Traumatic Rhabdomyolysis: Crush Syndrome, Compartment Syndrome, and the 'Found Down' Patient.

Traumatic rhabdomyolysis is a systemic manifestation of muscle injury and can occur from various traumatic etiologies, including crush syndrome (CrshS) and compartment syndrome (CS). Although historically described in natural disaster survivors trapped under collapsed structures, the frequency of CrshS has increased in the setting of 'found down' patients from opioid overdoses. Signs and symptoms of the injured limb in CrshS may range from pressure-induced skin changes to neurologic deficits and paralysis. Although its pathophysiology differs from CS, severe injuries may lead to an associated CS. Identifying CS in a patient with CrshS can be difficult but is important to distinguish because it affects treatment. The degree of muscle damage, viability of the remaining muscular compartment, and presence of elevated compartment pressures dictate the need for surgical intervention in the form of fasciotomy. Surgical outcomes from CrshS and delayed CS result in similar high morbidity and surgical complications. This review defines and classifies the types of traumatic rhabdomyolysis and summarizes the outcomes to facilitate timely diagnosis and appropriate management for this population to reduce morbidity associated with these conditions.

Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source for Patient Education on Dupuytren's Contracture.

Purpose: This study seeks to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on Dupuytren's contracture. Methods: The first 50 unique videos on Dupuytren's contracture were evaluated by searching YouTube for Dupuytren's contracture. Video metrics, source, and content type were recorded. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark criteria. Video educational quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and a Dupuytren's Contracture-Specific Score (DC-SS). Results: The total number of views for all 50 videos evaluated was 1,908,608 (mean, 38,172.16 ± 5,502.45 views). The mean reliability (JAMA) score was 2.21 ± 0.69 (range 0-4), the mean educational quality (GQS) score was 2.80 ± 1.28 (range 1-5), and the mean disease-specific (DC-SS) score was 6.05 ± 2.17 (range 0-15). Nonphysician health care professionals had the most popular videos, but the lowest DC-SS. GQS varied based on the video source, with physician-uploaded videos having the highest average quality scores. Physician source was an independent positive predictor of higher quality (GQS) (ß = 0.477). Conclusions: Videos on Dupuytren's contracture were frequently viewed on YouTube but had overall low educational quality and reliability. Of the videos that discussed collagenase as a treatment option, 40% failed to mention percutaneous needle aponeurotomy. Patients may be exposed to an incomplete set of treatment options. Educational content on YouTube should be interpreted cautiously and proper in-office education and high-quality resources for Dupuytren's contracture should be provided by physicians. Type of Study/Level of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Analysis of variability and trends in medical school clerkship grades.

Background: Medical school clerkship grades are used to evaluate orthopedic surgery residency applicants, however, high interinstitutional variability in grade distribution calls into question the utility of clerkship grades when evaluating applicants from different medical schools. This study aims to evaluate the variability in grade distribution among medical schools and look for trends in grade distribution over recent years. Methods: Applications submitted to Rush University's orthopedic surgery residency program from 2015, 2019, and 2022 were collected from the Electronic Residency Application Service. Applications from the top 100 schools according to the 2023-2024 U.S. News and World Report Research Rankings were reviewed. The percentage of "honors" grades awarded by medical schools for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships were extracted from applicants' Medical Student Performance Evaluation letters. Results: The median percentage of honors given in 2022 was 36.0 % (range 10.0-82.0) for the surgery clerkship and 33.0 % (range 6.7-80.0) for the internal medicine clerkship. Honors were given 6.6 % more in the surgery clerkship in 2022 compared to 2015. There was a negative correlation between a higher (worse) U.S. News and World Report research ranking and the percentage of honors awarded in 2022 for the surgery and internal medicine clerkships. Conclusion: There is substantial interinstitutional variability in the rate that medical schools award an "honors" grade with evidence of grade inflation in the surgery clerkship. Residency programs using clerkship grades to compare applicants should do so cautiously provided the variability demonstrated in this study.

Outcomes of upper extremity sensory neuromas treated with excision and burial.

