Does Perioperative Radiation Affect Implant Survivorship of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Setting of Metastatic Bone Disease?

Background: Metastatic bone disease (MBD) commonly affects the hip and surgical intervention including total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often indicated to treat the joint and improve function. Patients with metastatic cancer often receive radiotherapy, and orthopaedic oncologists must consider surgical risks with operating on irradiated bone and soft tissue. We evaluated surgical outcomes and implant survival (IS) of titanium acetabular components and femoral components in patients treated for MBD in the setting of perioperative radiation. Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent THA for MBD at 3 institutions between 2017 and 2021. Outcomes included rates of reoperation, complications, IS, and overall survival. Results: Forty-six patients who received primary THA for MBD were included in the study. Twenty patients (43.5%) received perioperative radiation for MBD. Six postoperative complications including one superficial wound infection, 2 dislocations, 2 pathologic fractures, and one aseptic acetabular component loosening led to 5 reoperations. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes, reoperation after THA, and IS based on radiotherapy status. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first paper evaluating primary THA outcomes and IS between patients who receive perioperative radiation for MBD to the hip and those who do not. As surgical management is a crucial part of the treatment in alleviating pain and disability in patients with MBD, we continue to recommend THA for patients who received radiation at the operative site.

Outcomes of distal femoral replacement versus internal fixation for metastatic bone diseases of the distal femur.

Background: In clinical practice, internal fixation (IF) is a commonly utilized technique for metastatic bone disease (MBD) to the distal femur. Additionally, distal femoral reconstruction (DFR) has shown to be an effective surgical technique for primary tumors and MBD in the distal femur. The existing body of research comparing these methods has not focused on MBD or pathological fractures and thus does not guide surgical approach in the case of distal femoral MBD. Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective review of musculoskeletal oncology patients treated surgically with IF (n = 29) or DFR (n = 34) for distal femoral MBD between 2005 and 2023. Overall survival, revision risk, and functional status were assessed. Results: 5-year patient overall survival was 47.9 % (CI, 29.5-77.6 %) and 46.6 % (CI, 31.5-68.8 %), for DFR and IF, respectively (p = 0.91). After competing risk analysis, the 5-year risk of implant revision for DFR was 18 % (95 % CI: 5.1-37 %) and 11 % for IF (95 % CI: 2.4-28 %) (p = 0.3). DFR had longer operative times (p = 0.002), higher blood loss (p < 0.001), and greater postoperative (p = 0.006) complications than IF. In addition, patients undergoing DFR had more distal lesions than patients who received IF (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Despite similar overall survival and revision rates, IF may be preferable for patients due to its shorter operative time and lower rates of complication than DFR. However, specific anatomic location in the distal femur must be considered prior to deciding which procedure is optimal.