Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
BMC Med Educ ; 23(1): 350, 2023 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to the rarity of shoulder dystocia, an obstetric emergency, it is difficult even for experts to develop the appropriate routine in this emergency. Regular further training is therefore recommended for obstetricians and midwives. Evidence is lacking on the extent to which e-learning as a teaching method can be successfully used to acquire these skills and put them into practice. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how the learning objectives for shoulder dystocia, listed in the National Competence Based Learning Objectives Catalog for Medicine (NKLM, Germany) can be successfully taught in medical studies using a blended learning concept (e-learning and practical application on a birth simulator). METHODS: After completing an e-learning course, final year medical students and midwife trainees demonstrated their action competence for shoulder dystocia procedure on a birth simulator. This transfer of the theoretical knowledge to the case study was assessed using an evaluation form oriented to the recommendations for action. RESULTS: One hundred sixty medical students and 14 midwifery trainees participated in the study from April to July 2019. Overall, 95.9% of the study participants met the required standards, i.e. achieved very good to adequate performance (Ø good) in simulation training. CONCLUSIONS: E-learning with annotated high-quality learning videos is an excellent way to transfer theoretical knowledge about shoulder dystocia procedures into medical practice on a birth simulator. The learning objectives required by the NKLM for shoulder dystocia can be successfully conveyed to students via the applied blended learning concept.


Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction , Dystocia , Shoulder Dystocia , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Delivery, Obstetric/education , Emergencies , Clinical Competence , Dystocia/diagnosis , Dystocia/therapy , Emergency Treatment , Shoulder
2.
Gesundheitswesen ; 85(2): 119-122, 2023 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35338477

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to investigate the opportunities and challenges of using video online seminars (VOS) in the clinical phase of medical studies from the perspective of teachers and students. METHODOLOGY: Teachers and medical students from the 5th to the 10th semester completed questionnaires about their attitudes towards and experiences with VOS. Recommended procedures for VOS were derived from the results. RESULTS: A total of 19 teachers and 108 students participated in this study; 67% of students found VOS helpful in the clinical phase of the degree course. Cognitive learning objectives (91% agreement) should be taught more often in the VOS format than affective learning objectives (71% agreement). However, 83% stated that VOS did not prepare them for future practical activities. Teachers indicated that cognitive (77% agreement) could be significantly better communicated than affective learning objectives (only 27% agreement). For two-thirds of the teachers, support or trainings were important. Good technical conditions were important for both groups. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the option of individual learning regardless of location to be an advantage of VOS. A teaching format is considered to be particularly useful if successful interaction between teacher and student takes place. In the context of blended learning concepts with preceding lectures and subsequent practical exercises, the learning success of VOS is greatest. Cognitive and some affective learning objectives can be achieved by this method. VOS can prepare for practical exercises, but they are not suitable in medical education for comprehensive teaching of practical learning objectives.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical , Students, Medical , Humans , Germany , Learning , Educational Measurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL