Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 17(1): 260, 2017 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28403857

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast carcinogenesis is a multistep process involving genetic and epigenetic changes. Tumor tissues are frequently characterized by gene-specific hypermethylation and global DNA hypomethylation. Aberrant DNA methylation levels have, however, not only been found in tumors, but also in tumor-surrounding tissue appearing histologically normal. This phenomenon is called field cancerization. Knowledge of the existence of a cancer field and its spread are of clinical relevance. If the tissue showing pre-neoplastic lesions is not removed by surgery, it may develop into invasive carcinoma. METHODS: We investigated the prevalence of gene-specific and global DNA methylation changes in tumor-adjacent and tumor-distant tissues in comparison to tumor tissues from the same breast cancer patients (n = 18) and normal breast tissues from healthy women (n = 4). Methylation-sensitive high resolution melting (MS-HRM) analysis was applied to determine methylation levels in the promoters of APC, BRCA1, CDKN2A (p16), ESR1, HER2/neu and PTEN, in CDKN2A exon 2 and in LINE-1, as indicator for the global DNA methylation extent. The methylation status of the ESR2 promoter was determined by pyrosequencing. RESULTS: Tumor-adjacent and tumor-distant tissues frequently showed pre-neoplastic gene-specific and global DNA methylation changes. The APC promoter (p = 0.003) and exon 2 of CDKN2A (p < 0.001) were significantly higher methylated in tumors than in normal breast tissues from healthy women. For both regions, significant differences were also found between tumor and tumor-adjacent tissues (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and tumor and tumor-distant tissues (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) from breast cancer patients. In addition, tumor-adjacent (p = 0.002) and tumor-distant tissues (p = 0.005) showed significantly higher methylation levels of CDKN2A exon 2 than normal breast tissues serving as control. Significant correlations were found between the proliferative activity and the methylation status of CDKN2A exon 2 in tumor (r = -0.485, p = 0.041) and tumor-distant tissues (r = -0.498, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: From our results we can conclude that methylation changes in CDKN2A exon 2 are associated with breast carcinogenesis. Further investigations are, however, necessary to confirm that hypermethylation of CDKN2A exon 2 is associated with tumor proliferative activity.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p18/genetics , DNA Methylation , Estrogen Receptor beta/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Adult , Aged , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 , Epigenesis, Genetic , Exons , Female , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , Middle Aged , Promoter Regions, Genetic
2.
Amino Acids ; 49(1): 117-127, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27714514

ABSTRACT

AMPA receptors mediate most fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain. Highly dynamic AMPA receptors are subjected to trafficking, recycling, and/or degradation and replacement. Changes in AMPA receptor abundance is an important mechanism involved in learning and memory formation. Results obtained with the Morris water maze (MWM), a paradigm for testing spatial memory in rodent, correlate with hippocampal synaptic plasticity and NMDA function. Different phases of spatial learning like acquisition and retrieval involve AMPA receptors. Long-term memory formation requires dynamic changes in gene transcription and protein synthesis. It is, however, not known so far if epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and mRNA levels participate in regulation of AMPA receptors in hippocampus during memory retrieval. In the present study, rats were trained or untrained in the MWM. Steady state levels of hippocampal GluA1-4 mRNA were determined by RT-PCR and promoter methylation levels of GluA1-4 by in-house developed bisulfite pyrosequencing methods. GluA1-4 protein levels were determined in parallel in a membrane fraction by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting. Our results indicate that changes of hippocampal membrane AMPA receptors were modulated at the protein level, while no changes were observed at the mRNA and at the promoter methylation level of hippocampal GluA1-4. Training in the MWM at retrieval may, therefore, involve GluA2 and GluA4 subunits that may be regulated by protein stability or trafficking as protein determinations were carried out in a hippocampal membrane fraction.