Background: Upper extremity sensory neuromas can be extremely debilitating leading to pain and dysfunction. Surgical management of neuromas can either be ablative or reconstructive. The primary aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of surgically treated sensory neuromas within the forearm, wrist, and hand with exclusion of digital neuromas. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients surgically treated for an upper extremity sensory neuroma from a multi-surgeon, single institution database. The types of neuroma, mechanism of injury and the surgical technique utilized for treatment were documented. Patient reported outcomes were collected including resolution of symptoms, pain scores, complications, and need for revision surgery. Averages and proportions were used for analysis. Results: 79 patients were included with mean age of 42.3 years and an average follow-up of 6.7 months. The types of sensory neuromas included 23 dorsal radial sensory, 21 medial antebrachial cutaneous, 15 palmar cutaneous, and 14 dorsal ulnar sensory. Single isolated cases of neuromas were more common (94.9%) than multiple neuromas (5.1%). 67.1% (53/79) of patients experienced pain or hypersensitivity with a mean improvement of 2.0 in the visual analog scale (VAS) following surgery. 6.3% (5/79) required revision surgery, and 82% returned to work in some capacity. Conclusion: Surgical excision of neuroma and burial into local surrounding tissue can be safely performed with a relatively low reoperation rate. 80% of patients had full resolution or improvement in their symptoms.

Recalcitrant Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review on Current Nonoperative and Operative Treatment Modalities.

BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylitis is a common cause of elbow pain that is generally self-limiting. For patients who have persistent symptoms refractory to conservative treatment, there is still no clear consensus on the most favorable treatment modality. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the available literature regarding both nonoperative and operative treatment modalities for recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis (RLE) to provide insight into the efficacy of treatment options. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, where the PubMed, MEDLINE/Ovid, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were queried to identify studies evaluating treatment options for RLE. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies with 1,958 patients were included. Of the reviewed studies, there were a wide variety of treatments including platelet-rich plasma injections, percutaneous tenotomies, and various arthroscopic and open procedures. CONCLUSION: There are a wide variety of treatment modalities available for RLE that have promising efficacy in the short, medium, and long terms. A comprehensive approach combining evidence-based and patient-centered care is critical for effective management of refractory symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Opening Wedge Osteotomy for the Treatment of Pediatric Radial Neck Malunion and Anterior Radiocapitellar Dislocation: A Case Report.

Radial neck fractures are common injuries of the elbow in the pediatric patient. Surgical intervention is recommended for significant angulation and displacement or mechanical blocks to motion. Radial neck malunion is a rare complication and may result in altered joint mechanics and, if severe, joint incongruency. Dislocation of the radial head has yet to be reported in this population after radial neck malunion. Treatment for radial neck malunions with dislocation varies and can include radial head excision or radial neck osteotomy. Outcomes after radial neck osteotomy is limited to case reports and small cases series. We present a case report of pediatric patient with radial neck malunion and anterior radiocapitellar dislocation treated with joint realignment via opening wedge osteotomy. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a pediatric case with radial head dislocation secondary to neck malunion and the first described report using this technique.

Patient-Directed Online Education for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Release: Analysis of What Patients Ask and Quality of Resources.

Purpose: This study classifies common questions searched by patients from the Google search engine and categorizes the types and quality of online education resources used by patients regarding carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and carpal tunnel release (CTR). Methods: Google's results were extracted and compiled using the "People also ask" function for frequent questions and associated web pages for CTS and CTR. Questions were categorized using Rothwell's classification with further topic subcategorization. Web pages were evaluated by using Journal of the American Medical Association Benchmark Criteria for source quality. Results: Of the 600 questions evaluated, "How do I know if I have carpal tunnel or tendonitis?" and "What causes carpal tunnel to flare up?" were the most commonly investigated questions for CTS. For CTR, frequent questions investigated included "How long after hand surgery can I drive" and "How do you wipe after carpal tunnel surgery." The most common questions for CTS by Rothwell classification were policy (51%), fact (41%), and value (8%) with the highest subcategories being indications/management (46%) and technical details (27%). For CTR, the most common questions entailed fact (54%), policy (34%), and value (11%) with the highest subcategories as technical details (31%) and indications/management (26%). The most common web pages were academic and medical practice. The mean Journal of the American Medical Association score for all 600 web pages was 1.43, with journals (mean = 3.91) having the highest score and legal (mean = 0.52) and single surgeon practice websites (mean = 0.28) having the lowest scores. Conclusions: Patients frequently inquire online about etiology, precipitating factors, diagnostic criteria, and activity restrictions regarding CTS/CTR. Overall, the quality of online resources for this topic was poor, especially from single surgeon practices and legal websites. Clinical relevance: Understanding the type and quality of information patients are accessing assists physicians in tailoring counseling to patient concerns and facilitates informed decision-making regarding CTS/CTR as well as guiding patients to high-quality online searches.