Prevention of allergic reactions during oxaliplatin desensitization through inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase.

BACKGROUND: Acute infusion reactions to oxaliplatin, a chemotherapeutic used to treat gastrointestinal cancers, are observed in about 20% of patients. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) protocols often allow the continuation of oxaliplatin in patients with no alternative options. Breakthrough symptoms, including anaphylaxis, can still occur during RDD. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate whether pretreatment with acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can prevent anaphylaxis during RDD in a patient sensitized to oxaliplatin. METHODS: A 52-year-old male with locally advanced gastric carcinoma developed anaphylaxis during his fifth cycle of oxaliplatin. As he required 6 additional cycles to complete his curative-intent treatment regimen, he underwent RDD to oxaliplatin but still developed severe acute reactions. The risks and benefits of adding acalabrutinib before and during RDD were reviewed, and the patient elected to proceed. RESULTS: With acalabrutinib taken before and during the RDD, the patient was able to tolerate oxaliplatin RDD without complication. Consistent with its mechanism of action, acalabrutinib completely blocked the patient's positive skin prick response to oxaliplatin. Acalabrutinib did not alter the percentage of circulating basophils (1.24% vs 0.98%) before the RDD but did protect against basopenia (0.74% vs 0.09%) after the RDD. Acalabrutinib was associated with a drastic reduction in the ability of basophils to upregulate CD63 in vitro following incubation with oxaliplatin (0.11% vs 2.38%) or polyclonal anti-human IgE antibody (0.08% vs 44.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Five doses of acalabrutinib, 100 mg, orally twice daily starting during the evening 2 days before and continuing through RDD allowed a sensitized patient to receive oxaliplatin successfully and safely.

Single cell RNA sequencing of human eosinophils from nasal polyps reveals eosinophil heterogeneity in chronic rhinosinusitis tissue.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is characterized by type 2 inflammation in the United States, but the actual roles that eosinophils play in CRSwNP remain largely unclear. OBJECTIVE: To reveal the roles and heterogeneity of eosinophils in nasal polyp (NP) tissue, we performed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) analysis of NP tissue. METHODS: Sinonasal tissues (NP and control sinus tissue) and patient matched peripheral blood (PB) samples were obtained from 5 control patients and 5 patients with CRSwNP. Eosinophils were enriched before processing for scRNA-Seq. The gene expression profiles in eosinophils were determined by microwell-based scRNA-Seq technology (BD Rhapsody platform). We predicted the overall function of NP eosinophils by Gene Ontology (geneontology.org) enrichment and pathway analyses and confirmed expression of selected genes by flow cytometry. RESULTS: After filtering out contaminating cells, we detected 5,542 eosinophils from control PB, 3,883 eosinophils from CRSwNP PB, 101 eosinophils from control sinus tissues (not included in further analyses), and 9,727 eosinophils from NPs by scRNA-Seq. We found that 204 genes were downregulated and 354 genes upregulated in NP eosinophils compared to all PB eosinophils (>1.5-fold, Padj < .05). Upregulated genes in NP eosinophils were associated with activation, cytokine-mediated signaling, growth factor activity, NF-κB signaling, and antiapoptotic molecules. NP eosinophils displayed 4 clusters revealing potential heterogeneity of eosinophils in NP tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated eosinophils in NP tissue appear to exist in several subtypes that may play important pathogenic roles in CRSwNP, in part by controlling inflammation and hyperproliferation of other cells.

