[Questionnaire Survey on Oral Care and Oral Troubles for Patients with Gastric Cancer Received Chemotherapy].

BACKGROUND: The actual situation of oral care and oral troubles for patients with gastric cancer received chemotherapy is not clear. METHODS: Questionnaire survey in the form of oral questions was performed for patients with gastric cancer who received chemotherapy from December 2021 to February 2022. The relevance between the survey results and background factors was examined using the χ2 test. RESULTS: We performed the questionnaire survey for 36 patients. Of the 36 patients, 29 patients received dental check-up before starting chemotherapy. Fourteen of the 29 patients(48%)continued the dental check-up. Of 14 patients who continued the dental check-up, 9 patients were 65 years or older, while 14 of 15 patients who discontinued the dental check-up were 65 years or older. Continuity of dental check-up was low among the elderly patients. The rate of dysgeusia were 78 vs 30% in the patients who adopted and who did not adopt oral care other than toothbrushing(p=0.01). The frequency of oral troubles was dysgeusia(47%), stomatitis(42%), and dry mouth(36%). The severity of the oral troubles was, in order, dysgeusia, dry mouth, and pain. The most common side effect due to chemotherapy causing decreased food intake was dysgeusia. CONCLUSIONS: Dysgeusia was the most frequent and severe oral trouble.

[Regimen Selection by Narrative Approach in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer-Paclitaxel or Nab-Paclitaxel?]

BACKGROUND: According to the sixth Gastric Cancer Treatment Guideline, the regimen included nab-paclitaxel(nab-PTX) is a conditional recommendation as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. However, the selection criteria of nab-PTX is not clear. METHOD: Questionnaire survey as narrative approach on the problems of paclitaxel premedication, the symptoms due to paclitaxel containing alcohol, and infusion time was conducted for patients who had been treated with paclitaxel. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients answered the questionnaire. Nonelderly patients(<65 years)or patients without comorbid medications complained of dissatisfaction with the inconvenience due to premedication significantly more than elderly patients(≥65 years)or patients with comorbid medications. Females or nonelderly patients were significantly more troubled by sleepiness due to premedication than males or elderly patients. Eight out of 11 patients who had visited hospital by driving a car for first-line treatment were troubled by prohibition of driving on the day of treatment. Thirty out of 36 patients answered that they would feel benefits from 30-minutes shortening of infusion time. CONCLUSION: Questionnaire survey suggests that we may select the patients for nab-PTX properly by clarifying the inconvenience of daily life associated with premedication, the way of transportation for visiting hospital, and the benefits by shortening of infusion time.

[A Case of 30s Female with Advanced Anal Canal Adenocarcinoma Managed with Adolescent-And-Young-Adult Team].

A 30s female complaining of anal pain and melena was referred to our hospital. The support by adolescent-and-young- adult(AYA)team was initiated after the first encounter. Colonoscopic examination revealed an ulcerated tumor on the anterior wall of anal canal with its anal margin on anal verge and the tumor was diagnosed as an adenocarcinoma. Contrast- enhanced CT and MRI revealed adjacency of tumor and vagina, enlarged lymph nodes and multiple pulmonary nodules. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose(FDG)-positron emission tomography(PET)additionally revealed tracer accumulation in left sciatica, which led us to the diagnosis of advanced anal cancer. We planned and safely performed concomitant partial vaginal resection in robot-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for the palliative purpose after discussion on physical and psychosocial issues including stoma and fertility with the patient, her family and AYA members. The pathological diagnosis was pT4b(vagina)N1aM1b, pStage ⅣB, and the local margin was pathologically negative. The postoperative course was smooth and she was discharged on postoperative day 16. Fifty one days after operation, she started systemic chemotherapy after decision on not to take ovarian samples and continues systemic chemotherapy as of writing. Support by AYA team was effective to facilitate the patient's decision-making and the communication between the patient and the medical team.

[A Case of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Which Was Diagnosed during the Best Supportive Care of Recurrent Ascending Colon Cancer].

A 70s male, who had undergone single-incision laparoscopic ileocecal resection for ascending colon cancer with pathological diagnosis of T3N3M0, Stage Ⅲc(without adjuvant chemotherapy), had enhanced-computed tomography(CT)for 3-month follow-up and a hepatic low-density area, an newly emergent nodule behind inferior vena cava and distal ileal tumor were found. Three months later, enhanced CT showed that the distal ileal tumor got exponentially larger and the diagnosis of"malignant lymphoma"was suspected. The patient became sepsis, so we planned and safely performed partial resection of the tumor. The pathological diagnosis was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Postoperative course was smooth except for the Clostridium difficile colitis and he was discharged on postoperative day 19. Although the regrowth of the remnant tumor was observed soon after surgery, partial response was confirmed after introduction of systemic chemotherapy. When we cope with malignant lymphoma of small intestine, we need to keep it in mind that surgery is an option for the prevention of perforation and bacterial translocation.

