A novel scoring system to predict short-term mortality after living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure.

Liver transplantation is often the only lifesaving option for acute liver failure (ALF); however, the predictors of short-term mortality (death within one year) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for ALF have yet to be defined. We retrospectively collected patients ≥18 years old who underwent LDLT for ALF between 2010 and 2020 at 35 centers in Asia. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical variables related to short-term mortality and establish a novel scoring system. The Kaplan-Meier method was performed to explore the association between the score and overall survival. Of the 339 recipients, 46 (13.6%) died within 1 year after LDLT. Multivariate analyses revealed 4 independent risk factors for death: use of vasopressors or mechanical ventilation, the higher model for end-stage liver disease score, and a lower graft-to-recipient weight ratio. The internally validated c-statistic of the short-term mortality after transplant (SMT) score derived from these 4 variables was 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.87). The SMT score successfully stratified recipients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with 1-year overall survival rates of 96%, 80%, and 50%, respectively. In conclusion, our novel SMT score based on 4 predictors will guide ALF recipient and living donor selection.

Microbiota and Gut-Liver Axis: An Unbreakable Bond?

The gut microbiota, amounting to approximately 100 trillion (1014) microbes represents a genetic repertoire that is bigger than the human genome itself. Evidence on bidirectional interplay between human and microbial genes is mounting. Microbiota probably play vital roles in diverse aspects of normal human metabolism, such as digestion, immune modulation, and gut endocrine function, as well as in the genesis and progression of many human diseases. Indeed, the gut microbiota has been most closely linked to various chronic ailments affecting the liver, although concrete scientific data are sparse. In this narrative review, we initially discuss the basic epidemiology of gut microbiota and the factors influencing their initial formation in the gut. Subsequently, we delve into the gut-liver axis and the evidence regarding the link between gut microbiota and the genesis or progression of various liver diseases. Finally, we summarise the recent research on plausible ways to modulate the gut microbiota to alter the natural history of liver disease.

Immunosuppression in Liver Transplant Recipients in the Setting of Sepsis.

Management of immunosuppression (IS) in liver transplant recipients in the setting of sepsis is an open stage for debate. The age-long practice of reduction or complete cessation of IS during sepsis has been followed by most centres across the world, although, their exact strategies are highly heterogeneous. On the other hand, the emergence of striking new evidence suggesting that there is, in fact, decreased mortality with the continuation of IS in sepsis, has raised doubts about our previously conceived intuitive notion that IS portends increased risk in sepsis. The theory postulated is that IS agents, perhaps reverse the state of dysregulated immune response in sepsis to that of an iatrogenically modulated immune response, thus dimming the inflammatory cascade and preventing its deleterious effects. Of note, none of these studies reported exaggerated rejection-related complications. These contrasting outlooks have made it rather onerous to formulate an evidence-based recommendation for liver transplant recipients afflicted with sepsis. Inclusion of transplanted patients in randomised controlled trials of sepsis-related interventions seems to be the need of the hour.

Pregnancy After Liver Transplantation: Outcomes From a Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Although much has been learnt regarding pregnancy after liver transplantation, data from India are scant. Hence, we evaluated the maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies after liver transplantation at our center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent liver transplantation and later conceived at our center between 2006 and 2019. RESULTS: Of the 750 liver transplantations performed at our center, 129 were female and 62 of them were in the childbearing age group (15-44 years). A total of seven conceptions occurred in seven patients during the study period. All the pregnancies occurred spontaneously. The median age of the patients at the time of liver transplantation and conception was 25 years (range, 24-33 years) and 29 years (range, 26-36 years), respectively. The median interval between transplantation and conception was 40 months (range, 7-48 months). All patients were on tacrolimus monotherapy. None of the patients had rejection during pregnancy despite a low median tacrolimus trough level of 2.7 ng/mL. Live birth (five cesarean and one normal) occurred in six of seven pregnancies at a median gestation age of 37.5 weeks. Mean birth weight was 3055.8 g (range, 2470-3635 g). Antenatal rubella infection and grade III intrauterine growth restriction resulting in still birth at 29 weeks occurred in one patient. The median postnatal follow-up was 25 months (range, 2-81 months). All babies and mothers were healthy. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy after liver transplantation has a favorable outcome with a multidisciplinary team approach. There is a physiological reduction of tacrolimus trough levels during pregnancy for which dose augmentation is not usually required.