Association of women-specific size threshold and mortality in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether women derive mortality benefit from early repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The aim of this study was to compare short- and mid-term mortality for women treated at small versus large diameters. METHOD: Women receiving elective repair of AAA at small (49-54 mm) and large (≥55 mm) diameters from 2008 to 2022 were extracted from the Swedish National Registry for Vascular Surgery (n = 1642 women). The effect of diameter on 90-day, 1- and 3-year mortality was studied in logistic regression and propensity score models. Age, co-morbidities, smoking and repair modality were considered as confounders. Men (n = 9047) were analysed in parallel. RESULTS: Some 1642 women were analysed, of whom 34% underwent repair at small diameters (versus 52% of men). Women with small (versus large) AAAs were younger (73 versus 75 years, P < 0.001), and 63% of women in both size groups had endovascular repairs (P = 0.120). Mortality was 3.5% (90 days), 7.1% (1 year) and 15.8% (3 years), with no differences between the size strata. There was no consistent association between AAA size and mortality in multivariable models. Sex differences in mortality were almost entirely due to mortality in younger-than-average women versus men (3-year mortality: small AAAs 11.1% versus 7.3%, P < 0.030, or large 14.4% versus 10.7%, P < 0.038). CONCLUSION: Mortality in women is high and unaffected by AAA size at repair. The optimal threshold for women remains undefined. The higher rupture risk in women should not automatically translate into a lower, women-specific threshold.

Peak wall rupture index is associated with risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms, independent of size and sex.

BACKGROUND: Information on the predictive determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture from CT angiography are scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate biomechanical parameters in abdominal aortic aneurysms and their association with risk of subsequent rupture. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the digital radiological archive was searched for 363 patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. All patients who underwent at least one CT angiography examination before aneurysm rupture were included. CT angiography results were analysed to determine maximum aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, and biomechanical parameters (peak wall stress and peak wall rupture index). In the primary survival analysis, patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms less than 70 mm were considered. Sensitivity analyses including control patients and abdominal aortic aneurysms of all sizes were performed. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients who underwent 109 CT angiography examinations before aneurysm rupture were identified. The majority were men (47, 70%) and the median age at the time of CTA examination was 77 (71-83) years. The median maximum aneurysm diameter was 56 (interquartile range 46-65) mm and the median time to rupture was 2.13 (interquartile range 0.64-4.72) years. In univariable analysis, maximum aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, peak wall stress, and peak wall rupture index were all associated with risk of rupture. Women had an increased HR for rupture when adjusted for maximum aneurysm diameter or aneurysm volume (HR 2.16, 95% c.i. 1.23 to 3.78 (P = 0.007) and HR 1.92, 95% c.i. 1.06 to 3.50 (P = 0.033) respectively). In multivariable analysis, the peak wall rupture index was associated with risk of rupture. The HR for peak wall rupture index was 1.05 (95% c.i. 1.03 to 1.08) per % (P < 0.001) when adjusted for maximum aneurysm diameter and 1.05 (95% c.i. 1.02 to 1.08) per % (P < 0.001) when adjusted for aneurysm volume. CONCLUSION: Biomechanical factors appear to be important in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Women are at increased risk of rupture when adjustments are made for maximum aneurysm diameter alone.

Women with large intact abdominal aortic aneurysms remain untreated.

OBJECTIVE: A lower elective repair rate among women with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has been a consistent finding. Reasons behind this gender gap have not been thoroughly outlined. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05346289) at three European vascular centers in Sweden, Austria and Norway. Patients in surveillance with AAAs were consecutively identified starting from January 1, 2014, until reaching a total sample size of 200 women and 200 men. All individuals were followed for 7 years through medical records. Final treatment distributions and the proportion of "truly untreated" (surgically untreated despite reaching guideline-directed thresholds: 50 mm for women and 55 mm for men) were determined. In a complementary analysis, a universal 55-mm threshold was used. Gender-specific primary reasons behind untreated statuses were clarified. Eligibility for endovascular repair among the truly untreated was assessed in a structured computed tomography analysis. RESULTS: Women and men had similar median diameters at inclusion (46 mm; P = .54) and at treatment decisions (55 mm; P = .36). After 7 years, the repair rate was lower among women (47% vs 57%). More women were truly untreated (26% vs 8%; P < .001) despite similar mean ages as for male counterparts (79.3 years; P = .16). With the 55-mm threshold, 16% women still classified as truly untreated. Similar reasons for nonintervention were captured for women and men (50% due to comorbidities alone, 36% morphology and comorbidity). The endovascular repair imaging analysis revealed no gender differences. Among truly untreated women, ruptures were common (18%), and mortality was high (86%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical AAA management differed between women and men. Women could be underserved in terms of elective repairs: one in every four women was untreated with over-the-threshold AAAs. The lack of obvious gender differences in eligibility analyses could imply unmeasured discrepancies (eg, in disease extent or patient frailty).

A population-based study of post-endovascular aortic repair rupture during 15 years.