[A Case of Fibromatosis-Like Tumor Which Was Difficult to Differentiate from Local Recurrence of Ascending Colon Cancer].

A 60s female, who had undergone single-incision laparoscopic ileocecal resection for ascending colon cancer with pathological diagnosis of T3N1bM0, Stage Ⅲb, followed by adjuvant therapy with 8 courses CAPOX 2 years ago, had enhanced- computed tomography(CT)for follow-up and a 15-mm nodule near anastomotic site was found. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography(PET)CT revealed abnormal accumulation of 18F-FDG only to the lesion and diagnosis of"anastomotic recurrence"was made. We planned and safely performed resection of the anastomotic site and the nodule. The pathological diagnosis was fibromatosis-like tumor without evidence of recurrence, and margin was negative. Postoperative course was smooth and she was discharged on postoperative day 9. When we diagnose local recurrence, we need to keep it in mind that fibromatosis is one of the differential diagnoses, although its incidence rate is low.

The effect of specimen processing time on HER2 expression in gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer: a single-center retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in the field of companion diagnosis and molecular-targeting therapeutic agents have helped in developing treatments targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in gastric cancer (GC) and esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC), and the importance of accurate diagnosis of HER2 expression is increasing. However, the HER2-positivity rate significantly differs among reports in GC and EGJC, and factors that affect HER2-positivity require elucidation. METHODS: The present study retrospectively examined factors related to HER2-positivity in a single institution, including age, sex, body mass index, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, tumor information, and surgery information, including time to specimen processing. RESULTS: Our study included 165 patients tested for HER2 using GC and EGJC surgery specimens among the 1,320 patients who underwent gastrectomy from January 2007 to June 2022. In total, 35 (21.2%) and 130 (78.8%) patients were HER2-positive and -negative, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that intestinal type (odds ratio [OR]: 3.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-8.09, p = 0.005), pM1 (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.51-10.55, p = 0.005), and time to specimen processing of < 120 min (OR: 2.65, 95% CI: 1.01-6.98, p = 0.049) were independent factors that affected HER2-positivity. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of the present study indicated that intestinal type, pM, and time to specimen processing are important factors affecting HER2-positive rates in GC and EGJC. Therefore, the risk of false-negative HER2 results may be reduced by decreasing the time required to process the resected specimen. Additionally, accurate diagnosis of HER2 expression may increase the opportunity to administer molecular-targeted drugs that can expect therapeutic effects to patients appropriately. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

[Conversion Surgery Performed after SOX plus Nivolumab Therapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer with Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis].

The patient was a 78-year-old woman. She presented with anemia and a positive fecal occult blood test. Endoscopic findings revealed type 3 advanced gastric cancer. As it had metastasized to the para-aortic lymph node(PALN: No. 16a2 lat), it was diagnosed as gastric cancer at cardia cT4aN1(No.1)M1(No.16a2 lat), cStage Ⅳ. She was administered S-1, oxaliplatin, and nivolumab(SOX plus Nivo)therapy as a first-line treatment. SOX plus Nivo resulted in a remarkable reduction of the lymph nodes, which were PR. After 3 courses of chemotherapy, a laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy was performed, with D2 plus No. 16a2 int/lat lymph nodes dissection as conversion surgery. Histopathological examination was pT3N0M0, and R0 resection was pStage ⅡA. She was discharged at POD21 and started S-1 from POD69. The patient is alive with no signs of recurrence 10 months postoperatively.

[A Case of Preoperative Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer, Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissection].

Bulky N+ gastric cancer has a poor prognosis. The results of JCOG0405 showed the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin combination therapy for Bulky N+ gastric cancer. JLSSG0901 demonstrated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer. But the safety of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced and extensive nodal metastasis cancer(T4b, para-aortic lymph node metastasis)is not apparent. After DOS therapy, we performed total laparoscopic gastrectomy, DP(distal pancreatectomy), D2+ #16a2/b1 lat, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction, and histopathological results showed that the aortic lymph node metastasis disappeared. We controlled extensive lymph node metastasis using preoperative triplet chemotherapy. Laparoscopic surgery after preoperative chemotherapy for Bulky N+ gastric cancer can be a treatment option because we performed laparoscopic resection and para-aortic lymph node dissection with no complications, including pancreatic complications.

[Our Experience with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

We report our experience with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Fourteen patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our department were retrospectively evaluated for antitumor efficacy and adverse events. RESULTS: Age ranged from 66-91 years(median 77.5 years), 11 males and 3 females, number of doses ranged from 2-26(median 13), and observation period ranged from 31-790 days (median 427 days). Antitumor efficacy was CR in 3 patients, PR in 3, SD in 6, and PD in 2. One patient with PD died 650 days after the start of treatment, but the others are still alive. Adverse events included proteinuria in 9 patients who discontinued bevacizumab, hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine sodium hydrate in 7 patients, dermatitis in 2 patients, and colitis requiring hospitalization in 2 patients. DISCUSSION: Despite the small number of cases, a high antitumor effect was observed with a CR rate of 21%. Although proteinuria and hypothyroidism were observed relatively frequently as adverse events, they were easily controlled and did not pose a major clinical problem.

[Clinical Outcome of Five Patients with Perforated Colorectal Cancer].

We studied the clinicopathological findings of 5 patients with perforated colorectal cancer. Three patients were male, and the primary cancer site was left side colon in 4 patents. Two patients had endoscopy-related perforation. The chief complaint was abdominal pain in all cases. All patients underwent emergency surgery. Two patients had Stage Ⅱ cancer, 3 had Stage Ⅳ. The mean ICU stay was 2.8 days. The average postoperative hospital stay was 71.8 days. Three patients were discharged home and 2 were transferred to other hospitals. The 3 patients who were discharged home received chemotherapy. Perforation of the cancer site is a risk factor for recurrence, and early recovery and additional treatment should be considered.

[A Case Report of the Ascending Colon Cancer with Bullous Pemphigoid].

The patient was a 70-year-old man. The patient had progressive anemia while taking 10 mg/day of prednisolone and 100 mg/day of mizoribine orally for bullous pemphigoid, a colonoscopy diagnosed ascending colon cancer. Adenocarcinoma, Group 5 was detected on biopsy. Abdominal computed tomography showed no metastases. The tumor was diagnosed as ascending colon cancer, cT4aN0M0, cStage Ⅱb. We performed laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and D3 dissection. Histopathological examination revealed pT3N0M0, pStage Ⅱa. In the present report, we describe a case of the ascending colon cancer with bullous pemphigoid, and discuss the case with a review of the literature.

[A Case Report of SOX Therapy for an Elderly Patient with Hemorrhagic Primary Duodenal Carcinoma].

BACKGROUND: Although pancreatoduodenectomy is recommended as a radical surgery for duodenal carcinoma, it has been reported that pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients has a high risk of surgical complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A man in his 80's was diagnosed with advanced duodenal carcinoma, presenting with anemia(Hb 5.4 g/dL). Computed tomography scanning showed wall thickening in the descending leg of the duodenum, pancreatic invasion was suspected, and clinical diagnosis was Stage ⅡB(cT4N0M0). Although radical surgery was possible, the patient refused surgery considering the risks of surgical complications. The gastroduodenal bypass surgery was performed to control bleeding, and the patient was treated with S-1 plus oxaliplatin(SOX; S-1 100 mg/body, days 1-14; oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, day 1 q21 days). After 6 courses of the SOX regimen, the wall thickening of duodenum disappeared, and SOX was switched to S-1 monotherapy (S-1 100 mg/body, days 1-28, q42 days)according to Grade 2 thrombocytopenia and decreased performance status. After 11 courses of S-1, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed that the tumor had disappeared, the biopsy of duodenum showed no evidence of malignancy, and chemotherapy was terminated. The patient has been followed up for 7 months without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: SOX for elderly patient showed efficacy against hemorrhagic duodenal carcinoma.

[Tolerability and Outcome of Neoadjuvant GS Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer].

