new labor guidelines in 2014 that allow longer duration of labor times. There are little data on the impact of these guidelines on CD rates and pregnancy outcomes in a predominantly Hispanic population. This study aimed to compare the primary CD rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing primary CD for arrest of labor before and after implementation of the 2014 guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of term patients who underwent a CD for an arrest disorder between January 2011 and April 2017 at a county teaching hospital. Our primary outcome was the composite maternal and neonatal morbidities (CMM and CNM, respectively). Differences in the demographic and clinical characteristics, CMM, and CNM stratified by time period (pre- vs. postimplementation) were examined. RESULTS: There were 4,976 deliveries in the study period: 525 (11%) underwent primary CD for arrest disorder; 298 (6%) prior to 2014, and 227 (5%) after 2014 (p = 0.62). There was no significant difference in the rate of CD between the two periods (13.4 vs. 13.3%, p = 0.81). In patients undergoing CD for arrest of dilation (n = 389), the CMM and CNM did not significantly change between both groups (63.3 vs. 56%, p = 0.15). In patients who had a CD for arrest of descent (n = 136), the rate of CMM significantly increased from 50 to 75% (p = 0.02) with no significant change in the CNM (13.2 vs. 20%, p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: Despite significant changes in labor management after the publication of the 2014 guidelines, our primary CD rate was not reduced, and we noticed an increase in CMM in patients who had CD for arrest of descent. A randomized controlled trial is needed to further evaluate the effect of these guidelines nationally. KEY POINTS: · The Obstetric Care Consensus statement aims to decrease the rate of cesarean delivery (CD).. · We observed an increase in morbidity in CD if done for arrest of descent (pre/post the consensus).. · A randomized controlled trial is needed to further assess the impact of the guidelines on morbidity..

Time in Range and Pregnancy Outcomes in People with Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: The international consensus on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) recommends time in range (TIR) target of >70% for pregnant people. Our aim was to compare outcomes between pregnant people with TIR ≤ versus >70%. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective study of all people using CGM during pregnancy from January 2017 to May 2021 at a tertiary care center. All people with pregestational diabetes who used CGM and delivered at our center were included in the analysis. Primary neonatal outcome included any of the following: large for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, need for intravenous (IV) glucose, or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Maternal outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Logistic regression was used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 78 people managed with CGM, 65 (80%) met inclusion criteria. While 33 people (50.1%) had TIR ≤70%, 32 (49.2%) had TIR >70%. People with TIR ≤70% were more likely to be younger, have a lower body mass index, and have type 1 diabetes than those with TIR >70%. After multivariable regression, there was no difference in the composite neonatal outcome between the groups (aOR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.16-1.92). However, neonates of people with TIR ≤70% were more likely to be admitted to the NICU (p = 0.035), to receive IV glucose (p = 0.005), to have RDS (p = 0.012), and had a longer hospital stay (p = 0.012) compared with people with TIR >70%. Furthermore, people with TIR ≤70% were more likely to develop hypertensive disorders (p = 0.04) than those with TIR >70%. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, the target of TIR >70% was reached in about one out of two people with diabetes using CGM, which correlated with a reduction in neonatal and maternal complications. KEY POINTS: · Among people with diabetes, 50% reached the recommended time in range using CGM.. · Time in range >70% was associated with reducing the rate of some neonatal complications.. · Time in range ≤70% was associated with increased risk for adverse maternal outcomes..

Development of the Sepsis-Associated Adverse Outcomes in Pregnancy Score.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a scoring system-called the Sepsis-Associated Adverse Outcomes in Pregnancy (SAAP) Score-to identify individuals with maternal infection that have composite maternal adverse outcomes (CMAO). STUDY DESIGN: Using the International Classification of Disease codes, we identified pregnant and postpartum (up to 6 weeks after birth) individuals admitted at our center with a primary diagnosis of infection. The primary outcome was CMAO which included any of the following: maternal intensive care unit admission, surgical intervention, vasopressor use, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary edema, mechanical ventilation, high-flow nasal cannula, disseminated intravascular coagulation, dialysis, organ failure, venous thromboembolism, or maternal death. Regularized logistic regression was used to identify variables that best discriminate CMAO status. Variables were chosen for inclusion following evaluation of statistical and clinical significance. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. RESULTS: Of the 23,235 deliveries during the study period, 227 (0.9%) individuals met inclusion criteria and among them CMAO occurred in 39.2% (95% CI: 33.1-45.7%). The SAAP score consisted of six variables (white blood cell count, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, lactic acid, and abnormal diagnostic imaging) with scores ranging from 0 to 11 and a score of ≥7 being abnormal. An abnormal SAAP score had an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86) for CMAO. The sensitivity and specificity of the SAAP score for CMAO was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64-0.80), respectively. The positive predictive value was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.72) and negative predictive value was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.71-0.86). CONCLUSION: Pending external validation, the sixth variable SAAP score may permit early recognition of pregnant and postpartum individuals with infection who are likely to develop adverse maternal outcomes. KEY POINTS: · Sepsis is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.. · Early recognition improves maternal sepsis outcomes.. · The SAAP score may permit early recognition of maternal adverse outcomes due to infection..

