Apposite insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor glycosylation is critical to the maintenance of vascular smooth muscle phenotype in the presence of factors promoting osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.

Vascular calcification is strongly linked with increased morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Vascular calcification is an active cell-mediated process that involves the differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) to an osteoblast-like phenotype. Several inhibitors of this process have been identified, including insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). In this study, we examined the role of the IGF receptor (IGFR) and the importance of IGFR glycosylation in the maintenance of the VSMC phenotype in the face of factors known to promote osteogenic conversion. IGF-I (25 ng/ml) significantly protected VSMCs from ß-glycerophosphate-induced osteogenic differentiation (p < 0.005) and mineral deposition (p < 0.01). Mevalonic acid depletion (induced by 100 nm cerivastatin) significantly inhibited these IGF protective effects (p < 0.01). Mevalonic acid depletion impaired IGFR processing, decreased the expression of mature IGFRs at the cell surface, and inhibited the downstream activation of Akt and MAPK. Inhibitors of N-linked glycosylation (tunicamycin, deoxymannojirimycin, and deoxynojirimycin) also markedly attenuated the inhibitory effect of IGF-I on ß-glycerophosphate-induced mineralization (p < 0.05) and activation of Akt and MAPK. These results demonstrate that alterations in the glycosylation of the IGFR disrupt the ability of IGF-I to protect against the osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of VSMCs by several interrelated mechanisms: decreased IGFR processing, reduced IGFR cell-surface expression, and reduced downstream signaling via the Akt and MAPK pathways. IGF-I thus occupies a critical position in the maintenance of normal VSMC phenotype and protection from factors known to stimulate vascular calcification.

Reduced pericellular sensitivity to IGF-I in fibroblasts from girls with Turner syndrome: a mechanism to impair clinical responses to GH.

Girls with Turner syndrome (TS) are treated with supraphysiological doses of growth hormone (GH) to improve final height; however in some girls, the growth response can be poor. This may reflect aberrations in GH and/or IGF-I actions at the cellular level, and thus this study compared the response of skin fibroblasts from normal children (n = 5) and girls with TS (n = 8) to GH, IGF-I, or a combination, by assessing the IGF binding protein (IGFBP) profile of conditioned medium harvested over 7 d. The two cell types had a comparable IGFBP profile; IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-4 were the most abundant species. TS fibroblasts produced more IGFBP-3 (d 7, 51.4 ± 45 ng/mL versus 20 ± 22 ng/mL; p < 0.05) than control cells; levels of IGFBP-4 were similar (21 ± 12 ng/mL versus 30 ± 21 ng/mL). GH did not influence IGFBP production. IGF-I treatment did not affect IGFBP-4 levels but enhanced the production of IGFBP-3 by both cell types (p < 0.05). However, the response of TS fibroblasts to IGF-I was approximately half that observed in normal cells (p < 0.05). Altered IGF-I activity, because of reduced bioavailability and/or reduced sensitivity, could contribute to the need for high GH doses in TS and for the poor response to GH in some girls with TS.