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S-1(NAC GS)has been reported to prolong the prognosis of resectable pancreatic cancer, and is now being used in daily practice. In this study, we investigated the tolerability and outcome of neoadjuvant GS therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer in our hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients who underwent NAC GS for resectable pancreatic cancer between November 2019 and March 2023 were included in this study. RESULTS: The mean age of all 52 patients was 75 years, 28 were male and 24 were female. Tumor site was pancreatic head cancer in 32 patients, pancreatic body cancer in 13 patients, and pancreatic tail cancer in 8 patients. Only 2 patients of the 52 patients completed 2 cycles of GS therapy with full dose, and dose reduction and treatment deferral were performed in remaining 50 patients. The dose intensity was 78.4% for gemcitabine and 66.7% for S-1. Grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutropenia in 21 patients(40.4%), biliary tract infection in 6 patients(11.5%), fatigue, anorexia, hepatic dysfunction, and constipation in 1 patient each(1.9%). 47 patients(90.4%)underwent R0 resection. 4 patients had pancreatic fistula, which was classified as Grade Ⅲ by Clavien-Dindo, and one of them died in the hospital due to bleeding from a pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSION: NAC GS therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer was considered feasible with appropriate management of adverse events.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for descending colon cancer (DCC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SILS for DCC compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 137 consecutive patients with stage I-III DCC who underwent SILS or MPLS at two high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary hospitals between April 2008 and December 2018, using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 88 patients (n = 44 in each group). SILS was successful in 97.7% of the matched cohort. Compared with the MPLS group, the SILS group showed significantly less blood loss and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes. Morbidity rates were similar between groups. Recurrence pattern did not differ between groups. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year disease-free and overall survivals. CONCLUSION: SILS appears safe and feasible and can provide satisfactory oncological outcomes for patients with DCC.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid or upper rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for rectal cancer is technically challenging, and its clinical impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of SILS for rectal cancer compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 357 consecutive patients with stage I-III rectal cancer located in the rectosigmoid or upper rectum who underwent SILS or MPLS between January 2012 and December 2016, using propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 204 patients (n = 102 per group). Before matching, significant group-dependent differences were observed in tumor location (p < 0.001). After matching, preoperative clinical factors were similar between groups. SILS was successful in 73.5% of cases, an additional port was required in 23.5%, and 2.9% were converted to open surgery. Compared to the MPLS group, the SILS group showed shorter operative time (192 vs. 211 min, p = 0.015) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (9 vs. 11 days, p = 0.038). Other operative factors and morbidity rates did not differ significantly between groups. The number of harvested lymph nodes was smaller in the SILS group (24) than in the MPLS group (27, p = 0.008). Postoperative recurrence did not differ between groups, either before or after matching. No significant differences in 3-year disease-free, 3-year local recurrence-free, or 5-year overall survival were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: SILS is safe, is feasible, and offers satisfactory oncological outcomes in selected patients with rectosigmoid or upper rectal cancer.

TRESBIEN (OGSG 2101): encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for early recurrent stage II/III BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer.

The BRAF V600E mutation accounts for approximately 5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and is an extremely poor prognostic factor. However, there are no clear recommendations regarding first-line therapy for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently, a novel combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab, showed a higher response rate than standard chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. Here we describe our plan for the TRESBIEN study (OGSG 2101), which is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate whether encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab are effective for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. The planned number of subjects is 25.

An ongoing study to evaluate encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for people with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer. BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) is a type of cancer caused by change (mutation) in a gene called BRAF. It is one of the most difficult types of CRC to treat because currently available drugs do not effectively treat the disease. Recently, two novel treatments, encorafenib and cetuximab, have been approved for use together in several countries for the treatment of advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. In Japan, these drugs are also approved to be given with another treatment called binimetinib, an approach called triplet therapy. This article describes the ongoing TRESBIEN study that is looking at how effective and how safe triplet therapy is for the treatment of people with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after they have additional (adjuvant) chemotherapy. This study is ongoing, and the researchers are currently recruiting new participants. TRESBIEN will evaluate the percentage of participants whose tumors shrink with triplet therapy. The study will also look at any side effects. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs051210152 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search?language=en&page=1).

Impact of aspirin discontinuation on thrombotic complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients taking antiplatelet therapy is increasing. However, there is no definitive guideline for the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy. Conventionally, the discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs has been the basic treatment as perioperative management. Therefore, we investigated the risk of discontinuing aspirin concerning thrombotic complications in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, a total of 729 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Toyonaka Municipal Hospital. Sixty-four patients taking antithrombotic drugs aside from aspirin were excluded from this study; the remaining 665 patients were considered eligible and divided into three groups. The patients not taking aspirin were classified as the "Control group" (n = 588). Among the patients taking aspirin, those who continued preoperative aspirin were classified as the "Aspirin group" (n = 30), and those who discontinued preoperative aspirin were classified as the "No-aspirin group" (n = 47). The Aspirin, No-aspirin, and Control groups were compared retrospectively. RESULT: Among the 3 groups, there were no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.14), bleeding volume (p = 0.63), or postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.06). Assessing the postoperative complication, bleeding complications were significantly more frequent in the Aspirin group (p < 0.01), although those complications were all Clavien-Dindo grade II. In contrast, thrombotic complications were significantly more frequent in the No-aspirin group (p < 0.01). Note that those complications were all Clavien-Dindo Grade III/IV. This result suggested that discontinuing aspirin increased the risk of severe thrombotic complication. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of aspirin as perioperative management in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery increased the risk of severe thrombotic complications.