OBJECTIVE: The devastating event of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) in patients who have survived a previous AAA repair, either elective or urgent, is a feared and quite uncommon event. It has been suggested to partly explain the loss of the early survival benefit for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) vs open surgical repair (OSR). The main objective of this study was to report the national incidence rate, risk factors and outcome of post-EVAR ruptures. Secondarily, the national incidence rate of ruptures after OSR (post-OSR ruptures) was investigated. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide, population-based, retrospective cohort study using the inpatient and outpatient entries for all patients >40 years of age, receiving their first (index) surgical procedure for AAA, from 2001 to 2015. Only patients surviving their index procedure were included. The primary outcome was rAAA, registered after discharge from the index procedure (EVAR or OSR), identified in the Swedish National Patient Registry and the Cause of Death Registry. RESULTS: In total, 14,859 patients survived their primary (index) AAA procedure. There were 6470 EVAR procedures, 5893 for intact AAA (iAAA) and 577 for rAAA. Of the 6470 EVAR patients, 86 cases of post-EVAR rupture were identified, corresponding with a cumulative incidence of 1.3% over a mean follow-up time of 3.9 years. The incidence rate was 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-4.2)/1000 person-years. The independent risk factors identified for post-EVAR rupture were rAAA at index surgery HR 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4-4.1, p 0.002) and age (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P < .001). Freedom from post-EVAR rupture was 99%, 98%, and 96% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Total and postoperative mortality after post-EVAR rupture were 42% and 17% (30 days), 45% and 22% (90 days), and 53% and 33% (1 year). The incidence rate of post-OSR rupture was 0.9/1000 person-years (95% CI, 0.7-1.2). CONCLUSIONS: Post-EVAR rupture is a rare complication that can occur at any time after the index EVAR procedure. This finding may have implications for the discussion of limited follow-up programs and for the choice of procedure in patients with an AAA with a long life expectancy. An rAAA as the indication for the index surgery and age were identified as risk factors for post-EVAR rupture. The mortality associated with post-EVAR rupture is high, but lower than that of primary rAAA. The much lower risk of post-OSR rupture was confirmed, but must not be neglected as a possible late complication.

Long-term Prognosis After Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair is Poor in Women and Men: The Challenges Remain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of changes in elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) management on life-expectancy of AAA patients. BACKGROUND: Over the past decades AAA repair underwent substantial changes, that is, the introduction of EVAR and implementation of intensified cardiovascular risk management. The question rises to what extent these changes improved longevity of AAA patients. METHODS: National evaluation including all 12.907 (82.7% male) patients who underwent elective AAA repair between 2001 and 2015 in Sweden. The impact of changes in AAA management was established by a time-resolved analysis based on 3 timeframes: open repair dominated period (2001-2004, n = 2483), transition period (2005-2011, n = 6230), and EVAR-first strategy period (2012-2015, n = 4194). Relative survival was used to quantify AAA-associated mortality, and to adjust for changes in life-expectancy. RESULTS: Relative survival of electively treated AAA patients was stable and persistently compromised [4-year relative survival and 95% confidence interval: 0.87 (0.85-0.89), 0.87 (0.86-0.88), 0.89 (0.86-0.91) for the 3 periods, respectively]. Particularly alarming is the severely compromised survival of female patients (4-year relative survival females 0.78, 0.80, 0.70 vs males 0.89, 0.89, 0.91, respectively). Cardiovascular mortality remained the main cause of death (51.0%, 47.2%, 47.9%) and the proportion cardiovascular disease over non-cardiovascular disease death was stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in elective AAA management reduced short-term mortality, but failed to improve the profound long-term survival disadvantage of AAA patients. The persistent high (cardiovascular) mortality calls for further intensification of cardiovascular risk management, and a critical appraisal of the basis for the excess mortality of AAA patients.

Sex Differences in Rupture Risk and Mortality in Untreated Patients With Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Background Studies on intact abdominal aortic aneurysms mainly focus on treated patients, and data on untreated patients are sparse. The objective was to investigate sex differences among untreated patients regarding rupture and mortality rates and to determine predictors for these events. Sex-specific causes of death were evaluated. Methods and Results All patients ≥40 years diagnosed from 2001 to 2015 (n=32 393) with intact abdominal aortic aneurysms were identified in national registries; 60% (n=19 569) were untreated. Comorbid loads, crude rupture, and mortality rates were assessed. Predictors of 5-year rupture and mortality were analyzed in Cox models (sex, age, comorbidities, income, and marital status). The proportion of men and women with multiple comorbidities was similar. Within 5 years, 798 ruptures occurred (9.7% women versus 6.9% men, P<0.001). Ruptures were independently predicted by female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.42; P=0.004), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15-1.62; P<0.001), age (HR, 11.49; 95% CI, 5.68-23.25 for ≥80 years; P<0.001), and income (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.75 for highest tertile; P<0.001). After 5 years, 56.5% women and 50.4% men were deceased. Mortality was not independently predicted by female sex. Rupture was the third most common cause of death (11.9% women versus 8.7% men; P<0.001). The median time-to-events was 2.8 years. Conclusions A considerable proportion of patients with intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in surveillance remain untreated. Despite surveillance algorithms, the healthcare system fails to prevent a high number of ruptures, especially among women. The time-to-event data highlight the urgency to develop more individualized surveillance.