IL-13 and IL-13-induced periostin levels are specifically decreased in patients following endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 (T2) inflammation plays a pathogenic role in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The effects of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on T2 inflammation are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare T2 inflammatory biomarkers from middle meatal (MM) mucus for distinguishing patients with CRS from CRS-free patients, identifying major phenotypes (CRS without nasal polyps [CRSsNP] and CRS with nasal polyps [CRSwNP]), assessing endotypic change, and establishing cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes in patients undergoing ESS. METHODS: MM mucus samples were collected from patients with CRSsNP and patients with CRSwNP before and 6 to 12 months after ESS and compared with samples from CRS-free control patients. T2 biomarkers were evaluated both continuously and using threshold-based definitions of T2 endotype to identify relationships with patient-reported (based on the 22-Item Sinonasal Outcomes Test and Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patient-Reported Outcomes Measure) and clinician-reported (radiographic and endoscopic) severity. Linear mixed models were developed to analyze clinical variables associated with T2 biomarker levels. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients with CRS (89 with CRSsNP and 65 with CRSwNP) were enrolled, with a mean interval of 9 months between ESS and follow-up. An analysis of pre-ESS MM mucus samples revealed elevated levels of T2 mediators in patients with CRSwNP versus in patients with CRSsNP and CRS-free controls. Temporally stable correlations between levels of IL-13 and IL-5, levels of periostin and complement 5a, and levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eotaxin-3 were observed. On this basis and on the basis of pathologic significance, levels of IL-13, periostin and ECP were further analyzed. After ESS, levels of IL-13 and periostin decreased significantly, whereas ECP levels remained unchanged. Across pre- and post-ESS evaluation, the T2 endotype was associated with radiographic severity but did not predict outcomes. CRSwNP status and African American race were associated with higher levels of IL-13 and periostin, whereas ECP level was higher in patients undergoing extensive surgery. CONCLUSION: ESS decreased levels of IL-13 and periostin in the middle meatus. T2 inflammation after ESS was correlated with patient- and clinician-reported severity across phenotypes. Pre-ESS T2 inflammation did not predict post-ESS outcomes.

Consultation for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma: clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and treatment options.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the sinonasal mucosa, affects over 12% of the US population, and costs over $20 billion annually. CRS can be divided into two major phenotypes based on whether nasal polyps are present (CRSwNP) or absent (CRSsNP). This grand rounds review will discuss the clinical approach to patients with CRSwNP, including typical presentations, work-up, and currently available treatment options. Tools that physicians can utilize to assess subjective sinonasal symptoms, as well as objective measures of disease, will be reviewed. Additional focus will be on recognizing clinical comorbidities commonly associated with CRSwNP, including asthma, bronchiectasis, allergic rhinitis, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD). Clinical outcomes can be improved by providing a comprehensive approach to evaluating (and managing) patients with CRSwNP.

Associations between chronic rhinosinusitis and the development of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown an association between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if CRS increases the risk of developing non-CF bronchiectasis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing electronic medical records from an academic center. Patients with CRS without bronchiectasis, with at least one chest computed tomography (CT) performed after the diagnosis of CRS, were identified between January 2006 and December 2015. Charts were reviewed until May 2022. The control group was age, sex, and race matched, and included patients without CRS, asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who had at least one chest CT. Bronchiectasis was identified by chest CT radiology reports. The odds of developing bronchiectasis were analyzed in patients with CRS without asthma or COPD (Cohort 1) and patients with CRS with asthma or COPD (Cohort 2). RESULTS: The odds of developing bronchiectasis were significantly higher in patients with CRS (139/1594, 8.7%) compared to patients in the control group (443/7992 [5.5%], OR 1.63 [1.34-1.99]). Furthermore, the odds of developing bronchiectasis were higher in Cohort 1 (63/863 [7.3%], OR 1.34 [1.02-1.76]) and Cohort 2 (76/731 [10.4%], OR 1.98 [1.53-2.55]) versus the control group. After adjusting for confounding diseases, the association was attenuated in Cohort 1 (OR 1.22 [0.92-1.61]) but remained significant in Cohort 2 (OR 1.78 [1.37-2.31]). CONCLUSIONS: CRS is associated with the future development of non-CF bronchiectasis. Patients with CRS, especially those with asthma or COPD, have a higher likelihood of developing bronchiectasis than patients without CRS.