Long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: results of a propensity score-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for colon cancer (CC), as practiced in real-world settings, especially in relation to disease stage, have not been established. We examined, retrospectively, both short- and long-term outcomes of SILC versus those of multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC) performed for CC in a propensity-score-matched cohort. METHODS: The study involved 263 patient pairs matched 1:1 from among 691 patients who, between January 2008 and May 2014, underwent either SILC or MPLC for a primary solitary CC at our hospital. Short-term and long-term operative outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Operation time was the only surgical outcome that varied significantly between the two groups (p = 0.0004). Overall 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the SILC group was 93.7 (95% CI 89.6-96.2)%, and CSS per pathological stage (I, II and III) was 98.5 (90.0-99.8)%, 96.0 (88.2-98.7)%, and 88.3 (79.6-93.6)%, respectively, whereas overall 5-year CSS in the MPLC group was 93.3 (89.4-95.9)%, and CSS per pathological stage was 100%, 95.4 (88.3-98.3)%, and 84.1 (74.1-90.8)% (p = 0.5278, 0.2679, 0.7666, and 0.9073), respectively. Overall 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) in the SILC group was 94.0 (90.2-96.4)%, and 3-year DFS per pathological stage was 98.6 (90.4-99.8)%, 90.1 (81.4-95.0)%, and 79.0 (69.4-86.2)%, respectively, whereas overall 3-year DFS in the MPLC group was 93.2 (89.4-95.7)%, and 3-year DFS per pathological disease stage was 100%, 94.5 (87.4-97.7)% and 75.5 (64.7-83.8)% (p = 0.2829, 0.7401, 0.4335 and 0.8518), respectively. Thus, oncological outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Incisional hernia occurred in 21 (8.0%) SILC group patients and 17 (6.5%) MPLC group patients, without a significant between-group difference (p = 0.6139). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that perioperative and oncological outcomes of SILC performed for CC are comparable to those of MPLC performed for CC.

Vascular variants in laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with central vascular ligation for right colon cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the right colic vascularity, focusing on the confluences of veins. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 100 patients who underwent laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy (Lap-ERHC) between April 2015 and September 2020, at our hospitals. Veins draining into the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) included the ileocecal vein (ICV), the right colic vein (RCV), the middle colic vein (MCV), and the gastrocolic trunk of Henle (GCT). Veins draining into vessels other than the SMV were defined as accessory colic veins (aICV, aRCV or aMCV). RESULTS: The GCT, aRCV, and aMCV were found in 86, 89, and 15 patients, respectively. In 66 patients with one aRCV, drainage was split as the anterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein (ASPDV) in 12, the right gastroepiploic vein (RGEV) in 7, and the GCT in 47. In 23 patients with two aRCVs, drainage was split as the ASPDV in 4, the RGEV in 1, the GCT in 11, and the ASPDV and GCT in 7. In 14 patients with one aMCV, drainage was split as the GCT in 8, the splenic vein in 5, and the first jejunal vein (FJV) in 1. One patient had two aMCVs, draining into the GCT and the FJV. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our evaluation of vascular anatomy, focusing on confluences of the colic veins, provides useful information for colorectal surgeons.

Long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a single-institution experience of 186 consecutive cases.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was conducted to compare the long-term outcomes of single-incision totally extraperitoneal (S-TEP) inguinal hernia repair and conventional multiport totally extraperitoneal (M-TEP) inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: The study population included 186 consecutive patients (S-TEP, n = 149; M-TEP, n = 37) who underwent elective surgery for inguinal hernia at Osaka Police Hospital between 2011 and 2013. RESULTS: No significant between-group difference was found in patient or hernia characteristics or in perioperative outcomes, with the exception of age (S-TEP group vs. M-TEP group: median 69 [IQR 60-75] years vs. 64 [55-69] years, respectively; P = 0.019). Furthermore, no significant between-group difference was found in follow-up time (5.5 [3.0-5.8] vs. 5.4 [3.1-5.7] years, P = 0.839), recurrence rate (0.6 vs. 2.4%, P = 0.358), chronic pain (1.2 vs. 0%, P = 1.000), feeling the mesh (2.3 vs. 7.1%, P = 0.142), or movement limitation (0.6 vs. 0%, P = 1.000). All chronic symptoms were "mild but not bothersome." A metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia developed in 8.1% of patients. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes of S-TEP repair were comparable to those of M-TEP, with rates of recurrence, chronic pain, feeling the mesh, and movement limitation falling within acceptable limits.