Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Vitamin D deficiency is a common nutritional problem worldwide that may have worsened during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The present study sought to examine the prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency among healthcare workers three years after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Participants comprised 2543 staff members from a medical research institute, who completed a questionnaire and donated blood samples in June 2023. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels were measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval while adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The proportions of participants with vitamin D insufficiency (25[OH]D 20-29 ng/mL) and deficiency (25[OH]D < 20 ng/mL) were 44.9% and 45.9%, respectively. In a multivariable-adjusted model, factors associated with a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency included younger age, female sex, fewer hours of daytime outdoor physical activity during leisure time (without regular use of sunscreen), lower intake of fatty fish, no use of vitamin D supplements, smoking, and no alcohol consumption. Occupational factors, including shift work, were not independently associated with vitamin D deficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency are highly prevalent among healthcare workers. Health education regarding lifestyle modifications for this occupational group are warranted to improve their vitamin D status in the COVID-19 era.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vitamin D Deficiency , Animals , Humans , Female , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin D , Vitamins , Health PersonnelABSTRACT
Delays in clearance and rapid evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been reported in immunocompromised patients. We encountered a case of recurrent, multi-mutational SARS-CoV-2 infection in a 40-year-old man with severe immunodeficiency due to Good syndrome. The patient had not received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In August 2021, he was first admitted to the hospital owing to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and was administered dexamethasone, remdesivir, and baricitinib. Although his fever and respiratory condition improved once, chest computed tomography (CT) revealed extensive diffuse consolidation and ground-glass opacities (GGOs), and both methylprednisolone pulse therapy and tocilizumab yielded a limited effect. After a third course of remdesivir without immunosuppressants or steroids, the patient recovered, and he tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. On day 272 since the clinical onset, he was readmitted with dyspnea and mild fever due to a COVID-19 recurrence. He was infected with the Delta variant (AY.29), despite the Omicron (BA.2) variant being predominant at that time. During this admission, additional remdesivir and casirivimab/imdevimab yielded marked effects, and the SARS-CoV-2 quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) tests rapidly returned negative. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated the accumulation of mutations, including those yielding remdesivir resistance, throughout the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Appropriate use of antivirals and monoclonal antibodies may aid in the recovery of patients with COVID-19 and immunodeficiency and in preventing the emergence of multi-mutational SARS-CoV-2 variants.
ABSTRACT
With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is growing interest in utilizing adaptive platform clinical trials (APTs), in which multiple drugs are compared with a single common control group, such as a placebo or standard-of-care group. APTs evaluate several drugs for one disease and accept additions or exclusions of drugs as the trials progress; however, little is known about the efficiency of APTs over multiple stand-alone trials. In this study, we simulated the total development period, total sample size, and statistical operating characteristics of APTs and multiple stand-alone trials in drug development settings for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Simulation studies using selected scenarios reconfirmed several findings regarding the efficiency of APTs. The APTs without staggered addition of drugs showed a shorter total development period than stand-alone trials, but the difference rapidly diminished if patient's enrollment was accelerated during the trials owing to the spread of infection. APTs with staggered addition of drugs still have the possibility of reducing the total development period compared with multiple stand-alone trials in some cases. Our study demonstrated that APTs could improve efficiency relative to multiple stand-alone trials regarding the total development period and total sample size without undermining statistical validity; however, this improvement varies depending on the speed of patient enrollment, sample size, presence/absence of family-wise error rate adjustment, allocation ratio between drug and placebo groups, and interval of staggered addition of drugs. Given the complexity of planning and implementing APT, the decision to implement APT during a pandemic must be made carefully.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Computer Simulation , Drug Development , Humans , Drug Development/methods , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sample Size , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic , Research DesignABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in saliva samples treated with a guanidine-based or guanidine-free inactivator, using nasopharyngeal swab samples (NPS) as referents. Based on the NPS reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results, participants were classified as with or without COVID-19. Fifty sets of samples comprising NPS, self-collected raw saliva, and saliva with a guanidine-based, and guanidine-free inactivator were collected from each group. In patients with COVID-19, the sensitivity of direct RT-PCR using raw saliva and saliva treated with a guanidine-based and guanidine-free inactivator was 100.0%, 65.9%, and 82.9%, respectively, with corresponding concordance rates of 94.3% (κ=88.5), 82.8% (κ=64.8), and 92.0% (κ=83.7). Among patients with a PCR Ct value of <30 in the NPS sample, the positive predictive value for the three samples was 100.0%, 80.0%, and 96.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection was lower in inactivated saliva than in raw saliva and lower in samples treated with a guanidine-based than with a guanidine-free inactivator. However, in individuals contributing to infection spread, inactivated saliva showed adequate accuracy regardless of the inactivator used. Inactivators can be added to saliva samples collected for RT-PCR to reduce viral transmission risk while maintaining adequate diagnostic accuracy.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Guanidine , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , RNA, Viral/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcription , Saliva , COVID-19/diagnosis , Guanidines , Nasopharynx , Specimen Handling , COVID-19 TestingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vaccination against mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), is needed to prevent outbreaks and consequent public health concerns. The LC16m8 vaccine, a dried cell-cultured proliferative live attenuated vaccinia virusbased vaccine, was approved in Japan against smallpox and mpox. However, its immunogenicity and efficacy against MPXV have not been fully assessed. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of LC16m8 against MPXV in healthy adults. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm study that included 50 participants who were followed up for 168 days postvaccination. The primary end point was the neutralizing antibody seroconversion rate against MPXVs, including the Zr599 and Liberia strains, on day 28. The secondary end points included the vaccine "take" (major cutaneous reaction) rate, neutralizing titer kinetics against MPXV and vaccinia virus (LC16m8) strains, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Seroconversion rates on day 28 were 72% (36 of 50), 70% (35 of 50), and 88% (44 of 50) against the Zr599 strain, the Liberia strain, and LC16m8, respectively. On day 168, seroconversion rates decreased to 30% (15 of 50) against the Zr599 and Liberia strains and to 76% (38 of 50) against LC16m8. The vaccine "take" (broad definition) rate on day 14 was 94% (46 of 49). Adverse events (AEs), including common solicited cutaneous reactions, occurred in 98% (45 of 48) of participants; grade 3 severity AEs occurred in 16% (8 of 50). No deaths, serious AEs, or mpox onset incidences were observed up to day 168. CONCLUSIONS: The LC16m8 vaccine generated neutralizing antibody responses against MPXV in healthy adults. No serious safety concerns occurred with LC16m8 use. (Funded by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials number, jRCTs031220171.)