The impact of abnormalities in IGF and inflammatory systems on the metabolic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Low plasma levels of IGF-I, particularly when coupled with low levels of the potentially inhibitory IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), have been implicated in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome X and cardiovascular disease. We report the relative contributions of IGFBP-1 and CRP to the occurrence of the metabolic syndrome in a healthy population cohort to establish the extent to which these factors may contribute to subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The volunteers in the study were all participants in the Ely study, a continuing population-based cohort in Ely, Cambridgeshire, U.K. Of 839 individuals studied, 154 (18.4%) fulfilled criteria for the metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: Subjects with the metabolic syndrome had lower IGFBP-1 (14.4 microg/l [95% CI 12.9-16.0] vs. 25.4 [24.1-26.7], P < 0.001) and higher CRP (1.9 mg/l [1.6-2.2] vs. 1.0 [0.9-1.1], P < 0.001). Logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, fasting insulin, and IGF-I, demonstrated a striking 14-fold increased risk for the metabolic syndrome (odds ratio 14.1 [4.1-48.4], P < 0.001) in individuals with a CRP value in the highest tertile and IGFBP-1 levels below the median. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a high CRP concentration coupled with a low IGFBP-1 results in a dramatic increase in an individual's risk of having the metabolic syndrome. Further elucidation of the biological processes linking the IGF and inflammatory systems may allow the identification of novel therapeutic targets for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Insulin-like growth factor-II and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 prospectively predict longitudinal elevation of HDL-cholesterol in type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Associations of insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2) with cardiovascular risk have been inadequately studied. We hypothesized that IGF-II and IGFBP-2 associate with longitudinal trends in lipid profiles in type 2 diabetes patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and eighty nine subjects with type 2 diabetes (age 27-87 years) from the Salford Diabetes Cohort were studied. Longitudinal clinical information was extracted for an eight-year period (2002-2009) from an integrated electronic dataset of primary care and hospital data. RESULTS: There were 294 male subjects and mean age was 62.9 years. At baseline, IGF-II concentration was 602 ng/mL. HDL cholesterol at baseline was associated with log-IGF-II concentration in a model adjusted for age, gender, baseline body-mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and lipid-lowering therapy. IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 were associated with high HDL-cholesterol. A higher circulating IGF-II concentration at baseline was also associated with longitudinal increase in HDL-cholesterol in mixed-effects regression analyses independent of IGF-I, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, age, gender, eGFR, BMI and lipid-lowering therapy. Log-transformed baseline concentrations of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 were also associated with longitudinal elevation in HDL-cholesterol. No association was observed for IGF-II or IGFBP-2 with longitudinal LDL cholesterol trends. CONCLUSION: Our analyses based on 'real world' data demonstrate that higher baseline IGF-II and IGFBP-2 predict increased HDL concentration over time, implicating IGF-II in modulation of circulating HDL-cholesterol concentrations.

Atorvastatin administration is associated with dose-related changes in IGF bioavailability.

OBJECTIVE: IGF levels, their binding proteins (IGFBPs) and high-dose statin therapy have been linked to the development of diabetes. We aimed to identify whether atorvastatin caused dose-related changes in IGF proteins. DESIGN AND METHODS: We measured IGF1, IGF2, IGFBP1 and IGFBP3 concentrations at baseline, 6 and 12 months in Protection Against Nephropathy in Diabetes with Atorvastatin trial participants with type 2 diabetes randomised to 10 mg (n=59) vs 80 mg (n=60) of atorvastatin (n=119; mean (S.D.): age 64 (10) years; 83% male; HbA1c 61 (10) mmol/mol; blood pressure 131/73 mmHg). RESULTS: Atorvastatin was associated with overall reductions in circulating IGF1, IGF2 and IGFBP3 concentrations (P<0.05 for all changes). The adjusted mean (95% CI) between-group differences that indicate dose-related changes in IGF proteins were not significant for IGF1: -3 (-21 to 14) ng/ml; IGF2: -23 (-65 to 18) ng/ml and IGFBP3: -0.34 (-0.71 to 0.03) µg/ml, negative values indicating numerically greater lowering with high dose. The IGFBP1 concentration did not change with atorvastatin therapy overall but the adjusted mean (95% CI) between-group difference indicating a dose-related change in log IGFBP1 was highly significant -0.41 (-0.69 to 0.13, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: IGF1, IGF2 and IGFBP3 concentrations decreased following atorvastatin therapy. A differential effect of low- vs high-dose atorvastatin on IGFBP1 concentrations was observed with likely implications for IGF bioavailability. The dose-related differential impact of atorvastatin treatment on concentration of IGF proteins merits investigation as a mechanism to explain the worsening of glucose tolerance with statin therapy.

IGFBP2 is a biomarker for predicting longitudinal deterioration in renal function in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin-like growth factors are implicated in the development of diabetic nephropathy. IGF-binding protein 2 (IGFBP2) and IGF2 are expressed in the kidney, but their associations with diabetic nephropathy are unclear. We therefore tested the hypothesis that circulating levels of IGF2 and IGFBP2 predict longitudinal renal function in individuals with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: IGFBP2 and IGF2 measurements were performed in 436 individuals (263 males) with type 2 diabetes. Linear mixed-effect regression analysis was used to model the relationship between plasma IGFBP2 concentration and longitudinal changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over an 8-year period. Analyses were also performed for IGF1, IGF2, IGFBP1 and IGFBP3 concentrations as predictors of longitudinal renal outcomes. RESULTS: High IGFBP2 concentration at baseline was associated with a decreased eGFR over an 8-year period (ß=-0.02, (95% confidence interval -0.03 to -0.01), P<0.001). High IGFBP1, IGFBP2 and IGFBP3 were also associated with low baseline eGFR concentration. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that IGFBP2 is a predictor of longitudinal deterioration of renal function in type 2 diabetes.