Subject(s)
Epigenesis, Genetic , Hippocampus/metabolism , Maze Learning/physiology , Memory/physiology , Protein Isoforms/genetics , Receptors, AMPA/genetics , Animals , DNA Methylation , Male , Neuronal Plasticity , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptors, AMPA/metabolism , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Synaptic Transmission
3.
Breast Cancer Res ; 17: 125, 2015 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26370119

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown in some articles that genetic and epigenetic abnormalities cannot only be found in tumor tissues but also in adjacent regions that appear histologically normal. This phenomenon is metaphorically called field cancerization or field defect. Field cancerization is regarded as clinically significant because it is assumed to be an important factor in local recurrence of cancer. As the field showing these molecular abnormalities may not be removed completely by surgery, these changes might lead to neoplasms and subsequent transformation to a tumor. We aimed to investigate the applicability of the methylation status of six tumor suppressor genes as biomarkers for detecting field cancerization in breast cancer. METHODS: The promoter methylation status of CCND2, DAPK1, GSTP1, HIN-1, MGMT and RASSF1A was determined by methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) analysis. MS-HRM methods for CCND2, MGMT and RASSF1A were developed in-house, primer sequences for DAPK1, GSTP1 and HIN-1 have already been published. Biopsy samples were taken from tumor, tumor-adjacent and tumor-distant tissue from 17 breast cancer patients. Normal breast tissues of four healthy women served as controls. RESULTS: All MS-HRM methods proved to be very sensitive. LODs were in the range from 0.1 to 1.5 %, LOQs ranged from 0.3 to 5.3 %. A total of 94 %, 82 % and 65 % of the tumors showed methylation of RASSF1A, HIN-1 and MGMT promoters, respectively. The methylation status of these promoters was significantly lower in tumor-distant tissues than in tumor tissues. Tumor-adjacent tissues showed higher methylation status of RASSF1A, HIN-1 and MGMT promoters than tumor-distant tissues, indicating field cancerization. The methylation status of the HIN-1 promoter in tumor-adjacent tissues was found to correlate strongly with that in the corresponding tumors (r = 0.785, p < 0.001), but not with that in the corresponding tumor-distant tissues (r = 0.312, p = 0.239). CONCLUSIONS: Among the gene promoters investigated, the methylation status of the HIN-1 promoter can be considered the best suitable biomarker for detecting field cancerization. Further investigation is needed to test whether it can be used for defining surgical margins in order to prevent future recurrence of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cytokines/genetics , DNA Methylation/genetics , DNA Modification Methylases/genetics , DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Adult , Aged , Biopsy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cyclin D2/genetics , Death-Associated Protein Kinases/genetics , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Female , Glutathione S-Transferase pi/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
4.
Oncotarget ; 7(45): 73347-73369, 2016 Nov 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27689338

ABSTRACT

Overexpression of ABCB1, ABCC1 and ABCG2 in tumor tissues is considered a major cause of limited efficacy of anticancer drugs. Gene expression of ABC transporters is regulated by multiple mechanisms, including changes in the DNA methylation status. Most of the studies published so far only report promoter methylation levels for either ABCB1 or ABCG2, and data on the methylation status for ABCC1 are scarce. Thus, we determined the promoter methylation patterns of ABCB1, ABCC1 and ABCG2 in 19 human cancer cell lines. In order to contribute to the elucidation of the role of DNA methylation changes in acquisition of a multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype, we also analyzed the promoter methylation patterns in drug-resistant sublines of the cancer cell lines GLC-4, SW1573, KB-3-1 and HL-60. In addition, we investigated if aberrant promoter methylation levels of ABCB1, ABCC1 and ABCG2 occur in tumor and tumor-surrounding tissues from breast cancer patients.Our data indicates that hypomethylation of the ABCC1 promoter is not cancer type-specific but occurs in cancer cell lines of different origins. Promoter methylation was found to be an important mechanism in gene regulation of ABCB1 in parental cancer cell lines and their drug-resistant sublines. Overexpression of ABCC1 in MDR cell models turned out to be mediated by gene amplification, not by changes in the promoter methylation status of ABCC1. In contrast to the promoters of ABCC1 and ABCG2, the promoter of ABCB1 was significantly higher methylated in tumor tissues than in tumor-adjacent and tumor-distant tissues from breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Methylation , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/genetics , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , CpG Islands , DNA Copy Number Variations , Drug Resistance, Multiple/genetics , Female , Gene Expression , Humans , Middle Aged , Pharmacogenomic Variants , Reproducibility of Results , Sequence Analysis, DNA
5.
Oncotarget ; 7(19): 27379-93, 2016 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27036042