The Role of Cerclage in Subsequent Pregnancy following Previable Prelabor Rupture of Membranes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain the outcomes associated with a cervical cerclage among individuals with a history of previable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM). STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2021. We included individuals with a history of previable (before 24 weeks) PROM and the subsequent viable pregnancy. Women with multifetal gestation, preterm birth (PTB) or cerclage in previous gestation, or abdominal cerclage after trachelectomy were excluded. Primary outcome was PTB rate (delivery <37 weeks). Recurrence of preterm PROM and adverse composite maternal and neonatal outcomes (CMO and CNO) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. CMO included any of the following: suspected chorioamnionitis, endometritis, red blood cell transfusion, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, or death. CNO included any of the following: previable PTB (<24 weeks of gestation), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, mechanical ventilation, seizures, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, or death. RESULTS: During the study period, 118 individuals had a history of previable PROM and a documented subsequent pregnancy, out of which 74 (62.7%) met inclusion criteria. Nineteen (25.7%) of eligible individuals underwent a cerclage for prior previable PROM and were compared with controls (n = 55, 74.3%). Women who underwent a cerclage had higher rates of PTB < 37 weeks (63.2 vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 14.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.97-49.35) and < 34 weeks (21.1 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.03; OR: 7.07, 95% CI: 1.18-42.39) compared with those without cerclage. Furthermore, recurrent preterm PROM and previable PTB rates were higher among patients who underwent cerclage. The survival curve further indicated that individuals with cerclage delivered earlier. CMO and CNO rates were similar in those with and without cerclage. CONCLUSION: Cerclage placement in individuals with prior previable PROM was associated with higher rates of recurrent preterm PROM and PTB. KEY POINTS: · The management of individuals in a subsequent pregnancy following previable PROM is a conundrum.. · Cerclage following previable PROM is associated with higher rates of recurrent preterm PROM and PTB.. · Composite maternal and neonatal outcome rates were similar in those with and without cerclage..

Racial and Ethnic Disparities among Pregnancies with Chronic Hypertension and Adverse Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to ascertain whether the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the United States among individuals with chronic hypertension differed by maternal race and ethnicity and to assess the temporal trend. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based retrospective study using the U.S. Vital Statistics datasets evaluated pregnancies with chronic hypertension, singleton live births that delivered at 24 to 41 weeks. The coprimary outcomes were a composite maternal adverse outcome (preeclampsia, primary cesarean delivery, intensive care unit admission, blood transfusion, uterine rupture, or unplanned hysterectomy) and a composite neonatal adverse outcome (preterm birth, small for gestational age, Apgar's score <5 at 5 minutes, assisted ventilation> 6 hours, seizure, or death). Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased from 1.6 to 2.2%. After multivariable adjustment, an increased risk for the composite maternal adverse outcome was found in Black (aRR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.09-1.11), Hispanic (aRR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.02-1.05), and Asian/Pacific Islander (aRR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.05-1.10), compared with White individuals. Compared with White individuals, the risk of the composite neonatal adverse outcome was higher in Black (aRR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.37-1.41), Hispanic (aRR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.13-1.16), Asian/Pacific Islander (aRR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.31-1.37), and American Indian (aRR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07-1.17). The racial and ethnic disparity remained unchanged during the study period. CONCLUSION: We found a racial and ethnic disparity with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in pregnancies with chronic hypertension that remained unchanged throughout the study period. KEY POINTS: · Between 2014 and 2019, the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased.. · Among people with chronic hypertension, there are racial and ethnic disparities in adverse outcomes.. · Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander have a higher risk of the adverse neonatal outcomes..