The effect of atorvastatin on serum lipoproteins in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is associated with long-term adverse effects on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Reducing growth hormone secretion improves well-being and symptoms, but may not significantly improve the lipoprotein profile. An additional approach to cardiovascular risk reduction in acromegaly may therefore be to target lipoprotein metabolism directly. In this study we investigated the effect of statin treatment. DESIGN: Double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effects on circulating lipoproteins of atorvastatin 10 mg daily vs. placebo. Each treatment was given for 3 months in random order. SUBJECTS: Eleven patients with acromegaly. MEASUREMENTS: Lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, enzyme activity and calculated cardiovascular risk. RESULTS: Atorvastatin treatment compared to placebo resulted in a significant decrease in serum cholesterol (5.85 +/- 1.04 mmol/l vs. 4.22 +/- 0.69 mmol/l; mean +/- SD; P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (2.95 +/- 1.07 mmol/l vs. 1.82 +/- 0.92 mmol/l; P < 0.001), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (0.31 (0.21-0.47) mmol vs. 0.23 (0.13-0.30) mmol/l median (interquartile range); P < 0.05), apolipoprotein B (111 +/- 28 mg/dl vs. 80 +/- 18 mg/dl; P < 0.001), and calculated coronary heart disease risk (6.8 (3.3-17.9) vs. 2.8 (1.5-5.7)% over next 10 years; P < 0.01). Serum triglyceride was 1.34 (1.06-1.71) mmol/l on placebo and 1.14 (0.88-1.48) mmol/l on atorvastatin (ns). HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1 and Lp(a) concentrations and cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin: cholesterol acyl transferase activities were also not significantly altered. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin treatment was safe, well tolerated and effective in improving the atherogenic lipoprotein profile in acromegaly.

Abrogation of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and insulin action by mevalonic acid depletion: synergy between protein prenylation and receptor glycosylation pathways.

The vasculoprotective effects of hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) correlate with cholesterol lowering. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors also disrupt cellular processes by the depletion of isoprenoids and dolichol. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling appear particularly prone to such disruption as intracellular receptor processing requires dolichol for correct N-glycosylation, whereas downstream signaling through Ras requires the appropriate prenylation (farnesol). We determined how HMG-CoA reductase inhibition affected the mitogenic effects of IGF-I and metabolic actions of insulin in 3T3-L1 cells and examined the respective roles of receptor glycosylation and Ras prenylation. IGF-I- and insulin-induced proliferation was significantly reduced by all statins tested, although cerivastatin (10 nm) had the greatest effect (p < 0.005). Although inhibitors of Ras prenylation induced similar results (10 microm FTI-277 89% +/- 7.4%, p < 0.01), the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibition could only be partially reversed by farnesyl pyrophosphate refeeding. Treatment with statins resulted in decreased membrane expression of receptors and accumulation of proreceptors, suggesting disruption of glycosylation-dependent cleavage. Glycosylation inhibitors inhibited IGF-I-induced proliferation (tunicamycin p < 0.005, castanospermine p < 0.01, deoxymannojirimycin p < 0.01). High concentrations of statin were necessary to impair insulin-mediated glucose uptake (300 nm = 33% +/- 12% p < 0.05), and this process was not effected by farnesyl transferase inhibition. Gycosylation inhibitors mimicked the effect of statin treatment (tunicamycin p < 0.001, castanospermine p < 0.05, deoxymannojirimycin p < 0.05), and there was insulin proreceptor accumulation. These data imply that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors disrupt IGF-I signaling by combined effects on Ras prenylation and IGF receptor glycosylation, whereas insulin signaling is only affected by disrupted receptor glycosylation.