ABSTRACT

As an environmental poison, arsenic is responsible for many cancer deaths. Paradoxically, arsenic trioxide (ATO) presents also a powerful therapy used to treat refractory acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and is intensively investigated for treatment of other cancer types. Noteworthy, cancer therapy is frequently hampered by drug resistance, which is also often associated with enhancement of tumor aggressiveness. In this study, we analyzed ATO-selected cancer cells (A2780ATO) for the mechanisms underlying their enhanced tumorigenicity and aggressiveness. These cells were characterized by enhanced proliferation and spheroid growth as well as increased tumorigenicity of xenografts in SCID mice. Noteworthy, subsequent studies revealed that overexpression of Met receptor was the underlying oncogenic driver of these effects, as A2780ATO cells were characterized by collateral sensitivity against Met inhibitors. This finding was also confirmed by array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) and whole genome gene expression arrays, which revealed that Met overexpression by chronic ATO exposure was based on the transcriptional regulation via activation of AP-1. Finally, it was shown that treatment with the Met inhibitor crizotinib was also effective against A2780ATO cell xenografts in vivo, indicating that targeting of Met presents a promising strategy for the treatment of Met-overexpressing tumors after either arsenic exposure or failure to ATO treatment.


Subject(s)
Arsenicals/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , Oxides/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/genetics , Animals , Arsenic Trioxide , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Crizotinib , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , HCT116 Cells , Humans , Mice, SCID , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/metabolism , Pyrazoles/pharmacology , Pyridines/pharmacology , RNA Interference , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays/methods
6.
Oncotarget ; 7(31): 50161-50179, 2016 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27367030

ABSTRACT

Genomically amplified fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) is an oncogenic driver in defined lung cancer subgroups and predicts sensibility against FGFR1 inhibitors in this patient cohort. The FGFR inhibitor nintedanib has recently been approved for treatment of lung adenocarcinoma and is currently evaluated for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, tumor recurrence due to development of nintedanib resistance might occur. Hence, we aimed at characterizing the molecular mechanisms underlying acquired nintedanib resistance in FGFR1-driven lung cancer. Chronic nintedanib exposure of the FGFR1-driven SCLC cell line DMS114 (DMS114/NIN) but not of two NSCLC cell lines induced massive overexpression of the multidrug-resistance transporter ABCB1. Indeed, we proved nintedanib to be both substrate and modulator of ABCB1-mediated efflux. Importantly, the oncogenic FGFR1 signaling axis remained active in DMS114/NIN cells while bioinformatic analyses suggested hyperactivation of the endothelin-A receptor (ETAR) signaling axis. Indeed, ETAR inhibition resensitized DMS114/NIN cells against nintedanib by downregulation of ABCB1 expression. PKC and downstream NFκB were identified as major downstream players in ETAR-mediated ABCB1 hyperactivation. Summarizing, ABCB1 needs to be considered as a factor underlying nintedanib resistance. Combination approaches with ETAR antagonists or switching to non-ABCB1 substrate FGFR inhibitors represent innovative strategies to manage nintedanib resistance in lung cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Indoles/pharmacology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/metabolism , Receptors, Endothelin/metabolism , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Separation , Cell Survival , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , DNA Methylation , Flow Cytometry , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Phenotype , Signal Transduction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL